search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Medical Sciences
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Journal of Medical Sciences Trust
ISSN: 0019-5359 EISSN: 1998-3654
Vol. 58, Num. 9, 2004, pp. 369-380

Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 58, No. 9, September, 2004, pp. 369-380

Review Article

Trends in medical education: Challenges and directions for need-based reforms of medical training in South-East Asia

Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia - 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan
Correspondence Address:School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia - 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan azim@kb.usm.my

Code Number:ms04065

ABSTRACT

Most medical schools, especially in South-East Asia, currently are experiencing difficulties in providing the right quality and quantity of educational experiences as the curricula have failed to respond to the needs of the community and country. The pedagogic shift from traditional approach to a need-based approach requires a fundamental change of the roles and commitments of educators, planners and policymakers. Teachers of health professional education in the region are to be well-informed of the trends and innovations and utilize these to increase relevance and quality of education to produce competent human resources for the region. The purpose of this paper is twofold: (i) to discuss innovative strategies and emerging trends, which have been successfully adopted by educators around the world for the reorientation of medical education to overcome existing traditions of educational planning, review and development and (ii) to highlight their implications and importance to initiate need-based reforms of medical training in South-East Asia.

Key Words: Reorientation, medical education, South-East Asia.

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, political systems, epidemiological and demographic patterns, micro-economic strategies, technology, and health care systems have undergone profound changes [Table - 1]. To cope with these changes, educational institutions around the world have been increasingly confronted with the challenge of making their curricula more meaningful and relevant to the needs of the time to produce doctors oriented to the real needs of the community. Many authorities highlighted the need for reorientation of medical education and suggested strategies for direction of such changes.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] For example, "The Edinburgh Declaration" of World Federation for Medical Education (WFME)[3] [Table - 2] and "Tomorrow′s Doctors" of General Medical Council (GMC) of UK[6],[11] [Table - 3], outlined a number of specific strategies to guide reforms and bring need-based changes in medical education. The Edinburgh Declaration, now translated into all major languages, has been very widely adopted as basis for reform of medical education.[12]

Most of the medical schools in Asia have traditional, teacher-centred and hospital-based training[13],[14],[15] with a few exceptions only.[13] Educational innovations and experiments are not quite evident in this region as seen in other parts of the world.[16] Medical teachers, planners and policymakers are to be well-informed of such trends and utilize these in planning, implementing and evaluating training programs to increase relevance and quality and to produce need-based human resources for health for the region. The purpose of this paper is twofold: (i) to discuss innovative strategies and emerging trends, which have been successfully adopted by educators around the world for the reorientation of medical education to overcome existing traditions of educational planning, review and development and (ii) to highlight their implications and importance to initiate need-based reforms of medical training in South-East Asia.

Trend 1: Education for Capability
In most of the medical schools, existing medical training provides a general education in a variety of subjects relevant to a doctor′s need and this broad base has made a significant contribution to the problem of information overload.[6] Education for capability is a move to strike a balance between general education and vocational training to bring relevance in education in order to reduce information overload in curriculum.[2],[6],[7],[9],[10],[17]

To overcome the problem of factual or information overload, a new strategy "core with options" has been advocated.[17],[18],[19] Core curriculum is to be developed by delineating basic knowledge, skills and attitudes, which must be studied "before a newly qualified doctor can assume the responsibilities of a pre-registration house officer".[6] Currently many medical schools and professional bodies are actively pursuing to delineate the core curriculum in their areas.[17],[19],[20],[21],[22] "Options" provides areas to the students for study depending on individual needs or interests. Mastery of the core ensures the maintenance of standards; the options provide in-depth work and achievement of high-level competencies, such as critical thinking.

Another facet of education for capability is the increased importance placed on practical training and generic competencies. Concern has been expressed that the undergraduate curriculum fails to fulfil this expectation, despite students′ extensive exposure to clinical teaching.[6],[23],[24],[25] In addition to clinical competencies, students must develop generic competencies or transferable personal skills essential to their roles as health professionals, which include bio-ethics and communication skills, interpersonal skills, problem-solving ability, decision-making capability, management and organization skills, working in team, IT skills and doctor-patient relationship.

Trend 2: Community Orientation in Medical Education (COME)
COME is an educational process, which focuses on population groups and individual persons in the community, and takes into consideration the health needs of the community concerned.[2] A community-oriented curriculum should also encompass health promotion, illness prevention, assessment and targeting of population needs and awareness of environmental and social factors in disease.[6] The strategic hallmark of COME is community-based training, where students are placed in the community and learn by delivering the care using the existing health services. Adoption of community orientation in health professional education has potential benefits for the students, the medical schools, and also for the community.[26],[27],[28],[29] WHO[2] outlined six reasons in favour of community-based education, which are outlined in [Table - 4].

Trend 3: Self-directed/learner-centred learning
Self-directed learning involves the learner as an active participant and encourages the development of deep learning. Most of the current undergraduate training is didactic and pedagogical, with the teacher as a source of information, which encourages students for surface learning. Learner-centred learning is an active process, where the student does "learn to learn" through his own "digging" or study.[30] This provides the student to use his "learning relevant to his educational needs, and his style and manner of learning, and can pace his learning appropriately, according to his ability to learn or understand in any particular area".[30] Moreover, the approach motivates student to adapt to the new knowledge, challenges, and problems he will encounter in future in his professional life.

The key features of self-directed learning[31] concord with the principles of adult learning[32] and also with the findings of research in cognitive psychology.[33] Strategies that have been developed as self-directed learning include:[31] problem-based learning; discovery learning; task-based learning; experiential and reflective learning; portfolio-based learning; small-group, self instructional and project-based learning; peer-evaluation and learning contracts.

Trend 4: Problem-based Learning (PBL) and Task-based Learning (TBL)
Problem-based learning has been described as one of the most significant development in professional education, which was pioneered by the McMaster Medical School in Canada in 1969. Soon, thereafter many medical and health institutes across the world adopted this innovative approach. The WFME and the WHO have endorsed PBL as an educational strategy.

PBL adopts learner-centered method where students learn by working on real life problems and activities, where teacher acts as a facilitator. The problems are used as a focus for learning basic science and clinical knowledge along with clinical reasoning skills in an integrated manner,[30] which follows a particular sequence such as the Maastricht "seven jump"[31] [Table - 5]. It is argued that such a method is more effective than learning based on established disciplines and solves some problems of the traditional curriculum [34],[35],[36] [Table - 6]. Moreover, PBL conforms to the principles of adult learning and cognitive science, as mentioned before.

Another strategy, which has the similarities with problem-based learning, is task-based learning.[37],[38] In PBL, a small group tackles a paper simulation. In TBL, the focus for the learners is not a paper simulation but an actual task addressed by healthcare professionals.

Trend 5: Integration and Early Clinical Contact
Some critics felt that a system which many medical schools are now practicing exposed the student to a succession of subjects studied in different department is not effective for producing competent physicians.[6],[39] The situation is wasteful (because of unnecessary repetition), disjointed (because of isolation from other ′subjects′), and confusing (because of departmental differences of opinion). From this dissatisfaction, in the early 1950s, the Cape Western Reserve University initiated an "integrated teaching" programme. The move away from discipline-based teaching towards integration of the curriculum occurs in two distinctive ways - multiprofessional and multidisciplinary.

In multiprofessional education, students of different professions, such as medicine, nursing and dentistry are taught together in certain appropriate situations.[2] The approach encourages development of the student′s ability to share knowledge and skills, enhances personal and professional confidence, helps attainment respect between professionals, promotes reflective practice and ensures quality health services.[40],[41],[42]

In multidisciplinary integration, courses may be integrated horizontally, where topics traditionally taught separately in one level of the course are taught together, or they may be integrated vertically, where topics can be taught by two or more departments. Vertical integration is associated with the earlier introduction of clinical work incorporating basic science throughout the undergraduate program.[4] This strategy is found to be more effective way of preparing students for their future roles.[3],[43] Far from being premature and interfering with the study of basic sciences, the evidence is that early clinical contact is handled well by students, who see the relevance and value of what they are learning.

Trend 6: Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
CPD emphasizes the responsibility of the professional beyond their personal development and recognizes that professionals have a special responsibility towards their society. To maintain this accountability a professional is required to move beyond the achievement of initial qualification to CPD.[44] CPD is essential to maintain the competencies of newer graduates, to influence the practice the older graduates, to remedy practice gaps, and to enable all doctors to respond to the challenges of the professional environment.[9] Professional bodies have a responsibility not only for safe-guarding standards but also for the professional development of their own members.[4],[45],[46],[47] Abrahamson et al[48] suggested eight principles for continuing medical education for health professionals [Table - 7].

In the 1990s, a clear trend was observed in the health professions education towards more professionalism - training on planning, management and evaluation of curricula. Experts in medical education emphasized consistently that more attention should be paid to the quality of teaching, as an important condition for improving medical education.[19],[49],[50],[51],[52] The teachers and trainers need to develop professionally in relation to their abilities as teachers or trainers, i.e. in their educational development activity and also in their abilities as a professional health worker i.e. in their professional discipline activity.[53] Through faculty-development programmes and other strategies, trainers should be taught to train, teachers to teach and educators to educate. Provisions for incentives and rewards are to be created for those who spend time and energy on educational activities.[54],[55]

Trend 7: Unity between Education and Practice
There has been much discussion in the recent literature about the need to adapt medical education to changing patterns of health care delivery of the country.[4],[6],[56],[57],[58] The World Summit on Medical Education[9] identified the "disjunction between medical education and the medical practice environment" as one of the important constraints that medical education is currently facing in an effort to bring relevance in medical training. It has been observed that most medical schools are mainly theoretical and at the same time it is unfortunate to note that much of the health service lies unused for teaching.[4] Medical institutes should have access to all the clinical facilities of the entire community, at all stages of the curriculum, for placement of the students.[2] Medical education needs to be planned and implemented with full awareness of the aims and demands of the health care services including consistent integration of the sciences of medical practice.

Trend 8: Evidence-based medical education
Currently, in medical education, a trend has emerged to utilize "trustable research findings" in place of "personal opinions" as a basis for educational management and decision-making. Opinion-based decision-making practiced in most of medical schools in curriculum development and other educational planning involves ′debates over assumptions, cherished traditions, and quaint myths′.[59] The educational community is also becoming more aware of the importance of evidence in educational decision-making. It is also expected that educational researchers, teachers, academic administrators, health managers, care-providers and policy-makers, join together to develop strategies, and set priorities to enable educational research to guide the future medical education, justify huge investment and address social accountability.[59],[60],[61] This has given rise to "evidence-based medicine (EBM)"[62] and "best evidence medical education (BEME)".[63],[64] Utilizing the research findings, most medical schools are inclined to move from opinion-based tradition to evidence-based education. BEME is the practice and implementation of methods and approaches to education based on the best evidence available to teachers in their practice.[63] It is to be ensured that curricular changes in the medical schools are evidence-based and this evidence base should encompass all dimensions of medical education.

Trend 9: Communication and information technology (C&IT)
Recent and rapid advances in communication and information technology (C&IT) together with the pervasion of the worldwide web into everyday life have offered many changes and challenges in medical education.[65] Medical schools around the world have invested heavily in computing facilities, not only to attract the best students but also because C&IT and informatics skills are seen as essential in a profession that is increasingly dependent on electronic information. C&IT should contribute to research, education and health care organization. Therefore, teaching C&IT is important for medical students, as they will be the tomorrow′s doctors. Medical schools should use all the educational possibilities of C&IT, either in the classroom or the non-classroom environment to educate students in such a way that they use this technology in their efforts at self-directed learning.

Such explosion of technology has also encouraged medical education to turn gradually to web-based instruction,[66] e-learning[67] and virtual education.[68],[69] However, for Internet education to be successful, particularly in developing countries, medical students must have access to computers and the Internet as well as positive attitudes toward this form of learning.

Challenges and implications for medical education in South-East Asia
Like other parts of the world, medical education in South-East Asia has also experienced many changes and challenges over the last few years. The countries of the region have taken initiatives with the help and support of international organizations (e.g. WHO, World bank, Overseas Development Administration, UK etc.) to reorient their medical education in order to meet the emerging community needs.[13],[14],[15],[70],[71],[72],[73],[74] The profile of the doctor has been refashioned; the curricula has been reviewed with an increased use of community as learning resource; innovative approaches to medical education, such as problem-based learning and community-oriented education have been adopted; greater flexibility has been introduced in to the educational programmes; teachers′ training on medical education has been initiated; and quality assurance, accreditation and curriculum evaluation mechanisms are being implemented. The establishment of medical education units in many medical schools and initiation of teachers′ training programmes in recent years have led to increased interest in teaching methodologies and sporadic research activities in medical education. The overall outcome is not frustrating, rather encouraging, as an "educational environment for change" is beginning to emerge in the arena of medical education.[13],[74],[75],[76]

However, the challenge ahead for improving the standard of medical education in South-East Asia is enormous and is not an easy task. Political commitment and leadership in the arena of medical education is urgently and acutely needed with provision of allocation of enough funds and resources. The following general recommendations are put forward to improve the medical education in South-East-Asia in the light of trends discussed above:

  1. The mission and objectives of medical education should be determined by priority health needs and health problems prevalent in the community. Medical education needs to be planned and implemented with full awareness of the aims and demands of the health care services including consistent integration of the sciences of medical practice.
  2. Educational programme
    • Educational principles should be student-centred with provisions for self-directed learning, early clinical contact and early contact with health care services. Design and implementation of the curriculum should demonstrate that content and balance of the curriculum and its assessment matches the explicit objectives of medical education.
    • Core curriculum encompassing the essential knowledge, skills and appropriate attitudes to be attained by the graduates should be outlined. It should be augmented by a series of special study modules, which allow students to studying depth areas of particular interest to them. The core curriculum should be system-based and integrated, to break the rigid pre-clinical/clinical and departmental boundaries. Basic science teaching should be relevant to the overall objectives of the medical course and its relevance should be clear to the students.
    • The theme of the primary health care should figure prominently in the curriculum, encompassing health promotion and disease prevention, assessment and targeting of population needs, and awareness of environmental and social factors in disease. Special emphasis should be given to priority community health needs and issues.
    • Teaching and learning methods should be consistent with medical education objectives and promote student-centred and competency-based learning, simulate analytical and problem-solving abilities, and foster life-long learning skills.
    • Use of extended learning settings, including primary care and non-medicalanalytical settings, is needed.Community-based teaching should be introduced very early and must continue throughout the educational program. Medical institutes should have access to all the clinical facilities of the entire community, at all stages of the curriculum, for placement of the students. Clinical teaching settings should be extended to rural, urban, suburban, community and private hospitals, in general practice, in community health centers and other settings which will allow students to gain the necessary clinical experiences of ambulatory care.
3. Medical schools should have policies for recruitment of quality teaching staff, staff development and review, promotion and posting.

4. Medical schools should have adequate teaching facilities and library resources to achieve objectives of the medical schools.

5. Medical colleges should have continuous and inbuilt curriculum evaluation mechanism to receive feedback from the stakeholders and to bring changes accordingly.

6. Governance and administration:

  • Medical colleges should have sufficient autonomy to be able to direct resources to achieve the overall objectives of medical education.
  • Medical, dental and nursing colleges and other health care professions should be put under the same umbrella (for, example under the faculty of health sciences) to promote multiprofessional education and ensure effective integration.
  • A suppor tive health authority and appropriate channels of communication is needed to allow problems to be addressed and new initiatives to be developed.
7. In addition to social needs, medical schools need to continuously adapt to changes in scientific, educational and health practices worldwide. Accreditation, quality Assurance and best-evidence-based medical education should be the basis for such initiatives and changes.

CONCLUSION

Change in medical education is currently a worldwide phenomenon. It is needed to prepare doctors to fulfill the expectations of society, to cope with the exponential growth of medical and scientific knowledge, to inculcate physicians′ ability for lifelong learning, to ensure mastery in information technology, and to adjust medical education to changing conditions in the health care delivery system. These trends have been introduced in the different health institutes in most of the developed countries. In South-East Asia, greater efforts are to be taken to orient teachers, trainers and planners about these trends to bring desired changes in medical education to produce need-based human resources for health in the region. However, such peadagogic shift from traditional approach to a need-based approach requires a fundamental change of the roles and commitments of educators, planners and policymakers.

REFERENCES

1.WHO. Towards the assessment of quality in medical education. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.WHO. Community-based education of health personnel: Report of a WHO Study Group. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1987.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.World Federation for Medical Education. The Edinburgh Declaration. Med Educ 1988;22:481-2.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Mediterranean Medical Meeting. Statement on Medical Education in Europe: Report of 1st Mediterranean Medical Meeting. Crete, 26 Sept 1989. Med Educ 1990;24:78-80.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Advisory Committee on Medical Training of European Community. Report and Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. Brussels: Committee of the European Communities, 1993.   Back to cited text no. 5    
6.GMC. Tomorrow's Doctors. Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Curriculum. London: General Medical Council, 1993.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Pew Health Professions Commission. Health Professions Education for the Future: Schools in Service to the Nation. San Francisco: Pew Health Professions Commission, 1993.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.WHO. Increasing the Relevance of Education for Health Professionals. WHO Technical Report Series 838. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.World Federation for Medical Education. Recommendations: World Summit on Medical Education, Edinburgh 8-12 August 1993. Med Educ 1994;28:142-9.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.BMA. Core values of the medical profession in the 21st century: Conference at the British Medical Association, 1994. Educ for Health 1996;9:9-11.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Spencer J. More of the same, only different. Med Teacher 1999;33:877-8.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Walton H. The Edinburgh Declaration: Ten years afterwards. Basic Science Educator 1999;9:3-7.   Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Abeykoon P, Mattock N. Medical Education in South-East Asia New Delhi: Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health Organisation, 1996.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Majumder MA. Today's student tomorrow's physician: Emerging challenges for undergraduate medical education. Bangladesh Med J 2003;32:84-7.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Majumder MA. Medical Education in Bangladesh: Past Successes, Future Challenges. Bangladesh Med J 2003;32:37-9.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Majumder MA. Issues and Priorities of Medical Education Research in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004;33:257-63.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
17.Harden RM, Davis MH. The core curriculum with options or special study modules. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 5. Med Teacher 1995;17:125-48.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ 1984;18:284-97.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  
19.Bligh J. Identifying the core curriculum: the Liverpool approach, Med Teacher 1995;17:383-9.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Gunzburger LK. Responses of US Paediatrics Chairs about a core curriculum. Acad Med 1994;69:853.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Association of British Neurologists. Teaching neurology in the 21st century: Suggestions from the Association of British Neurologists for the UK medical schools planning the core curriculum. Med Teacher 1995;17:5-12.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Rayner HC. A model undergraduate core curriculum in adult renal medicine. Med Teacher 1995;17:409-12.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC. Clinical experience of UK medical students. Lancet 1998;351:802-3.  Back to cited text no. 23  [PUBMED]  
24.Lowry S. What's wrong with medical education in Britain? BMJ 1992;305:1277-80.  Back to cited text no. 24  [PUBMED]  
25.Jolly BC, MacDonald MM. Education for practice: the role of practical experience in undergraduate and general clinical training. Med Educ 1989;23:189-95.  Back to cited text no. 25  [PUBMED]  
26.Prywes M. The Beer Sheva experience: Integration of medical care and medical education. Israel J Med Science 1983;19:775-9.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Habbick BF, Leeder SR. Orienting medical education to community need: a review. Med Educ 1996;30:163-71.  Back to cited text no. 27  [PUBMED]  
28.Murray E, Jinks V, Modell M. Community-based medical education: feasibility and cost. Med Educ 1995;29:66-71.  Back to cited text no. 28  [PUBMED]  
29.Oswald N, Jones S, Date J, Hinds D. Long-term community-based attachments: The Cambridge course. Med Educ 1995;29:72-6.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Barrows HS, Tamblyn R. Problem-based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer, 1980.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner-centred approach in medical education. BMJ 1999;318:1280-3.  Back to cited text no. 31  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
32.Knowles M. The adult learner: a neglected species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1990.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Regehr G, Norman GR. Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med 1996;71:988-1001.  Back to cited text no. 33  [PUBMED]  
34.Neufeld V, Barrows HS. The "McMaster Philosophy": An approach to medical education. J Med Educ 1974;49:1040.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Pallie W, Carr DH. The McMaster medical education philosophy in theory, practice and historical perspective. Med Teacher 1987;9:59-71.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Engel CE, Clarke RM. Medical Education with a difference. Programmed Learning and Educ Technology 1979;16:70-87.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Harden RM, Laidlaw JM, Ker JS, Mitchell HE. Task-based learning: an educational strategy for undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education, Part 1. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 7. Med Teacher 1996;18:7-13.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Harden RM, Laidlaw JM, Ker JS, Mitchell HE. Task-based learning: an educational strategy for undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education, Part 2. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 7. Med Teacher 1996;18:91-8.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Association of American Medical Colleges. Physicians for the 21st century: Report of the project panel on the general professional education of the physician and college preparation for medicine. J Med Educ 1984:59:1-208.  Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Bajaj JS. Multi-professional education as an essential component of effective health services. Med Educ 1994;28:86-91.   Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Harden RM. Multi-professional education: Part 1- Effective multi-professional education: a three-dimensional perspective. AMEE Guide No. 12. Med Teacher 1998; 20:402-8.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Mires GJ, Williams FL, Harden RM, Howie PW, Mccarey M, Robertson A. Multiprofessional education in undergraduate curricula can work. Med Teacher 1999;21:281-5.  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Kaufman A, Mennin S, Waterman R, Duban S, Hansbarger C, Silverblatt H, et al. The New Mexico experiment: educational innovation and institutional change. Acad Med 1989;64:285-94.  Back to cited text no. 43  [PUBMED]  
44.Clyne S. Continuing Professional Development: Perspective on CPD in Practice. London: Kogan Page, 1995.   Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Houle CO. Continuing Learning in the Professions. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1980.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Gezairy HA. The education system. Med Educ 1994;28:102-4.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.McGuire CH, Foley RP, Richards RW. Handbook of Health Professions Education. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1983.  Back to cited text no. 47    
48.Abrahamson S, Baron J, Elstein AS, Hammod WP, Holzman GB, Marlow B, et al. Continuing medical education for life: Eight principles. Acad Med 1999;74:1288-94.  Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Towle A. Cultural Thinking. The Future of Undergraduate Medical Education. London: King's Fund Centre, 1991.  Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Lowry S. Teaching the teachers. BMJ 1993;306:127-30.  Back to cited text no. 50    
51.Elton L, Partington P. Teaching Standards and Excellence in Higher Education: Developing a Culture for Quality. London: CVCP, 1991.  Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Stewart A. Report on a Consultancy at the Centre for Medical Education, Dhaka, Nov 1997. Dhaka: Further Improvement of Medical Colleges Project, 1997.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.Biggs JS, Agger SK, Dent TS, Allery JA, Coles C. Training for medical teachers: An UK survey 1993. Med Educ 1994;28:99-106.  Back to cited text no. 53    
54.Rothman AL, Poldre P, Cohen R. Evaluating clinical teachers for promotion. Acad Med 1989;116:774-5.  Back to cited text no. 54    
55.Kelley WN, Stross JK. Faculty tracts and academic success. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:654-9.   Back to cited text no. 55    
56.Lowry S. Trends in health care and their effects on medical education. BMJ 1993;306:255-8.  Back to cited text no. 56    
57.Rees L, Wass J. Undergraduate medical education. BMJ 1993;306:258-61.  Back to cited text no. 57    
58.Marandi A. Integrating medical education and health services: the Iranian experience. Med Educ 1996;30:4-8.  Back to cited text no. 58    
59.Jason H. The importance - and limits - of best evidence medical education. Educ for Health 2000;13:9-13.  Back to cited text no. 59    
60.Bligh J, Parsell G. Research in medical education: finding its place. Med Educ 1999;33:162-3.  Back to cited text no. 60    
61.Boelen C, Heck JE. Defining and measuring social accountability of medical schools. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1995.  Back to cited text no. 61    
62.Dawes M, Davies P, Gray A, Mant J, Seers K, Snowball R. Evidence-based practice. Churchill Livingstone, 1999.  Back to cited text no. 62    
63.Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart I. BEME Guide No 1: Best Evidence Medical Education. Med Teacher 1999; 21:553-62.  Back to cited text no. 63    
64.Hart I. Best evidence medical education. Med Teacher 1999;21:5.  Back to cited text no. 64    
65.Ward JP, Gordon J, Field MJ, Lehmann HP. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet 2001;357:792-6.  Back to cited text no. 65    
66.Judy M, Carol J, Peter C. Web based learning. BMJ 2003;326:870-3.  Back to cited text no. 66    
67.Klass DJ. Will e-learning improve clinical judgment? (Editorial). BMJ 2004;328:1147-8.  Back to cited text no. 67    
68.The International Virtual Medical Schools (IVIMEDS). Retrieved 22 Sept 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ivimeds.org/.  Back to cited text no. 68    
69.Majumder MA, Rahman S. Learning through Internet: Necessity not luxury! (Rapid response). BMJ. Retrieved 22 Sept 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/328/7449/1147#61039.  Back to cited text no. 69    
70.WHO. Reorientation of Medical Education: Goal, Strategies and Targets (No. 2). SEARO Regional Publications No. 18. New Delhi: World Health Organisation, Regional Office for South-East Asia, 1988.  Back to cited text no. 70    
71.WHO. Reorientation of Medical Education: Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation (No. 3). SEARO Regional Publications No. 18. New Delhi: World Health Organisation, Regional Office for South-East Asia, 1991.   Back to cited text no. 71    
72.WHO. Reorientation of Medical Education: Guidelines for developing National Plans for Action (No. 4). SEARO Regional Publications No. 18. New Delhi: World Health Organisation, Regional Office for South-East Asia, 1991.  Back to cited text no. 72    
73.WHO. Reorientation of Medical Education in South-East Asia: Review and Refinement of Strategies. Report of Regional Consultation, New Delhi, India, 5-10 Feb 1993. New Delhi: World Health Organisation, Regional Office for South-East Asia, 1993.  Back to cited text no. 73    
74.Goudar SS, Kotur PF. Trends in Medical Education. Indian J Anaesth 2003;47:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 74    
75.Khoo HE. Implementation of problem-based learning in Asian medical schools and students' perceptions of their experience. Med Educ 2003;37:401-9.  Back to cited text no. 75    
76.Majumder MA. A review of the undergraduate medical curriculum. Bangladesh Med J 2002;34:47-50.  Back to cited text no. 76    

Copyright 2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ms04065t6.jpg] [ms04065t1.jpg] [ms04065t3.jpg] [ms04065t2.jpg] [ms04065t7.jpg] [ms04065t5.jpg] [ms04065t4.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil