 |
| About Bioline | All Journals | Testimonials | Membership | News |
|
||||||
|
||||||
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 95(3) May/Jun. 2000, pp: 381-388 The Central Projection of Cephalic Mechanosensory Axons in the Haematophagous Bug Triatoma infestans Teresita C Insausti+, Claudio R Lazzari Departamento de Biología,
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, +Corresponding author. Fax: +54-11-4576.3384 / 4544. 7893. E-mail: lazzari@bg.fcen.uba.ar Received 20 September
1999 Code Number: oc00062 The projections of mechanosensory hairs located on the dorsal and lateral head of the adult haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans were analyzed by means of cobalt filling. Axons run into the anterior and posterior tegumentary nerve and project through the brain to the ventral nerve cord. The fibres are small in diameter and run as a fascicle. Some branches run into suboesophageal and prothoracic centres; others run as far as to the mesothoracic ganglion. These sensory projections resemble that of wind-sensitive head hairs of the locust. The functional role of this sensory system in this species is discussed. Key words: Triatoma - mechanoreceptors - Chagas disease vectors - neuroanatomy Since the classical work of Wigglesworth and Gillett (1934) on the role of antennae during the orientation of Rhodnius prolixus, the sensory systems of Chagas disease vectors have been the subject of several studies. This work and the subsequent ones by diverse authors have allowed us to comprehend better how these insects acquire and respond to information from the environment in order to locate resources, such as food, shelters and mates. Comparative analysis with other insects reveals many unusual features in Triatominae, such as sensitivity to infrared radiation (Lazzari & Núñez 1989), their singular anemotactic response to odours (Taneja & Guerin 1995) or two visual systems mediating phototaxis (Lazzari et al. 1998). Of special interest due to its role in dispersal are those sensory systems involved in guiding flight and in the selection of a shelter. Both fight control and thigmotaxis involve mechanoreceptive inputs from different parts of the body. The head of the bug Triatoma infestans is elongated and exhibits a tubular form. Compound eyes are positioned laterally. Two well-developed ocelli are located behind them, looking dorsolaterally and frontally. The whole cephalic capsule is covered by thick sensilla chaetica, to which a mechanosensory function has been ascribed (Wigglesworth & Gillett 1934, Bernard 1974, Lazzari 1983). Two bilateral tegumentary nerves innervate the head integument of T. infestans, which gather the axons of cephalic mechanoreceptors. The anterior tegumentary nerve runs into the deutocerebrum, close to the origin of the antennal nerve, while the posterior tegumentary nerve runs into the posterior protocerebrum, close to the corpora cardiaca nerve I (Insausti 1994). The projection of head hairs of T. infestans is interesting for comparative analysis for several reasons. First, the head hairs do not differ in their morphology from mechanoreceptors elsewhere on the body, i.e., heavy sensilla chaetica. Second, in other insects, head hairs are long and trichoid, with a basal plate situated on a thin flexible articular membrane (Weis-Fogh 1949), facilitating stimulation by air-currents. Finally, T. infestans, although able to fly (Lehane & Schofield 1976, Schofield et al. 1992), are mainly walking insects, in contrast to other insects where these hairs exhibit a high degree of specialisation, such as for example, locusts. In this study, the projections of the head hairs sensory axons within the central nervous system in the bug T. infestans are described on the basis of cobalt fillings. This method has been successfully employed in the past to reveal the ocellar pathways in this species (Insausti & Lazzari 1996) and will be the first report on this subject for Hemiptera. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults of T. infestans were reared in the laboratory at 28°C and fed on citrated sheep blood with the aid of an artificial feeder (Núñez & Lazzari 1990). For light microscopy, heads were fixed in a mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide. After dehydration, the heads were embedded in Durcupan, cut at a thickness of 5 µm and stained with methylene blue. Scanning electron microscopy was done on fresh or fixed heads, using an Electroscan environmental scanning electron microscope, which does not require coating the specimen with metal. Fifty insects were used for CoCl2 filling of the sensory axons of the dorsal head hairs. The insects were immobilised with plasticene on a glass plate, dorsal side up, with the head fixed with dental wax. Some mechanosensory hears (see below) were cut off with a razor blade and a drop of 2.5% cobalt chloride in distilled water was placed on the lesion, which was then covered with vaseline. The preparations were left for 1-3 h at 21°C for cobalt uptake. Thereafter, the animals were glued on a wooden plate with dental wax, ventral side up. The brain and ganglia were exposed and immersed for 5 min in a solution of ammonium sulphide (five drops of saturated ammonium sulphide added to 5 ml Ringer). The dissected nervous system was fixed for 2 h in glacial acetic acid/ethanol/formalin fixative (Lillie 1965) and silver intensified according to Bacon and Altman (1977). The cobalt-labelled tissue was either cleared with methyl salicylate for whole mount viewing or embedded in Durcupan or cut horizontally at 30-35 µm. Photographs and reconstruction drawings were made from whole mounts and sections. Cobalt applications were done at four different areas of the dorsal head capsule, i.e., (1) anterior to the compound eyes , (2) between the compound eyes, (3) around the ocelli and (4) posterior to the ocelli (Fig. 1). The last area served as a control for possible diffusion through the internal integument, given that it lacks hairs. All hairs in a given area were cut off and, in most cases, bilateral applications were performed. Nervous areas were named according to Strausfeld (1976) and Insausti (1994). RESULTS Figs 1 and 2 show the distribution and general structure of the sensilla chaetica on the cephalic capsule of T. infestans. The anterior and posterior tegumentary nerves collect the axons of neurones associated with hairs located in the cephalic capsule. Axons from areas 1 and 2 (see Fig. 1) join in the anterior tegumentary nerve, proximal to the antennal nerve (Figs 3, 4, 5A). The fibres bundle runs along the brain, towards the suboesophageal ganglion. There some fibres terminate in the mandibular and maxillary neuropils (Fig 3, 4, 5B, C). Other fibres continue to the prothoracic ganglion. Some run to the midline, where their projections superimpose with those of the contralateral fascicle (Figs 3, 6A, B). From this point, axons further descend to the posterior ganglion where they send branches to the mesothoracic neuropil, where they converge in the midline together with contralateral projections (Figs 3, 6A, B). Axons from area 3 run through the posterior tegumentary nerve into the brain and join the fibre bundles of the anterior tegumentary nerve in the suboesophageal ganglion, prior to branching into this nervous mass. From this point onwards, these axons exhibit the same branching pattern as the fibre bundles of the areas 1 and 2 (Figs 3, 4, 5B, C, 6A, B). Conversely to the axons projecting from areas 1 and 2, these axons penetrate the dorsal brain before running ventrally into the nerve cord. DISCUSSION Head hairs have been implicated in sensing air currents and initiating and maintaining flight of locusts (Weis-Fogh 1949, Wilson 1961). In addition, Neese (1965) ascribed a function related to flight control to interommatidial hairs of bees. Similar groups of hairs are also present on the head of non-flying insect species, e.g., the cricket Gryllus campestris, thus suggesting that these mechanosensors could be involved in other behaviours such as grooming. A comparative analysis of the central projection of these mechanoreceptors between different species reveals similarities. The axons enter the brain through tegumentary nerves (dorsal and ventral nerves in locusts, lateral-dorsal and medial-dorsal nerves in honeybees and dorsal nerve in crickets) and arborize in the median ventral tract of several neuromeres of the ventral cord, i.e., suboesoph-ageal and pro- and mesothoracic ganglia (Mobbs 1985). The central projection of cephalic mechanoreceptors of T. infestans is similar to that of head hairs of other insects. This is surprising because in T. infestans (1) the sensilla differ considerably in their morphology from wind receptors; (2) these hairs are distributed over the whole body; (3) although capable of flying, flight is restricted to certain phases and conditions of the life cycle, and (4) grooming of the antennae and legs but not groom of the head has been observed (personal observation). Wind-sensitive hairs of the locust are long thin sensilla trichoidea that are deflected by air currents. They project directly into the motor centres located in the suboesophageal and pro- and mesothoracic ganglia. These characteristics indicate a fast system that is involved in the control of flight manoeuvres (Weis-Fogh 1949, Tyrer et al. 1979). However, such properties are not specific for wind-sensitive hairs. Head hairs of crickets and interommatidial bristles of honeybees, as well as other head hairs of orthopterans, also project into the medial ventral tract (Mobbs 1985). Similar descending pathways are also exhibited by T. infestans. Comparative analysis of our present results in T. infestans and observations by other authors in other insect species suggests that direct descending projections of cephalic mechanoreceptors may not have evolved to serve a function that requires rapid processing of sensory information. An alternative hypothesis is that cephalic mechanoreceptors would be a part of a general mechanical sense, distributed all over the integument and with integrative centres located along the ventral cord. T. infestans would represent a primitive undifferentiated state, where all mechanoreceptors are morphologically identical and are gathered together in given nervous pathways. Wind receptors of the locust, interommatidial and head hairs of the honeybee and head hairs of crickets would represent morphological and functional adaptations to certain tasks such as flight, grooming, etc. In agreement with this hypothesis, cobalt fills of other nerves, e.g., antennal nerves in T. infestans (Insausti unpubl.), bees and locusts, mandibular nerve of the locust and neck hairs of bees (Mobbs 1985), project into the median ventral tract and overlap with other sensory projections in ganglionic motor areas. As stated by Mobbs (1985), these results suggest that the median ventral tract is an area for the association of somatosensory inputs, and indicate the extent of the direct connection between different neuromeres by populations of primary afferents. Finally, in considering the functional role of these mechanoreceptors in T. infestans, the bugs spend daylight hours hidden in wall crevices and places that offer a close contact with the substrate and conspecifics. This behaviour is mediated by negative phototaxis (Reisenman et al. 1998, Lazzari et al. 1998), by assembling signals (Schofield & Patterson 1977, Lorenzo & Lazzari 1996, Lorenzo Figueiras & Lazzari 1998) and by thigmotaxis. The last response is mediated by mechanoreceptive inputs coming from the whole body surface, is able to induce certain physiological changes in the bugs, such as a decrease in the heart rate (Chiang et al. 1992). Thus, head hairs could play a role in maintaining thigmotaxis and triggering physiological responses associated with this behaviour. This hypothesis receives support from the preliminary analysis of the central projection of sensilla chaetica located in different abdominal segments, as revealed by cobalt fillings (Insausti, unpubl.). Sensory axons from these mechanoreceptors branch in the same neuropil areas (meso- and metathoracic centres) as do those originating from cephalic hairs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To J Zeil for critical reading of the manuscript and for introducing to us the technique of cobalt staining. To the staff members of our laboratory for helpful discussions and improvement of the manuscript. REFERENCES
This work received financial support from the Universidad de Buenos Aires, Conicet/Argentina, and the WHO/UNDP/World Bank Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. Copyright 2000 Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[oc00062f3.jpg] [oc00062f5.jpg] [oc00062f4.jpg] [oc00062f6.jpg] [oc00062f1.jpg] [oc00062f2.jpg] |
| |||||||||
