search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Medical Sciences
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Journal of Medical Sciences Trust
ISSN: 0019-5359 EISSN: 1998-3654
Vol. 59, Num. 4, 2005, pp. 165-170

Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 59, No. 4, April, 2005, pp. 165-170

Review Article

Pamidronate - a promising new candidate for the management of spondyloarthropathy

Department of Medicine, Seth GS and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India

Correspondence Address: S.M. Akerkar, Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Seth GS and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, India. E-mail: shashank77_2000@yahoo.com

Code Number: ms05026

Abstract

Bisphosphonate group of agents are known for their anti-bone resorptive properties. However, recently their anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritis properties have come to light. Clinical trials of their use in spondyloarthropathy are showing promising results, especially in patients with shorter disease duration. The adverse event profile is mainly limited to postinfusion arthralgia, myalgia and fever. The concept of pamidronate in spondyloarthropathy management should be evaluated further in light of these clinical studies and could have a major impact on our resource-restricted setting.

Keywords: Pamidronate, Bisphosphonates, Ankylosing spondylitis, spondyloarthropathy

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a frequently occurring chronic disease. For the past several decades, NSAIDs and physiotherapy have been the mainstay of therapy. Most NSAIDs, including the COX-2 inhibitors, are of symptomatic benefit with no disease modifying properties. Sulfasalazine has been evaluated in several trials; however, the results are not consistent. Biological agents have been a major breakthrough in the management of the disease. However, in a country like India these agents will be of limited use in view of the high costs. Hence, the concept of bisphosphonte therapy in AS is worth pursuing in view of its promising reports in western countries.

History of bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are pyrophosphate analogues and have been known to the chemists since the 19th century; the first synthesis dating back to 1865.[1] They were used in industry, mainly as corrosion inhibitors. They were known to inhibit calcium carbonate precipitation and this property led to their use in scaling.[2] This unique property was later studied both in vitro and in vivo . These studies revealed their effect on mineralization and bone resorption.[3,4] They were also found to inhibit ectopic calcification in vivo and this led to the hypothesis that local pyrophosphatases could be physiological regulators of calcification and perhaps also of decalcification.[5]

Chemical structure

Bisphosphonates are compounds characterized by two C-P bonds. The P-C-P group is resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis and hence they are not metabolized in the body and excreted unaltered. The P-C-P structure allows a great number of possible variations, mostly by changing the two lateral chains on the carbon. Small changes in the structure of the bisphosphonates can lead to extensive alterations in their physicochemical, biological, therapeutic and toxicological characteristics.

Anti-arthritic and anti-inflammatory effects

Bisphosphonates have been evaluated in various animal models of arthritis: rat adjuvant-induced polyarthritis, murine-antigen-induced arthritis and a murine model of chronic inflammation; the delayed type hypersensitivity granuloma reaction. They were found to inhibit the chronic inflammatory response associated with delayed type hypersensitivity and erosive arthritis in these animal models.[6-9] Recent work into their mechanism of action has shown that they specifically inhibit the enzyme farnesyl diphosphate synthetase in the mevalonate pathway.[10] This leads to impaired prenylation of a number of proteins that are involved in inflammatory cascade like the Ras superfamily.[11] Effect has also been noted on cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage with inhibition of growth, migration, differentiation and viability.[12,13] Exposure of the cultured macrophages to Pamidronate has been shown to suppress the generation of pro inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α.[14] This is a dose-dependent phenomenon occurring at a concentraion of 10-5 M. Although these levels are unlikely to be attained by IV Pamidronate in blood, the levels of Pamidronate in the vicinity of resorbing bone are much higher; up to 10-3.[15] Alendronate has been shown to impair the antigen presenting function of the peripheral blood monocytes.[16] Pamidronate has also been shown to retard structural damage in a TNF-α transgenic mouse model.[17]

The anti-resorptive properties can also be explained on the basis of the prenylation theory as this affects a number of proteins that ultimately leads to apoptosis of the osteoclasts.[18]

The evaluation of pamidronate in ankylosing arthritis was prompted by the observation that bisphosphonates reduce chronic inflammation and pathological mineralization in animal models of arthritis. [19,20]

Trials of pamidronate in spondyloarthropathy

In Edmonton, anti-inflammatory properties of pamidronate were evaluated in 16 patients with NSAID refractory active AS.[21] Sixteen patients with mean disease duration of 12.3 years were randomized to two equal groups. One group received six infusions per month; 30 mg for the first 3 months and 60 mg for the next 3 months while the other group received 60 g per month for 3 months only. An amount of 30-60 mg dose was used in view of the previous experience with this dose in Paget′s disease and osteoporosis. Clinical outcome measures included the BASDAI for measurement of disease severity, BASFI for measurement of functional impairment, and BASMI for measurement of spinal mobility. Group 1 showed significant improvements in BASDAI and BASMI scores (P <0.03 for both) and in the ESR (P =0.009). Group 2 showed a significant improvement only in the BASMI (P =0.007), with no significant change in BASDAI score or ESR. Five out of the seven patients of group 1 had reductions of the BASDAI score of more than 30% and it persisted for at least 3 months posttreatment. Maximum change in clinical parameters and ESR was observed in the 3-6 month period. Thus, the trial indicated delayed but long lasting and significant effects of pamidronate in NSAID refractory AS.

A second preliminary open study[22] assessed an intensive regime of Pamidronate (60 mg pamidronate at 1, 2, 14, 28 and 56 days). Nine patients with NSAID refractory peripheral SpA (5-AS, 3-undifferentiated SpA and 1-reactive arthritis) with mean disease duration of 5.5 years were included. Patients were assessed up to 84 days. The study found significant improvement in all clinical and laboratory parameters. The mean BASDAI decreased by 44.2% (P =0.028), mean BASFI by 47% (P =0.015), mean BASGI by 42% (P =0.011), mean ESR by 49.4% and CRP by 66.9%. Additional benefit was also seen in peripheral joints with a decrease in mean tender and swollen joint count by 98.2% (P =0.012) and 93.8% (P =0.017), respectively. Dynamic MR imaging with Gadolinium enhancement was also carried out in these patients at baseline and at posttreatment. Maximal rate and magnitude of the MR signal after Gadolinium enhancement was found to decrease in these patients thus implying the effect on bone marrow edema.

A placebo-controlled trial of pamidronate is not feasible due to the high incidence of posttransfusion (after the first dose) arthralgias and myalgias; thus compromising blinding. An amount of 10 mg dose is the lowest dose of IV pamidronate that has been shown to induce postinfusion arthralgias and myalgias. Hence a randomized, double blind trial[23] comparing 60 mg vs 10 mg IV pamidronate was conducted. This was also the biggest trial with 84 NSAID refractory AS patients. Seventy-two completed the 6 months therapy. Significant changes in BASFI, BASDAI and BASGI was evident at 6 months (the same were found to be insignificant at 3 months). At 6 months, the mean BASDAI had decreased by 2.22 (34.5%) in the 60 mg group and by 0.93 (15%) in the 10 mg group. Significantly greater reductions in the 60 mg group were also noted for the BASFI (P <0.01), BASGI (P =0.01) and BASMI (P =0.03). Significantly more patients achieved a reduction of >25% in the BASDAI in the 60 mg group vs the 10 mg group (63.4% vs 30.2%; P =0.004).

An open observational study with 12 active AS patients with mean disease duration of 20 years by Haibel et al.[24] found a significant reduction in the BASDAI (P =0.04), physician and patient global assessment at 3 months. An ASAS 20% response was seen in 2 of 11 patients at the end of 3 months and four of nine patients at the end of 6 months.

Cairns et al.[25] evaluated the bone markers in patients with AS on Pamidronate. Six infusions per month were given; 30 mg being the starting dose followed by 60 mg. Fifteen patients with mean disease duration of 14.8 years participated in the study. The study revealed a significant fall in degradation products of type-I collagen C-terminal telopeptides (P =0.001), Serum bone GLA protein (P =0.02), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (P =0.02). Significant improvement was seen in the BASDAI score; but not in BASMI, CRP or ESR.

Adverse event profile

Most common adverse event reported after IV pamidronate is flu-like syndrome with fever spike, arthralgias and myalgia. These are largely limited to the first infusion. Another study reported transient arthralgias/myalgias after the first infusion in 68.3% patients.[23] The adverse events are independent of the dose and are seen irrespective of whether the first dose is 30 or 60 mg.[26] Prolonged hypocalcaemia is a known but a rare complication of pamidronate infusion.[27]

Conclusions

Pamidronate seems to be a potential agent in the management of spondyloarthropathy. This should be viewed in light of the fact that there are very few options in the management of spondyloarthropathies; with TNF-α inhibitors being out of reach of a majority of the population. The disease duration at the start of therapy does seem to affect the outcome of therapy. Postinfusion myalgia, arthralgia, and fever are the commonest adverse effects and are independent of the dose of first infusion. Although disease activity shows an early improvement, a significant improvement in inflammatory markers lags behind the clinical response. Clinical trials with a longer duration should provide significant inputs towards further clinical use of this agent.

References

1.Menschutkin N. Ueber die Einwirkung des Chlorazetyls auf phosphorige Sδure. Ann Chem Pharm 1865;133:317-20.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Blomen LJMJ. History of the bisphosphonates: discovery and history of the non-medical uses of bisphosphonates. In : Bijvoet OLM, Fleisch HA, Canfield RE, Russell RGG, editors. Bisphosponate on bones. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1995. p. 111-24.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Fleisch H, Russell RGG, Francis MD. Diphosphonates inhibit hydroxyapatite dissolution in vitro and bone resorption in tissue culture and in vivo . Science (Wash, DC) 1969;165:1262-4.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Francis MD, Russell RGG, Fleisch H. Diphosphonates inhibit formation of calcium phosphate crystals in vitro and pathological calcification in vivo . Science (Wash, DC) 1969;165:1264-6.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Fleisch H, Russell RGG, Straumann F. Effect of pyrophosphate on hydroxyapatite and its implications in calcium homeostasis. Nature 1966;212:901-3.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Dunn CJ, Galinet LA, Wu H, Nugent RA, Schlachter ST, Staite ND, et al. Demonstration of novel anti-arthritic and anti-inflammatory effects of diphosphonates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993;266:1691-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Nugent RA, Schlachter ST, Murphy M, Dunn CJ, Staite ND, Galinet LA, et al. Carbonyl-containing bisphosphonate esters as novel anti-inflammatory and antiarthritic agents. J Med Chem 1994;37:4449-54.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Schlachter ST, Galinet LA, Shields SK, Aspar DG, Dunn CJ, Staite ND, et al. Anti-inflammatory/antiarthritic ketonic bisphosphonic acid esters. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 1998;8:1093-6.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Nugent RA, Murphy M, Schlachter ST, Dunn CJ, Smith RJ, Staite ND, et al. Pyrazoline bisphosphonate esters as novel anti-inflammatory and antiarthritic agents. J Med Chem 1993;36:134-9.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  
10.Van Beek E, Pieterman E, Cohen L, Lowik C, Papapoulos S. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase is the molecular target of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999;264:108-11.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.Khwaja A, Conolly J, Hendry B. Prenylation inhibitors in renal disease. Lancet 2000;355:741-4.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Cecchini MG, Fleisch H. Bisphosphonates in vitro specifically inhibit, among the hematopoietic series, the development of the mouse mononuclear phagocyte lineage. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:1019-27.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  
13.Stevenson PH, Stevenson JR. Cytotoxic and migration inhibitory effects of bisphosphonates on macrophages. Calcif Tissue Int 1986;38:227-33.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  
14.Pennanen N, Lapinjoki S, Urti A, Monkkonen J. Effect of liposomal and free bisphosphonates on the IL-10, IL-6 and TNF alpha secretion from RAW 264 cells in vitro . Pharm Res 1995;12:916-22.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Sato M, Graser W. Effects of bisphosphonates on isolated rat osteoclasts as examined by reflected light microscopy. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:31-40.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Sansoni P, Passeri G, Fagnoni F, Mohagheghpour N, Snelli G, Brianti V, et al. Inhibition of antigen-presenting cell function by alendronate in vitro . J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1719-25.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  
17.Redlich K, Hayer S, Maier A, et al. Tumor necrosis factor a-mediated joint destruction is inhibited by targeting osteoclasts with osteoprotegerin. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:785-92.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
18.Luckman SP, Hughes DE, Coxon FP, Russell G, Rogers MJ. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates inhibit the mevalonate pathway and prevent post-translational prenylation of GTP-binding proteins, including Ras. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:581-9.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Francis MD, Hovancik K, Boyce RW. NE-58095: a diphosphonate which prevents bone erosion and preserves joint architecture in experimental arthritis. Int J Tissue React 1989;11:239-52.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  
20.Flora L. Comparative antiinflammatory and bone protective effects of two diphosphonates in adjuvant arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1979;22:340-6.  Back to cited text no. 20  [PUBMED]  
21.Maksymowych WP, Jhangri GS, Leclercq S, Skeith K, Yan A, Russell AS. An open study of pamidronate in the treatment of refractory ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1998;25:714-7.  Back to cited text no. 21  [PUBMED]  
22.Maksymowych WP, Lambert R, Jhangri GS, Leclercq S, Chiu P, Wong B, et al. Clinical and radiological amelioration of refractory peripheral spondyloarthritis by pulse intravenous pamidronate therapy. J Rheumatol 2001;28:144-55.  Back to cited text no. 22  [PUBMED]  
23.Maksymowych WP, Jhangri GS, Fitzgerald AA. A six-month randomized, controlled, double-blind, dose-response comparison of intravenous pamidronate (60 mg versus 10 mg) in the treatment of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-refractory ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:766-73.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Haibel H, Brandt J, Rudwaleit M, Soerensen H, Sieper J, Braun J. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with pamidronate. Rheumatology 2003;42:1018-20.  Back to cited text no. 24  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
25.Cairns AP, Wright SA, Taggart AJ, et al. An open study of pulse pamidronate treatment in severe ankylosing spondylitis, and its effect on biochemical markers of bone turnover. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:338-9.  Back to cited text no. 25  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
26.Buckler HM, Mercer SJ, Davison CE, et al. Evaluation of adverse experiences related to pamidronate infusion in Paget's disease of bone. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:572.  Back to cited text no. 26  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
27.Singh R, Menon Y, Cuchacovich R, et al. A six-month randomized, controlled, double-blind, dose-response comparison of intravenous pamidronate (60 mg versus 10 mg) in the treatment of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-refractory ankylosing spondylitis: comment on the article by Maksymowych et al. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:583-4.  Back to cited text no. 27  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]

Copyright 2005 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil