search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
National Research Centre of Medical Sciences of I.R. IRAN
ISSN: 1016-1430
Vol. 19, Num. 2, 2005, pp. 169-174

Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran , Vol. 19, No. 2, August, 2005, pp. 169-174

EFFECTS OF UBIQUINOL-10 AND β-CAROTENE ON THE IN VITRO SUSCEPTIBILITY OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN TO COPPER-INDUCED OXIDATION

MOHAMMAD-REZA SAFARI*, MOHSEN REZAEI AND HESHMATOLLAH TAHERKHANI

From the *Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Hamadan, Iran.

Address for correspondence: Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, P.O. Box: 65178-3-8736, Hamadan, Iran.
*Tel: (+98)8118282801. Fax: (+98)8118281442.
E-mail address: safari@umsha.ac.ir

Code Number: mr05013

ABSTRACT

Background: Dietary antioxidant intake has been reported to be inversely associated with coronary artery disease. To clarify the possible role of lipophilic antioxidants in the prevention of atherosclerosis, we investigated the effects of ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene on the susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein(LDL) to oxidative modification.
Methods: In this study, first “ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene”were added to plasma and incubated for 3hr at 37°C. Then, the LDL fraction was separated by ultracentrifugation. The oxidizability of LDL was estimated by measuring conjugated diene (CD), lipid peroxides and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) after cupric sulfate solution was added.
Results: We showed that ubiquinone-10 and β-carotene significantly (p<0.01 byANOVA) and dose-dependently prolonged the lag time before initiation of oxidation reaction.Also, these two compounds suppressed the formation of lipid peroxides and TBARS more markedly than others. The ability of them to prolong lag time and suppression of lipid peroxides and TBARS formation resulted to be in the following order: ubiquinol-10> β-carotene.
Conclusion: LDL exposed to the lipophilic antioxidants in vitro reduced oxidizability. These findings suggest that ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene have a role in ameliorating atherosclerosis.

Keywords: LDL, Oxidation, Atherosclerosis, Ubiquinol-10, β-Carotene.

INTRODUCTION

Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been suggested as a causal factor in human atherosclerosis.1 Oxidatively modified LDL is a potent ligand for scavenger receptors on macrophages and thus contributes to the generation of macrophage-derived foam cells, the hallmark of early atherosclerotic fatty streak lesions.2 Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been Many additional mechanisms by which oxidized LDL may suggested as a causal factor in human atherosclerosis.1 contribute to atherosclerosis have been identified.3 The Oxidatively modified LDL is a potent ligand for scaven-oxidative modification hypothesis of atherosclerosis is ger receptors on macrophages and thus contributes to supported by numerous in vivo findings, e.g., the presence of epitopes of oxidatively modified LDL in athhersoclerotic lesions4 and elevated titers of circulating auto-antibodies against oxidized LDL in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.5 Antioxidant compounds provide resistance to this process and have been suggested to possess lower atherogenicity.6 Considerable epidemiologic,7,8 biochemical,9 and clinical10 evidence has accumulated in support of this hypothesis.

LDL contains different lipophilic antioxidants, the most abundant being β-tocopherol that is the major form of vitamin E. All the other antioxidants (β-tocopherol, carotenoids, ubiquinol-10) are much less present in LDL.

Vitamin E is thought to be the major nonenzymatic antioxidant present in the lipid structures of cells and lipoproteins. It is a donor antioxidant (reductant), which increases the LDL resistance against the oxidative modification. In lipid solutions and dispersions, it inhibits radical formation linearly with time until consumed in the process.11

Ubiquinol-10, the reduced form of ubiquinone-10 (coenzyme Q10), is a well-known proton-electron carrier in the inner mitochondrial membrane and a potent lipophilic antioxidant in different cell membranes and LDL. It is well established that both ubiquinols and ubiquinones are active against lipid peroxidation in mitochondria and liposomes but that the quinols are much more powerful antioxidants than the corresponding quinines.

Recently, it has been suggested that ubiquinol-10 can protect human LDL more efficiently against lipid peroxidation than vitamin E, even though it is present in LDL in much lower concentrations.12,13 Yalcin et al. reported on the prominent antioxidant activity of ubiquinol-10 in human LDL.14 They showed that ubiquinol-10 is the antioxidant first consumed during in vitro LDL oxidation.Also, It has been suggested by Tribble et al.15 that the ubiquinol-10 level may represent a surrogate measure of some other LDL property affecting its oxidizability, for example its initial lipid hydroperoxide content.

Carotenoids have been accepted to play a preventive role in a variety of diseases, cancer and aging.16 βCarotene has been accepted to function as a precursor of retinal and retinoic acid, quencher of electronically excited species such as a singlet oxygen and triplet sensitizer, and antioxidant in tissue and plasma. The inhibition by β-carotene of photosensitized oxidants of lipids mediated by singlet oxygen has been clearly demonstrated.17 Burton and Ingold found that β-carotene inhibited the peroxyl-radical-mediated oxidants of tetralin and methyl linoleate in solution.Such antioxidant action of β-carotene has also been observed in the oxidations of lipids in solution.18

In this study, we investigated the effects of plasma preincubation with ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene on the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Chemicals

Ubiquinol-10, β-carotene and other reagents were purchased from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany) or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

In vitro addition of ubiquinol-10, β-carotene to plasma

Blood was collected in an ethylenediamidinetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing (1g/L) tube from a normolipidemic healthy male volunteer after an overnight fast. Plasma was separated by low-speed centrifugation at 1000g at 4°C for 15 min. To enrich LDL with lipophilic antioxidants, each one of two compounds –dissolved in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH=7.4) (20mL 10% DMSO/L plasma) –were added to plasma (50, 100 and 200 μmol/L) and then incubated at 37°C for 3 hr.

Isolation of LDL

LDL (density 1.019-1.063 g/mL) was isolated from the plasma in the 1.019-1.063 g/mL density range by a rapid isolation technique as reported by Chung et al.19 The pooled plasma solvent density was adjusted to 1.019 g/mL with a high density salt solution (containing NaCl, KBr, and EDTA). After centrifugation for 1hr at 100,000g and 16°C, the top layer of supernatant was removed. The density of pooled infranatant was adjusted to 1.063 g/mL and was recentrifuged as before. The LDL, which floats at a relative density of 1.063, was collected and exhaustively dialyzed for 12 hr at 4°C with four 1-L changes in EDTA-free PBS(pH= 7.4) that had been degassed by using a vacuum procedure. Control LDL was prepared by the same technique after adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma) to the plasma and incubating for 3 hr at 37°C. In a preliminary study, we confirmed that DMSO at this concentration did not affect the oxidizability of LDL. The LDL suspension was stored at 4°C under argon in the dark.

Measurement of oxidizability of LDL

The oxidizability of LDL was estimated by measuring three indexes including: conjugated dienes (CD), lipid peroxides, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS).

1) CD: Freshly prepared LDL (50 mg protein/L) was incubated with cupric sulphate solution (final concentration 10 μ mol/L) at 37°C in a Hitachi spectrophotometer (Hitachi Sangyo Co, Tokyo) fitted with a peltier heater. The increase in absorbance at 234 nm was automatically recorded at 10-min intervals. Lag time before the initiation of oxidation and the propagation rate were determined according to the methods of Esterbauer et al20 with some modification. The output from the spectrophotometer was converted directly into the ASCII file format and used to compute the lag time prior to the onset of oxidation. The spectrophotometer was converted directly into the ASCII file format and used to compute the lag time prior to the onset of maximum diene concentration, which was determined from the difference between the absorbance curve and the absorbance at time zero using the extinction coefficient for conjugated dienes at 234 nm (E=295,000 mol/cm3). After incubation for 90 or 180 min with 10 μ mol CuSO4/L , the oxidation reaction was stopped by adding EDTA (100 μmol/L final concentration).

2) Lipid peroxides: The content of lipid peroxides in LDL was measured colorimetrically with a commercially available kit. For measuring the content of lipid peroxides in LDL, we used an assay based on the oxidative activity of LOOH, which convert iodide to iodine. Iodine is further to form the triiodide ion, which absorbs at 365 nm. We used the microtiter plate procedure by using a commercially available reagent (CHOD-iodide, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The LDL oxidation was carried out in polystyrene microtiter plates. 190 μ L of room-tempered CHOD iodide reagent was added to plates and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. The absorbance at 365 nm was measured in a microplate reader (Labsystems, Muluskan MCC/340, Uppsala, Sweden). The concentration of LOOH was calculated from the molar absorption coefficient of 246,000 mol/cm3 for the triiodide ion and a path length in the microtiter plate of 1 cm for the final volume of 330 μL.

3) TBARS: The concentration of TBARS was also measured by using the method described by Buege and Aust.21 LDL (0.1 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of 0.67% TBA and 0.5 mL 20% trichloroacetic acid and incubated at 100°C for 20 min. After cooling, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min and the absorbance of the supernatant read at 532 nm. The concentration of TBARS was calculated by using the extinction coefficient of 165,000 mol/cm. The concentration of TBARS was expressed as nmol of malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalents per mg LDL protein using a freshly diluted 1,1,3.3-tetraethoxypropane for the standard curve.

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as mean ± standard deviations (n= 5). Data between groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Fisher’s test was used whenever a statistically significant difference between the two groups was shown by ANOVA.

RESULTS

Addition of ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene to plasma for 3 hr at 37°C resulted in lipoprotein antioxidants enrichment. Of course, efficiency of the enrichment depended on the compound concentration in medium.

Incubation of copper ions with the LDL suspension caused extensive oxidation of the lipoprotein as judged by measuring of CD, lipid peroxides and TBARS in the LDL sample. Enriching LDL with antioxidant agents made it more resistant to copper-induced oxidation in comparison with a native. This effect was demonstrated with all the indices of oxidation used and appeared to be most pronounced within the first hours of oxidation.

Table I shows the effects of ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene on the susceptibility of LDL to copper-induced oxidation by measuring of lag time. These significantly increased lag time before the onset of CD formation (p<0.01 by ANOVA). Prolongation of the the lag time by these components was dose-dependent. Continuous registration of absorbance of the LDL sample at 234 nm showed that ubiquinol-10 (200 μ mol/L )exerted the strongest effects, prolonging lag time to more than three times that of the control. Also, β-carotene prolonged lag time to twice that of the control, respectively. The lag time was significantly increased in the LDL separated from pretreated plasma with 50 μmol/L ubiquinol-10, or with 100 μ mol/L ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene, or with 200 μmol/L

Table I: Effect of addition of β-carotene & ubiquinol-10 (0-200 μmol/L) to plasma on susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein to Cu-induced oxidation by measuring of lag time.*

Compound concentration 0 (control) Lag time (min)
50 μmol/L              100 μmol/L
200 μmol/L
β-Carotene 58.1 ± 3.0 59.1 ± 6.6             90.0 ± 8.8a 131.9 ± 14.0b
Ubiquinol-10 58.1 ± 3.0 69.9 ± 4.9a            91.2 ± 5.8a 176.0 ± 9.8b

* Mean ± SD of three separate experiments. Lag times for ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene differ significantly than control. p<0.01(ANOVA).

a,bSignificantly different from control (Fisher’s test): ap<0.01 & bp<0.05. After adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma) to the plasma and incubating for 3 hr at 37°C, control LDL was prepared. DMSO at this concentration did not affect the oxidizability of LDL.

Table II: Effect of addition of β-carotene & ubiquinol-10 (0-200 μ mol/L) to plasma on susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein to Cu-induced oxidation by measuring of lipid peroxides.*

Compound concentration

Lipid peroxides (nmol/mg protein)

0 (control)         50 μmol/L          100 μmol/L

200 μmol/L
β-Carotene 214.0 ± 2.0          197.52 ± 4.80a     129.44 ± 14.54b 59.83 ± 10.62b
Ubiquinol-10 214.0 ± 2.0          196.0 ± 5.50a          79.33 ± 7.15b 25.90 ± 8.20b

*Mean ± SD; n=4. One representative experiment of three is shown; the other two experiments yielded similarresults.
Lipid peroxides differ significantly between groups, p<0.01(ANOVA).
a,bSignificantly different from control: ap<0.05 & bp<0.0001.After adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma) to the plasma and incubating for 3 hr at 37°C, control LDL was prepared. DMSO at this concentration did not affect the oxidizability of LDL.

Table III: Effect of addition of β-carotene and ubiquinol-10 (0-200 μmol/L) to plasma on susceptibility oflow-density lipoprotein to Cu-induced by measuring of TBARS.*

Compound concentration 0 (control)

TBARS (nmol MDA/mg protein)

50 μmol/L          100 μmol/L

200 mol/L
β-Carotene 15.60 ± 1.60 9.51 ± 0.88a          8.39 ± 0.47a 4.89 ± 1.68b
Ubiquinol-10 15.6 0± 1.60 9.42 ± 0.57a         6.62 ± 0.93b 3.23 ± 0.29b

*Mean ± SD; n= 4. One representative experiment of three is shown; the other two experimentsyielded similar results. TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances; MDA, malondialdehyde.TBARS differ significantly between groups, p<0.01 (ANOVA).
a,bSignificantly different from control: ap<0.05 & bp<0.0001.After adding only vehicle (20 min 10% DMSO/L plasma) to the plasma and incubating for 3 hr at37°C, control LDL was prepared. DMSO at this concentration did not affect the oxidizability ofLDL.

ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene (p<0.01 & p<0.05 by Fisher’s test). The capacity to prolong the lag time was in the following order: ubiquinol-10> β-carotene.

Suppression of TBARS and lipid peroxides formation was observed in the LDL samples to which these agents had been added. Tables II and III show results obtained. In these experiments, ubiquinol-10 exerted a stronger effect and suppressed the formation of TBARS and lipid peroxides more markedly than βcarotene. Effects were proportional to the compound doses. TBARS and lipid peroxide formation in the medium was significantly reduced in the LDL separated from plasma that had been incubated with 50, 100 and 200 μ mol/L ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene (p<0.05 & p<0.0001).The suppression ability of TBARS and lipid peroxide formation was in the following order: ubiquinol10>β-carotene.

DISCUSSION

In this study we showed that the copper-catalyzed oxidation of LDL, isolated from plasma preincubated with ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene, was significantly inhibited in a dose-dependent manner as assessed by lag time before the initiation of oxidation and the formation of TBARS and lipid peroxides. To add these two compounds to LDL in vitro, we incubated EDTA-containing plasma at 37°C for 3 hr with each one of them at the concentrations 50, 100 and 200 μ mol/L; LDL was then separated and dialyzed against PBS before the induction of oxidation. Therefore, the compounds not associated with LDL particles were removed during dialysis. Thus, they that were on the surface of or within LDL particles were considered to be responsible for inhibiting LDL oxidation.

The concentration of both compounds chosen for this study was obtained from our previous dose-response studies and the published data and is equivalent to values in the upper end of the reference range.22,23

Ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene are known to be highly efficient lipid-soluble antioxidants in the protection of lipids in a variety of biological and model systems including cell membranes, LDL and liposomes. Ubiquinol10 is generally assumed that the quinol may exhibit its protective effect by preventing a formation of lipid free radicals and/or by eliminating them. On the other hand, the possibility that the inhibition of LDL modification such as oxidation or glycation by ubiquinol-10 is related to its interactions on the lipid structure of the LDL particle needs further investigation.24

Ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene contain shielding methyl(-CH3) and methoxyl(-OCH3) groups adjacent to the phenolic hydroxyl group and are optimally positioned in the LDL particle by its phytyl side-chain. In addition, both protect LDL against peroxidative modification, maintaining its ability to act as a ligand for LDL receptors.25,26

Moreover, in vivo supplementation of LDL with ubiquinol-10 is known to decrease LDL susceptibility to modification and to increase LDL clearance in the plasma. A decreased level of total ubiquinol are found in plasma of patients with atherosclerosis as well as numerous examples of successful treatment with ubiquinol-10 of some pathologies raise the possibility that ubiquinol-10 may decrease the effect of LDL in formation of atherosclerotic lesions.14 β –Carotene differs from the other major fat-soluble antioxidant, vitamin E, in being more effective at low oxygen pressures. However, in concert with the tocopherols, it is strategically carried primarily in the LDL particle and hence affords LDL with a defense against oxidative attack.17 Currently, there is much intensive effort being directed at elucidating β-carotene’s postulated cancer chemo-preventative properties. However, as an antioxidant, β-carotene might also have a role in preventing the development of the atherosclerotic lesion. Previously, it has been shown that smoking, as a major risk factor for coronary artery disease, results in decreased levels of both ascorbic acid and β-carotene.27 This antioxidant deficiency could render the LDLs of smokers more prone to oxidative modification and hence promote atherogenesis. Also, β-carotene can retard the progression of atherosclerosis in LDL-receptor-deficient rabbits. To this end, it recently was reported in preliminary form that β-carotene supplementation significantly reduced not only major coronary events but all major vascular events in a group of man subjects. It is tempting to speculate that this beneficial effect of β-carotene was being mediated in part by its inhibitory effect on LDL oxidation.28

Incubation of both compounds to plasma over a long period of time may enrich the LDL particles sufficiently to make them less susceptible to oxidative reaction.

In conclusion, we clearly showed that incubation of plasma with ubiquinol-10 and β-carotene protected LDL from copper-induced oxidation reaction. These compounds significantly decreased the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification; therefore, they may have favorable effects in ameliorating atherosclerosis.

REFERENCES

  1. Stocker R, Keaney JF: Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis. Physiol Rev 84(4) : 1381-1388, 2004.
  2. Heinecke JW: Oxidative stress: new approaches to diagnosis and prognosis in atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 6; 91(3A): 12A-16A, 2003.
  3. Galle J : Atherosclerosis and arteritis: implications for therapy of cardiovascular disease. Herz 29(1): 4-11, 2004.
  4. Palade F, Alexa ID, Azoicai D, et al : Oxidative stress in atherosclerosis. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat 107: 502-511, 2003.
  5. Abuja PM : Atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 14(6): 647650, 2003.
  6. Niki E: Antioxidants and atherosclerosis. Biochem Soc Trans 32: 156-159, 2004.
  7. Violi F, Loffredo L, Marcoccia A: Antioxidants in peripheral arterial disease. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord 4: 289-294, 2004.
  8. Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK, et al : Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 361: 20172023, 2003.
  9. Todd J, Anderson L, Meredith I, et al: The effect of cholesterol-lowering and antioxidant therapy on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion. New Engl J Med 332: 488493, 1995.
  10. Norata GD, Pirillo A, Catapano AL: Statins and oxidative stress during atherogenesis. J Cardiovasc Risk 10: 181189, 2003.
  11. Suzukawa M, Ishikawa T, Yoshida H, et al: Effect of in vitro suspplementation with low-dose vitamin E on susceptibility of low density lipoprotein and high density lipoprotein in oxidative modification. J Am Coll Nutr 14: 46-52, 1995.
  12. Fremant L, Belguendouz L, Delpal S: Antioxidant activity of resveratrol and alcohol-free wine polyphenols related to LDL oxidation and polyunsaturated fatty acids Life Sci 64: 2511-2521, 1999.
  13. Scheffer PG, Bakker SJ, Popp-Snijders CC, et al: Composition of LDL as a determinant of its susceptibility to in vitro oxidation in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabet Metab Res Rev 17: 459-466, 2001.
  14. Yalcin A, Kilinc E, Sagcan A, et al: Coenzyme Q10 concentrations in coronary artery disease. Clin Biochem 37(8): 706-709, 2004.
  15. Tribble Dl, Van den Berg JJM, Motchnik PA, et al: Oxidative susceptibility of low density lipoprotein subfractions is related to their ubiquinol-10 and alpha-tocopherol content. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 1183-7, 1994.
  16. Tavani A, La Vecchia C: Beta-carotene and risk of coronary heart disease. A review of observational and intervention studies. Biomed Pharmacother 53: 409-416, 1999.
  17. Lowe GM, Bilton RF, Davies IG, et al : Carotenoid composition and antioxidant potential in subfractions of human low-density lipoprotein. Ann Clin Biochem 36 : 323332, 1999.
  18. Odorico A, Martines D, Kiechl S, et al: High plasma levels of alpha- and beta-carotene are associated with a lower risk of atherosclerosis: results from the Bruneck study. Atherosclerosis 153: 231-236, 2000.
  19. Chung BH, Segrest JP, Ray MJ, et al: Single vertical spin gradient ultracentrifugation. Meth Enzymol 128: 181-209, 1986.
  20. Esterbauer H, Striegl H, Puhl H, et al: Countinuos monitoring of in vitro oxidation of human low density lipoprotein. Free Rad Res Comm 6: 67-75, 1989.
  21. Buege JA, Aust SD: Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Meth Enzymol 52: 302-310, 1978. Safari MR: Effects of vitamin E and volatile oils on the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification. Iranian Biomed J 7(2): 79-84, 2003.
  22. Safari MR, Sheikh N: The effect of flavonoids on the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification. Prostaglan Leukotrienes Essential Fatty Acids 69(1): 73-77, 2003.
  23. Plat J, Mensink RP: Effects of diets enriched with two different plant stanol ester mixtures on plasma ubiquinol10 and fat-soluble antioxidant concentrations. Metabolism 50: 520-525, 2001.
  24. Thomas SR, Leichtweis SB, Pottersson K, et al: Dietary cosupplementation with vitamin E and coenzyme Q(10) inhibits atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E gene knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21: 585-593, 2001.
  25. Marino M, Distefano E, Pallottini V, et al: S. Activation of IP(3)-protein kinase C-alpha signal transduction pathway precedes the changes of plasma cholesterol, hepatic lipid metabolism and induction of LDL receptor expression in 17-beta-oestradiol-treated rats. Exp Physiol 86: 3945, 2001.
  26. Retsky KL, Frei B: Vitamin C prevents metal ion-dependent initiation and propagation of lipid peroxidation in human low-density lipoprotein. Biochim Biophys Acta 1257: 279-287, 1995.
  27. Kontush A, Weber W, Beisiegel U: Alpha- and beta-carotenes in low density lipoprotein are the preferred target for nitric oxide-induced oxidation. Atherosclerosis 148: 87-93, 2000.

Copyright 2005 -Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil