search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development
Rural Outreach Program
ISSN: 1684-5358 EISSN: 1684-5374
Vol. 11, Num. 3, 2011, pp. 4828 -4846

African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2011 pp. 4828 -4846

Prevalence And Determinants Of Overweight And Obesity In Adult Residents Of Cape Coast, Ghana: A Hospital-Based Study

Amegah AK*1, Lumor S1 and F Vidogo1

1Dept. of Human Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

*Corresponding author email: raskofiadel@yahoo.com

Code Number: nd11032

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of obesity in developing countries is more noticeable in urban areas with as much as 20-50% of the urban population of African countries estimated to be either overweight or obese. Studies investigating the prevalence of overweight and obesity in developing countries have mainly been concentrated in the capital and major cities of these countries whilst neglecting other urban settlements. It is against this background that a hospital-based cross-sectional design was employed to determine the overweight and obesity prevalence in Cape Coast, an urban settlement in the Central Region of Ghana, to identify the vulnerable groups and factors associated with the disease within this urban population. Anthropometric methods and structured questionnaire were used to determine the BMI status of 300 adults sampled from the Out Patients Department of the main hospital in the area and establish the predisposing factors of the disease in the area. Prevalence of overweight and obesity within this population was relatively high with rates of 21% and 17%, respectively. Several socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics, and parity were found to be associated with overweight and obesity in the area. Of the socio-demographic parameters studied age, sex, occupation, marital status and ethnic origin of respondents were highly associated with overweight and obesity (p<0.05). Obesity prevalence increased with age with middle age adults (46-55 years) found to be most vulnerable. Females were more likely to be overweight or obese than their male counterparts (p<0.05). Snacking in-between meals, time of supper and lack of exercise were the lifestyle characteristics found to be associated with overweight and obesity in the area (p<0.05). The multivariate analysis, however, found the association with snacking and exercise to be confounded by sex and age of respondents. Exercise nevertheless remained a strong determinant of obesity in the area with respondents who did not exercise found to be about four times more likely to be obese than their counterparts who did exercise (OR = 4.174; CI = 1.886 – 9.234; p<0.05). A concerted effort by health professionals is thus needed to reduce the overweight and obesity burden and associated co-morbidities in this urban population.

Key words: Prevalence, Overweight, Obesity, BMI, Exercise

INTRODUCTION

With the developed world grappling with a proportionately high burden of non-communicable diseases, developing countries are experiencing a double burden of non-communicable and communicable diseases [1]. Overweight and obesity, once associated with only high income countries are now also prevalent in low and middle income countries [2,3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) in 1998 declared obesity a global epidemic and called for a coordinated effort in the management and prevention of the condition [4]. Recent global figures indicate that up to 1.6 billion adults aged 15 years and above are overweight with the number of obese adults estimated at 400 million [5]. Obesity is a well recognized risk factor for a variety of chronic conditions including cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, dyslipidemia, stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus, certain cancers and arthritis [6,7]. Higher grades of obesity are associated with excess mortality, primarily from cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and certain cancers [6,8,9]. In developing countries, it has been suggested that over 115 million people suffer from obesity related health conditions [10,11,12].

Developing countries have undergone acculturation with alterations in dietary and physical activity patterns as a result of westernization and appear to account for the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in these countries [4,13]. It has been estimated that by 2025, three quarters of the obese population worldwide will be in non-industrialized countries [2]. The prevalence of obesity in developing countries is more noticeably in urban areas [5,14] with as much as 20-50% of the urban population of African countries estimated to be either overweight or obese [15,16]. In Ghana, prevalence of obesity is similarly high in urban areas of the country. A nationwide survey found overweight and obesity to be common in the more urbanized southern part of the country compared to the largely rural northern part [17]. Greater Accra Region, the most urbanized region in the country, recorded the highest prevalence rate in this survey [17]. A study conducted previously in urban and rural Accra, the capital of the country, found prevalence of overweight and obesity among adult residents to be 23.4% and 14.1%, respectively [18].

Studies investigating prevalence of overweight and obesity in developing countries have largely been concentrated in the capital and major cities of these countries whilst neglecting other urban settlements. In Ghana, almost all published studies on obesity to date have focused on residents of Accra, with prevalence of overweight and obesity in other urban areas of the country yet to be established. This study, therefore, seeks to determine the prevalence of overweight and obesity in Cape Coast, an urban settlement in the Central Region of Ghana, and to identify the vulnerable groups and associated factors of the disease within this urban population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Location

The study was conducted in Cape Coast, an urban settlement and regional capital of the Central Region of Ghana using a hospital-based cross-sectional design. Cape Coast Metropolis covers an area of 122 square kilometres and was the capital of Ghana during the colonial era. The Central Regional Hospital (CRH), which is the main health facility in the metropolis and also serves as the referral centre for medical cases in the Central Region was visited.

Study Population and Sampling Procedure

The study population comprised all adults aged 18 years and above residing in Cape Coast and attending the Out Patients Department (OPD) of CRH. Three hundred participants, 150 each of males and females were randomly selected for the study. The sampling procedure involved the assignment of numbers to all seats in the OPD and randomly selecting and labelling participating seats. An adult resident of the metropolis who visited the OPD and sat on a labelled seat was then recruited.

Anthropometric Measurements and Data Collection

The height (in cm) and weight (in kg) of the participants were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale, respectively. Participants were asked to remove their footwear and any heavy clothing before their measurements were taken. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on the background and demographic characteristics of the subjects and on predisposing factors of obesity.

Data Analysis and Statistical Methods

SPSS 16.0 statistical package was used to analyse the collected data. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean of a continuous dependent variable for two groups of an independent variable. In comparing the mean of a continuous dependent variable for three or more groups of an independent variable, a one-way ANOVA was applied, and in determining which means differ, the Tukey Post Hoc test was run. The Chi-square test was employed to investigate the association between two categorical variables. To evaluate the association between obesity and associated predisposing factors, odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using binary logistics regression. Significance level was set at 5%.

Body mass index (BMI) was determined from the weight and height measurements of the participants as ratio of weight (kg) to square of height (m). Body mass index was categorized as follows: underweight, <18.5 kg/m2; normal, 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25–29.9 kg/m2; and obese, ≥30 kg/m2.

Ethical Consideration

Approval for the study was sought from the Research Committee of the University of Cape Coast School of Biological Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from each of the respondents before their participation in the study.

RESULTS

Socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional (BMI) status of respondents

Equal proportions of male and female adults were recruited for the study. Age group 18-25 years and 46-55years recorded the highest and lowest proportion of respondents, respectively. More than one-third (39%) of the subjects were educated up to tertiary level. Respondents with no formal education were about 12%. Traders and office/administrative workers each represented about 18% of the respondents studied. More than half (54%) of the respondents were married. Majority (69%) of the respondents were of the Akan tribe and only a few (1.3%) were Hausas.

About 21% and 17% of the respondents were overweight and obese, respectively with underweight rate found to be 7.3% (Table 1). Females recorded the highest proportion of overweight and obesity cases (Table 1) with more than half (54%) of female respondents either overweight or obese compared to 22.7% of overweight and obese cases among the male respondents (Table 2). Males recorded the highest underweight cases (Table 1). Obesity rate increased with increasing age up to age 55 years whereas overweight rate remained the same for all the age groups up to age 45 years (Table 1). About 37% of respondents aged 46-55 years were obese compared to 6% obese cases among respondents aged 18-25 years (Table 2). Respondents aged 55 years and above recorded a slightly lower proportion (26.2%) of obese cases and a much lower proportion (9.5%) of overweight cases compared to respondents aged 46-55 (Table 2). Underweight rates decreased with increasing age (Table 1). Overweight and obesity rates increased with increasing educational level with tertiary educated respondents recording the highest proportions (Table 1). The highest proportions of underweight cases were also educated up to the tertiary level (Table 1).

Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional (BMI) status of respondents

Variable

N(%)

% Underweightn=22(7.3%)

% Normaln=163(54.3%)

% Overweightn=63(21%)

% Obese n=52 (17.3%)

Sex

Male

150(50)

68.2

62.0

42.9

13.5

Female

150(50)

31.8

38.0

57.1

86.5

Age group

18-25 years

83(27.7)

31.8

33.7

25.4

9.6

26-35 years

70(23.3)

27.3

23.9

25.4

17.3

36-45 years

64(21.3)

27.3

18.4

25.4

23.1

46-55 years

41(13.7)

9.1

8.0

17.5

28.8

>55 years

42(14.0)

4.5

16.0

6.3

21.2

Educational level

Primary

33(11.0)

13.6

13.5

7.9

5.8

Junior High

37(12.3)

13.6

10.4

17.5

11.5

Senior High/Technical

78(26.0)

13.6

27.6

22.2

30.8

Tertiary

117(39.0)

54.5

38.7

39.7

32.7

None

35(11.7)

4.5

9.8

12.7

19.2

Occupation

Trader

54(18.0)

9.1

12.3

23.8

32.7

Manual worker

40(13.3)

18.2

17.2

12.7

0.0

Office/Administrative

worker

53(17.7)

18.2

16.6

20.6

17.3

Unemployed/

Housewife

33(11.0)

4.5

6.7

11.1

26.9

Fish monger/Farmer

24(8.0)

4.5

10.4

4.8

5.8

Skilled worker

47(15.7)

13.6

18.4

12.7

11.5

Students

49(16.3)

31.8

18.4

14.3

5.8

Marital status

Married

162(54.0)

27.3

46.6

66.7

73.1

Single

131(43.7)

68.2

51.5

33.3

21.2

Divorced/Widowed

7(2.3)

4.5

1.8

0.0

5.8

Ethnic origin

Akan

207(69.0)

72.7

67.5

69.8

71.2

Ewe

69(23.0)

27.3

25.8

22.2

13.5

Ga

20(6.7)

0.0

4.3

7.9

15.4

Hausa

4(1.3)

0.0

2.5

0.0

0.0

Table 2: Distribution of BMI categories of respondents by socio-demographic variables

Variable

% Underweight

% Normal

% Overweight

%

Obese

Sex

Male

10.0

67.3

18.0

4.7

Female

4.7

41.3

24.0

30.0

Age group

18-25 years

8.4

66.3

19.3

6.0

26-35 years

8.6

55.7

22.9

12.9

36-45 years

9.4

46.9

25.0

18.8

46-55 years

4.9

31.7

26.8

36.6

>55 years

2.4

61.9

9.5

26.2

Educational level

Primary

9.1

66.7

15.2

9.1

Junior High

8.1

45.9

29.7

16.2

Senior High/Technical

3.8

57.7

17.9

20.5

Tertiary

10.3

53.8

21.4

14.5

None

2.9

45.7

22.9

28.6

Occupation

Trader

3.7

37.0

27.8

31.5

Manual worker

10.0

70.0

20.0

0.0

Office/Administrative worker

7.5

50.9

24.5

17.0

Unemployed/Housewife

3.0

33.3

21.2

42.4

Fish monger/Farmer

4.2

70.8

12.5

12.5

Skilled worker

6.4

63.8

17.0

12.8

Students

14.3

61.2

18.4

6.1

Marital status

Married

3.7

46.9

25.9

23.5

Single

11.5

64.1

16.0

8.4

Divorced/Widowed

14.3

42.9

0.0

42.9

Ethnic origin

Akan

7.7

53.1

21.3

17.9

Ewe

8.7

60.9

20.3

10.1

Ga

0.0

35.0

25.0

40.0

Hausa

0.0

100.0

0.0

0.0

Traders recorded the highest proportion of overweight and obese cases followed by unemployed/housewives and office/administrative workers (Table 1). Of the number of traders and unemployed/housewives in the study, more than half (59.3% and 63.6% respectively) were either overweight or obese (Table 2). About 42% of office/administrative workers were either overweight or obese (Table 2). Students recorded the highest underweight rate (Table 1). Almost three-quarters (73.1%) of obese cases were married (Table 1). Married respondents also recorded the highest proportion (66.7%) of overweight cases with single respondents recording the highest underweight cases (Table 1). Almost half (49.4%) of married respondents were either overweight or obese (Table 2). Sixty five percent of the Ga tribe respondents in the study were either overweight or obese compared to 39.2% and 30.3% overweight/obese cases among the Akan tribe and Ewe tribe respondents, respectively (Table 2).

Sex, age group, occupation and marital status of respondents were highly associated with BMI status (p<0.05), implying that a respondent’s BMI status is dependent on his/her sex, age group, occupation and marital status (Table 3). BMI status of respondents was not dependent on their educational level or ethnic origin (p>0.05). The mean BMI of respondents was considerably high and falls within the overweight category (Table 4). There was a positive linear relationship between age and BMI of respondents (slope = 0.086; p<0.05) with every unit change in age increasing BMI by 0.086 units (Table 4).

Table 3: Association between socio-demographic variables and BMI categories of respondents

Variable

Chi-square (Χ2) value

p value

Sex

41.30

0.000

Age group

31.24

0.002

Educational level

12.98

0.371

Occupation

48.25

0.000

Marital status

27.57

0.000

Ethnic origin

15.22

0.085

Table 4: Linear regression of BMI and age of respondents

Mean BMI ± Std Deviation

24.94±6.11

Mean Age± Std Deviation

37.68±15.25

Slope of regression line

0.086

Intercept

21.687

Coefficient of determination r2

0.046

Correlation coefficient r

0.215

F Statistic

14.508

p value

0.000

Socio-demographic determinants of overweight and obesity

Females had a higher mean BMI compared to their male counterparts, a mean difference which was highly significant (p<0.05), meaning females were more likely to be obese than males (Table 5). There was a highly significant difference in mean BMI between the respondents with respect to their age group (p<0.05), with mean BMI increasing with increasing age category (Table 5). The mean difference between age groups 18-25 years and 26-35 years, and age groups 26-35 years and 46-55 years was significant (p<0.05). Table 5 shows there is no significant difference in mean BMI of respondents defined by their educational level (p>0.05).

Table 5: Association of BMI with socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

Variable

N

Mean

Std Deviation

Test Statistic

p value

Post Hoc p value

Sex

Male

150

22.63

3.62

-7.070

0.000


Female

150

27.26

7.15

Age Group

18-25 years1

83

22.91

4.07

5.653

0.000

0.0001&3

0.0242&3

26-35 years2

70

24.39

5.75

36-45 years

64

25.60

6.91

46-55 years3

41

27.90

6.89

>55 years

42

25.99

6.69

Educational Level

Primary

33

23.881

6.4921

1.792

0.130


Junior High

37

24.961

5.4926

Senior High/Technical

78

25.562

6.9385

Tertiary

117

24.228

5.1332

None

35

26.930

7.1032

Occupation

Trader1

54

28.205

7.6609

9.337

0.000

0.0001&2

0.0061&3

0.0021&4

0.0001&5

0.0002&6

0.0043&6

0.0024&6

0.0005&6


Manual worker2

40

22.291

3.1478

Office/Administrative worker

53

25.232

5.3603

Unemployed/Housewife6

33

28.877

7.6027

Fish monger/Farmer3

24

23.171

4.2019

Skilled worker4

47

23.768

5.0800

Students5

49

22.540

4.4506

Marital status

Married1

162

26.530

6.6704

13.960

0.000

0.0001&2


Single2

131

22.910

4.6407

Divorced/Widowed

7

26.221

6.5223

Ethnic origin

Akan

207

25.207

6.5171

3.531

0.015

0.0371&2


Ewe1

69

23.616

4.5661

Ga2

20

27.744

5.7002

Hausa

4

20.110

1.6642

There was a highly significant difference in mean BMI of the respondents defined by their occupation (p<0.05) with unemployed/housewives and traders recording the highest mean BMI followed by office/administrative workers (Table 5). Traders and unemployed/housewives were more likely to be overweight or obese compared to their other counterparts (p<0.05) with the exception of office/administrative workers. Table 5 shows married respondents were more likely to be overweight or obese than their single counterparts (p<0.05). The difference in mean BMI of the respondents with respect to their ethnic origin was highly significant (p<0.05) with Ga respondents recording the highest mean BMI and were more likely to be overweight or obese than their Ewe counterparts (p<0.05) (Table 5).

Lifestyle and biological determinants of overweight and obesity

Respondents who did not smoke and those who did not drink alcohol had a marginally higher mean BMI compared to their smoking and alcohol drinking counterparts (Table 6). The mean difference was, however, not significant (p>0.05). Table 6 shows that respondents who did not exercise had a higher mean BMI and were more likely to be obese than their counterparts who did exercise (p<0.05). Respondents who snack in-between meals had slightly higher mean BMI than those who did not snack in-between meals, a mean difference which was significant (p<0.05). This implies that respondents who snack in-between meals were more likely to be overweight or obese than their counterparts who did not snack in-between meals (Table 6). There was no significant difference in mean BMI of those who snack 1-2 times a day and those snacking 3-4 times a day (p>0.05).

Table 6: Association of BMI with lifestyle characteristics and biological history of respondents

Variable

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Test Statistic

p value

Post Hoc

p value

Family history of

obesity

Yes

51

25.39

5.88

0.568


0.570



No

249

24.85

6.17

Parity

Yes

100

29.97

7.11

7.762


0.000



No

50

21.84

2.91

Smoking

Yes

19

22.95

4.21

-1.471


0.142



No

281

25.08

6.20

Alcohol intake

Yes

41

23.20

4.28

-1.969


0.050



No

259

25.22

6.32

Snacking in between

meals

Yes

138

25.76

6.87

2.155


0.032



No

162

24.24

5.32

Snacking frequency

1-2 times per day

74

24.50

6.27

-0.217


0.829



3-4 times per day

64

24.74

6.58

Eating prior to bed

Yes

44

26.45

6.77

1.778


0.076



No

256

24.68

5.97

Exercise

Yes

115

23.36

4.58

-3.612


0.000



No

185

25.93

6.73

Number of meals

eaten per day

One-two

58

24.71

5.49

2.455



0.088




Three

234

24.84

6.04

More than three

8

29.64

10.61

Time of supper

Before 6 to 8pm1

220

24.39

5.57

5.686



0.004



0.0081&2



Between 8 and 10pm

69

25.90

7.20

After 10pm2

11

30.01

6.65

Respondents who reported eating prior to going to bed at night had a slightly higher mean BMI compared to respondents who did not engage in this practice (Table 6). The mean difference was, however, not significant (p>0.05). Respondents who ate more than three times a day had a much higher mean BMI than those who ate one to two times a day and three times a day (Table 6). The mean difference was also not significant (p>0.05). Table 6 shows a significant difference in mean BMI of respondents defined by the time they took supper with those taking their supper after 10pm found to have a much higher mean BMI than their counterparts who took supper before 6pm and 8pm and between 8 and 10pm (p<0.05). The mean difference between respondents who took supper before 6pm and 8pm and those taking supper after 10pm was significant (p<0.05).

Respondents with a family history of obesity had a slightly higher mean BMI than respondents with no family history of obesity; the mean difference was, however, not significant (Table 6). Female respondents who had children had a much higher mean BMI compared to their counterparts with no children (Table 6). The mean difference was highly significant (p<0.05), implying female respondents who had children were more likely to be obese than their counterparts without children.

Table 7 shows the association of overweight/obesity with snacking in-between meals and lack of exercise was not significant after controlling for the confounding effect of sex and age of respondents (p>0.05). Table 8, however, shows that respondents who did not exercise were about four times more likely to be obese than their counterparts who did exercise (OR=4.174; CI = 1.886 – 9.234; p<0.05). Snacking in-between meals and parity were not associated with obesity in the logistic regression analysis.

Table 7: Association of BMI with lifestyle characteristics and biological history of respondents after adjusting for effect of sex and age of respondents

Variable

F Statistic

p value

Snacking

0.003

0.956

Sex

39.17

0.000

Age group

16.02

0.000


Lack of exercise

1.68

0.196

Sex

36.96

0.000

Age group

17.24

0.000


Parity

46.47

0.000

Age group

8.54

0.004


Time of supper

4.20

0.016

Sex

41.47

0.000

Age group

20.37

0.000

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of overweight and obesity within this population was relatively high with rates of 21% and 17%, respectively and confirms the commonness of overweight and obesity among urban residents of developing countries as highlighted by some studies [5,14]. According to some authors [15,16], as much as 20-50% of the urban population of African countries are either overweight or obese. The prevalence estimates for our study area are comparable to the findings of a study in the Accra Metropolis [18], which estimated the prevalence of overweight and obesity to be 23% and 14%, respectively. This study found prevalence of overweight and obesity among females to be more than twice that of males with more than half of females found to be either overweight or obese. This is also similar to the findings of other studies in Ghana [17,18], South Africa [19,20], Latin America [21] and rural China [22], which have also estimated the prevalence of overweight and obesity to be higher in females than in males. According to Scidell [23], in countries with relatively low gross national product, the prevalence of obesity is about 1.5 to 2 times higher among women than men. Abubakari and colleagues [5] reported that the high prevalence of obesity in the female gender reflects the situation in all West African-origin populations around the world including those in the diaspora. Zhang et al. [22] has also highlighted the differences in lifestyle and socio-demographic variables, as well as other genetic or behavioural factors as possible explanation for the observed sex differences.

The study found a high proportion of males to be underweight, which is consistent with the finding of two studies [18,24], which reported significantly higher rates of underweight in adult males compared to females. According to Amoah [18], Ghanaian males tend to be involved in more physically active occupations than do females, resulting in increased energy expenditure among males. This assertion coupled with food scarcity according to the author may be partly responsible for the relatively higher levels of undernutrition among males in their study. This could explain the findings of this study especially when the Cape Coast area is well noted for food scarcity and insecurity. Students recorded the highest undernutrition rate in this study and this could be attributed to their low purchasing power as most have to rely on their parents/guardians for income and living. Also because of the scarcity of food resources in Cape Coast, food prices are high and could be beyond the reach of most students. The usually demanding and energy sapping reading and learning activities of students could also contribute to the high underweight cases among the student respondents.

Females were more likely to be more obese than their male counterparts (p<0.05). In Ghana and similar sub-Saharan African countries, overweight and obesity is an indicator of beauty in women as highlighted by some authors [5,18]. According to these authors, this societal influence drives women in these countries to go all out to gain weight to appear beautiful and attractive. This could partly explain the findings of this study. As Amoah [18] puts it “Ghanaian men are generally known to prefer overweight and obese women to thin women and may conceivably contribute to the higher rates of overnutrition and consequent obesity among females”. It is also well documented that women generally gain weight once they start having children and was a finding of this study with women who reported to have children found to be more likely to be obese than their counterparts without children (p<0.05). This could also explain the likelihood of females to be more obese than their male counterparts, especially when the proportion of female respondents who reported to have children constituted exactly one-third of the total number of respondents surveyed. Obesity rate increased with increasing age up to 55 years with more than one-third of respondents aged 46-55 years found to be obese. Studies in Ghana [17,18] also found the prevalence of obesity to increase with age up to 60 and 64 years, respectively.

Traders, office/administrative workers and unemployed/housewives recorded the highest overweight and obesity cases with traders and unemployed/housewives found to be more likely to be overweight or obese compared to their counterparts in other trades (p<0.05). This findings could be explained by the sedentary nature of these jobs with a consequent decrease in energy expenditure; the unlimited access to food resources by most traders; the high incomes of office/administrative workers and hence the ability to patronize energy dense and high caloric foods; and the habit of eating and sleeping locally termed “adidas” engaged in by most unemployed/housewives who are essentially at home. A study in Accra, Ghana [18] also found overweight and obesity to be high among housewives, professionals and managers. Respondents of the Ga tribe had a very high mean BMI and were more likely to be overweight or obese than their Ewe counterparts (p<0.05). Studies in Ghana [17,18] also found overweight and obesity rates to be highest among Ga-Adangbes. According to Biritwum and colleagues [17], Ga people largely have a sedentary lifestyle and a diet pattern that centres on kenkey; an energy dense food prepared from corn, and could explain the finding of this study.

The study found married people to be more likely to be overweight or obese than their single counterparts (p<0.05), which is consistent with the findings of other studies [17,25]. Most married people find themselves in stable relationships with total support from their spouses, hence are less stressed and have the mindset to eat several times a day. Also most marital homes have continuous supply of and access to food resources especially when children are present in the household, which often tends to perpetuate overeating by the household members. It is also not uncommon to find married men in Ghana and other sub-Saharan African countries with a habit of having supper late as they come home from work late and are compelled to eat the prepared meals in order not for their wives to think they are having extramarital affairs. Also in these parts of the world, most married women are predominantly housewives with the tendency to engage in the habit of eating and sleeping. Heliovaara and Aromaa [26], also assert that single women, unlike their married counterparts, are less likely to be multiparous, which is associated with higher risk of obesity. These factors could, therefore, explain why this study found married people to be more likely to be overweight or obese than their single counterparts.

Family history of obesity was not related to obesity (p>0.05), contrary to the findings of several studies. Respondents who had a family history of obesity, however, had a higher mean BMI than their counterparts with no family history of obesity. Smoking and alcohol intake were also not related to obesity with respondents who do not indulge themselves in this lifestyle ironically having a higher mean BMI than their counterparts who indulged themselves in this lifestyle. Biritwum et al. [17] reported similar findings for smoking and overweight/obesity but found a higher proportion of people who consumed alcohol to be obese. Zhang et al. [22] also reported alcohol drinking to increase the risk of obesity. The ATTICA study [27] also found obese and overweight participants to consume higher quantities of alcoholic beverages compared with those of normal weight.

Snacking in-between meals, lack of exercise, and time of taking supper were found to be highly related to overweight and obesity. The association of overweight/obesity with snacking in-between meals and lack of exercise was, however, not significant after controlling for the confounding effect of sex and age of respondents. Estimating the odds ratio to evaluate the association of obesity with these associated factors, however, identified respondents who did not exercise to be about four times more likely to be obese than their counterparts who did exercise (OR = 4.174; CI = 1.886 – 9.234; p<0.05) with snacking in-between meals and parity paradoxically found not to be associated with obesity. A study in China [22] found moderate physical activity to decrease the risk of obesity. Similar findings regarding the association of obesity with physical activity status have also been observed in studies conducted in Australia [28] and America [29]. Lack of exercise is known to lead to positive energy balance, a situation where energy intake exceeds energy expenditure, thus resulting in weight gain and consequently obesity. It is, therefore, not surprising this study found lack of exercise to be a strong risk factor of obesity. Lankford [30] cited lack of exercise as the single most important causative factor in obesity.

Table 8: Binary logistic regression of obesity and associated lifestyle and biological determinants

Variable

Odds Ratio

Confidence Interval

p value

Family history of obesity

1.154

0.507 - 2.624

0.733

Smoking

1.840

0.412 – 8.218

0.425

Alcohol intake

2.104

0.716 – 6.185

0.176

Snacking in between meals

0.382

0.205 - 0.714

0.003

Eating prior to bed

0.785

0.352 - 1.752

0.555

Lack of exercise

4.174

1.886 – 9.234

0.000

Late supper (After 8pm)

1.765

0.936 – 3.328

0.079

Parity

0.026

0.003 - 0.196

0.000

CONCLUSION

The study clearly demonstrates relatively high levels of overweight and obesity among adult residents of Cape Coast attending the main health facility in the metropolis, with females and middle age adults found to be most vulnerable. Several socio-demographic and lifestyle determinants account for the high prevalence of overweight and obesity in the study area and calls for a concerted effort by health and wellness professionals to reduce the disease burden and associated co-morbidities.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank the administrator and management of the Central Regional Hospital for granting them permission to use their facility and equipments for the conduct of the study. We would also like to thank all the staff of the OPD and Mr Samuel Koranchie of the Diabetes Clinic of the Hospital for their immense support during the data collection. The financial support from Radel Consulting, a public health research and consultancy firm located in Accra, Ghana is very much appreciated.

REFERENCES

  • Lopez A, Mathers C, Ezzati M, Jamison D and C Murray Global Burden of disease and risk factors. New York: Oxford University Press 2006.
  • WHO. Preventing chronic diseases, a vital investment. Geneva: World Health Organization 2005.
  • Campbell T and A Campbell Emerging disease burdens and the poor in cities of the developing world. J Urban Health 2007; 84(3):i54-64.
  • WHO. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series No. 894. Geneva: World Health Organisation 1998.
  • Abubakari AR, Lauder W, Agyemang C, Jones M, Kirk A and RS Bhopal Prevalence and time trends in obesity among adult West African populations: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2008; 9(4):297–311.
  • Malnick SD and H Knobler The medical complications of obesity. QJM 2006; 99(9):565-579.
  • Asfaw A The effects of obesity on doctor-diagnosed chronic diseases in Africa: empirical results from Senegal and South Africa. J Public Health Policy 2006; 27(3):250-264.
  • Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF and MH Gail Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA 2007; 298(17):2028-2037.
  • Orpana HM, Berthelot JM, Kaplan MS, Feeny DH, McFarland B and NA Ross BMI and mortality: results from a national longitudinal study of Canadian adults Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.191.aa.
  • WHO. Obesity and overweight Fact Sheet Geneva: WHO 2004. www.who.org\Papers\Obesity\WHOObesity and overweight.htm Accessed May 2010.
  • McLellan F Obesity rising to alarming levels around the world. Lancet 2002; 359(9315):1412.
  • Walker AR, Adam F and BF Walker World pandemic of obesity: the situation in Southern African populations. Public Health 2001; 115:368-372.
  • Popkin BM The nutrition transition in low income countries: an emerging crisis. Nutr Rev 1994; 52:285–298.
  • Martorell R, Khan LK, Hughes ML and LM Grummer-Strawn Obesity in women from developing countries. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54(3):247-252.
  • Kamadjeu RM, Edwards R, Atanga JS, Kiawi EC, Unwin N and JC Mbanya Anthropometry measures and prevalence of obesity in the urban adult population of Cameroon: an update from the Cameroon Burden of Diabetes Baseline Survey. BMC Public Health 2006; 6:228.
  • Sodjinou R, Agueh V, Fayomi B and H Delisle Obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors in urban adults of Benin: relationship with socio-economic status, urbanisation, and lifestyle patterns. BMC Public Health 2008; 8:84.
  • Biritwum R, Gyapong J and G Mensah The epidemiology of obesity in Ghana. Ghana Med J 2005; 39:82–85.
  • Amoah AGB Sociodemographic variations in obesity among Ghanaian adults. Public Health Nutr 2003; 6(8):751–757.
  • van der Merwe MT and MS Pepper Obesity in South Africa. Obes Rev 2006; 7:315–322.
  • Puoane T, Steyn K, Bradshaw D, Laubscher R, Fourie J, Lambert V and N Mbananga Obesity in South Africa. The South African demographic and health survey. Obes Res 2002; 10:1038–1048.
  • Uauy R, Albala C and J Kain Obesity trends in Latin America: transiting from under to overweight. J Nutr 2001; 131:S893–S899.
  • Zhang X, Sun Z, Zhang X, Zheng L, Liu S, Xu C, Li J, Zhao F, Li J, Hu D and Sun Y Prevalence and associated factors of overweight and obesity in a Chinese Rural Population. Obesity 2008; 16:168–171.
  • Scidell JC Epidemiology of obesity. Semin Vasc Med 2005; 5:3–14.
  • Steyn K, Bourne L, Jooste P, Fourie JM, Rossouw K and C Lombard Anthropometric profile of a black population of the Cape Peninsula in South Africa. East Afri Med J 1998; 75:35–40.
  • Ziraba AK, Fotso JC and R Ochako Overweight and obesity in urban Africa: a problem of the rich or the poor? BMC Public Health 2009; 9:465.
  • Heliovaara M and A Aromaa Parity and obesity. J Epidemiol Community Health 1981; 35(3):197-199.
  • Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Risvas G, Kontogianni MD, Zampelas A and C Stefanadis Epidemiology of overweight and obesity in a Greek adult population: the ATTICA study. Obes Res 2004; 12:1914–1920.
  • Cameron AJ, Welborn TA, Zimmet PZ, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Salmon J, Dalton M, Jolley D and JE Shaw Overweight and obesity in Australia: the 1999–2000 Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Med J Aust 2003; 178:427–432.
  • Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL and CL Johnson Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002; 288:1723–1727.
  • Lankford TR Foundations of normal and therapeutic nutrition. 2nd Edition. Albany, New York: Delmar Publishers Inc 1994.
  • Copyright 2011 - African Journal of Food Agriculture, Nutrition and Development


    The following images related to this document are available:

    Photo images

    [nd11032t1.jpg] [nd11032t2.jpg] [nd11032t8.jpg] [nd11032t3.jpg] [nd11032t4.jpg] [nd11032t6.jpg] [nd11032t7.jpg] [nd11032t5.jpg]
    Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
    © Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
    Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
    System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil