search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development
Rural Outreach Program
ISSN: 1684-5358 EISSN: 1684-5374
Vol. 11, Num. 3, 2011, pp. 4867- 4879

African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2011 pp. 4867- 4879

An Agro-Economic Appraisal Of The Response Of Okra To Leaf Defoliation: Growth And Marketable Yield

Adeniyi OR1* and A Ayandiji2

*Corresponding author E-mail: adeniyiwamiwa2008@yahoo.com

1 Production and Farm Management Economist, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State. Nigeria and formerly a Chief Lecturer in Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo, Ondo State, Nigeria.
2Agricultural Extensionist, Lecturer in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State. Nigeria. banji22aug@yahoo.com

Code Number: nd11034

ABSTRACT

The leaves, shoots, immature pods and dry seeds of okra are used extensively in vegetable food preparations in the tropics. The fruit is rich in minerals and vitamins, which are essential for body functions. The soft and succulent nature of the leaves make them vulnerable to attack and subsequent damage by a range of leaf eating insects, animal pests and man. Such damage results in remarkable yield loss and reduced market value. Identification of the critical stages of attack and extent of loss taking place at each stage of development of the plant could aid in planning strategies for prevention and/or control. Thus, two field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of leaf removal on the growth and marketable yield of okra. The treatments on leaf defoliation at different stages of development consisted of removal of leaves at 4 weeks after sowing (WAS) as early vegetative stage, 6WAS (at floral budding stage) and 8 WAS (at early fruiting stage). The treatments on the degrees of defoliation included the control (no leaf removal), removal of a quarter (D25), half (D50), three quarter (D75) or total removal (D100) of every fully expanded leaf. Different proportions of every leaf were removed with sharpened scissors. Each treatment was replicated four times. The experiment was 3 x 5 factorial with randomized complete block design. Current market price was used to value the yields. The removal of up to a quarter of each leaf did not affect the fruit yield significantly but the yield was significantly reduced by 39, 79 and 86% when ½, ¾ of each leaf and complete leaf were defoliated, respectively. In money terms, the losses were N26,390($175.93), N52,780($351.87), and N57,876($385.84) per hectare, respectively for these various defoliation levels. Removal of okra leaves during the early fruiting stage led to 82% marketable yield reduction. Complete leaf defoliation was detrimental to fruit yield. The results suggested that okra could tolerate 25% defoliation as might occur from leaf eating insects, human predators or foliage pathogenic infections but beyond this level, it would be detrimental. A programme of control of leaf predators in okra management should therefore commence prior to or at the early fruiting phase in order to realize yields of good value. Further research on commercial uses of okra and the economics of pest control on okra fields is recommended.

Key words: Agro-economic, Defoliation, Fruiting, Yield, Commercial

INTRODUCTION

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench) is a popular vegetable in the tropics, cultivated for its immature pods and dry seeds [1, 2]. It is a flowering plant in the mallow family and known in many English speaking countries as ladys fingers or gumbo. It is a good source of vitamins C and A, also B complex vitamins, iron and Calcium [3]. It is low in calories, a good source of dietary fibre and is fat free. The vitamin C present in its fruits and vegetables is a powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory, making it play a major role in fighting cancer and heart disease and also helping keep the digestive system healthy [4]. The leaves are tender and mild to eat and can be taken to control blood pressure by enhancing blood flow. Its superior fibre content helps to stabilize blood sugar as it curbs the rate at which sugar is absorbed from the intestinal tract. The greenish yellow edible oil extracted from the seeds of okra has a pleasant taste and odour and is high in unsaturated fats such as oleic acid and linoleic acid [5]. A few people eat the young shoot and leaves as vegetable salad. Okra seeds may be roasted and ground to form a caffeinate-free substitute for coffee [6].

When adequate control measures are not properly taken, the leaves are most often damaged by a range of leaf eating insect pests such as grasshoppers, leaf rollers (Hanitalodes derogate), caterpillars, spider mites (Tetranychus spp.), Podagrica spp. Sylepta derogate and diseases such as early blight, powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica) and black mould (Carcospora abelmoschi)  a very common phenomenon in most small-holder farms in the developing tropical countries [7,8, 9]. These types of damage (either through the removal of leaves by man as vegetables or by insects, pests and diseases) on okra foliage when it is still actively growing on the field may reduce the physiological activities of the plant and decrease the supply of assimilates to the developing pods thereby causing appreciable yield loss [10].

Leaf loss, according to Pandey [11], interferes with many processes of the plant, not only after flowering but also in the early vegetative phase and it may alter the flowering pattern and storage of assimilate in the vegetative structures. In the literature, there is little information on the effect of varying degrees of leaf defoliation at different stages of okra growth on marketable yield in the humid tropical environments [9, 12].

Ewete [13] had earlier reported that one of the factors limiting the yield of okra fruit in the tropics was the range of insect pests associated with the crop. Hence the determination of simulating the effects of insects, pests or diseases through the removal of leaves in okra field will help in generating the required data for providing information to farmers on the importance and timing of pest control management in okra fields. In the study area, typical of developing tropical countries, the majority of farmers take few protective measures against predations on the crops. Such measures, including hand picking of insect pests, spreading of wood ash on young leaves and frequent harvesting of immature pods were done at times at odd or arbitrary periods [14, 15]

The objective of the work reported here, therefore, was to simulate the effects of insect predation on yield of okra by removing varying proportions of leaf at different stages of growth and observing their respective yield response. This is with a view to advising the farmers on optimal pest control management for increased fruit yield of okra. The quality and quantity of fruit yield here is considered as proxy for measuring the economic value of okra produced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two field trials were conducted at the Agricultural Research Farms of Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo (07005'N,04055'E), Nigeria, during the rainy seasons in two consecutive years using early maturing (V35) okra that is commonly grown in the western part of the country. The soil at the site was a well-drained sandy loam with the following chemical characteristics: 1.41% organic matter, 0.268% total N; 6.6ppm available P (BRAYS-P1):1:14 me/100g Ca; 0.31me/100 K and pH 5.5 (1:1 soil water ratio). This soils characteristics are typical of the okra growing zone of western Nigeria.

The treatments on leaf defoliation at different stages of development consisted of removal of leaves at 4 weeks after sowing (WAS) as early vegetative stage, 6 WAS (at floral budding stage) and 8 WAS (at early fruiting stage). The treatments on the degrees of defoliation included the control (no leaf removal), removal of a quarter (D25), half (D50), three quarter (D75) or total removal (D100) of every fully expanded leaf. Different proportions of every leaf were removed with sharpened scissors. Each treatment was replicated four times. The experiment was 3 x 5 factorial with randomized complete block design.

Each plot measured 19.2m by 4.8m and plant spacing was 60 x 45cm. A single plant was established per stand giving a plant population of about 37,000 plants per hectare. All plots were regularly hand-weeded and foliar pests controlled by spraying with a mixture of 300ml ha-1 of cymbush 10EC (containing 100mg Litre -1 cypemethrin) in 500 litres of water and 0.75 kg a.i.ha-1 furadan 10% (carbofuran) at an interval of one week, five times starting on the fifth day after formation of flower buds .

Assessment of some of the indicators of growth and development, which could ultimately determine quality of yield was made by measuring plant height, branch number, leaf area indices, shoot dry weight and days to first harvest. Measurements were taken from 12 plants, randomly taken from the centre rows of each treatment plot where interaction was assumed to be optimal. Average leaf areas were determined by the method described by Tayo [16] in which a random sample of five leaves were taken from each treatment and the area determined by the graph paper method. Using the dry weight of the sample and the total leaf weight, the leaf area per plant was estimated by simple proportion. Dry weights were recorded after drying the samples continuously at 900C for 48 hours. Marketable fruits were harvested from 40 plants per treatment every four days and the number, weights, harvest indices and total fruit yields recorded. The selection of 12, 5 and 40 plants, leaves and plants fruits, respectively for analyses was based on fair representation of sample, the limitation of space and time available for the experiment.

Pods without blemish measuring 4.0cm and above in length were regarded as marketable. Yields were valued with the average of prices paid by consumers over the period covered by the study as obtained from the consumer panel.

RESULTS

The results obtained from the two trials are similar; hence, the averages of the data obtained from the experiments for the two-year period are analyzed for the results reported in this study.

As shown in table 1, plant height, shoot dry weight, branch number and leaf area indices decreased significantly while maturity period is elongated with increasing degree of leaf defoliation. It is also shown that growth was most adversely affected when defoliation occurs at the early fruiting stage (see table 1). Baloch et al. [17] had observed that, for the various cultivars of okra considered, the most critical period for yield determination is the early fruiting stage .The current result is, therefore, in line with their observation.

Table 1: Effect of severity of leaf defoliation on growth of okra+

Treatment (Defoliation

Plant

Height

(cm)

No of

Branches

Plant -1

Days to first

Harvest

(DAS)

Shoot dry

Weight

(g plant -1)

Leaf area

index

Degree of Defoliation

Control (None)

68.6

3.8

52

74.7

0.88

One quarter

63.2

3.0

52

65.5

0.74

Half

51.9

3.1

54

49.4

0.59

Three quarter

46.4

2.8

57

34.3

0.25

Complete

36.4

2.5

59

20.9

0.21

LSD

10.4**

1.3n.s.

2.08*

19.1**

0.11**

Stage of plant development

Early

Vegetative

63.1

2.8

56

44.9

0.56

Floral budding

54.9

3.3

57

33.3

0.33

Early fruiting

46.2

2.3

58

27.9

0.32

LSD

7.1 **

1.0n.s

2.3*

11.7**

0.14**

DAS = Days after sowing, n.s. = not significant, * = significant at 0.05
WAS = Weeks after sowing, + = samples taken at 13WAS, ** = significant at 0.01
LSD = Least Significant Difference

Complete leaf defoliation or defoliating three-quarters and half of each leaf at this critical stage reduced plant height, decreased shoot dry weight, branch number and leaf area index of okra. This observation has been implied by Jose and Keith [18] in their study of okra production in California when seasonal variations in weather tend to affect negatively all the growth characteristics.

Table 2 presents the results of the effect of severity of leaf defoliation on fruit yield of okra. There was significant reduction in the number of fruits per plant, weight of fruits and harvest index and fruit yield per hectare as the degree of defoliation becomes more intense. Similar observation has been made in some other countries in the tropics [12, 19].

Table 2: Effect of severity of leaf defoliation on fruit yield of okra

Treatment

(Defoliation)

No of

Fruits

plant -1

Weight fruit -1

Harvest

Index

Fruit yield

(t ha -1)

Degree of Defoliation

Control (None)

13.3

14.1

0.55

7.36

One quarter

12.0

13.7

0.47

6.22

Half

8.3

12.1

0.40

4.46

Three quarter

5.7

6.7

0.23

1.56

Complete

3.5

5.9

0.19

1.00

LSD

2.3**

1.1**

0.11**

1.70**

Stage of plant development

Early

Vegetative

9.0

11.2

0.39

5.38

Floral budding

5.7

9.1

0.27

3.38

Early fruiting

3.5

7.3

0.21

1.34

LSD

1.3*

1.9*

0.11*

1.27*

* = significant at 0.05, ** = significant at 0.01


The harvesting of first marketable fruits was delayed by two, four and six days when half of each leaf, three quarters of each leaf and the whole leaves were defoliated, respectively (see table 2).

The interactive effects of the various degrees of defoliation administered at different stages of growth of okra were significant in its growth and fruit yields (see tables 3 and 4). As the degree of defoliation increased from one quarter to complete defoliation, the percentage rates of yield reductions ranged from 0-73, 15-93 and 27-96% at early vegetative, floral budding and early fruiting stages, respectively. The effect of each rate of defoliation at the reproductive stage relative to that of the vegetative stage was pronounced. This pointed to the extreme vulnerability of the reproductive stages (especially the early flowering stage) to defoliation by pests.


Table 3: Interactive effects of stage and degree of defoliation on growth of okra

Treatment

(Defoliation)

Plant

Height

(cm)

No of

Branches

Plant -1

Days to

First

Harvest

(DAS)

Shoot dry

Weight

(g plant -1)

Leaf area

Index

Early Vegetative Stage

Control (None)

67.9

3.6

51

70.5

0.91

One quarter

67.3

3.0

52

60.2

0.80

Half

61.4

3.0

54

51.5

0.64

Three quarters

56.0

2.4

56

30.0

0.40

Complete

48.7

2.4

58

23.2

0.25

Floral budding stage

Control

69.6

4.2

52

77.5

0.78

One quarter

62.0

3.2

53

56.0

0.60

Half

56.0

3.4

56

50.5

0.42

Three quarters

47.0

2.9

58

19.0

0.16

Complete

38.0

2.6

64

17.8

0.10

Early fruiting stage

Control

68.5

3.5

53

71.5

0.76

One quarter

61.0

2.6

53

50.0

0.51

Half

40.0

2.9

56

36.2

0.35

Three quarters

37.0

2.4

59

20.0

0.10

Complete

25.0

2.3

62

21.5

0.06

LSD

11.5**

1.7n.s-

4.4*

17.9*

0.10**

n. s. = not significant, * = significant at 0.05, * * = significant at 0.01



Table 4: Interactive effects of stage and degree of defoliation on fruit yield of okra

Treatment

(Defoliation)

No of

Fruits plant -1

Weight fruit -1

Harvest

Index

Fruit yield

(t ha-1)

Early Vegetative Stage

Control

12.0

14.3

0.57

7.82

One quarter

13.0

14.5

0.50

8.00

Half

10.0

13.5

0.42

6.30

Three quarters

6.0

8.7

0.27

3.72

Complete

4.0

6.0

0.19

2.12

Floral budding Stage

Control

13.0

14.2

0.57

7.45

One quarter

12.1

12.8

0.47

6.3

Half

8.4

8.8

0.39

3.87

Three quarters

5.0

5.3

0.20

1.10

Complete

3.3

3.9

0.17

0.52

Early fruiting Stage

Control

13.0

14.1

0.57

6.85

One quarter

9.0

10.0

0.44

5.0

Half

6.3

6.8

0.38

1.57

Three quarters

3.0

4.2

0.20

0.60

Complete

2.0

2.6

0.16

0.25

LSD

2.1**

2.3**

0.12*

1.51**

*- significant at 0.05, * * = significant at 0.01

DISCUSSION

The significant reduction in the growth and yields of defoliated plants might be due to the reduction in assimilates production in the plants, thereby causing shortage of metabolites movement from the plant parts to the developing fruits. Besides, this could also lead to abscission of flowers and abortion of fruits that were witnessed in the defoliated plants. The intensity of these effects increases with increase in the degree of defoliation.

Defoliation of one quarter of leaves led to a fruit yield reduction of about 15% as compared with losses of about 39, 79 and 86% when half, three quarters and the whole leaves were defoliated, respectively. It seems, therefore, that okra can tolerate at most 25% defoliation before any substantial loss occurs. A similar tolerance level has been reported in tomato and okra [20, 21].

The stage at which defoliation occurred in okra had significant effects on plant height, shoot dry weight, leaf area index (Table 1) and the fruit yields (Table 2). The growth and fruit yields of okra plants defoliated at the early fruiting stage were most adversely affected while those that defoliated at early vegetative stage were least affected. For example, the average percentage reduction in total fruit yield when plants were defoliated at early fruiting, floral budding and early vegetative stages were 82, 54 and 27, respectively. The adverse effect of defoliation during the reproductive stage on fruit yield tends to suggest that fruiting in okra depends largely on post flowering photosynthesis. Thus, adequate protection against insects and diseases is necessary, particularly during this stage in order to realize full yield potentials.

At the average price of N9, 100($60.67) per tonne of okra during the period of study, losses ranging between N26, 390($175.93) and N57, 876($385.84) per hectare (39%-86%) could be incurred if more than half of the leaves are defoliated especially during the critical early fruiting stage.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that the critical period for control of defoliating pests on okra fields are the early fruiting and floral budding stages of plant development if one has to realize the potential yield. The early fruiting stage is, however, more critical and, therefore, intensification of efforts to control leaf predators at this period is recommended for valuable fruit yield in okra production.

It is also recommended that further research be conducted on control of pests at the critical stages to investigate the economics of control and compare same with the losses being anticipated from the pest-induced damages. In addition, there is potential in increasing market demand for okra if other avenues of use such as in beverages and drug manufacture are explored. This also calls for further research.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Dr C T Omotunde, Crop Physiologist, a former Senior Lecturer of Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo, for providing the expertise for carrying out the experiment.

REFERENCES

  1. Rice RP, Rice LW and HD Tindall Fruit and Vegetable Production in Africa, Journal of Tropical Ecology. Cambridge University Press. 1990; 6:124-125.
  2. Anonymous A yellow vein mosaic disease resistant new variety of okra. A Leaflet of BARI Dherosh-1 USAID/ BARC/AVRDC /BARI, Joydebpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 1998.
  3. Isbatou B, Nathan WS, Xinia EF, Frisch RJ, Bruce AW, Lesa P and DF Alyce Calcium Analysis of Selected Western African Foods, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2001;14:37-42.
  4. Mohamed Mudathir MA Studies on the Control of Insect Pests in Vegetables (okra, tomato and onion) in Sudan, with special reference to Neem preparations. Published PhD thesis, Institute of Phytopathology and Applied Zoology, University of Giessen. 2000.
  5. Franklin W M Okra, Potential Multiple-purpose crop for the temperate Zones and Tropics, Economic Botany1982; 36:340-345.
  6. N R C. Okra, Lost crops of Africa:Volume 2:Vegetables.National Research Council, National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-10333 6, 2006. Retrieved- 2008.
  7. Webb SE Insect management of okra, In ENY-466(IG152);Entomology and Nematology Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 2010: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ Accessed Sept.10,2010.
  8. Hill SN and MK Hausbeck Evaluation of TOM-CAST in Timing Fungicide Sprays for management of Alternaria Blight on American Ginseng. In:Plant Disease (Edited by R.Michael Davis)-American Phytopathological Society, 2008; 92(12):1611-1615.
  9. Kelemu S, Calvert L, Cardona C, Correa F, Mahuku G, Alvarez E, Morales F, Belloti A, Buruchara R and E Minga Advances in application of agricultural Bio-technology to control diseases and pests of tropical crops.The 9th ICABR International Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology, 2005:Ten years Later,Ravello,Italy.19p.
  10. James B, Atcha-Ahowe C, Godonou I, Baimey H, Goergen H, Sikirou R and M Toko Integrated Pest management in Vegetable Production: A guide for extension workers in West Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 2010;120p.
  11. Pandey RK Influence of defoliation on seed yield in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.) in a sub-Tropical environment. Field Crops Research. 1983; 7: 249  256.
  12. Fidele Tiendrebeogo VS, Edgar T, Jean-Michael L, Nicholas B, Guissa K, Alfred S and T Oumar Impact of okra leaf curl disease on morphology and yield of okro. Crop protection 2010; 29(7):712-716.
  13. Ewete FK Insect species and description of damage caused on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench). East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 1978; 44: 152  163.
  14. Malenge FK Evaluation of efficacy and Cost effectiveness of selected synthetic insecticides neem products and border crops in management of aphids (Aphis gossypii) in okra (Abelmochus esculentus) fields in Kenya. Published Masters thesis, Dept of Crop Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Nairobi. 2005.
  15. Frances M Strategies for organic grasshopper control. 2006: http:// www.greenharvest.com.au/pestcontrol/grasshopper_info.html Accessed Sept. 10, 2010.
  16. Tayo TO Comparative analysis of the growth, development and yield of three soyabean varieties (Glycine max L). Journal of Agricultural Science  Camb. 1977; 88: 151  157.
  17. Baloch AF, Quayyum SM and MA Baloch Growth and yield performance of okra (Abemoschus esculentus L.) Cultivars. Gomal Univ. J.Res, 1990;10:191.
  18. Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland Publication-ISBN 978-1-7210-60107-002-9. 1996; p.2.
  19. Youdeowei A Integrated Pest Management Practices for the production of Vegetables. Ministry of Agriculture (MOFA) Plant protection and Regulatory Services Directorate(PPRSO),Ghana,and German Development Corporation (GTZ).ISBN 9988-1088-5. 2002.
  20. Stacey DL The effect of artificial defoliation on the yield of tomato plants and its relevance to pest damage. Journal of Horticultural Science 1983; 58: 117  120.
  21. Olasantan FO Effect of leaf removal on the growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and its relevance to leaf harvesting patterns and pest damage. Experimental Agriculture 1988; 24: 449  455.

Copyright 2011 - African Journal of Food Agriculture, Nutrition and Development


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[nd11034t2.jpg] [nd11034t1.jpg] [nd11034t4.jpg] [nd11034t3.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil