|
Neurology India, Vol. 51, No. 3, July, 2003, pp. 376-378 Two cases of neuro-Behçet's disease mimicking cerebral tumor Tuzgen S, Kaya AH, Erdincler D, Oguzoglu SA, Ulu O, Saip S Correspondence Address: Code Number: ni03122 ABSTRACT Two cases of neuro-Behçet's disease with isolated, solitary fronto-temporal and mesencephalic lesions respectively are reported. The cases were misdiagnosed as cerebral tumor. The postoperative outcome of the first patient was not satisfactory as he developed hemispheric edema. The second patient, with mesencephalic lesion, was treated only with corticosteroids, and the patient improved significantly. The lesion in this case resolved completely at six-month follow-up. We conclude that distinguishing the isolated solitary cerebral lesion of the Behçet's disease from a tumor may prevent surgical intervention. INTRODUCTION Behçet's disease is a chronic relapsing multisystem disorder, originally described in 1937 by the Turkish dermatologist Hulusi Behçet. It is characterized by the clinical triad of oral apthous ulceration, genital ulceration and ocular inflammation. The disease is now recognized as a systemic vasculitis.[1] Neurological involvement is reported to occur in 4 to 49% of the cases and mainly, it is in the form of cerebral venous thrombosis.[2],[3] The most common sites of the neural parenchymal involvement are the diencephalic, pontobulbar, thalamic, hypothalamic, basal ganglia and cerebellar regions. It is rarely seen as an isolated, solitary lesion.[3],[4] In such a case, the differential diagnosis from a primary cerebral tumor is difficult and this may result in an unnecessary surgical intervention. We present 2 cases of neuro-Behçet's disease, which presented with solitary intracerebral lesion mimicking primary cerebral tumor. The results of the surgical and conservative treatment modalities are discussed. CASE REPORTS
Case 1 DISCUSSION Behçet's disease is a multisystemic disease. Central nervous system involvement can be suspected with a detailed history, careful systemic examination, and proper laboratory and radiological evaluation. Rarely, neuro-Behçet's disease manifests as an isolated, solitary cerebral lesion.[2],[3],[4] In these cases, the correct diagnosis is difficult. Both CT and MRI are sensitive for the cerebral lesions of neuro-Behçet's disease, the latter investigation being superior and more sensitive. Neuroradiological findings are not specific and the differential diagnosis includes other vasculitic pathologies, multiple sclerosis, ischemic lesions, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis and a glial neoplasm. The lesion is hypodense on CT scans, and has high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and low signal intensity on T1-weighted MRI. A nodular contrast enhancement is possible as was seen in our second case.[3],[5],[6] Unlike multiple sclerosis wherein the white matter is involved primarily, neuro-Behçet's disease involves both gray and white matter and the brainstem. The brainstem involvement is rare in other vasculitic processes. Solitary tuberculoma must also be considered in the differential diagnosis of neuro-Behçet's lesions. In contrast with the usual appearance of the neuro-Behçet's lesions, which are hyperintense on T2-weighted images, the lesion in our second case was hypointense on T2-weighted MRI. This appearance was previously mentioned as a finding only in the subacute or chronic stage of the lesion and was thought to result from the deposits of hemosiderin.[7] No satisfactory explanation is available for this observation. Although generally the neurological manifestations of Behçet's disease appear two to four years after the first clinical presentation, there are a few reported cases of neuro-Behçet's disease in which the neurological findings preceded the other more typical systemic manifestations of the disease.[3],[5] The majority of them were misdiagnosed as intracranial tumor and some of them were operated as in our first case.[8],[9],[10] Distinguishing a solitary cerebral lesion of neuro-Behçet's disease from the tumoral pathologies is difficult in the absence of other cardinal findings such as recurrent oral and genital apthous ulcerations. The histopathological findings of the lesion are vessel wall and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltration that is consistent with vasculitis involving both arterial and venous systems.[3] As the underlying pathology in neuro-Behçet's lesion is the result of an inflammatory vasculitic process, the surgical intervention, unlike in the tumoral lesions, means the resection of normal cerebral tissue. Steroid pulse therapy has been found to be effective in the treatment of these lesions.[9],[10] The suspicion of neuro-Behçet's disease in such a lesion offers a less invasive and effective treatment choice of corticosteroid therapy. Stereotactic biopsy may help establish a diagnosis. Stereotactic biopsy followed by prompt treatment with corticosteroid regimen has been reported to be a successful modality of treatment.[8],[11],[12] REFERENCES
Copyright 2003 - Neurology India. Also available online at http://www.neurologyindia.com The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[ni03122f2.jpg] [ni03122f1.jpg] [ni03122f3.jpg] |
|