
|
Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
National Research Centre of Medical Sciences of I.R. IRAN
ISSN: 1016-1430
Vol. 19, Num. 2, 2005, pp. 169-174
|
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran , Vol. 19, No. 2, August,
2005, pp. 169-174
EFFECTS OF UBIQUINOL-10 AND β-CAROTENE ON
THE IN VITRO SUSCEPTIBILITY OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN TO COPPER-INDUCED
OXIDATION
MOHAMMAD-REZA SAFARI*,
MOHSEN REZAEI AND HESHMATOLLAH TAHERKHANI
From the *Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan
University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Hamadan, Iran.
Address for correspondence: Department of Laboratory Sciences, School
of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and
Health Services, P.O. Box: 65178-3-8736, Hamadan, Iran.
*Tel: (+98)8118282801.
Fax: (+98)8118281442.
E-mail address: safari@umsha.ac.ir
Code Number: mr05013
ABSTRACT
Background: Dietary antioxidant intake has been reported to be inversely
associated with coronary artery disease. To clarify the possible role of lipophilic
antioxidants in the prevention of atherosclerosis, we investigated the effects
of ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene on the susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein(LDL)
to oxidative modification.
Methods: In this study, first “ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene”were
added to plasma and incubated for 3hr at 37°C. Then, the LDL fraction was
separated by ultracentrifugation. The oxidizability of LDL was estimated by
measuring conjugated diene (CD), lipid peroxides and thiobarbituric acid-reactive
substances (TBARS) after cupric sulfate solution was added.
Results: We
showed that ubiquinone-10 and β-carotene significantly
(p<0.01 byANOVA) and dose-dependently prolonged the lag time before
initiation of oxidation reaction.Also, these two compounds suppressed the formation
of lipid peroxides and TBARS more markedly than others. The ability of them
to prolong lag time and suppression of lipid peroxides and TBARS formation
resulted to be in the following order: ubiquinol-10> β-carotene.
Conclusion: LDL
exposed to the lipophilic antioxidants in vitro reduced oxidizability. These
findings suggest that ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene
have a role in ameliorating atherosclerosis.
Keywords: LDL, Oxidation, Atherosclerosis, Ubiquinol-10, β-Carotene.
INTRODUCTION
Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been suggested as a causal factor
in human atherosclerosis.1 Oxidatively modified LDL is a potent ligand
for
scavenger receptors on macrophages and thus contributes to the generation of
macrophage-derived foam cells, the hallmark of early atherosclerotic fatty streak
lesions.2 Oxidation of low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) has been Many additional mechanisms by which oxidized LDL
may suggested as a causal factor in human atherosclerosis.1 contribute
to atherosclerosis have been identified.3 The Oxidatively modified
LDL is a potent ligand for scaven-oxidative modification hypothesis of atherosclerosis
is ger receptors on macrophages and thus contributes to supported by numerous
in vivo findings, e.g., the presence of epitopes of oxidatively modified LDL
in athhersoclerotic lesions4 and elevated titers
of circulating auto-antibodies against oxidized LDL in patients with carotid
atherosclerosis.5 Antioxidant compounds
provide resistance to this process and
have been suggested to possess lower atherogenicity.6 Considerable epidemiologic,7,8 biochemical,9 and
clinical10 evidence has accumulated in support of this hypothesis.
LDL contains different lipophilic antioxidants, the most abundant being β-tocopherol
that is the major form of vitamin E. All the other antioxidants (β-tocopherol,
carotenoids, ubiquinol-10) are much less present in LDL.
Vitamin E is thought to be the major nonenzymatic antioxidant present in the
lipid structures of cells and lipoproteins. It is a donor antioxidant (reductant),
which increases the LDL resistance against the oxidative modification. In lipid
solutions and dispersions, it inhibits radical formation linearly with time
until consumed in the process.11
Ubiquinol-10, the reduced form of ubiquinone-10 (coenzyme Q10), is a well-known
proton-electron carrier in the inner mitochondrial membrane and a potent lipophilic
antioxidant in different cell membranes and LDL. It is well established that
both ubiquinols and ubiquinones are active against lipid peroxidation in mitochondria
and liposomes but that the quinols are much more powerful antioxidants than
the corresponding quinines.
Recently, it has been suggested that ubiquinol-10 can protect human LDL more
efficiently against lipid peroxidation than vitamin E, even though it is present
in LDL in much lower concentrations.12,13 Yalcin et al. reported
on the prominent antioxidant activity of ubiquinol-10 in human LDL.14 They
showed that ubiquinol-10 is the antioxidant first consumed during in vitro
LDL oxidation.Also, It has been suggested by Tribble et al.15 that
the ubiquinol-10 level may represent a surrogate measure of some other LDL
property affecting its oxidizability, for example its initial lipid hydroperoxide
content.
Carotenoids have been accepted to play a preventive role in a variety of diseases,
cancer and aging.16 βCarotene has been accepted to function
as a precursor of retinal and retinoic acid, quencher of electronically excited
species such as a singlet oxygen and triplet sensitizer, and antioxidant in
tissue and plasma. The inhibition by β-carotene of photosensitized oxidants
of lipids mediated by singlet oxygen has been clearly demonstrated.17 Burton
and Ingold found that β-carotene inhibited the peroxyl-radical-mediated
oxidants of tetralin and methyl linoleate in solution.Such antioxidant action
of β-carotene has also been observed in the oxidations of lipids in solution.18
In this study, we investigated the effects of plasma preincubation with ubiquinol-10
and β-carotene on the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Chemicals
Ubiquinol-10, β-carotene and other reagents were purchased from Sigma (Deisenhofen,
Germany) or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
In vitro addition of ubiquinol-10, β-carotene to plasma
Blood was
collected in an ethylenediamidinetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing (1g/L)
tube from a normolipidemic healthy male volunteer after an overnight
fast. Plasma was separated by low-speed centrifugation at 1000g at 4°C
for 15 min. To enrich LDL with lipophilic antioxidants, each one of two compounds –dissolved
in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH=7.4)
(20mL 10% DMSO/L plasma) –were added to plasma (50, 100 and 200 μmol/L)
and then incubated at 37°C for 3 hr.
Isolation of LDL
LDL (density 1.019-1.063 g/mL) was isolated from the plasma in the 1.019-1.063
g/mL density range by a rapid isolation technique as reported by Chung et al.19 The
pooled plasma solvent density was adjusted to 1.019 g/mL with a high density
salt solution (containing NaCl, KBr, and EDTA). After centrifugation for 1hr
at 100,000g and 16°C, the top layer of supernatant was removed. The density
of pooled infranatant was adjusted to 1.063 g/mL and was recentrifuged as before.
The LDL, which floats at a relative density of 1.063, was collected and exhaustively
dialyzed for 12 hr at 4°C with four 1-L changes in EDTA-free PBS(pH= 7.4)
that had been degassed by using a vacuum procedure. Control LDL was prepared
by the same technique after adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma)
to the plasma and incubating for 3 hr at 37°C. In a preliminary study,
we confirmed that DMSO at this concentration did not affect the oxidizability
of LDL. The LDL suspension was stored at 4°C under argon in the dark.
Measurement of oxidizability of LDL
The oxidizability of LDL was estimated by measuring three indexes including:
conjugated dienes (CD), lipid peroxides, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances
(TBARS).
1) CD: Freshly prepared LDL (50 mg protein/L) was incubated with cupric sulphate
solution (final concentration 10 μ mol/L) at 37°C in a Hitachi spectrophotometer
(Hitachi Sangyo Co, Tokyo) fitted with a peltier heater. The increase in absorbance
at 234 nm was automatically recorded at 10-min intervals. Lag time before the
initiation of oxidation and the propagation rate were determined according
to the methods of Esterbauer et al20 with some modification. The
output from the spectrophotometer was converted directly into the ASCII file
format and used to compute the lag time prior to the onset of oxidation. The
spectrophotometer was converted directly into the ASCII file format and used
to compute the lag time prior to the onset of maximum diene concentration,
which was determined from the difference between the absorbance curve and the
absorbance at time zero using the extinction coefficient for conjugated dienes
at 234 nm (E=295,000 mol/cm3). After incubation for 90 or 180 min
with 10 μ mol CuSO4/L , the oxidation reaction was stopped
by adding EDTA (100 μmol/L final concentration).
2) Lipid peroxides: The content of lipid peroxides in LDL was measured colorimetrically
with a commercially available kit. For measuring the content of lipid peroxides
in LDL, we used an assay based on the oxidative activity of LOOH, which convert
iodide to iodine. Iodine is further to form the triiodide ion, which absorbs
at 365 nm. We used the microtiter plate procedure by using a commercially available
reagent (CHOD-iodide, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The LDL oxidation was carried
out in polystyrene microtiter plates. 190 μ L of room-tempered CHOD iodide
reagent was added to plates and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. The absorbance
at 365 nm was measured in a microplate reader (Labsystems, Muluskan MCC/340,
Uppsala, Sweden). The concentration of LOOH was calculated from the molar absorption
coefficient of 246,000 mol/cm3 for the triiodide ion and a path
length in the microtiter plate of 1 cm for the final volume of 330 μL.
3) TBARS: The concentration of TBARS was also measured by using the method described
by Buege and Aust.21 LDL (0.1 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of 0.67% TBA
and 0.5 mL 20% trichloroacetic acid and incubated at 100°C for 20 min.
After cooling, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min and
the absorbance of the supernatant read at 532 nm. The concentration of TBARS
was calculated by using the extinction coefficient of 165,000 mol/cm. The concentration
of TBARS was expressed as nmol of malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalents per mg
LDL protein using a freshly diluted 1,1,3.3-tetraethoxypropane for the standard
curve.
Statistical analysis
All results are presented as mean ± standard deviations (n= 5). Data
between groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Fisher’s
test was used whenever a statistically significant difference between the two
groups was shown by ANOVA.
RESULTS
Addition of ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene to plasma for 3 hr at 37°C
resulted in lipoprotein antioxidants enrichment. Of course, efficiency of the
enrichment depended on the compound concentration in medium.
Incubation of copper ions with the LDL suspension caused extensive oxidation
of the lipoprotein as judged by measuring of CD, lipid peroxides and TBARS
in the LDL sample. Enriching LDL with antioxidant agents made it more resistant
to copper-induced oxidation in comparison with a native. This effect was demonstrated
with all the indices of oxidation used and appeared to be most pronounced within
the first hours of oxidation.
Table I shows the effects of ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene on the susceptibility
of LDL to copper-induced oxidation by measuring of lag time. These significantly
increased lag time before the onset of CD formation (p<0.01 by ANOVA).
Prolongation of the the lag time by these components was dose-dependent. Continuous
registration of absorbance of the LDL sample at 234 nm showed that ubiquinol-10
(200 μ mol/L )exerted the strongest effects, prolonging lag time to more
than three times that of the control. Also, β-carotene prolonged lag time
to twice that of the control, respectively. The lag time was significantly
increased in the LDL separated from pretreated plasma with 50 μmol/L ubiquinol-10,
or with 100 μ mol/L ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene, or with 200 μmol/L
Table I: Effect of addition of β-carotene & ubiquinol-10 (0-200 μmol/L)
to plasma on susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein to Cu-induced oxidation
by measuring of lag time.*
Compound concentration |
0 (control) |
Lag time (min)
50 μmol/L 100 μmol/L |
200 μmol/L |
β-Carotene |
58.1 ± 3.0 |
59.1 ± 6.6 90.0 ± 8.8a |
131.9 ± 14.0b |
Ubiquinol-10 |
58.1 ± 3.0 |
69.9 ± 4.9a 91.2 ± 5.8a |
176.0 ± 9.8b |
* Mean ± SD of three separate experiments. Lag times for ubiquinol-10
and β-carotene differ significantly than control. p<0.01(ANOVA).
a,bSignificantly different from control (Fisher’s test): ap<0.01 & bp<0.05.
After adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma) to the plasma and incubating
for 3 hr at 37°C, control LDL was prepared. DMSO at this concentration
did not affect the oxidizability of LDL.
Table II: Effect of addition of β-carotene & ubiquinol-10 (0-200 μ mol/L)
to plasma on susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein to Cu-induced oxidation
by measuring of lipid peroxides.*
Compound concentration |
Lipid peroxides (nmol/mg protein)
0 (control) 50 μmol/L 100 μmol/L |
200 μmol/L |
β-Carotene |
214.0 ± 2.0 197.52 ± 4.80a 129.44 ± 14.54b |
59.83 ± 10.62b |
Ubiquinol-10 |
214.0 ± 2.0 196.0 ± 5.50a 79.33 ± 7.15b |
25.90 ± 8.20b |
*Mean ± SD; n=4. One representative experiment of three is shown; the
other two experiments yielded similarresults.
Lipid peroxides differ significantly between groups, p<0.01(ANOVA).
a,bSignificantly
different from control: ap<0.05 & bp<0.0001.After
adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma) to the plasma and incubating
for 3 hr at 37°C, control LDL was prepared. DMSO at this concentration did
not affect the oxidizability of LDL.
Table III: Effect of addition of β-carotene and ubiquinol-10 (0-200 μmol/L)
to plasma on susceptibility oflow-density lipoprotein to Cu-induced by measuring
of TBARS.*
Compound concentration |
0 (control) |
TBARS (nmol MDA/mg protein)
50 μmol/L 100 μmol/L |
200 mol/L |
β-Carotene |
15.60 ± 1.60 |
9.51 ± 0.88a 8.39 ± 0.47a |
4.89 ± 1.68b |
Ubiquinol-10 |
15.6 0± 1.60 |
9.42 ± 0.57a 6.62 ± 0.93b |
3.23 ± 0.29b |
*Mean ± SD; n= 4. One representative experiment of three is shown; the
other two experimentsyielded similar results. TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive
substances; MDA, malondialdehyde.TBARS differ significantly between groups, p<0.01
(ANOVA).
a,bSignificantly different from control: ap<0.05 & bp<0.0001.After
adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma) to the plasma and incubating
for 3 hr at37°C, control LDL was prepared. DMSO at this concentration did
not affect the oxidizability ofLDL.
ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene (p<0.01 & p<0.05 by Fisher’s
test). The capacity to prolong the lag time was in the following order: ubiquinol-10> β-carotene.
Suppression of TBARS and lipid peroxides formation was observed in the LDL samples
to which these agents had been added. Tables II and III show results obtained.
In these experiments, ubiquinol-10 exerted a stronger effect and suppressed
the formation of TBARS and lipid peroxides more markedly than βcarotene.
Effects were proportional to the compound doses. TBARS and lipid peroxide formation
in the medium was significantly reduced in the LDL separated from plasma that
had been incubated with 50, 100 and 200 μ mol/L ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene
(p<0.05 & p<0.0001).The suppression ability of TBARS and lipid
peroxide formation was in the following order: ubiquinol10>β-carotene.
DISCUSSION
In this study we showed that the copper-catalyzed oxidation of LDL, isolated
from plasma preincubated with ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene, was significantly
inhibited in a dose-dependent manner as assessed by lag time before the initiation
of oxidation and the formation of TBARS and lipid peroxides. To add these two
compounds to LDL in vitro, we incubated EDTA-containing plasma at 37°C
for 3 hr with each one of them at the concentrations 50, 100 and 200 μ mol/L;
LDL was then separated and dialyzed against PBS before the induction of oxidation.
Therefore, the compounds not associated with LDL particles were removed during
dialysis. Thus, they that were on the surface of or within LDL particles were
considered to be responsible for
inhibiting LDL oxidation.
The concentration of both compounds chosen for this study was obtained from
our previous dose-response studies and the published data and is equivalent
to values in the upper end of the reference range.22,23
Ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene are known to be highly efficient lipid-soluble
antioxidants in the protection of lipids in a variety of biological and model
systems including cell membranes, LDL and liposomes. Ubiquinol10 is generally
assumed that the quinol may exhibit its protective effect by preventing a formation
of lipid free radicals and/or by eliminating them. On the other hand, the possibility
that the inhibition of LDL modification such as oxidation or glycation by ubiquinol-10
is related to its interactions on the lipid structure of the LDL particle needs
further investigation.24
Ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene contain shielding methyl(-CH3) and
methoxyl(-OCH3) groups adjacent to the phenolic hydroxyl group and
are optimally positioned in the LDL particle by its phytyl side-chain. In addition,
both protect LDL against peroxidative modification, maintaining its ability
to act as a ligand for LDL receptors.25,26
Moreover, in vivo supplementation of LDL with ubiquinol-10 is known to decrease
LDL susceptibility to modification and to increase LDL clearance in the plasma.
A decreased level of total ubiquinol are found in plasma of patients with atherosclerosis
as well as numerous examples of successful treatment with ubiquinol-10 of some
pathologies raise the possibility that ubiquinol-10 may decrease the effect
of LDL in formation of atherosclerotic lesions.14 β –Carotene
differs from the other major fat-soluble antioxidant, vitamin E, in being more
effective at low oxygen pressures. However, in concert with the tocopherols,
it is strategically carried primarily in the LDL particle and hence affords
LDL with a defense against oxidative attack.17 Currently, there
is much intensive effort being directed at elucidating β-carotene’s
postulated cancer chemo-preventative properties. However, as an antioxidant, β-carotene
might also have a role in preventing the development of the atherosclerotic
lesion. Previously, it has been shown that smoking, as a major risk factor
for coronary artery disease, results in decreased levels of both ascorbic acid
and β-carotene.27 This antioxidant deficiency could render
the LDLs of smokers more prone to oxidative modification and hence promote
atherogenesis. Also, β-carotene can retard the progression of atherosclerosis
in LDL-receptor-deficient rabbits. To this end, it recently was reported in
preliminary form that β-carotene supplementation significantly reduced
not only major coronary events but all major vascular events in a group of
man subjects. It is tempting to speculate that this beneficial effect of β-carotene
was being mediated in part by its inhibitory effect on LDL oxidation.28
Incubation of both compounds to plasma over a long period of time may enrich
the LDL particles sufficiently to make them less susceptible to oxidative reaction.
In conclusion, we clearly showed that incubation of plasma with ubiquinol-10
and β-carotene protected LDL from copper-induced oxidation reaction. These
compounds significantly decreased the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification;
therefore, they may have favorable effects in ameliorating atherosclerosis.
REFERENCES
- Stocker R, Keaney JF: Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis.
Physiol Rev 84(4) : 1381-1388, 2004.
- Heinecke JW: Oxidative stress: new approaches to diagnosis and prognosis
in atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 6; 91(3A): 12A-16A, 2003.
- Galle J : Atherosclerosis and arteritis: implications for therapy of cardiovascular
disease. Herz 29(1): 4-11, 2004.
- Palade F, Alexa ID, Azoicai D, et al : Oxidative stress in atherosclerosis.
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat 107: 502-511, 2003.
- Abuja PM : Atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 14(6): 647650, 2003.
- Niki E: Antioxidants and atherosclerosis. Biochem Soc Trans 32: 156-159,
2004.
- Violi F, Loffredo L, Marcoccia A: Antioxidants in peripheral arterial disease.
Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord 4: 289-294, 2004.
- Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK, et al : Use of antioxidant vitamins
for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised
trials. Lancet
361: 20172023, 2003.
- Todd J, Anderson L, Meredith I, et al: The effect of cholesterol-lowering
and antioxidant therapy on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion. New
Engl J
Med 332: 488493, 1995.
- Norata GD, Pirillo A, Catapano AL: Statins and oxidative stress during
atherogenesis. J Cardiovasc Risk 10: 181189, 2003.
- Suzukawa M, Ishikawa T, Yoshida H, et al: Effect of in vitro suspplementation
with low-dose vitamin E on susceptibility of low density lipoprotein and
high density lipoprotein in oxidative modification. J Am Coll Nutr 14: 46-52,
1995.
- Fremant L, Belguendouz L, Delpal S: Antioxidant activity of resveratrol
and alcohol-free wine polyphenols related to LDL oxidation and polyunsaturated
fatty acids Life
Sci 64: 2511-2521, 1999.
- Scheffer PG, Bakker SJ, Popp-Snijders CC, et al: Composition of LDL as
a determinant of its susceptibility to in vitro oxidation in patients with
well-controlled
type 2 diabetes. Diabet Metab Res Rev 17: 459-466, 2001.
- Yalcin A, Kilinc E, Sagcan A, et al: Coenzyme Q10 concentrations in coronary
artery disease. Clin Biochem 37(8): 706-709, 2004.
- Tribble Dl, Van den Berg JJM, Motchnik PA, et al: Oxidative susceptibility
of low density lipoprotein subfractions is related to their ubiquinol-10
and alpha-tocopherol
content. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 1183-7, 1994.
- Tavani A, La Vecchia C: Beta-carotene and risk of coronary heart disease.
A review of observational and intervention studies. Biomed Pharmacother 53:
409-416, 1999.
- Lowe GM, Bilton RF, Davies IG, et al : Carotenoid composition and antioxidant
potential in subfractions of human low-density lipoprotein. Ann Clin Biochem
36 : 323332, 1999.
- Odorico A, Martines D, Kiechl S, et al: High plasma levels of alpha- and
beta-carotene are associated with a lower risk of atherosclerosis: results
from the Bruneck
study. Atherosclerosis 153: 231-236, 2000.
- Chung BH, Segrest JP, Ray MJ, et al: Single vertical spin gradient ultracentrifugation.
Meth Enzymol 128: 181-209, 1986.
- Esterbauer H, Striegl H, Puhl H, et al: Countinuos monitoring of in vitro
oxidation of human low density lipoprotein. Free Rad Res Comm 6: 67-75, 1989.
- Buege JA, Aust SD: Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Meth
Enzymol 52: 302-310, 1978. Safari MR: Effects of vitamin E and volatile oils
on the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification. Iranian Biomed J
7(2): 79-84, 2003.
- Safari MR, Sheikh N: The effect of flavonoids on the susceptibility of
LDL to oxidative modification. Prostaglan Leukotrienes Essential Fatty Acids
69(1):
73-77, 2003.
- Plat J, Mensink RP: Effects of diets enriched with two different plant
stanol ester mixtures on plasma ubiquinol10 and fat-soluble antioxidant concentrations.
Metabolism
50: 520-525, 2001.
- Thomas SR, Leichtweis SB, Pottersson K, et al: Dietary cosupplementation
with vitamin E and coenzyme Q(10) inhibits atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein
E gene
knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21: 585-593, 2001.
- Marino M, Distefano E, Pallottini V, et al: S. Activation of IP(3)-protein
kinase C-alpha signal transduction pathway precedes the changes of plasma
cholesterol,
hepatic lipid metabolism and induction of LDL receptor expression in 17-beta-oestradiol-treated
rats. Exp Physiol 86: 3945, 2001.
- Retsky KL, Frei B: Vitamin C prevents metal ion-dependent initiation and
propagation of lipid peroxidation in human low-density lipoprotein. Biochim
Biophys Acta
1257: 279-287, 1995.
- Kontush A, Weber W, Beisiegel U: Alpha- and beta-carotenes in low density
lipoprotein are the preferred target for nitric oxide-induced oxidation.
Atherosclerosis
148: 87-93, 2000.
Copyright 2005 -Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran
|