|
Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 60, No. 12, December, 2006, pp. 506-513 Original Contributions Newborn care practices in an urban slum of Delhi Rahi Manju, Taneja DK, Misra Amrita, Mathur NB, Badhan Suresh Department of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College - 110 002 Code Number: ms06075 Abstract BACKGROUND: Despite efforts by government and other agencies, neonatal morbidity and mortality continues to be high in India. Among other reasons, newborn care practices are major contributors for such high rates. Keywords: Home deliveries, newborn care, slum Over the last three decades, the annual number of deaths among children less than 5 years old has decreased by almost a third. Although infant mortality has fallen in many developing countries over the past two decades, the rate of fall is slowing. One reason is the contribution of neonatal mortality, which has remained fairly steady over this period. As neonatal mortality contributes to over 64% of infant deaths in India,[1] interventions to improve child survival must address the neonatal period. The World Health Organization guidelines for essential newborn care encompass cleanliness, thermal protection, initiation of breathing, early and exclusive breast feeding, eye care, immunization, management of illness and care of low birth weight infants.[2] The current study was carried out to assess how far these guidelines are being implemented in an urban slum of Delhi. Study area The present study was carried out in an urban resettlement colony (a type of slum) situated in East Delhi, associated with Urban Health Centre of a medical college, from April to June 2005. The population in the area, as in all slums, is characterized by low-income group and a large section being migrant from other states and utilization of health facilities provided by qualified personnel is poor in this group . Since slums are known to have population with poor living standards, unhealthy behavior and practices, therefore the choice of the slum area, for the present study. Materials and Methods All live births during this period, in the service area were followed up. Mothers of 82 neonates were interviewed within 1 week of birth using a semi-structured, pre-tested schedule containing both open-ended and close-ended questions pertaining to place and mode of delivery, care at birth, cord care, breast feeding practices and immunization. Statistical analysis Data were analyzed using Epi - info version 6.04. Fischer exact test and χ 2 test were applied wherever applicable to find out significant difference between comparable groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Socio-demographic characteristics The study population consisted mostly of Hindus (77, 93.9%). Joint family system was the pre-dominant type (62, 75.6%) and nuclear families accounted for 24.4% (20). Most mothers were educated up to primary level (33, 40.2%), followed by senior secondary (28, 34.1%) and graduate and above (5, 6.1%). Just literate and illiterate constituted 6.1% (5) and 13.4% (11) respectively. Place of delivery, person conducting and mode of delivery Home deliveries (46) were more common (56.1%) as compared to institutional deliveries (36, 43.9%). Home deliveries were conducted by dais (24, 91.3%) or by relatives (4, 8.7%). Most of the deliveries (80, 90.2%) were normal vaginal deliveries and only 2 (9.8%) were caesarian sections. Most of the babies (81, 98.8%) cried immediately after birth while 1 (1.2%) failed to do so. Newborn care Cleaning the baby Bathing the newborn immediately after birth seemed to be a common practice as a large section (38, 82.6%) of home delivered newborns were given a bath after birth. Clearing the respiratory passage Air passage was cleaned by using a finger in 29 (63%) of home deliveries and in 14 (30.4%) air passages were not cleaned at all. Eye care Eyes of the newborns were cleaned (wiped) by unsterile cloth or cotton in 14 (30.4%) of home deliveries and by boiled and different cotton swabs for each eye in 1 (2.2%) case, whereas in 15 (32.6%) of home delivered newborns, eyes were not cleaned at all. Birth weight Of the home delivered babies, 18 (39.1%) were weighed at birth compared to weighing in all cases of institutional deliveries. Rooming in Rooming in of babies was practiced more often in home deliveries than institutional deliveries. Immunization BCG, OPV and hepatitis B vaccine were given to 8 (17.4%) newborns that were delivered at home. Majority of this immunization was done at urban health centre, situated in the study area. In the institutional deliveries BCG and OPV were given to most of the newborns but hepatitis B vaccine was given only to 28 (77.8%) babies. Surprisingly, 12 (26.1%) home delivered newborns were given injection tetanus toxoid by unqualified practitioners of that area. This was on the recommendation of the dai conducting the delivery [Table - 1]. Care of the cord Instrument used to cut the cord Out of 46 home deliveries, a new shaving blade was used to cut the cord in 36 (78.3%) of home deliveries. Surgical blade available in the delivery kit was used in 5 cases. In one case each, old blade or a shaving razor or a kitchen knife was used to cut the cord. Cord tie Cord of the newborn was tied using a clip or a rubber band in institutional deliveries. Whereas sterile thread or clip (available in the delivery kit) was used only in 13 (28.3%) of home deliveries, the difference being highly significant ( P < 0.001). In rest of the cases threads, available at home, were used which can be presumed to be unsterile [Table - 2]. Applicant Nothing was applied to the cord, more in case of newborns born in the institutions (31, 86.1%) than at home (29, 63%). This difference was significant ( P < 0.05). Povidine iodine or tincture iodine was applied in some cases (3, 3.6% of all newborns). Other applicants like turmeric with oil or ghee; just oil or ghee and cold cream were also applied in as much as 15 (32.6%) home deliveries. These were applied in 4 (11.1%) institutional deliveries not in the institution but after the child was brought home [Table - 2]. Breast feeding practices First feed after birth First feed given to the baby after birth was breast milk in 11 (23.9%) home deliveries and 16 (44.4%) institutional deliveries. In other cases babies were given prelacteal feeds (39, 47.6%) such as ghutti (26.1%), honey (14.6%) or jaggery (8.5%) or even top milk (16, 19.5%) Time of initiating breast feeding Breast feeding was initiated within 4 hours in only 34.8% of home deliveries (16) as against 44.4% of institutional deliveries (16). The difference was statistically not significant. In case breast-feeding initiated later than 4 hours, reasons for this were enquired into. Traditional practices such as baby to be fed on a starlit night or in the presence of a paternal aunt etc were cited as reasons in 26% of cases. It was dai's advice who conducted the deliveries in 14% of cases, no milk secretion (18.1%), no knowledge regarding early breast feeding (16%), mother was tired (10%), post operative (10%), staff instructions (4%) or baby asleep/ didn't take feed (2%) were the other reasons cited. Colostrum feeding Colostrum was given to the baby in 26 (72.2%) hospital deliveries as against 32 (69.5%) of home deliveries. Nearly 1/3rd (29.3%) of all newborns were not given colostrums [Table - 3]. Discussion The present study was carried out in a resettlement colony (a type of slum area). Literacy level of mothers was high (71, 86.5%) and joint family system was predominant (62, 75.6%). The proportion of institutional deliveries in the current study (36, 56.1%) is similar to that reported by National Family Health Survey - II (NFHS-II) for Delhi.[3] Newborn care at birth In majority of home deliveries (38, 82.6%), the newborn was bathed immediately after birth. Such a practice, reported elsewhere too[4] should be discouraged as it can lead to hypothermia. Bathing the newborns in the first hour after delivery resulted in significantly increased prevalence of hypothermia in a randomized controlled trial conducted in Uganda.[5] In 29 (63%) home deliveries, finger was used to clear the air passage of the newborn by the birth attendant. This can lead to introduction of infection and injury. Unsterile cloth or cotton or even fingers were used in large proportion of cases to wipe the eyes of the newborn. These unhygienic practices should be discouraged, as these can be a potential source of infection. Only a little more than one third of the newborns delivered at home were weighed at birth. Weighing at birth is an essential activity carried out to determine babies at higher risk and accordingly, determine need for extra care. Although weighing of newborns has been emphasized in Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) and training of dais, its importance may have to be emphasized to the would-be-mothers during antenatal period besides monitoring the work of dais to make weighing at birth universal. It was encouraging to find out that, rooming in was practiced in 75 (91.4%) cases. Findings are similar to a previous study.[6] As per the recommended immunization schedule BCG, OPV and hepatitis B vaccines were given to most of the babies at birth, in case of institutional deliveries. Even 17.4% (8) of the home delivered newborns were immunized with BCG, OPV and Hepatits B within a day or two at the Urban Health Center in the area. It was revealing to know that 12 newborns (26.1%) delivered at home were injected tetanus toxoid on the recommendation of the traditional birth attendant by unqualified practitioners. Mothers should be made aware of the correct and complete immunization schedule to enhance immunization coverage and to avoid such a malpractice. Care of the cord A new/ surgical blade was used to cut the cord in 41 (89.1%) home deliveries. Such a good practice was found to be more common in the present study than earlier studies.[7],[8] Use of an old blade or a shaving razor or a kitchen knife calls for urgent intervention. Training of traditional birth attendant has been shown to be effective in reducing perinatal mortality.[9] Antenatal mothers and family members (especially women) should be made aware of the adverse consequences of using such instruments for cutting the cord, during the antenatal period itself. In 33 (71.7%) home deliveries, any thread available at home was used to tie the cord. Mothers should be educated to at least boil the thread before use. Application of oil or ghee with or without turmeric to the cord was common in home deliveries. It was surprising to observe that even in 4 (11.1%) institutional deliveries, these were applied after the baby was brought home. Such a practice may predispose the newborn to risk of neonatal tetanus as topical application of ghee to the umbilical wound has been shown to pose a significant risk of neonatal tetanus.[10] This issue should be discussed and clarified not only with mothers and family members but also with the birth attendant conducting the delivering as her advice to the family has serious implications on neonatal health. Breastfeeding practices About 27 (32.9%) newborns were given breast milk as the first feed in the present study as compared to 47.5% in a study conducted in Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam[11] Although breast milk was the first feed was given to higher proportion of babies delivered in the institutions, the practice of pre-lacteal feeds in the form of ghutti, honey, jaggery water was still highly prevalent in both home and institutional delivered babies. The practice of pre-lacteal feeds is widely prevalent in India.[12],[13] Such a practice, by delaying initiation of breastfeeding, may adversely affect establishment of lactation[14] and introduce enteric infections if pre-lacteal feeds are not given in hygienic manner. Although in the current study, colostrum was given to babies more commonly than other studies,[12],[15] still about one-third mothers had discarded colostrum, which needs to be stopped. Similar to other studies,[12],[14],[16] most mothers in institutional as well as home deliveries did not initiate breast-feeding within one hour of birth. The protection provided by early initiation of breast-feeding against the risk of neonatal mortality was established in a study in rural Ghana. It showed that 16%of neonatal deaths could be averted if all infants were breast-fed from day 1and 22% if breast-feeding started within the first hour.[17] As the baby is most active during the first hour of birth and sucks more vigorously during this period, lactation is more likely to be successfully established if breastfeeding is initiated early. For popularizing such a practice, common reasons like quasi-religious rituals,[18] not enough milk,[16] ill health and fatigue of mother and lactation failure[15],[19] need to be addressed through suitable IEC and counseling. Besides health care providers conducting deliveries, should also focus on this aspect. Limitations of the study The study is based on reported newborn care and not based on actual observations. As a result response for some of the practices could not be obtained in case of institutional deliveries, as mothers were not aware of those. The survey is likely to have missed information on neonates who died before the visit of the investigator or were hospitalized. However, their number is likely to be very small. Conclusions Inspite of the fact that most of the mothers were literate, harmful newborn care practices were common. This can be attributed largely to dias as most deliveries were at home and harmful practices were observed most often in these cases. Besides traditions, community practices also seem to be important contributors as harmful practices were observed even in some institutional deliveries or after discharge from the institution. There is an urgent need to educate mothers and train health care providers including traditional birth attendants and anganwadi workers on newborn and early neonatal care. Various behavioral change communication strategies through mass media and interpersonal education during antenatal visits may be studied for their effectiveness. Prevailing unhealthy practices in the area also should be discussed with health care providers including dais and local practitioners, so that they take special action in preventing these.References
Copyright 2006 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[ms06075t3.jpg] [ms06075t2.jpg] [ms06075t1.jpg] |
|