|
Neurology India, Vol. 59, No. 4, July-August, 2011, pp. 504-505 Editorial Chronic encapsulated intracerebral hematoma K Ganapathy Department of Neurosurgery, Apollo Specialty Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India PMID: 21891923 DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.84327 Operative findings include finding a thick, fibrous capsule consisting of an outer layer of dense collagenous tissue and an inner layer of granulation tissue enclosing old and recent areas of hemorrhage possibly due to the rupture of vessels near the inner surface of the thickest part of the fibrous capsule. The mechanism of capsule formation and self-perpetuating expansion still remains uncertain, as is the causal relationship with vascular malformations. Occasionally, the fibrous capsule has been found histologically to arise from an occult angiomatous malformation or a cavernous angioma. It has been suggested that repeated subclinical hemorrhages could mask the macroscopic evidence of a cavernous angioma or vascular malformation. Detailed histological study of CEIH is therefore necessary. In this [3] first report from South Asia, the CEIH appears to be causally related to the original AVM. The relationship of the CEIH to embolization, and radiosurgery is probably fortuitous, rather than causal, though there is a suggestion that radiation could stimulate the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoting angiogenesis. The authors have mentioned the high prevalence of a residual nidus in CEIHs following radiosurgery for cerebral AVMs. The authors have also suggested at least 10 years' careful follow-up following radiosurgery for AVM. How common or rare is CEIH following stereotactic radio surgery (SRS) for AVM? It is unlikely that we will ever be able to quantify the true incidence and prevalence of these uncommon conditions due to incomplete follow-up - particularly long-term. Most of these delayed 'complications' are seen even 15 to 20 years after SRS and often are not overtly symptomatic. Lundsford [4] is of the opinion that there is a 1% lifetime risk of hemorrhage in an AVM treated with radiosurgery, despite documentation of total obliteration. Does it mean that follow-up should be lifelong? Are we justified in creating a possible fear psychosis in a patient, by discussing uncommon, delayed, long-term, possibly innocuous, conditions which could theoretically occur? The Supreme Court of India has opined that a doctor should use his discretion and judgment before discussing the "rarest of the rare" complications, which could occur after a procedure, lest the patient be frightened into refusing treatment which is more important. At the same time should patients be forewarned so that they come for regular follow-up? From a pragmatic view although the condition is uncommon, chronic encapsulated intracerebral hematoma needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis, when an encapsulated mass lesion is present in the brain. References
Copyright 2011 - Neurology India |
|