search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Medical Sciences
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Journal of Medical Sciences Trust
ISSN: 0019-5359 EISSN: 1998-3654
Vol. 62, Num. 10, 2008, pp. 392-396

Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 62, No. 10, October, 2008, pp. 392-396

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Antibiotic resistance pattern of group-a beta-hemolytic streptococci isolated from north Indian children

Department of Microbiology, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, UP
Correspondence Address:Department of Microbiology, CSM Medical University, Lucknow - 226 003
amita602002@yahoo.com

Code Number: ms08070

Abstract

Background: The current resistance pattern of GABHS (group-A beta-hemolytic streptococci) in India has not been discussed.
Aim:
To fill the above-mentioned void, we planned this study to determine the prevalence and degree of antibacterial resistance in GABHS isolates.
Settings and Design:
Children with acute pharyngo-tonsillitis who had not received antibiotic in the preceding week, attending the pediatric OPD, were prospectively enrolled over a period of 1 year. Throat swabs were collected from each child and transported to microbiology laboratory, as early as possible.
Materials and Methods:
A throat swab culture for GABHS was done. All GABHS were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test according to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines.
Results:
In the present study, 12.6% (55/435) of the children with acute pharyngo-tonsillitis had throat swab culture positive for GABHS. The prevalence of macrolide resistance was 10.2%. The MIC50 for macrolide-resistant strain was 0.5 µg/mL (range, 0.125-8 µg/mL), and MIC90 was 8 µg/mL (range, 0.125-8 µg/mL). Tetracycline and co-trimoxazole resistances were 24.5% and 12.2% respectively. The values of MIC50 for tetracycline- and co-trimoxazole-resistant strains were 4 µg/mL (range, 0.125-32 µg/mL) and 2 µg/mL (range, 0.25-8 µg/mL) respectively. All isolates were sensitive to penicillin G and chloramphenicol on disc diffusion test. However, their MIC50 was 0.032 µg/mL (range, 0.012-0.125 µg/mL) and 2 µg/mL (range, 0.25-4 µg/mL) respectively.
Conclusion:
High prevalence of antimicrobial resistance found among GABHS needs a longitudinal surveillance of isolates from different centers in India.

Keywords: Group-A beta-hemolytic streptococci, pharyngo-tonsillitis, streptococcus hemolyticus

Introduction

Acute respiratory infections are still a major health problem in most developing countries. Group-A streptococci are the leading cause of acute bacterial pharyngitis [2] and primary skin infections. Impetigo is the most frequently occurring disease, especially in tropical climates. Inappropriate antibiotic treatment for pharyngitis is becoming a major issue; hence only true group-A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections proven by rapid antigen test or culture should be treated with antibiotics.

Penicillin remains the treatment of choice for group-A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) pharyngitis, [1],[2],[5] and macrolide are recommended only for patients who are allergic to penicillin. Erythromycin resistance in GABHS ranges from as low as 1.3%-5% to as high as> 45% as reported from outbreaks in Finland, [9] Sweden, [6] and Japan. [12] High rates of resistance have also been reported sporadically from Australia (17%), [15] United Kingdom (22.8%), Taiwan (rate not specified), and Italy (40%). [9] Resistance to tetracycline and co-trimoxazol has been reported to be high, making them virtually unusable as an alternative for the treatment of GABHS infection. [9]

Antimicrobial drugs for GABHS are used to avoid suppurative complication, prevent rheumatic fever, abort person-to-person transmission, and diminish the signs and symptoms associated with these infections. The current resistance pattern of GABHS in India has never been evaluated. Hence we planned this study to determine the prevalence and degree of antibacterial resistance in GABHS isolates.

Materials and Methods

Study population
Children with acute pharyngo-tonsillitis attending the pediatric OPD who had not received antibiotic in the preceding 1 week and who consented to participate were prospectively enrolled over a period of 1 year (July 2005 to June 2006). An institutional ethical clearance was obtained.

Sample collection and transport
Throat swabs were collected. Each swab was transported to microbiology laboratory in screw-capped test tube with Stuart′s transport medium within half an hour.

Culture, identification, and antibiotic susceptibility testing

Throat swab from each patient was plated on trypticase soy blood agar with 5% sheep blood. Inoculated plates were incubated overnight at 37°C under 5% CO 2 effect and examined for the presence of GABHS by the formation of distinct zones of beta-hemolysis around colonies. [7] GABHS strains were identified on the basis of zone diameter around bacitracin disk (10 µg/disk) on susceptibility testing as recommended by CLSI. [4] In this study, we defined GABHS strains only using the bacitracin test, since serotyping is not available in our routine practice. Bacterial colonies producing no hemolysis were considered as bacitracin resistant.

Disks susceptibility testing was performed according to the guideline of CLSI. [4] Mueller-Hinton sheep blood agar was inoculated with a suspension of organism. Disks with 15 µg/disk of erythromycin, 30 µg/disk of tetracycline, 50 µg/disk of chloramphenicol, 25 µg/disk of co-trimoxazol, and 10 units/disk of penicillin G were dispensed on the Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) with 5% sheep blood, and zone diameters were determined according to CLSI standard.

Minimum inhibitory concentration
Susceptibility of the strain to erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, co-trimoxazol, and penicillin G was tested by broth dilution method. All the antibiotics were procured from Himedia (Mumbai, India). The antibiotics were tested at concentrations ranging from 0.012 to 0.125 µg of penicillin/mL, 0.125 to 4 µg of erythromycin/mL, 0.125 to 16 µg of tetracycline/mL, 0.25 to 2 µg of chloramphenicol/mL, and 0.25 to 4 µg of co-trimoxazol/mL. The following Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints were adopted according to CLSI guidelines [4] : penicillin-susceptible, ≤0.125 µg/mL; and resistant, ≥0.25 µg/mL; erythromycin-susceptible, ≤0.25 µg/mL; and resistant, ≥1 µg/mL; tetracycline-susceptible, ≤2 µg/mL; and resistant, ≥8 µg/mL; chloramphenicol-susceptible, ≤4 µg/mL; and resistant, ≥16 µg/mL; and co-trimoxazol-susceptible, ≤1 µg/mL; and resistant, ≥2 µg/mL.

A control plate was inoculated for each isolate to confirm the purity of the culture and the initial inoculum density. MICs were interpreted by using the CLSI breakpoints for streptococci.

Data analysis

Data was analyzed on WHO net microbiology laboratory database software (version 5.1).

Results and Discussion

Of the 435 children (age, 2-12 years) enrolled in the study, 55 (12.6%) were culture positive for GABHS [Table - 1]. Of these 55, 6 isolates lost their viability during storage and subculturing. Resistance pattern of remaining 49 isolates was tested against penicillin G, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole. The overall rate of macrolide resistance was 10.2%. Of these 49 GABHS isolates, 12 (24.4%) were resistant to tetracycline, followed by co-trimoxazole (6, 12.2%) and erythromycin (5, 10.2%) [Table - 2]. All the isolates were sensitive to penicillin G and chloramphenicol. Tetracycline and co-trimoxazol resistances were 24.5% and 12.2% respectively [Table - 2].

The MIC 50 for erythromycin-resistant strains was 0.5 µg/mL (range, 0.125-8 µg/mL), and MIC 90 was 8 µg/mL (range, 0.125-8 µg/mL). The values of MIC 50 for tetracycline- and co-trimoxazole-resistant strains were 4 µg/mL (range, 0.125-32 µg/mL) and 2 µg/mL (range, 0.25-8 µg/mL) respectively, while values of MIC 90 for these antibiotics were 16 µg/mL (range, 0.125-32 µg/mL) and 4 µg/mL (range, 0.25-8 µg/mL) respectively. MIC values for antimicrobials are given in [Table - 2].

Our study shows that prevalence of antibiotic-resistant group-A streptococci has emerged rapidly in northern India. [13] Several reports of erythromycin resistance ranging from 1% to 18% among group-A streptococci have been published. [6],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] An increasing trend toward erythromycin resistance was reported from Japan, [6] where the frequency of erythromycin-resistant group-A streptococci first increased from 70% to 80% and then decreased once the use of erythromycin was reduced. Erythromycin resistance ranges from as low as 1.3%-5% to as high as> 45% during outbreaks in Finland, [14] Sweden, [6] and Japan. [12] High rates of resistance have also been reported sporadically in Australia (17%) [15] and United Kingdom (22.8%). [9] Prevalence of macrolide resistance was 10.2% in our study. The importance of identifying macrolide resistance in GABHS is dependent upon whether these antibiotics are used for treatment and if in vitro resistance results in clinical failure. At present, erythromycin is recommended as alternative treatment for patients with GABHS pharyngitis who are allergic to penicillin. [1],[5] A continuous surveillance will be helpful in management of such cases.

The present study reports 24.5% tetracycline resistance in GABHS. In 1954, Lowbury and Cason [17] reported the first isolate of GABHS from a unit in Birmingham, England, that was resistant to tetracycline. Subsequent reports showed that 5% to 25% of the GABHS isolated from US [4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] and 17% of the GABHS isolated from Spain were resistant to tetracycline. The prevalence of co-trimoxazol resistance found in our study was 12.2%. Though resistance to this drug is low, it cannot be used because of the intrinsic resistance [17] of group-A streptococci. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol. No GABHS were found to be penicillin resistant in our study, reinforcing the fact that the penicillin resistance has not developed in this organism in northern India, in spite of frequent penicillin use.

References

1.American Academy of Pediatrics. Group-A streptococcal infection. In Redbook: Report of the committee on Infectious Diseases. vol. 3. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2003. p. 526-36.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Bruton S, Pichichero. Consideration in the use of antibiotics for streptococcal pharyngitis. J Fam Pract 2006;supply:S9-16.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Clinical laboratory standard institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests: Approved standard M17-A20. Wayne, PA. USA: Committee for clinical Laboratory Standards; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Cornaglia G, Ligozzi M, Mazzariol A, Valentini M, Orefici G, Fontana R, et al. Rapid increase of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin in Streptococcus pyogenes in Italy 1993-1995. Emerg Infect Dis 1996;2:339-42.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Dohar JE. Management of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis in children. J Fam Pract Book I 2006;55:S1-11.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Gerber MA. Antibiotic resistance: Relationships to persistence of group A streptococci in the upper respiratory tract. Pediatrics 1996;97:971-5.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Johnson DR, Kaplan EL. Laboratory diagnosis of group A Streptococcal infections. Geneva: WHO; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Kaya EG, Yucel M, Karakoc AE. Investigation of erythromycin resistance and resistance phenotypes in group A beta hemolytic streptococci. Mikrobiyol Bul 2006;40:161-8.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Lloyd CA, Jacob SE, Menon T. Antibiotic resistant beta-hemolytic streptococci. Indian J Pediatr 2007;74:1077-88.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Lowbury EJ, Cason JS. Aureomycin and erythromycin therapy for Streptococcus pyogenes in burns. Br Med J 1954;2:914-5.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Linder JA, Bates DW, Lee GM. Antibiotic treatment of children with sore throat. JAMA 2005;294:2354-6.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Mariani-Kurkdjian P, Doit C, Deforche D, Brahimi N, Francois M, Francois M, et al. Current Streptococcus pyogenes sensitivity responsible for acute tonsillopharyngitis in France. Press Med 2004;33:703-6.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Rajesh KR, Gordon RC. Streptococcal pharyngitis: Is penicillin still the drug of choice? Indian J Pediatr 1996;63:437-40.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Senses Z, Baysallar M, Gur D, Doganci L. Macrolide antibiotic resistance rates and phenotypes of group A beta hemolytic streptococci isolated between the years 1999-2000 and 2001-2002. Mikrobiyol Bul 2003;37:225-34.   Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Seppala H, Nissinen A, Jarvinen H, Huovinen S, Henriksson T, Herva E, et al. Resistance to erythromycin in group-A streptococci. N Engl J Med 1992;326:292-7.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Vollater MM, Soriano NJ, Salvert LM. Group A streptococcal bacteremia outcome and prognostic factors. Rev Esp Quimioter 2006;19:367-75.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Yazgi H, Ertek M, Akta? AE; Erythromycin resistance of group. A beta-hemolytic streptococci isolated from patients with upper respiratory tract infections. Mikrobiyol Bul 2002;36:11-4.  Back to cited text no. 17    

Copyright 2008 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ms08070t1.jpg] [ms08070t2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil