search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Journal of Biomedical Research
Ibadan Biomedical Communications Group
ISSN: 1119-5096
Vol. 9, Num. 3, 2006, pp. 141-148

 African Journal of Biomedical Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, Sept, 2006, pp. 141-148

Full Length Research Article

Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection: Aetiologic Agents and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern in Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria

1Taiwo SS and 2Aderounmu AOA   

Departments of 1Medical Microbiology/Parasitology and 2Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, PMB 4400, Osogbo, Nigeria
*Address for Correspondence (e-mail Address): (samtaiwo2003@yahoo.com)

Received: June 2006
Accepted (Revised): August 2006
Published: September, 2006

Code Number: md06025

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to identify microbial pathogens associated with bacteriuria and UTI in patients with indwelling urethral catheters and determine their susceptibility patterns to commonly used antimicrobial agents in our institution. Catheter urine and catheter tip specimens of all the patients were analyzed by microscopy and culture on Blood, MacConkey and CLED agar plates. Pure colonies of isolated organism were biochemically characterized and disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility was performed on each bacterial isolate. The commonest indication for catheterization is benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, 62.3%). One hundred and eight patients (88.5%) were urine culture positive for microbial pathogens with 126 microbial isolates while 14 (11.5%) were bacteriologically sterile. Ninety two of those positive (85.1%) each had one organism recovered, 14 (13.0%) had two organisms recovered and 2 (1.9%) had 3 organisms recovered. Klebsiella spp were the commonest pathogen isolated with 46 (36.6%), followed by Pseudomonas spp 34 (27.0%), Escherichia coli 26 (20.6%), Staphylococcus aureus 12 (9.5%), Proteus mirabilis 4 (3.2%), Candida albicans 4 (3.2%) and coagulase negative staphylococci 2 (1.6%). The in vitro antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Gram negative organisms showed high resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as ampicillin (100%), gentamicin (90.9%), tetracycline (89.1%), cotrimoxazole (87.3%), cefuroxime (81.1%), nalidixic acid (87.3%), nitrofurantoin (67.3%), colistin (63.7%), perfloxacin (65.5%) and ciprofloxacin (56.4%). Staphylococcus aureus isolates were also resistant to penicillin (100%), gentamicin (100%), cotrimoxazole (100%), chloramphenicol (100%), cloxacillin (83.3%), tetracycline (83.3%), erythromycin (66.7%) and cefuroxime (66.7%). Only perfloxacin (66.7% sensitivity) and ciprofloxacin (83.3% sensitivity) appear effective. We conclude that catheter-associated UTI in our institution is caused by multi-resistant microbial pathogens which has occurred consequent on prophylactic antibiotic therapy administered after catheterization. Emphasis should be placed on good catheter management rather than the use of prophylaxis, to reduce the incidence of catheter associated UTI.

Keywords: Catheter, UTI, multi-resistant, pathogen

INTRODUCTION

The urinary tract is the most common site of nosocomial infections accounting for more than 40% of the total number reported by acute care hospitals and affecting approximately 600,000 patients per year (CDC, 1979; Meers 1988; Warren 1997). Sixty six percent to 86% of these infections usually follow instrumentation of urinary tract, mainly catheterization (Martin and Bookrajian, 1962). The risk of acquiring a urinary tract infection (UTI) depends on method and duration of catheterization, the quality of catheter care and host susceptibility.    

Reported infection rates vary widely, ranging from 1% - 5% after a single brief catheterization (Turck et al, 1962) to virtually 100% for patients with indwelling urethral catheters draining into an open system for more than 4 days (Kass, 1956). Over 20% of patients catheterized and maintained on closed drainage on busy hospital wards may be expected to become infected (Kunin and McCormack, 1966; Garibaldi et al, 1974). Host factors which appear to increase the risk of acquiring catheter associated-UTI include advanced age, debilitation and the postpartum state (Brumfitt et al, 1961; Kunin, 1979)

Catheter-associated UTI are caused by a variety of pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, enterococci, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Serratia and Candida. Many of these micro organisms are part of the patients’ endogenous bowel flora but they can also be acquired by cross-contamination from other patients or hospital personnel or by exposure to contaminated solutions or non-sterile equipment (Selden et al, 1971; McLeod 1958).   

Catheter-associated UTI in healthy patients is often asymptomatic and is likely to resolve spontaneously with the removal of the catheter. Occasionally, infection persists and leads to such complications as prostatitis, epidydymitis, cystitis, pyelonephritis and Gram-negative bacteraemia particularly in high risk patients (Kunin, 1979). The last complication is serious since it is associated with a significant mortality but fortunately occurs in less than 1% of catheterized patients (Steere et al, 1979; Kreger et al, 1980). 

Although community acquired UTI has been well investigated in different groups of patients in Nigeria (Akinkugbe et al, 1973; Ekweozor and Onyemenem, 1996; Odutola et al, 1998), only few studies (Oni et al, 2003)have investigated and documented the aetiological agents of catheter-associated UTI or their susceptibility pattern to antimicrobial agents. In our institution, catheterization is a frequent procedure performed for patients with urinary tract obstructive lesions such as benign prostatic hyperplasia who are awaiting surgery and also as a routine in the management of unconscious patients to monitor their urine output. In this study, we identified the microbial pathogens associated with bacteriuria and UTI in catheterized patients and determined their susceptibility patterns to commonly used antimicrobial agents. This, we hope, will serve as a guide in the selection of appropriate antimicrobial agents for prophylaxis and empiric therapy of catheter associated UTI in patients on indwelling urinary catheters in our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

This study is cross sectional involving 122 patients attending the urology clinic or admitted into different wards of Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital. They all had indwelling urethral catheters inserted under aseptic condition for various medical and surgical indications (Table 2). Patients with symptoms of urinary tract infections prior to catheterization were excluded. For those attending the urology clinic, catheters are usually inserted and routinely changed after 2 or more weeks or changed when there are clinical complaints of fever, dysuria, cloudy urine, blockage or other symptoms of urinary tract infections. For those on admission, catheters are removed when they are deemed no longer necessary or when there are symptoms of infections.  

Specimen collection

Prior to catheter change or removal from each patient, 10 ml of urine was obtained from the distal edge of the catheter tube (after cleaning with an antiseptic) using a sterile needle and syringe into sterile universal container (Kunin and McCormack, 1966; Kunin, 1979)  and transported to the medical microbiology laboratory for analysis. The tip of the catheter removed from each patient was cut with a sterile surgical blade and also sent for culture.

Microscopy and culture isolation

Urine microscopy was performed on uncentrifuged catheter urine specimen to detect the presence of leukocytes, erythrocytes and other cells. A sterile calibrated wire loop was used to deliver a loopful (0.01ml) of urine onto each of Blood, MacConkey and CLED agar plates and incubated aerobically at 37oC for 24-48 hours. A sterile forcep was used to pick the catheter tip and rubbed along the agar surfaces of each of the three media types and incubated accordingly. Significant growth of ≥ 100 bacteria/ml of catheter urine (Warren, 1997) was interpreted as at least one colony of bacterial organism per plate, while all organisms recovered from the catheter tip cultures were characterized.

Pure colonies of isolated organism on the culture plates were biochemically characterized to identify the species using recommended guidelines (Barrow and Feltham, 1993). Antibiotic susceptibility was performed on pure colonies of each species to commonly used antimicrobial agents using the disc diffusion method (Bauer et al, 1966) on Mueller-Hinton agar. The zone diameter of inhibition for each antimicrobial agent was compared with the NCCLS interpretive table (NCCLS, 1997) to determine sensitivity or resistance. Control strains of organisms used were Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 6571, Escherichia coli NCTC 10418 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 10662.   

Bio-data analysis

Relevant bio-data were obtained from each patient using a prepared standard proforma that include demographic data such as hospital number, age, sex, occupation, religion and marital status. Other data obtained were underlying illness, indication for catheterization, length of catheterization, prophylactic antibiotic used and symptoms attributable to catheterization. Analysis was done using SPSS 11.0 statistical package. Association between variables was determined using Chi-square with level of significance set at p < 0.05. 

RESULTS

A total 122 patients with indwelling urinary catheters were studied, 106 were males while 16 were females, giving a male to female ratio of 6.6 to 1. The age range is 11 - 104 years with a mean age of 66.6 years. The age group 61-70 years constitutes the largest group with 39.3% followed by the age group 71-80 (26.2%) and age group 51-60 (18.0%). Over 90% of patients are above 50 years of age (Table 1).

Table 1: Age and sex distribution of patients on indwelling urethral catheter at Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo

Age group (yrs)/Sex

Male (%)

Female (%)

Total (%)

< 10

11-20

21-30

31-40

41-50

51-60

61-70

71-80

81-90

91-100

> 100

0

2

0

0

0

20

44

30

8

1

1

0

0

4

2

2

2

4

2

0

0

0

0 (0)

2 (1.6)

4 (3.3)

2 (1.6)

2 (1.6)

22 (18.0)

48 (39.3)

32 (26.2)

8 (6.6)

1 (0.8)

1(0.8)

Total

106

16

122 (100)

All the patients had indwelling urethral catheter inserted for a period ranging from 48 hours to over 28 days before change or removal (Table 2) and all were routinely placed on prophylactic systemic antibiotic following catheterization. The commonest indication for catheterization was (i.) bladder outflow obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in 76 (62.3%) patients, carcinoma of the prostate 8 (6.6%), urethral stricture 8 (6.6%), testicular tumour 2 (1.6%): (ii) post-operative 14 (11.5%), (iii.) cerebrovascular disease 4 (3.3%), (iv.) intestinal obstruction 2 (1.6%), and (v) others 8 (8.2%). (Table 2)

Table 2:  Indication for indwelling catheterization in relation to length of catheterization among patients at Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo

Indication for catheterization

Length of catheterization (days)

2-7

8-14

15-21

22-28

> 28

Total (%)

1. BPH

2. Ca prostate

3. Urethral stricture

4. Testicular tumour

5. Post-operative

6. CVD

7. Intestinal obstruction

8. Not stated  

-

-

-

-

14

-

1

-

-

-

3

-

-

4

1

8

21

1

3

-

-

-

-

-

28

2

2

-

-

-

-

-

27

5

-

2

-

-

-

-

76 (62.3)

8 (6.6)

8 (6.6)

2 (1.6)

14 (11.5)

4 (3.3)

2 (1.6)

8 (6.6)

Total

15

16

25

32

34

122 (100)

Table 3: Length of catheterization in relation to development of significant bacteriuria and UTI among patients at Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo

Length of catheterization (days)

Significant bacteriuria

No significant bacteriuria

Total (%))

UTI

No UTI

UTI

No UTI

1-7

8-14

15-21

22-28

> 28

1

12

22

29

26

2

2

3

3

8

1

-

-

-

-

11

2

-

-

-

15 (12.3)

16 (13.1)

25 (20.5)

32 (26.2)

34 (27.9)

Total

90

18

1

13

 122 (100)

108

14

Table 4: Microbial isolates from patients with indwelling urinary catheter in LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Osogbo

Isolate

Number (%)

Escherichia coli

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas florescens

Pseudomonas pyocyanea

Klebsiella aerogenes

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella ozaena

Klebsiella spp

Proteus mirabilis

Staphylococcus aureus

Coagulase negative staphylococci

Candida albicans

26 (20.6)

26 (20.6)

6(4.8)

2 (1.6)

16 (12.7)

4 (3.2)

4 (3.2)

22 (17.5)

4 (3.2)

12 (9.5)

2 (1.6)

4 (3.2)

Total

126 (100)

Of the 122 patients, 108 (88.5%) had significant bacteriuria, 14 (11.5%) had no bacteriuria and 91 (74.6%) had UTI. Of the 108 patients with significant bacteriuria, 90 (83.3%) had symptoms of UTI and > 5 white blood cells/ml of urine while only 1 (7.1%) of the 14 patients who were bacteriologically sterile had symptoms and > 5 WBC/ml of urine. Table 3 relates the length of catheterization to development of bacteriuria and urinary tract infections. One hundred and seven patients (87.7%) had urethra catheter in place for more than 1 week while only 15 (12.3%) had it for less than a week. Of the 107 patients, 105 had significant bacteriuria out of which 89 had UTI while only 2 had no bacteria in urine. Of the 15 patients with urethra catheter in place for less than 1 week, only 3 had significant bacteriuria out of which 1 had UTI while 12 had no bacteria in the urine but 1 of this had UTI..

A total of 126 microbial isolates were recovered from the 108 patients with significant bacteriuria. In 92 (85.1%) patients, only one species of organism was recovered while in 14 (13.0%) two species were recovered and in 2 (1.9%) 3 species were recovered. Klebsiella spp were the commonest pathogen isolated with 46 (36.6%), followed by Pseudomonas spp 34 (27.0%), Escherichia coli 26 (20.6%), Staphylococcus aureus 12 (9.5%), Proteus mirabilis 4 (3.2%), Candida albicans 4 (3.2%) and coagulase negative staphylococci 2 (1.6%). (Table 4).

The catheter tip specimen culture was positive for pathogens in all the 122 patients and essentially, the pathogens cultured were the same as those isolated from the 108 subjects with positive urine culture. The sensitivity of catheter specimen for diagnosis of catheter associated UTI is 98.9% but specificity is 41.9%, and positive and negative predictive values of 83.3% and 92.6% respectively. Although the sensitivity of catheter tip specimen was 100%, the specificity and negative predictive value is 0% (Table 5).

The in vitro antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Gram negative organisms showed high resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as ampicillin (100%), gentamicin (90.9%), tetracycline (89.1%), cotrimoxazole (87.3%), cefuroxime (81.1%), nalidixic acid (87.3%), nitrofurantoin (67.3%), colistin (63.7%), perfloxacin (65.5%) and ciprofloxacin (56.4%). (Table 6).

Table 5: Diagnostic values of catheter specimen of urine and catheter tip  

Method

Catheter urine

Catheter tip

with UTI

without UTI

with UTI

without UTI

Culture positive

Culture negative

90

1

18

13

91

0

31

0

Total

91

31

91

31

122

122

For catheter urine, sensitivity = 98.9%, specificity = 41.9%, PPV = 83.3%, NPV = 92.9%
For catheter tip, sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 0%, PPV = 74.6%, NPV = 0% 

Table 6: In vitro susceptibility patterns of Gram negative bacterial pathogens in catheter – associated UTI in LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Osogbo

Antibiotic

 

Amp (%)

Gent

Tet

Cot

Nit

Col

Cef

Nal

Cipro

Pef

E. coli       (n =26)           

S

R

0(0)

26(100)

0(0)

26(100)

4(18.2)

22(81.8)

4(18.2)

22(81.8)

10(38.5)

16(61.5)

12(46.2)

14(53.8)

0(0)

26(100)

0(0)

26(100)

0(0)

26(100)

0(0)

26(100)

Klebs spp

 (n= 46)   

S

R

0(0)

46(100)

8(17.4)

38(82.6

6(13.0)

40(87.0)

8(17.4)

38(82.6)

18(39.1)

28(60.9)

24(52.2)

22(47.8)

14(30.4)

32(69.6)

10(21.7

36(78.3

20(43.5)

26(56.5)

20(43.5

26(56.5

Pseudo sp

   (n=34)     

S

R

0(0)

34(100)

2(5.9)

32(94.1

2(5.9)

32(94.1

2(5.9)

32(94.1

6(17.7)

28(82.3

4(11.8)

30(88.2)

6(17.7)

28(94.1

4(11.8)

30(88.2

20(58.8)

14(41.2)

14(41.2

20(58.8

Proteus spp

 (n=4

S

R

0(0)

4(100)

0(0)

4(100)

0(0)

4(100)

0(0)

4(100)

2(50)

2(50)

0(0)

4(100)

NT

NT

0(0)

4(100)

4(100)

0(0)

4(100)

0(0)

Overall R (%) 

(n= 110)

 

110 (100)

100 (90.1)

98 (89.1)

96 (87.3)

74 (67.3)

70 (63.7)

86 (78.2)

96 (87.3

62 (56.4)

72 (65.5

Amp = Ampicillin, Tet = Tetracycline, Gent = Gentamicin, Cot = Cotrimoxazole, Col = Colistin, Nit = Nitrofurantoin
 Nal = Nalidixic acid, Cef = Cefuroxime, Cipro = Ciprofloxacin, Pef = Perfloxacin, S = Sensitive, R = Resistant

 Table 7: In vitro susceptibility pattern of S. aureus in catheter-associated UTI in LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Osogbo

Antibiotic

Pen

Clox

Tet

Ery

C/col

Gent

Cot

Cef

Cipro

Pef

S. aureus

 (n=12)   S

               R

 

0(0)

12(100)

 

 

2(16.7)

10(83.3

 

2(16.7)

10(83.3

 

 

4(33.3)

8(66.7)

 

0(0)

12(100)

 

0(0)

12(100)

 

0(0)

12(100)

 

4(33.3)

8(66.7)

 

10(83.3)

2(16.7)

 

8(66.7)

4(33.3)

Pen = Penicillin, Clox = Cloxacillin, Tet = Tetracycline, Ery = Erythromycin, C/col = Chloramphenicol, Gent = Gentamicin, Cot = Cotrimoxazole, Cef = Cefuroxime, Cipro = Ciprofloxacin, Pef = Perfloxacin S = Sensitive, R = Resistant

Staphylococcus aureus isolates were also resistant to penicillin (100%), gentamicin (100%), cotrimoxazole (100%), chloramphenicol (100%), cloxacillin (83.3%), tetracycline (83.3%), erythromycin (66.7%) and cefuroxime (66.7%). Only perfloxacin (66.7% sensitivity) and ciprofloxacin (83.3% sensitivity) appear effective (Table 7). 

DISCUSSION

Urinary catheterization is generally indicated to relieve urinary tract obstruction, to permit urinary drainage in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and urinary retention, to aid urologic surgery and to obtain accurate measurement of urinary output in clinically ill patients. An estimated 4 million patients are subjected yearly to urinary catheterization and therefore at risk for catheter-associated infection and its related sequelae. In this study, 108 (88.5%) of the 122 patients studied had significant bacteriuria, while 91 (74.6%) had UTI. The infection rate was 13.3% (2/15) if catheter had been in place for a week or less and increase to 98.9% (89/107) if catheter has been in place for more than one week. Although this rate is lower than the 100% reported by Kass (Kass, 1956) after 4 or more days catheterization draining into open system, it is by far higher than those of Kunin and colleague (Kunin and McCormack, 1966) and Garibaldi et al (Garibaldi et al, 1974) who in separate studies on indwelling urethral catheters maintained (for more than one week) on continuous closed drainage system, reported rates of less than 25%. This means more attention should be placed on catheter care and in the prevention of errors in the closed drainage system which was employed in our study. Also, use of catheter should be limited to carefully selected patients so as to reduce the size of population at risk.

One host factor that predisposes to catheter associated UTI is advanced age (Brumfitt et al, 1961). The mean age of patients in this study is 66 years and the age group 61-70 years constitutes the largest group (39.3%) while over 90% of the patients were above 50 years of age. This finding agrees with a previous study (Oni et al, 2003) in another institution located in the same geographical zone as ours. Males were also predominantly affected in our study. Although this is a reversal of what obtains in simple uncomplicated UTI where females tends to be more commonly affected, it is known that males are prone to obstructive urinary lesion especially from BPH, cancer of the prostate and stricture which occurred with advancing age.

Despite the fact that all the patients had prophylactic systemic antibiotics as a routine after catheter change, an overall infection rate of 74.6% (91/122) was recorded. This calls for reassessment of the rational for prophylactic antibiotic use after catheterization. Several other studies (Turck et al, 1962; Kass, 1956; Kunin and McCormack, 1966; Garibaldi et al, 1974; Britt et al, 1977; Oni et al, 2003) have shown antibiotic prophylaxis to be ineffective and rather lead to emergence of resistant pathogens as evidenced in this study.

Catheter specimen of urine was sensitive in detecting UTI by culture in 98.9% of patients (90/91) but was only 41.9% specific. The predictive value of a positive culture was 83.3% and of negative culture 92.6%. This implies that positive culture may not necessarily indicate a UTI, however, a negative culture most of the time excludes a UTI.  In contrasts, catheter tip, which was 100% sensitive in detecting a UTI by culture, is associated with high false positives with 0% specificity. Therefore, positive culture of a catheter tip specimen is not indicative of UTI and its use in the investigation of catheter-associated UTI should be discarded. Some researchers (Stark and Maki, 1984; Isenberg, 1998) have found Foley catheter tips to be unsuitable and unacceptable for culture as demonstrated in our study.                 

The commonest pathogen isolated in this study was Klebsiella spp followed by Pseudomonas spp, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans and CONS in that order. This is the pattern of distribution seen in most studies (Selden et al, 1971; McLeod 1958; Oni et al, 2003). Many of these pathogens are part of the patients’ endogenous bowel flora but some may have been acquired by cross-contamination from other patients or hospital personnel or by exposure to contaminated solutions or non-sterile equipment. A recent study (Taiwo et al, 2005) in our institution has reported the presence of some of these organisms in the hospital environment. The infection was monomicrobial in 85% of patients and more than one isolate was recovered in about 15%. Although catheter associated UTI is frequently polymicrobial (Oni et al, 2003; Yoshikova et al, 1996), this was not the case in our study. 

The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern confirms that most of the urinary isolates in our environment are resistant to the commonly used antibiotics including the cephalosporin and fluoroquinolones. This high resistant pattern could have resulted from poorly guided antibiotic prophylaxis after catheterization and empiric therapy of catheter associated UTI. In particular, the high resistance of the Gram negative isolates to the fluoroquinolones is worrisome as these are reserve drugs for treating resistant infections. Some researchers (Threfall et al, 1997; Oni et al, 2001; Oni et al, 2003; Livermore et al, 2002; Daini et al, 2005) have however pointed the danger of abuse of these drugs with consequent development of resistance, the effect of which we are beginning to see in our environment.  

Since bacteriuria is almost inevitable on long term catheterization as reported by previous researchers (Kass, 1956; Turck et al, 1962; Warren, 1997), and as shown in our study, we advise that patient’s catheters should be changed periodically to prevent formation of concretions and obstruction that can lead to infection. Although prophylactic systemic antibiotics have been known to delay onset of bacteriuria in catheterized patients, there is no justification for routine use as this practice has been shown to be associated with emergence of resistant pathogens (Warren, 1997). Treatment of catheter-associated UTI in this institution should be guided by the result of susceptibility test of isolated organisms.  

REFERENCES 

  • Akinkugbe FM, Familusi FB, Akinkugbe OO. (1973). Urinary tract infection in infancy and early childhood. East Afr. Med. J. 50(9): 514-520
  • Barrow GI, Feltham RKA. (1993). Cowan and Steel Manual for the Identification of  Medical Bacteria. Third edition. Cambridge University Press, London. 
  • Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.45: 493-496.
  • Britt MR, Garibaldi RA, Miller WA, Hebertson RM, Burke JP. (1977). Antimicrobial prophylaxis for catheter-associated bacteriuria. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 11:240-243.
  • Brumfitt W, Davies BL, Rosser E. (1961). The urethral catheter as a cause of urinary tract infection in pregnancy and peuperium. Lancet.2: 1059-1061
  • Center for Disease Control. (1979). National Nosocomial Infection Study Report, Atlanta: Centre for Disease Control. November 1979
  • Daini OA, Ogbolu OD, Ogunledun A. (2005). Quinolone resistance and R- plasmids of some Gram negative enteric bacilli. Afr. J. Clin. Exper. Microbiol.   6(1): 15-21.
  • Ekweozor CC, Onyemenem TN. (1996). Urinary tract infections in Ibadan; causative organism and antimicrobial sensitivity patterns. Afr. J. Med. med. Sci.     25: 125-169
  • Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB. (1974). Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization. N. Engl. J. Med. 291: 215-218  
  • Isenberg HD. (1998). Essential Procedures for Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, 1998.
  • Kass EH. (1956). Asymptomatic infection of the urinary tract. Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians. 69: 56-63
  • Kreger BE, Craven DE, McCabe WR. (1980). Gram-negative bacteraemia IV. Re-evaluation of clinical features and treatment in 612 patients. Am. J. Med. 68: 344-355
  • Kunin CM. (1979). Detection, prevention and management of urinary tract infections. 3rd ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1979.
  • Kunin CM, McCormack RC. (1966). Prevention of catheter-induced urinary tract infection by sterile closed drainage. N. Engl. J. Med. 274: 1155-1162
  • Livermore DM, James D, Reacher M, et al. (2002). Trends in fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin) resistance in enterobacteriaceae from bacteraemias (England and Wales) 1990-1999. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8: 473-478
  • Martin CM, Bookrajian EN. (1962). Bacteriuria prevention after indwelling catheterization. Arch. Intern. Med. 110: 703-711
  • McLeod JW. (1958). The hospital urine bottle and bedpan as reservoir of infection by Pseudomonas. Lancet. 1: 394-395
  • Meers PD. (1988). Infection control in developing countries. J. Hosp. Infect. 11(Suppl A): 406-410
  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1997): Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests. NCCLS document M2-A6. Approved Standards, 6th edition, Wayne, PA, 1997.
  • Odutola TA, Ogunsola FT, Odugbemi T, Mabadeje AFB. (1998). A study on prevalence of urinary tract infection in hypertensive patients attending an urban  hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Nig. Qt. J. Hosp. Med. 8(3): 190-192
  • Oni AA, Bakare RA, Arowojolu OA, Kehinde OA, Toki RA, Fashina NA. (2001). Comparative activities of commercially available quinolones and other antibiotics on bacterial isolates in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr. J. Med. Sci. 30: 35-37
  • Oni AA, Mbah GA, Ogunkunle MO, Shittu OB, Bakare RA. (2003). Nosocomial infection: Urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling urinary catheter. Afr.   J. Clin. Exper. Microbiol. 4: 63-71
  • Selden R, Lee S, Wang WLL, et al. (1971). Nosocomial Klebsiella infection; intestinal colonization as a reservoir. Ann. Intern. Med. 74; 657-664
  • Stark RP, Maki DG (1984). Bacteriuria in the catheterized patient: what quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant? N. Engl. J. Med. 311: 560-564.
  • Steere AC, Stamm WE, Martin SM, Bennett JV. (1979). Gram-negative rod bacteraemia. In: Bennett JV, Bracham PS (eds.). Hospital infections. Little, Brown and Company, Boston. pp 507-518.
  • Taiwo SS, Fadiora SO, Amure JO, Hassan WO, Ashiru JO. (2005). Environmental reservoir of microbial pathogens in a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Journal of Nigerian Infection Control Association (In Press)
  • Threfall EJ, Cheasty T, Graham A, Rowe B. (1997). High level resistance to ciprofloxacin in Escherichia coli. Lancet. 349: 403
  • Turck M, Goffe B, Petersdorf RG. (1962). The urethral catheters and urinary tract infection. J. Urol. 88: 834-837
  • Warren JW. (1997): Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 11: 609-622
  • Yoshikova TT, Nicolle LE, Norman DC. (1996). Management of complicated urinary tract infections in older patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.  44: 1235-1241.

Copyright 2006 - Ibadan Biomedical Communications Group

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil