search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Journal of Biomedical Research
Ibadan Biomedical Communications Group
ISSN: 1119-5096
Vol. 9, Num. 3, 2006, pp. 225-228

African Journal of Biomedical Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, Sept, 2006, pp. 225-228

Full Length Research Article 

Nitrogen Retention and Water Balance in Animals Fed Medium Protein Diet amidst Limited Water Supply  

Ajibola  .A 

Department of Physiology

Obafemi Awolowo College of Health Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, P.M.B 2005 Ikenne Ogun State 

Received: December 2005
Accepted (Revised): June 2006
Published: September, 2006

Code Number: md06036 

ABSTRACT 

Nitrogen metabolism of animals fed a medium protein diet (10.5% cp) ad libitum  with restricted water consumption was studied. During the 8-day digestibility trial, 3 groups of five animals each were subjected to 30%, 50% and 100% water supply, with concomitant jugular blood samples taken daily to monitor their hydration status. Water loss via the urine reflects the animals water intake, thus control animals voided more urine (P < 0.05) than 50% and 30% groups. Treatment groups retain high amount of nitrogen, in contrast to control animals that lost 2.4% nitrogen via the faeces. Inadequate drinking caused decreased excretion of urea. The improved nitrogen retention coupled with high rates of urea recycling enhances nutrients digestion and consequently the animals’ absorptive capabilities. 

Keywords: nitrogen, water restriction, digestion, urea, absorption, animals

INTRODUCTION

Animals in many parts of the world, especially Africa, where water is scarce are faced with irregular, infrequent and inadequate water supply. Desert breeds of sheep and goats are known for their adaptability to little water consumption, whereas their domestic counterparts depend on adequate and regular water supply for their metabolic activities. Several works have been done on nitrogen metabolism and limited water supply by desert breeds (Singh, More & Sahni, 1976; Brosh, Shkolnik & Choshniak, 1987; Silanikove, 1984) and little done on domestic ruminants (Silanikove, 1984; van der Walt et. al., 1999). Hence, knowledge of the digestive functions of domestic goats and their ability to retain nitrogen when exposed to limited water supply is essential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen mature male goats obtained from the Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa formed the research flock. The animals with initial body weight of 16 to 42 kg (average 29 kg) were adapted to the feed for at least 10 days prior to the study. They were fed ad libitum with a medium quality diet containing 10.5% crude protein and 17.5 Mj/kg gross energy level and housed individually in metabolic cages. Each goat was served 5 litres of clean drinking water daily during adaptation. Blood samples were taken from the jugular veins of the animals to determine the haematocrit, total plasma protein (TPP) and plasma osmolality. These and other physiological parameters were used to monitor the hydration status of the animals. 

They were randomly divided into three groups (A, B, C) of 5 goats each. Group A animals received 30% ad libitum of their regular water intake; group B goats were served 50% ad libitum water intake; while group C which served as control had no reduction in their  water supply (100% ad libitum). Feed supply to the animals was ad libitum throughout the study, which lasted for a period of 8 days.

Daily feed intake and water consumption by each goat were measured and recorded. The faeces and urine produced were collected and measured daily, and samples stored at -20°C. The faeces was thawed and analyzed for moisture (AOAC, 1984) and protein using an FP – 428 Nitrogen and Protein Determinator designed by Leco Inc., USA.

The data were recorded as means ± SEM and the Student t – test was used for comparison. Less than 5% statistical level (P<0.05) was accepted as being significant for any observation.  

RESULTS

As presented in table 1, water consumption (L kg –1 feed consumed) increases as water intake by the animals increases. Water loss via the urine is significantly (P<0.05) higher in control animals (100% water ad libitum) than treatment groups (table 2), a reflection of higher water intake by these animals. Free access to water also produces higher loss of water due to metabolism, respiration and insensible loss (table 2).  The water efficiency was calculated in ml/kg BW0.75/day and presented in table 3. The treatment groups are shown to be more efficient in the use of water. Table 4 shows that the treatment groups retain higher quantity of nitrogen while the control animals’ loss 2.4% nitrogen consumed rather than being retained. Similarly a significant amount of urea is lost by animals having unhindered access to water (table 5) unlike the treatment groups.

Table 1: Water intake, feed intake and water consumption by animals differing in water supply

 

     Group A

     Group B

     Group C

Water intake (Ld-1)

   0.33±0.00a

    0.65±0.09b

    1.43±0.37c

Feed intake (Kgd-1)

   0.54±0.08a

    0.64±0.09a

    0.76±0.16b

Water consumed (LKg-1 feed intake)

   0.61±0.10a

    1.02±0.17b

    1.88±0.33c

Superscripts that differ on the horizontal line are significantly different (P<0.05).

Table 2: Water balance by experimental animals (Means±SEM).

 

      Group A

     Group B

      Group C

Intake

    Free water (Ld-1)

   % of total intake

 

   0.33±0.00a

        89.2

 

   0.65±0.09b

        92.9

 

   1.43±0.37c

         96.0

    Feed water (Ld-1)

    % of total intake

  0.04±0.008a

        10.8

  0.05±0.008b

         7.1

   0.06±0.13b

          4.0

Total water intake (Ld-1)

  0.37±0.02a

  0.70±0.10b

 1.49±0.43c

Output

     Urine (Ld-1)

     % of total intake

 

  0.22±0.008a

       59.5

 

  0.21±0.09a

       30.0

 

  0.36±0.36b

        24.2

    Faecal water (Ld-1)

    % of total intake

  0.11±0.03a

       29.7

  0.24±0.09b

        34.3

  0.27±0.09b

       18.1

    Unmeasured water (Ld-1)

    % of total intake

  0.04±0.09a

       10.8

  0.26±0.16b

        35.7

   0.86±0.11c

        57.8

Total water loss (Ld-1)

  0.37±0.02a

  0.71±0.10b

   1.49±0.43c

Superscripts that differ on the horizontal line are significantly different (P<0.05).

Table 3: Water efficiency of animals on different water regimens (Means±SEM).

 

Group A

Group B

Group C

Body weight (Kg)

29.7±11.0

28.8±8.3

30.6±8.3

Water intake (Ld-1)

033±0.00a

0.65±0.09b

1.43±0.37c

Water efficiency (mlkg-0.75BWd-1)

28.1±10.3a

55.5±15.8b

112.0±31.0c

Superscripts that differ on the horizontal line are significantly different (P<0.05).

Table 4: Nitrogen consumption, excretion and retention by animals on water restriction (Means±SEM).

 

Group A

Group B

Group C

Intake

   N consumed (gd-1)

 

9.00±1.65a

 

10.79±1.71a

 

12.75±3.15b

Excretion

   Faecal N (gd-1)

   % of N consumed

   Urine N (gd-1)

   % of N consumed

 

4.40±1.10a

48.9

1.73±0.78a

19.2

 

6.97±1.62b

64.6

1.74±0.72a

16.1

 

7.83±2.04b

61.4

5.23±8.29b

41.0

Retention

   Intake – excretion (gd-1)

   % of N consumed

 

2.87±0.80a

31.9

 

2.08±1.52a

19.3

 

-0.31±7.28b

-2.4

Superscripts that differ on the horizontal line are significantly different (P<0.05).

Table 5: Urine output, urea output and urea concentration of experimental animals

 

Group A

Group B

Group C

Urine volume (Ld-1)

0.22±0.008a

0.21±0.09a

0.36±0.36b

Urea output (mmold-1)

82.6±37.8a

82.9±34.2a

249.0±349.7b

Urea conc. (mmolL-1)

365.90±45.6

404.04±72.8

524.28±281.7

Superscripts that differ on the horizontal line are significantly different (P<0.05).

DISCUSSION

The amount of water consumed by the experimental goats on 100% water ad libitum was more than that of the water-restricted animals. It has been previously demonstrated that goats drink small volumes of water (Devendra, 1980; More and Sahni, 1981). It was of interest to note that the goats used for this study differ significantly (P<0.05) in the use of water to meet various metabolic needs. Contrary to expectation the experimental animals have different unmeasured water values despite being of the same species with the same physiological demands, housed and fed under the same environmental conditions. However the treatment groups were superior with regard to water utilization and management than those given water free choice.

The reduced voluntary feed intake accompanying inadequate drinking led to decreased nitrogen consumption by the treatment groups, since the main source of nitrogen intake by the goats is feed. Correspondingly, the total amount of nitrogen excreted decreased as the water supply to the animals reduces. When the nitrogen loss was expressed as a percentage of N-intake (table 4), high losses were recorded through the faeces. This was a reflection of feed consumption and faecal output, thus a high feed intake produced a high faecal loss of nitrogen. The low nitrogen excretion by the water-restricted groups facilitated increased nitrogen retention. This was in contrast to the control group with a negative nitrogen balance while the treatment groups retained a significant percentage of the nitrogen consumed. These observations aligned with earlier reports from Brosh et al (1987) and van der Walt et al (1999) that infrequent and inadequate drinking lead to decreased nitrogen excretion and improved nitrogen retention. According to Kimambo et al (1999), this might be associated with low ammonia production in the rumen, due to low rate of degradation, thereby allowing most of the protein to escape ruminal digestion. This may be digested in the abomasum and small intestine. The elevated nitrogen uptake from the small intestine may lead to increased metabolism in the liver and could result in enhanced nitrogen recycling into the rumen.

Van der Walt, Boomker, Meintjes and Schultheiss (1999) reported that limited water intake by ruminants probably leads to a smaller amount of urea loss via the kidneys, which in turn increases the amount of urea recycled to the rumen. The significantly low quantity of urea (table 5) lost by the goats given small quantity of water to drink might facilitate their ability to recycle urea. The urea recycled to the rumen coupled with the favourable nitrogen balance by the treatment groups would elevate ammonia production by ruminal microbes. Earlier workers show that the improved conditions in the rumen enhance the digestion of nutrients by these animals (Kimambo et al 1999). The present study corroborated these findings as well as high rates of nutrients absorption. 

REFERENCES 

  • AOAC.  (1984). Official methods of analysis (13th Ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists.  Washington DC.
  • Brosh, A., Shkolnik, A. and Choshniak, I. (1987). Effects of infrequent drinking on the nitrogen metabolism of Bedouin  goats maintained on different diets. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 109, 165.
  • Devendra, C. (1980). Feeding and nutrition of goats. Vol. 2, pp 239 – 256. In: Church, D. C. (Ed.): Digestive physiology and nutrition of ruminants. O & A Books Corvallis, Oregon (USA).
  • Kimambo, A. E., Moiro, J. N., Aboud, A. A. O., Mtenga, L. A., Hveplund, T., Weisbjerg, M., Mgheni, D. M. and Madsen, J. (1999). Potential for nitrogen recycling into the rumen of adult rams. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 248 – 249.
  • More, T. and Sahni, K. L. (1981). Effects of water intake on feed digestibility. Wrld. Rev. Anim. Prod. 17: 33 – 40.
  • Silanikove, N. (1984). Renal excretion of urea in response to changes in nitrogen intake in desert (black Bedouin) and non desert (Swiss Saanen) goats fed on lucerne hay. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 79A: 651 -654.
  • Singh, N. P., More, T. and Sahni, K. L. (1976). Effect of water deprivation on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention in sheep. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 83: 431 – 433.
  • van der Walt, J. G., Boomker, E. A., Meintjes, R. A. and Schultheiss, W. A. (1999). Effect of water intake on the nitrogen balance of sheep fed a low or a medium protein diet. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 29 (3): 105 – 120.

Copyright 2006 - Ibadan Biomedical Communications Group

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil