search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Medical Sciences
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Journal of Medical Sciences Trust
ISSN: 0019-5359 EISSN: 1998-3654
Vol. 59, Num. 9, 2005, pp. 407-417

Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 59, No. 9, September, 2005, pp. 407-417

Practitioners section

Genetics of mental retardation

Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff
Correspondence Address:Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, ahujaas@cardiff.ac.uk

Code Number: ms05063

ABSTRACT

Mental retardation can follow any of the biological, environmental and psychological events that are capable of producing deficits in cognitive functions. Recent advances in molecular genetic techniques have enabled us to understand more about the molecular basis of several genetic syndromes associated with mental retardation. In contrast, where there is no discrete cause, the interplay of genetic and environmental influences remains poorly understood. This article presents a critical review of literature on genetics of mental retardation.

Keywords: chromosomal abnormalities; genetic; mental retardation; X-linked

Mental retardation is characterized by significantly below average intellectual functioning existing concurrently with related impaired limitations in two or more of the following applicable adaptive skills areas: communication, self-care, home living, social skills, community use, self-direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work, manifest before the age of 18.[1] The term mental retardation is not in itself a diagnosis, as it does not inform about aetiology, prognosis, or specific treatments. Rather, it refers to a clinical state that is developmental in origin and which affects intellectual and social functioning.

Early literature made a distinction between ′pathological′ severe mental retardation (SMR) and ′familial′ (usually mild) mental retardation. More recently it has been customary to divide it into two groups according to IQ. Those who show IQ scores between 50 and 70 are categorized as having mild mental retardation (MMR) and those with IQ scores of below 50 are considered as having moderate-severe mental retardation (SMR).′

The impact of molecular genetics on our understanding of disease processes has been enormous and is likely to increase even further. The resurgence of interest in phenotypes combined with the new genetic techniques has reduced the proportion of those with moderate/severe mental retardation in whom the cause is unknown to 20%. Genetic causes may be hereditary or nonhereditary and may not produce specific syndromes. Over 500 recognized syndromes involving a genetic disorder have now been isolated and many have behavioural epiphenomena.[2] A specific cause for mental retardation can be identified in approximately 80% of people with SMR (IQ<50) and 50% of people with MMR (IQ 50-70).

In this article, we will begin by considering what is known about the genetics of idiopathic mental retardation and then move onto discuss specific genetic causes of mental retardation.

Search methodology
Electronic searching was done and the relevant studies were identified by searching Medline, ClinPSYC, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and The Cochrane library using the keywords: mental retardation, genetics, learning disability, chromosomal abnormalities, single-gene defect and X-linked mental retardation. The references cited in the above studies were also searched in order to identify more studies. Also high yield journals related to the topic were identified and were hand searched for relevant articles.

Idiopathic mental retardation

Idiopathic mental retardation refers to individuals who show no evidence of gross chromosomal defects or single-gene anomalies. It is sometimes considered as representing the lower end of the IQ distribution. IQ scores have been shown to have an average weighted correlation of 0.86 for monozygotic twins and 0.61 for dizygotic twins and an average correlation between first-degree relatives of 0.4, suggesting an overall heritability of 50%.[3] A recent study found twin concordances for mild mental impairment was 74% for monozygotic twins, 45% for same-sex and 36% for opposite sex dizygotic twins with a group heritability of 0.49.[4] The aetiology of idiopathic mental retardation is usually explained in terms of the ′polygenic multifactorial model.′ The difficulty is that there are too few studies to provide sufficiently precise estimates of the likely role of genes and environment in determining idiopathic mental retardation. Given the dearth of published literature we are reliant on attempting to draw conclusions from family and twin studies, most of which are very old and which report widely varying recurrence risks.[5] Recent studies of MMR have shown high rates of chromosomal abnormalities and this raises the possibility that a proportion of individuals with idiopathic mental retardation may have undetected or unknown chromosomal aberrations or single-gene defects. Further advances in molecular genetics may find idiopathic mental retardation to be an aetiologically heterogeneous group with some individuals showing retardation secondary to specific genetic causes, others because of environmental effects and the remainder due to multifactorial causes.

Single-gene defects

Single-gene defects account for only a small proportion of mental retardation and are more likely to be seen in individuals with SMR. These are well-recognized Mendelian conditions and are characterized by autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant or X-linked patterns of inheritance. Many single-gene disorders are syndromic. Syndrome recognition facilitates diagnosis and has allowed discrete phenotypes to be delineated. It may be aided by the reference to a dysmorphology database such as the London Dysmorphology Database-LDDB (http://dhmhd.mdx.ac.uk LDDB.html). The second database is the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man-OMIM (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/). Another large group of single-gene disorders causing mental retardation is the in-born errors of metabolism, which have been well documented by Scriver et al.[6] In some circumstances, different mutations occurring within the same gene may cause different clinical phenotypes, depending on how the mutation affects the production and function of protein involved. This phenomenon is known as allelic heterogeneity. The majority of inborn errors of metabolism follow an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, with some notable exceptions, e.g. Hunter syndrome.

[Table - 1] describes some of the common single-gene defect disorders causing mental retardation.

X-linked mental retardation
X-linked disorders are due to germline mutations in genes on the X-chromosome and characteristically affect males. Carrier women usually have few, if any, manifestations. The large contribution of X-linked genes to mental retardation is striking and estimated to occur in about 1 in 600 male births. Many X-linked conditions with characteristic phenotypes are associated with mental retardation [Table - 2]. There are also a considerable number of X-linked nonsyndromic mental retardation syndromes, where certain clinical phenotypic features are associated with learning difficulties.[7] Over 200 heritable X-linked disorders associated with mental retardation are known and almost a third of these fall into the category of nonspecific XLMR, with no other features present apart from mental retardation.[8] The commonest cause of XLMR is the Fragile X syndrome. Manifesting females have been described in several of the XLMR disorders. In some conditions, such as Coffin-Lowry syndrome,[9] females always manifest, whereas in other disorders, carrier females are usually phenotypically normal but may occasionally manifest symptoms as a result of altered Lyonization[10] or the presence of an X-autosome translocation. In the latter case, the breakpoint on the X-chromosome affects the function of the XLMR gene concerned. Some forms of XLMR, which follow an X-linked dominant pattern of inheritance, affect females exclusively and usually, lead to lethality in males. Perhaps the best example of such a disorder is Rett syndrome, a neurodevelopmental disorder that occurs almost exclusively in females.

Fragile X syndrome

Fragile X syndrome is the most common inherited cause of mental retardation and originally derived its name from the characteristic nonstaining band or fragile site on the X-chromosome. It affects approximately 1 in 4425 to 6045 males and causes mental retardation in 1 in 8000 females. This syndrome accounts for half of all the X-linked mental retardation cases and around 0.6% of the population who show mental retardation. The mean IQ scores in Fragile X males seems to decline with increasing age, a phenomenon also described in people with Down syndrome.[11] A curvilinear relationship exists between the length of CGG repeat (the mutation) and the level of intelligence in Fragile X adults.[12]

In normal individuals between 6 and 54 CGG repeats are expected with an average of 30 repeats. The mutation for Fragile X is a heritable unstable sequence of trinucleotide CGG repeats ranging from 230 to over 1000.[13],[14] The full mutation, when the repeat sequence reaches a critical length of about 200 copies, is associated with hypermethylation of the repeat and adjacent region. This results in the failure of FMR1 transcription and an absence of the FMR1 gene protein product (FMRP), which is responsible for the characteristic clinical features of fragile X syndrome.[15] ′Anticipation′occurs when premutations often expand to full mutations while transmitted by female carriers and the clinical severity of the disease increases with each successive generation. A milder form of mental retardation expressed as FRAXE occurs by FMR-2 mutation.[16]

The key clinical characteristics of fragile X syndrome are mental retardation, large ears and a long face and macro-orchidism. In some adults, there is a characteristic facial appearance, with a large forehead with supra orbital fullness, long face, long nose, prominent jaws, high-arched palate and large ears with a bat-eared appearance. Eye abnormalities such as pale irises may be a subtle finding in some cases.[17] Epilepsy is reported in about 25% of the cases.

Many affected individuals show higher rates of speech and language problems, attentional difficulties and hyperactivity and autistic-like features such as gaze avoidance and hand flapping.[18],[19] The observation of this type of behavioural phenotype in conjunction with early reports of increased rates of Fragile X in autism led to interest in the relationship between Fragile X and autism.

Chromosomal abnormalities

Chromosomal abnormalities account for 35-40% of SMR and 10% of MMR.[20],[21] Chromosomal aneusomies (loss or excess of chromosomal material) cause a gene dosage difference for a large number of genes and the phenotypic effect is pleiotropic; therefore, they always cause syndromes of multiple congenital anomalies and mental retardation.[22] The commonest autosomal abnormalities are trisomies, particularly involving chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 and these are all associated with increased maternal age. The most common aneusomy in live newborns is trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), which is invariably associated with mental retardation. Almost all chromosomal aneuploidies, which involve an alteration in the amount of chromosome material, are associated with mental retardation. It is not certain whether this is due to dosage effects of specific genes within the duplicated or deleted segments, or to a more general effect of aneuploidy per se. It is certainly true that individuals with chromosomal aneuploidy share some nonspecific features in common such as poor growth, microcephaly, epicanthic folds and unusual palmar creases, in addition to features more specific to the chromosomes involved.

Some chromosome abnormalities occur in the mosaic form (where some cells show the normal 46 chromosomes and others have an extra chromosome) and for disorders, which are usually seen in the full form, mosaicism will confer a milder phenotype. However, there are some conditions, which are lethal in the full form and are therefore found only in the mosaic form in surviving individuals. The common chromosomal abnormalities associated with mental retardation are summarized in [Table - 3].

Down syndrome

It is the most common cause of mental retardation and affects approximately 1 in 1000 live births. The incidence rises with advancing maternal age at the time of conception. Approximately 94% of the cases are caused by trisomy 21, 3.5% by translocation and 2.5% by mosaicism. The majority of individuals have moderate to SMR and some of those with a milder phenotype have been shown to have a mosaic karyotype. The critical region for the Down syndrome phenotype is in the region of bands 21q21.3-21q22.[23]

Those with Down syndrome have characteristic clinical features including short stature, round skull, brachycephaly, neonatal hypotonia, a flat occiput, flat facial profile, small simply formed ears, protrusion of the tongue, high arched palate and typical eye signs (e.g. mongoloid slope of the palpebral fissures, epicanthic fold, Brushfield spots, premature cataracts, myopia, nystagmus, strabismus, etc.). Common abnormalities seen in the limbs include a single-palmar crease (simian crease), incurved fifth fingers, syndactyly (webbed fingers) and a wide gap between the first and second toes (sandal gap). Congenital heart defects (e.g. atrial or ventricular septal defect, mitral valve prolapse, patent ductus arteriosus) occur in 40% of infants and are a common cause of death. There is predisposition to Hirschprung′s disease, hypothyroidism and leukaemia and the early onset of Alzheimer′s disease.

Microdeletion syndromes

Recent advances in cytogenetic analysis techniques such as high resolution chromosome banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) together with microsatellite analysis[24],[25] have enabled the detection of increasingly small chromosomal abnormalities. The microdeletions are usually small- (4 kb) or less- and encompass multiple genes, which may all contribute to the phenotype. Those microdeletions, which are observed most commonly, tend to have similar breakpoints, occurring in regions of the chromosome where there is a repetitive DNA sequence.

Di George syndrome (velocardiofacial syndrome)
It is the commonest microdeletion syndrome and involves a deletion of chromosome 22q11. It has an estimated incidence of 1 in 5000. Multiple anomalies are seen including a cleft palate, velo-pharyngeal insufficiency (causing feeding difficulties), hypocalcaemia and immunodeficiency.[26] Cardiac malformations described are ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, interrupted aortic arch, pulmonary atresia and truncus arteriosus.[27] Hypotonia is present in half of the patients. Relatively slender hands with hypotonic and hyperextensible fingers are not uncommon. The facies are dysmorphic with a broad nasal bridge, narrow alae nasae that are often notched, small mouth and chin and overfolded helices. The features vary considerably from person to person, with the speech and swallowing difficulties being the most consistent features. There is an excess of psychotic disorders in these individuals. The most recent study found that more than one quarter fulfilled diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia.[28] Although language and motor developmental delay and persistent co-ordination deficits are common, intelligence is usually in the normal range.

Prader-Willi syndrome

The region of chromosome 15q11-13 is subject to the phenomenon known as genomic imprinting. The genetic information of maternal and paternal origin is manifested differently in this region. The individuals who have a microdeletion of 15q11-13 manifest different characteristics depending on whether the deletion is maternal or paternal in origin. A paternal deletion gives rise to features of the Prader-Willi syndrome[29] and a maternal deletion gives rise to features of Angelman syndrome.[30] These conditions can also arise from maternal and paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 15 leading to Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome, respectively.

Prader-Willi syndrome is also known as HHHO (H, hypotonia; H, hypogonadism; H, hypomentia; O, obesity). It is a rare condition with a prevalence of 1.2-1.3 per 10 000. It is characterized by neonatal hypotonia, hyperphagia (over eating), obesity, hypogonadism, short stature and mild to moderate mental retardation. Feeding difficulties such as absence of swallowing and sucking reflexes are common in the initial stages. The hands and feet are often small and the facies are distinctive, with bitemporal narrowing and almond-shaped palpebral fissures.

Abnormalities in speech, sleep and behaviour are common. A remarkable area of cognitive strength is their visual-spatial integration as they may show unusual skill with jigsaw puzzles.[31] Temper tantrums, self-injurious behaviour particularly in the form of skin picking and obsessional behaviour are frequently observed.[32]

Angelman syndrome

A deletion in the maternally derived long arm of chromosome 15 (q11-q13) will give rise to the symptoms of Angelman syndrome. It is also known as the ′happy puppet syndrome′.[30] It affects between 1 in 20 000 and 1 in 30 000 people and is characterized by ataxia, jerky limb movements and abnormal gait, absent speech and SMR. Typical facial features consist of a long face and prominent jaw, a wide mouth with widely spaced teeth, thin upper lip, mid facial hypoplasia, deep set blue eyes, blonde hair and microcephaly. Other characteristic features include epilepsy (about 86%) and/or an abnormal EEG, inappropriate bouts of laughter, tongue thrusting movement, mouthing behaviour and a happy, social disposition.

Sex chromosome anomalies

Abnormalities in the number of sex chromosomes are generally less devastating in their effects than aneuploidies in the autosomes. Sex chromosome anomalies occur in roughly 1 in 400 live births.[33] These abnormalities cause mild decreases in IQ (5-15 points) in relation to the family′s mean IQ. These anomalies are commonly due to chromosomal nondisjunction, the risk of which increases with maternal age. The most common include Turner′s syndrome (45,XO), Klinefelter′s syndrome (47XXY) and the 47XXX and 47 XYY karyotypes. All four are associated with a slight decrease in IQ, as evidenced by comparison with siblings and by their higher frequency in mentally retarded populations.[34]

Turner′s syndrome

Turner′s syndrome affects 1 in 2000 to 1 in 5000 females. It is characterized by the complete or partial absence of one X-chromosome (45XO). The clinical features include short stature, a webbed neck, increased carrying angle of the elbow, failure to develop secondary sexual characteristics and visuo-spatial deficits. Interesting recent data suggest the X-chromosome might also play an important role for other sorts of cognitive skills, which facilitate social interaction. Girls tend to show superior levels of skills such as the ability to respond to cues in the behaviour of others, to inhibit distractions and to develop strategies of action compared with boys. Females affected by Turner′s syndrome, whose X-chromosome is of maternal origin show poorer social cognitive skills than those who possess a paternally derived X-chromosome.[35]

Klinefelter′s syndrome

Klinefelter′s syndrome (47XXY) affects approximately 1 in 1000 males. In about two-thirds of cases the anomaly is due to maternal nondisjunction and is nonfamilial.[36] These individuals have high rates of speech and language disorders (Ratcliffe 1994). It was originally thought that affected individuals showed increased rates of mental retardation, psychiatric disorder and criminality. However early studies of the XXY behavioural phenotype were based on highly selected samples of those who had been institutionalised,[37] and it is now recognized that the majority who possess this karyotype are of normal intelligence and show no increased rates of behavioural psychiatric difficulties.[38],[39]

Conclusions

Recent advances in identifying previously undetected sub-microscopic chromosomal anomalies have proven to be successful. They highlight the fact that many cases of idiopathic mental retardation may have specific aetiologies, which may not yet be discovered. Given the increased interest in studying behavioural phenotypes associated with some of these conditions, it is hoped that the localization of specific genes and the identification of genes within critical chromosomal regions might pave the way for understanding more about the genetic basis of behaviour and psychiatric disorders.

The challenge for the future is to unravel the complex interaction between genes and environment using well-designed twin and adoption studies as well as molecular genetic strategies so as to determine the extent to which genes and environment contribute, co-act and interact in determining intelligence. Such research will contribute in planning appropriate interventions.

REFERENCES

1.American Association on Mental Retardation. Mental retardation: definition, classification and system of support. In : American Association of Mental Retardation, 9th Ed, Washington, DC: 1992.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Thapar A, Clayton-Smith J. Genetics of mental retardation . In : McGuffin, et al eds. Psychiatric Genetics & Genomics: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 113-29.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Thapar A, Gottesman II, Owen MJ, O' Donovan MC, McGuffin P. The genetics of mental retardation. Br J Psychiatr 1994;164:747-59.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Spinath FM, Harlaar N, Ronald A, Plomin R. Substantial genetic influence on mild mental impairment in early childhood. Am J Mental Retard 2004;109:34-43.   Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Crow YJ, Tolmie JL Recurrence risks in mental retardation. Journal of Medical Genetics 1998;35:177-82.   Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Valle D, Sly WS, Vogelstein B, Childs B, et al In : Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease, 7th Ed. McGraw Hill: New York; 1995.   Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Stevenson RE, Schwartz CE, Arena JF, Lubs HA. X-linked mental retardation: the early era from 1943-1969. Am J Med Gen 1994;51:538-41.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Chiurazzi P, Hamel BC, Neri G. XLMR genes: update 2000. Europ J Hum Gen 2001;9:71-81.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Young ID, Syndrome of the month: The Coffin-Lowry Syndrome. J Med Gen 1988;25:344-8.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Lyon MF. Epigenetic in mammals. Trends Gene 1993;9:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  
11.Devenny DA, Silverman WP, Hill AL, Jenkins E, Sersen EA, Wisniewski KE. Normal ageing in adults with Downs syndrome. J Intellect Dis Res 1996;40:208-21.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  
12.Loesch DZ, Huggins R, Hay DA, Gedeon AK, Mulley, C, Sutherland GR. Genotype-phenotype relationship in fragile-X syndrome; a family study. Am J Hum Gen 1993;53:1064-73.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Oberle I, Rousseau F, Heitz D, Kretz C, Devys D, Hanauer A, et al Instability of a 550 base pair DNA segment and abnormal methylation in fragile X syndrome. Science 1991;252:1097-102.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Yu S, Pritchard M, Kremer E, Lynch M, Nancarrow J, Baker E, et al Fragile X genotype characterized by an unstable region of DNA. Science 1991;252:1179-81.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Feng Y. Fragile X mental retardation: misregualtion of protein synthesis in the developing brain? Microscop Res Tech 2002;57:145-7.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
16.Flint J, Wilkie AO. The genetics of mental retardation. Br Med Bull 1996;52:453-64.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  
17.Turk J. The fragile-X syndrome: on the way to a behavioural phenotype. Br J Psychiatr 1992;160:24-35.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  
18.Hagerman RJ, Sobesky WE. Psychopathology in fragile X syndrome. Am J Orthopsychiatr 1989;59:142-52.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  
19.Brown WT, Jenkins E, Neri G, Lubs H, Shapiro LR, Davies KE, et al Conference report: Fourth International Workshop on the fragile X and X-linked mental retardation. Am J Med Gene 1991;38:158-72.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Bundey S, Thake A, Todd J. The recurrence risks for mild idiopathic mild mental retardation. J Med Gene 1989;26:260-6.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Raynham H, Gibbons R, Flint J, Higgs D. The genetic basis for mental retardation. QJM 1996;89:169-75.   Back to cited text no. 21  [PUBMED]  
22.Chiurazzi P, Oostra BA. Genetics of mental retardation. Curr Opin Paediatr 2000;12:529-35.  Back to cited text no. 22  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
23.Epstein CJ, Korenberg JR, Anneren G, Antonarakis SE, Ayme S, Courchesne E, et al. Protocols to establish genotype-phenotype co-relations in Down syndrome. Am J Hum Gene 1991;49:207-35.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Trask BJ. Fluorescent in situ hybridization: applications in cytogenetics and gene mapping. Trend Gene 1991;7:149-54.  Back to cited text no. 24  [PUBMED]  
25.Strachan T, Read AP. Genetic mapping. In : Human Molecular Genetics, 2nd Ed. Bios Scientific Publishers: Oxfordshire; 1996.   Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Wang PP, Woodin MF, Kreps-Falk R, Moss EM. Research on behavioural phenotypes: velocardiofacial syndrome (deletion 22q11.2). Develop Med Child Neurol 2000;42:422-7.   Back to cited text no. 26  [PUBMED]  
27.Vantrappen G, Devriendt K, Swillen A, Rommel N, Vogels A, Eyskens B, et al. Presenting symptoms and clinical features in 130 patients with velo-cardio-facial syndrome: the Leuven experience. Gene Counsell 1999;10:3-9.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Murphy KC, Jones LA, Owen MJ. High rates of schizophrenia in adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatr 1999;56:940-5.  Back to cited text no. 28  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
29.Cassidy SB. Prader-Willi Syndrome. J Med Gene 1997;34:917-23.  Back to cited text no. 29  [PUBMED]  
30.Angelman H. Puppet children . Develop Med Child Neurol 1965;7:681-8.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Dykens EM, Hodapp RM, Walsh K, Nash LJ. Profiles, correlates and trajectories of intelligence in individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiatr 1992;31:1125-30.  Back to cited text no. 31  [PUBMED]  
32.Einfield SL, Smith A, Durvasula S, Florio T, Tonge BJ. Behaviour and emotional disturbance in Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Gene 1999;82:123-7.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Simonoff E, Bolton P, Rutter M. Mental retardation: genetic findings, clinical implications and research agenda. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 1996;37:259-80.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.de la Chapelle A. Sex chromosome abnormalities. In : Emery AEH, Rimoin DL, eds. Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1990. p. 273-300.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Skuse D, James RS, Bishop DV, Coppin B, Dalton P, Aamodt-Leeper G, et al. Evidence from Turner's syndrome of an imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function. Nature 1997;387:705-8.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Sanger R, Tippett P, Gavin J, Teesdale P, Daniels GL. Xg groups and sex chromosome abnormalities in people of northern European ancestry: an addendum. J Med Gene 1977;14:210-1.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Hook EB. Behavioural implications of the human XYY genotype. Science 1973;179:139-79.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Stewart DA, Netley CT, Park E. Summary of clinical findings of children with 47XXY, 47XYY and 47XXX karyotypes. In : Stewart DA, editor. Birth Defects: Original Article Series, Alan Liss Inc: New York; 1982.   Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Mandoki MW, Sumner GS, Hoffman RP, Riconda DL. A review of Klinefelter's syndrome in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiatr 1991;30:167-72.  Back to cited text no. 39    

Copyright 2005 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ms05063t2.jpg] [ms05063t1.jpg] [ms05063t3.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil