search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Neurology India
Medknow Publications on behalf of the Neurological Society of India
ISSN: 0028-3886 EISSN: 1998-4022
Vol. 52, Num. 4, 2004, pp. 513-514

Neurology India, Vol. 52, No. 4, October-December, 2004, pp. 513-514

Letter To Editor

Biomechanics responsible for effect of elbow position on biceps tendon reflex

Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, 428, Lister House, Pondicherry
Correspondence Address:Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, 428, Lister House, Pondicherry, ramnarayankaveer@yahoo.com

Code Number: ni04175

Sir,

I read with interest the electrophysiological study published by Keles et al[1] quantifying the effect of elbow position on biceps tendon reflex in normal healthy volunteers. The amplitude and reflex onset latency were studied at 3 different elbow positions, at 90°, 120°, and 150° of joint angles. It was interesting to note in this study that the mean amplitude decreased progressively from 90° to 150°. The amplitude of the biceps tendon reflex is proportional to the net forces acting at the elbow in the direction of contraction of the biceps muscle during the biceps tendon reflex, which include the force of contraction (F) of the biceps muscle and the opposing force of the horizontal component of the ′tension′ (T) in the forearm due to the weight of the forearm. The force of contraction of the biceps muscle during the reflex is again dependent on various factors such as the strength of tendon tap, influences of reciprocal inhibition etc. As mentioned in this study, if care is exerted to maintain the strength of the tendon taps similar, the amplitude may, hence depend primarily on the opposing force of the forearm tension.

When the elbow is placed at 90°, as seen in [Figure - 1], tension ′T′ is equal to the component of the weight of the forearm in vertical direction i.e. ′mg′ (′mass of the forearm′ X ′acceleration due to gravity′). The horizontal component of this force which opposes the force of contraction of muscle is mgCos 90° i.e. zero.

When the elbow is placed at 120°, as seen in [Figure - 2], tension ′T′ along the direction of the forearm will be mg/cos 30°. The horizontal component of this force opposing ′F′ will be equal to (mg/cos 30°) X cos 60° or 0.57 mg or approximately half the weight of the forearm.

When the elbow is placed at 150°, as seen in [Figure - 3], tension ′T′ along the direction of the forearm will be mg/cos 60°. The horizontal component of this force opposing ′F′ will be equal to (mg/Cos 60°) X Cos 30° or 1.73 mg. Therefore at 150°, the opposing force to muscle contraction was almost equal to twice the weight of the forearm, which led to a statistically significant decrease in the amplitude at 150° as reported by Keles et al.[1]

Evidently the opposing force to the muscle contraction due to the horizontal component of the tension in the forearm increased with the increase in the elbow angle and thence led to the decrease in the amplitude of the muscle reflex with increasing angle. Clinically, most commonly appreciated character of a DTR is its amplitude and is thus accordingly noted as exaggerated, normal or diminished reflex. Hence to obtain the maximum amplitude in order to make an appropriate clinical judgment about the biceps tendon reflex, it is best to tap the biceps tendon with the elbow placed at an angle of 90°.

REFERENCES

1.Keles I, Balci N, Beyazova M. The effect of elbow position on biceps tendon reflex. Neurol India 2004;52:350-2.  Back to cited text no. 1    

Copyright 2004 - Neurology India


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ni04175f1.jpg] [ni04175f3.jpg] [ni04175f2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil