search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Neurology India
Medknow Publications on behalf of the Neurological Society of India
ISSN: 0028-3886 EISSN: 1998-4022
Vol. 53, Num. 3, 2005, pp. 365-367

Neurology India, Vol. 53, No. 3, July-September, 2005, pp. 365-367

Letter To Editor

A solitary cryptococcal granuloma in an immunocompetent host

Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth G. S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai
Correspondence Address:Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth G. S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, tdnadkarni@hotmail.com

Date of Acceptance: 10-Mar-2005

Code Number: ni05131

Sir,

Cryptococcomas or ′cryptococcal granulomas′ are rare in an immunocompetent host in the absence of cryptococcal meningitis. The morbidity and mortality due to cryptococcosis is high unless it is diagnosed and treated early.

A 22-year-old male presented with left focal seizures with secondary generalizations for three years. The patient had no clinical evidence of immunocompromise or meningitis. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies were negative and the CD4 T-cell lymphocyte counts were normal. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain revealed a right parietal lesion. It was isodense on plain scan and there was a peripheral enhancement on contrast administration [Figure - 1]. The lesion was surrounded by cerebral edema. The patient was placed on anticonvulsants and on the clinical and radiological suspicion of a tuberculoma the patient was empirically started on anti-tuberculous therapy. The patient was seizure free and had some relief from headaches.

After about one year of anti-tuberculous therapy the patient had recurrence of seizures and developed left hemiparesis. CT scan of the brain showed a slight increase in size and of the lesion and surrounding edema. The patient now had bilateral papillodema and left hemiparesis. A stereotactic biopsy of the lesion confirmed that the lesion was a cryptococcal granuloma. The mass was surgically excised. Histopathology showed characteristic features of a fungal granuloma with fibroblasts, giant cells with yeast forms of capsulated fungal elements and necrotic areas. The inflammatory response consisted mainly of lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, fibroblasts and multinucleated giant cells studded with cryptococci [Figure - 2]. The patient was treated with liposomal amphotericin and anticonvulsants. The patient was seizure free and the left hemiparesis improved. The follow-up is of 9 months.

Cryptococci have a strong neurotropic tendency and involve the meninges and brain.

Cryptococcosis is an infection caused by yeast like fungus, Cryptococcus neoformans.[6]

The infection occurs due to inhalation of fungus into the lungs. Hematogenous spread to the brain leads to clusters of cryptococci in the periventricular areas of cortical grey matter and basal ganglia. The leptomeninges become infiltrated, thickened and opaque. The Virchow-Robin spaces around penetrating vessels are distended with organisms; most of the patients have co-existent meningitis. Granulomatous lesions may be found in the cerebral or spinal parenchyma. In our patient a cryptococcal granuloma was identified in the parietal parenchyma in the absence of meningitis.

There are few, isolated reports of cryptococcal infection in immunocompetent patients in literature. [1],[2],[3],[4] Such previously reported cases include a cryptococcoma in the pituitary,[1] pons,[2] crytococcal meningitis [3], midbrain [4], and cerebellum.[5]

Data suggest an association between cryptococcal variety and host immune status.[6] The varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans serotypes are neoformans and gattii. These two varieties differ in their epidemiology and pathogenicity. Furthermore, symptoms, outcome, and response of cryptococcosis to antifungal therapy may vary. The two varieties also differ in immune-modulating effects. Sparse clinical data suggest the gattii variant to be more virulent and more recalcitrant to antifungal therapy. A better understanding of how cryptococcal variety influences the clinical course and response to the treatment of cryptococcosis is needed. Clinicians should be aware of the association, especially in patients with refractory disease. It may be useful to type the isolate to the variety level and administer prolonged antifungal therapy.

Early aggressive therapy has the best chances of cure. All the above patients including ours have been treated with Amphotericin B. Presently liposomal amphotericin ameliorates the adverse effects of plain amphotericin and ensures better brain penetration of the drug. Flucytosine or miconozole are alternative drugs. Surgical excision with concomitant medical therapy offers the best results.

Image based diagnosis of intracranial tuberculoma is fairly accurate in patients from endemic regions and it is not considered necessary to obtain a histological diagnosis. However, Selvapandian et al[7] have demonstrated the low positive predictive value for a diagnosis of intracranial tuberculoma on CT alone and they stress the need for confirming histological diagnosis. Surgical excision is feasible when such a lesion is easily accessible and not in an eloquent area.

In conclusion, the possibility of a fungal granuloma needs to be considered in an indolent lesion in an immunocompetent host. Histological diagnosis before initiating empirical therapy is recommended for all intracranial masses.

References

1.Yu YQ, Jiang XX, Gao YJ. MRI of a pituitary cryptococcoma simulating an adenoma. Neuroradiology 1995;37:449-50.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Kesler R, Maertens P. Pontine cryptococcoma in a nonimmunocompromised individual: MRI characteristics. J Neuroimaging 1999;9:118-21.   Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Mingue Z, Castellanos A. Cryptococcal Meningitis in an immunocompetent patient efficacy of Fluconazole. Neurologia 1992;7:276-8.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI, Korshunov AG, Arutiunov NV, Imshenetskaia VF, Khukhlaeva EA. A cryptococcal granuloma of the midbrain. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 1999;2:33-6.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Hallett R, Beilke M. Cerebellar cryptococcoma in a non-AIDS patient. Infect Med 1997;14:877-80.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Peachey PR, Gubbins PO, Martin RE. The association between cryptococcal variety and immunocompetent and immuncompromised hosts. Pharmacotherapy 1998;18:255-64.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Selvapandian S, Rajshekhar V, Chandy MJ, Idikula J. Predictive value of computed tomography-based diagnosis of intracranial tuberculomas. Neurosurgery 1994;35:845-50.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  

Copyright 2005 - Neurology India


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ni05131f2.jpg] [ni05131f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil