|
Nigerian Food Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2007, pp. 161-170 Physical, functional and amylograph pasting properties of cocoyam-soybean-crayfish flour blends Oti, E.1 and Akobundu, E. N. T2. 1 Postharvest Technology Programme, National Root Crops Research Institute,PMB 7006, Umuahia, Nigeria and Code Number: nf07016 ABSTRACT
Four composite flours prepared by combining cooked cocoyam cormels, cooked soybeans, and dried crayfish in the ratios 80:15:5. 70:25:5, 60:35:5. 50:45:5 were analyzed for selected physical and functional properties. The composite flours were reconstituted into pastes and the relative viscosities of the pastes determined. The amylograph pasting viscosities of the blends were also measured. Wettabilityandbulkdensity(looseandpacked) increased with increase in ratio of cocoyam flour in the mixture. The composite flours were not significantly different in water absorption capacity, their emulsion stabilities were low, and they formed very little and very unstable foams. The composite flour with the lowest ratio of cocoyam has a least gelation concentration of 18% (w/ v) flour, whereas the other three had a least gelation concentrationof16%(w/v)flour. Therewasaverystrong tendency for the relative viscosities of the composite flours to increase significantly with increase in the proportion of the cocoyam flour in the mixture. Amylograph pasting viscosity measurements of the cocoyam-soybean-crayfish composite flours gave maximum (peak) viscosity values ranging from 4 to 75 Branbender units. As the proportion of cocoyam in the mixture increased the peak viscosity increased, whereas an increase in soybean ratio decreased the peak viscosity but increased the gelation temperature. The setback value of each composite flour was zero. Key Words: Cocoyam-soybean-crayfish flour blends, physical , functional , amylograph pasting properties, INTRODUCTIONCocoyam (Colocasia and Xanthosoma spp.) is an under-exploited tuber crop although the literature is replete with its potential nutritional applications (Pedrama, 1978; Onwueme, 1987; Eleje, 1987; Idowu et al., 1996). The main nutrient in cormels of cocoyam is carbohydrate (mostly starch), Colocasia containing 13% and Xanthosoma 17 - 26% carbohydrates on a fresh weight basis (Coursey, 1968). Thesizeofcocoyamstarchgranuleranges from 3 - 20 micrometers, the extremely small sizeof Colocasia starch granule rendering it very easily digestible (Onwueme, 1987) thus making cocoyam suitable for complementary food production. Approximately 35 - 40% of the total dry matter of soybean (Glycine max) is protein and about 20% contains highly polyunsaturated fatty acids (Emovon, 1987; Weingarner, 1987). Soybean lacks starch (Fukushima, 1991). Heating soybean denatures its proteins and the functional properties such as gelation, emulsification, foaming, and hydration are reflections of the protein structure of the denaturedstate(Yamauchi etal., 1991). Crayfish is a crustacean of the order Decapoda and contains 47.7% of protein on dry weight basis (Oti, 2003). A number of food processing operations depend heavily upon rheological properties (deformation and flow characteristics) at an intermediate stage of manufacture because this has profound effect upon the quality of the finished product and hence its acceptability (Bourne, 1982). Starch gelatinization results from disruption or disorganization of the granule structure by heat and this event effects digestibility and texture of starch containing foods; leaching of amylase enhances susceptibility of starch to enzyme attack (Rickard, 1991) and the textural quality of utmost importance in certain foods is viscosity (Osman, 1967). The objective of this study was to determine the pasting viscosity characteristics, and selected physical and functional properties, of mixtures of flours of cooked cocoyam cormels, cooked soybeans, and dried crayfish with a view to determining the suitability of the blends for complementary food production. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preparation of cocoyam soybean-crayfish flour blends A mechanical slicer (Multi Wonder UK Design No. S-309) was used to produce approximately 4 mm thick slices from peeled and washed cormels of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta, var cocoindia). Three kilograms of the slices were boiled in 15 litres of potable water contained in aluminium pot for 15 min. The cooked slices were oven-dried at 80oC for 9 h., milled with a Premier Grinding Mill model 1A to obtain flour which was subsequently sieved through 0.35 mm sieve to yield a flour of fine texture. Essentially the method of Faryana (1985) was used for processing the soybeans into flour. The soybeans were boiled in water (water:soybean v/v) was 2:1) in aluminium pot for 30 min. After boiling, the soybeans were soaked in water (2:1) for 12 h, and the water changed every 6 h, The seed coats were removed by rubbing between the palms. The kernels were rinsed and dried in a forced air Gallenkamp oven at 80oC for 6 h, the dried soybeans were milled with Premier Grinding Mill model 1A and the resulting flour sieved through 0.35 mm sieve to yield flour of fine texture. Extraneousmaterialswereremovedfromthe crayfish by hand picking and winnowing. The sorted crayfish was then washed, placed in meshed aluminium container for water to drain, dried in forced air Gallenkamp oven at 80oC for 4 h, and milled with the dry mill of National Quickie-Mini blender into flour which was subsequently sieved with 0.35 mm sieve to produce flour of fine texture. Composite flours were prepared from the cocoyam, soybean, and crayfish flours in the ratios 80:15:5, 70:25:5, and 50:34:5 and the samples were designated CSC 1, CSC 2, CSC 3 and CSC 4, respectively. Assessment of Physical Qualities of Cocoyam-Soybean-Crayfish Composite Flour Wettability and bulk density (loose and packed) of the cocoyam-soybean crayfish composite flours were determined by the method of Okezie and Bello (1988). Relative viscosity of the composite flour was estimated by the method of Asinobi et al. (1998). The estimation involved determining the time taken by a ball bearing weighing 2 g dropped in a paste of the composite flour to fall to the bottom of 100 ml. measuring cylinder containing the paste. The paste was prepared by reconstituting 20 g flour with 85 ml distilled water. The relative viscosity was calculated using the following relation: Relative viscosity = h/g x 100, where Determination of the functional properties of the composite flours Functional properties (gelation property, water absorption capacity and foaming capacity/ foam stability) were estimated employing the method of Abbey and Ibeh (1988) and emulsion capacity/stability by the method of Okezie and Bello (1988) except that a micro-blender was not used. National Quickie-mini blender was used in place of a micro-blender and the weights of samples and volumes of oil-distilled water used were adjusted accordingly to maintain the weight to volume ratio. Determination of the Amylograph Pasting Properties of the Composite Flours The pasting characteristics of the cocoyamsoybean-crayfish composite flours were determined by the method of Rasper and Coursey (1967) using a Brabender amylograph. The standard mode was used in which the sample was heated at constant heating rate (2.5oC/min.) from starting point up to a final temperature (95oC) and the viscosity was recorded at a constant rotational velocity (50 rev./min) of the measuring vessel. Statistical Analysis Analysis of variance was carried out on all data collected using Generalized Linear Model procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (1989). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONBulk density (loose and packed) and wettability were highest in CSC 1 (flour with the highest cocoyam ratio) and lowest in CSC 4 (flour with the lowest cocoyam ratio) (Table 1). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among the composite flour samples with respect to these parameters. Bulk density of foods increases with increase in starch content (Bhattachrya and Prakash, 1994). The packed and loose bulk densities of the composite flours tended to increase with increase in cocoyam flour content, and the cocoyam flour contained mainly starch (Coursey, 1968). The composite flours were derived from cocoyam, soybean, and crayfish the proteins of which were denatured by heat processing, and denatured proteins bind more water (Padmashree et al., 1987). The time taken to dissolve the composite flours tended to decrease with increase in protein content of the flour thus suggesting that the higher the level of denatured protein in these flours the faster they imbibed water, or were wetted. There was a very strong tendency for the relative viscosities of the composite flours to increase significantly with increase in the ratio of cocoyam flour in the mixture (Table 1). While soybean lacks starch (Fukushima, 1991), cocoyamcontainsmainlystarch(Coursey, 1968). The cocoyam-soybean-crayfish composite flours contained gelatinized starch which formed viscous dispersions when the flours were reconstituted with water (Meyer, 1978). Consequently, composite flours which contained higher ratios of starch produced more viscous dispersions and correspondingly higher relative viscosities. Significant differences (p < 0.05) existed among the cocoyam-soybean-crayfish flours (CSC 1, CSC 2, CSC 3, CSC 4) with respect to emulsion capacity, but no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in water absorption capacity (Table 1). Proteins aid in formation and stabilization of emulsion (McWatters and Cherry, 1981) and heat processing reduces emulsion capacity (Abbey and Ibeh, 1988). The emulsion capacities of the composite flours were low probably because the components of the composites were heat processed. CSC 3 and CSC 4 were higher in protein content than CSC 1 and CSC 2 (Table 2) and the former, in agreement with the findings of McWatters and Cherry (1981), were higher in emulsion capacity than the latter. The emulsion stabilities of the flour blends were also low (Fig. 1) apparently because none of the components of the blends is known to contain a substantial amount of any known natural stabilizer. In addition, the proteins which would have helped to stabilize the emulsions had been denatured by heat processing. The oil absorption capacities of the composite flours tended to increase with increase in protein content (Table 1) since the protein in foods influences fat absorption (Richest et al., 1974). The composite flours contained denatured proteins with high affinity for water (Padmashree, 1978) and no significant differthat cocoyam starch is not susceptible to retrogradation thus rendering it suitable for complementary food manufacture. Furthermore, the setback values of the cocoyam-soybeancrayfish composite flours were not different from that of NUTREND (a reference baby food) (Table 3). CONCLUSIONThe amylograph pasting characteristics of the composite flours (CSC 1, CSC 2, CSC 3, and CSC 4) clearly show that pastes produced from the composite flours containing 80% and 70% cocoyam flour (CSC 1 and CSC 2, respectively) were much bulkier (much more viscous) than the pastesfromcompositescontaining60%and50% cocoyam flour (CSC 3 and CSC 4, respectively). If a complementary food is bulky infants and young children cannot consume enough at a time to meet their energy needs. Diluting the food with water to make it less bulky may produce a paste with very low energy density which is not suitable for growing children. Appropriate quantities of food grade amylase may be incorporated into CSC 1 and CSC 2 to reduce their viscosity to acceptable degree when reconstituted without diminishing their energy density drastically. Alternatively, the soybean used in the production of the cocoyam-soybeancrayfish base foods could be malted to serve as a source of amylase. Since the setback value of the composite flours was found to be zero, the starch of the composite flours (contributed solely by the cocoyam flour since both soybean and crayfish lack starch) is not susceptible to retrogradation (aggregation of part of starch to form microcrystals which precipitate). Pastes may be produced from the composite flours and stored without suffering retrogradation, thus obviating the difficulty encountered by infants and young children in digesting retrograded starch. The following characteristics of CSC 3 and CSC 4 strongly commend them for use as base foods in complementary food production: (i)They have a higher tendency than CSC 1 and CSC 2 to be wettable. This makes their reconstitution easier and faster. (ii) They producepastes of much lower viscosities than those of CSC 1 and CSC 2. This removes the need to incorporate amylase (a thinning enzyme) into the composites. (iii)They have significantly higher protein contents than CSC 1 and CSC 2. High protein contents in complementary foods are desirable because of their functional. REFERENCES
© Copyright 2007 - Annals of African Medicine. The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[nf07016f1.jpg] [nf07016t1.jpg] [nf07016t3.jpg] [nf07016t2.jpg] |
|