search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Neurology India
Medknow Publications on behalf of the Neurological Society of India
ISSN: 0028-3886 EISSN: 1998-4022
Vol. 54, Num. 3, 2006, pp. 248-249

Neurology India, Vol. 54, No. 3, July-September, 2006, pp. 248-249

Invited Commentaries

Cranial neuropathy in patients with leprosy

Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences and Department of Neurophysiology and Senior Consultant in Neurology, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi
Correspondence Address:Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences and Department of Neurophysiology and Senior Consultant in Neurology, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi Email: mgouriedevi@gmail.com

Code Number: ni06081

Leprosy is a common cause of peripheral neuropathy in tropical countries including India[1] and neuropathy is observed across the spectrum of leprosy from polar tuberculoid (TT), borderline (BT, BB, BL) to polar lepromatous (LL) types. Diagnosis is not difficult when cutaneous lesions are present, but in the ′pure or primary neuritic′ form where skin lesions are absent, a high index of suspicion is required to look for thickening of nerves and proceed with confirmatory investigations of nerve conduction and biopsy. The delineation of this pure polyneuritic form as a distinct clinical entity and inclusion in the classification of leprosy is a contribution of Indian leprologists.[2] In some of these patients, skin lesions may appear while on treatment.[3] As a result of implementation of the intensive National Leprosy Eradication Program in India, with early case detection and treatment, neurologists may be confronted with partially treated cases with resolution of skin lesions but persisting neuropathy (history of treatment is often not revealed by the patient due to the underlying stigma) or pure neuritic leprosy.

Mononeuritis, mononeuritis multiplex or symmetrical polyneuropathy forms are seen in leprosy. Cranial nerve paralysis generally occurs along with any of the above three types of peripheral neuropathy and rarely may also be an isolated feature. The reported frequency varies from 10 to 22%.[4] Facial, trigeminal and olfactory nerves are the commonest nerves to be affected. In this issue, Kumar and colleagues,[5] in the setting of neurology department in a tertiary health care center, observed that 9 of 51 (18%) patients admitted during a period of 8 years (1995 to 2003) with leprous neuropathy had involvement of cranial nerves. They had looked for involvement of only 3rd to 12th cranial nerves. Facial (5 patients) and trigeminal (4 patients) nerves were the commonest to be involved, and oculomotor, auditory, glossopharyngeal, vagus, spinal accessory and hypoglossal nerves were affected in one patient each. There were 4 patients with multiple cranial nerve paralysis. Lepromatous leprosy was the common type (5 patients), and there was a single patient with pure neuritic leprosy.

Thickening of peripheral nerves and cutaneous branches, particularly the greater auricular nerve (GAN), is a diagnostic marker of leprosy. Dharmendra[6] cautioned that in some normal individuals, GAN is thickened and therefore in leprosy endemic areas, if there is isolated thickened GAN, it would be necessary to confirm its involvement by nerve conduction study of this nerve.[1],[7] The elegant description by Monrad-Krohn in 1923 of the unique patchy bilateral facial paralysis in leprosy due to affection of small branches and the characteristic paralysis of medial segment of frontalis earlier to the lateral part giving appearance of ′V′ remains unsurpassed even today.[8]

Neurologists practicing in countries that were earlier considered to be endemic need to be extra vigilant to recognize leprous peripheral neuropathy and cranial nerve involvement, with its protean manifestations since specific treatment is available.

References

1.Gourie Devi M. Leprous neuropathy: Assessment of nerve damage by special electrophysiological techniques and teased single fibre studies. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2002;5:121-32.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Dharmendra, Ramanujam K, Ramu G. Pure polyneuritic leprosy of tuberculoid type. Lepr India 1986;38:152-8.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Talwar S, Jha PK, Tiwari VD. Neuritic leprosy; Epidemiology and therapeutic responsiveness. Lepr Rev 1992;63:263-8.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Gopinath DV, Thappa DM, Jaishankar TJ. A clinical study of the involvement of cranial nerves in leprosy. Indian J Lepr 2004;76:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Kumar S, Alexander M, Gnanamuthu C. Cranial nerve involvement in patients with leprous neuropathy. Neurol India 2006;54:283-5.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Dharmendra. Thickened nerves in diagnosis of leprosy. Lepr India 1980;52:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
7.Gourie Devi M. Greater auricular nerve conduction in leprosy. Indian J Lepr 1984;56:182-90.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Monrad-Krohn GH. The neurological aspects of leprosy. Oslo, Jacob, Dybwad, 1923.  Back to cited text no. 8    

Copyright 2006 - Neurology India

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil