search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz
ISSN: 1678-8060 EISSN: 1678-8060
Vol. 105, Num. 6, 2010, pp. 779-785

Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Vol. 105, No. 6, 2010, pp. 779-785

ARTICLES

Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from alow-endemic setting in northwestern state of Paraná in Southern Brazil

Erika Noda NogutiI; Clarice Queico Fujimura LeiteII; Ana Carolina MalaspinaII; Adolfo Carlos Barreto SantosII; Rosário Dominguez Crespo HirataIII; Mario Hiroyuki HirataIII; Elsa Massae MamizukaIII; Rosilene Fressatti CardosoI, +

IDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790 bloco J90 sala 5, 78020-900 Maringá, PR, Brasil
IIFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Araraquara, SP, Brasil
IIIFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil

+ Corresponding author: rfcardoso@uem.br

Received 11 January 2010
Accepted 13 May 2010

Financial support: CAPES

Code Number: oc10131

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to provide information about the genetic diversity and prevalent genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a low-endemic setting in northwestern state of Paraná in Southern Brazil. We employed spoligotyping and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units-variable number tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) techniques to genotype M. tuberculosisisolates from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). The 93 isolates analyzed by spoligotyping were divided into 36 different patterns, 30 of which were described in the SITVIT database. Latin American and Mediterranean, Haarlem and T families were responsible for 26.9%, 17.2% and 11.8% of TB cases, respectively. From the 84 isolates analyzed by MIRU-VNTR, 58 shared a unique pattern and the remaining 26 belonged to nine clusters. The MIRU loci 40, 23, 10 and 16 were the most discriminatory. A combination of MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping resulted in 85.7% discriminatory power (Hunter-Gaston index = 0.995). Thus, combining spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing proved to be most useful for epidemiological study in this low-endemic setting in Southern Brazil. The current study demonstrated that there is significant diversity in circulating strains in the city of Maringá and the surrounding regions, with no single genotype of M. tuberculosispredominating.

Key words:Mycobacterium tuberculosis - tuberculosis - molecular epidemiology - spoligotyping - MIRU

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death by an infectious agent and thus an important public health problem worldwide, with an estimated 9.27 million new cases in 2007. In Brazil, the estimated incidence rate is 48 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (WHO 2009). Brazil has five distinct geographic regions, among which the distribution of TB cases varies greatly. In the state of Paraná (PR) in Southern Brazil, the average rate of TB is 27.52 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (Malaghini et al. 2009). Maringá and the small cities surrounding it form a low-endemic area of TB in PR, with an incidence rate of 22.62 cases per 100,000 in 2007 (personal communication).

Genotyping methods have been applied extensively in the epidemiological study of TB worldwide (Candia et al. 2007, Sharma et al. 2008, Valcheva et al. 2008). These studies have been based on the assumption that patients with genotypically clustered strains are epidemiologically linked and represent recent transmissions. In contrast, patients infected with different types of strains are not considered indicative of recent transmission. Genetic markers need to be both sufficiently polymorphic to distinguish unrelated strains and stable enough to identify isolates of the same strains. Furthermore, the typing methods employed must be reproducible, discriminatory and easy to perform.

Some polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques are now being used to differentiate Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Currently, genotyping approaches targeting the analysis of the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units (MIRU), are the most promising. This technique is based on the variability found at 12 specific loci interspersed throughout the mycobacterial genome (Supply et al. 2000). Recently, MIRU-VNTR genotyping strategies using 15 or 24 loci (Supply et al. 2006, Oelemann et al. 2007a, Alonso-Rodríguez et al. 2008) were evaluated and applied to molecular epidemiological typing in mycobacteria.

Spoligotyping is the second most widely used method for M. tuberculosis complex genotype after IS6110-based fingerprinting (Prodinger 2007). It is based on the presence or absence of a set of target sequences in the direct repeat (DR) locus in the M. tuberculosis complex genome (Kamerbeek et al. 1997) that in combination with MIRU has been used to replace typing via restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) based on the insertion sequence IS6110. The IS6110 method has been considered the "gold standard" for genotyping M. tuberculosis since 1993, but it is an expensive, laborious and lengthy methodology that requires weeks of M. tuberculosis culturing and specific software to analyze the RFLP band-patterns, all of which make it difficult to interpret and exchange data. In addition, the IS6110 method has limited use in genotyping M. tuberculosis isolates that contain few copies of IS6110.

The aim of our study was to use spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing to provide preliminary information about the genetic diversity and prevalent genotype of M. tuberculosis isolates in a low-endemic setting in northwestern PR.

PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study isolates - From November 2005-June 2008, a total of 93 M. tuberculosis isolates were obtained from sputum of patients suspected of TB who were seen at the Clinical Bacteriology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Analysis of the State University of Maringá. This lab is a reference TB laboratory that handles patients from Maringá and other cities in northwestern PR. All isolates were cultured in DifcoTM Lowenstein Medium Base (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) and identified as M. tuberculosis using the conventional biochemical tests (Kent & Kubica 1985) and molecular biology (van Embden et al. 1993). The following retrospective demographic and epidemiological data were collected for all patients through a review of a national TB notification database (National Diseases Notification System): city and zip code of residence at the time of diagnosis, age, sex, ethnicity, HIV status, sample susceptibility profile, alcoholism and the occurrence of other diseases.

DNA extraction - DNA from M. tuberculosis was extracted from a subculture on DifcoTM Lowenstein Medium Base, as described by González-y-Merchand et al. (1996), with minor modifications. Briefly, a loopful of bacteria was suspended in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO, USA) and bacilli were lyzed by freezing at -20°C for 30 min followed by heating at 100ºC for 10 min. This procedure was repeated twice. DNA was further extracted with two volumes of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v) followed by two steps of extractions with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v). DNA was purified by ethanol precipitation, dissolved in 50 μL of Tris-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (TE buffer), pH 8.0, and stored at -20ºC until use. DNA concentration was determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometry.

Spoligotyping - Spoligotyping was performed in all 93 M. tuberculosis isolates, using the standard method, to detect the presence or absence of 43 spacers (Mo-lhuizem et al. 1998). Briefly, the DR region was amplified from 1 μL of mycobacterial DNA (10 ng) in 24 μL of a reaction mixture containing 0.4 μM of each primer and PCR Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. The primer sequences were Dra, 5'-GGTTTTGGGTCTGACGAC-3' (biotinylated 5' end) and DRb, 5'-CCGAGAGGGGACGGAAAC-3' (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc Coralville, USA). The DNA amplification was carried out in a TC-512 thermal cycler (Techne, UK). PCR products were hybridized with a set of 43 spacer oligonucleotides covalently linked to the spoligo-membrane (Isogen Life Sciences, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Bound fragments were detected by chemiluminescence after incubation with a streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany) and assessed by an enhanced chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK). Spoligotypes were reported using an octal code in which the 43-digit binary representing the 43 spacers ("1" is hybridization and "0" is no hybridization) was divided into 14 sets of three digits (spacers 1-42) plus one additional digit (spacer 43). Each three-digit set was converted to octal code (000 = 0, 001 = 1, 010 = 2, 011 = 3, 100 = 4, 101 = 5, 110 = 6 and 111 = 7), with the final digit remaining either 1 or 0, yielding a 15-digit octal designation (Dale et al. 2001).

MIRU-VNTR typing - MIRU-VNTR typing was performed in only 84 of the 93 M. tuberculosis isolates at the Laboratory of Mycobacteria Dr. Hugo David in the School of Pharmaceutical Science, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo (SP), Brazil. MIRU-VNTR was not performed in nine of the isolates because there was insufficient DNA for analysis.

The isolates were genotyped by PCR amplification of the original 12 MIRU-VNTR loci (2, 4, 10, 16, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 31, 39, 40) as described by Supply et al. (2000) and Mazars et al. (2001) in a PTC-100 thermal cycler (MJ Research, Ramsey, Minnesota, USA). Each locus was amplified individually from 2 μL of mycobacterial DNA (20 ng) in 23 μL of a reaction mixture containing 0.4 μM of loci-respective primers and PCR Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR conditions for each set of primers have been described elsewhere (Pandolfi 2006). PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in a 2% weight/volume agarose gel (Invitrogen Life Technologies, SP, Brazil). Both 50 and 100-bp DNA Ladders (Invitrogen Life Technologies, SP, Brazil) were used as molecular markers. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet light, then photodocumented with an Alpha-imager 2200 (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA, USA). PCR fragment size was determined by visual comparison with the molecular markers and the MIRU allele scoring was determined according to Mazars et al. (2001) and Supply et al. (2001). The results from each of the 12 loci were combined to create the 12-digit allelic profiles.

Interpretation of genotyping results - The observed spoligotypes were compared to the international database, SITVIT, which is an updated version of the published SpolDB4.0 database (Brudey et al. 2006) and it is available at pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVITDemo/. For previously unreported spoligopatterns in the SpolDB4.0, the "Spotclust" database was used (Vitol et al. 2006). This model takes into account knowledge of the evolution of the DR region and assigns spoligopatterns to families and subfamilies, using a computer algorithm based on studies of SpolDB3 (cgi2.cs.rpi.edu/~bennek/SPOTCLUST.html). BioNumerics software (version 4.45; Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) was used for analysis of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR patterns. Dendrograms were constructed for spoligotyping, MIRU-VNTR and the combination of both methodologies. The genetic distance was built using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) algorithm (Sneath & Sokal 1973). The evaluation of the discriminative power of each typing method alone as well as the two in combinations was undertaken using the Hunter-Gaston index (HGI) (Hunter & Gaston 1988). HGI is based on the probability that two unrelated strains sampled from the population will be placed into different typing groups. Allelic diversity of each locus' MIRU-VNTR was classified as "highly discriminant" (HGI > 0.6), "moderately discriminant" (0.3 d" HGI d" 0.6) and "poorly discriminant" (HGI < 0.3) (Sola et al. 2003).

RESULTS

The study population belonged to eight cities (Ma-ringá and seven other small, neighboring cities) and consisted of 78 males (83.9%) and 15 females (16.1%). The mean patient age was 40 years. The results of HIV-testing were available for 43 patients (46.2%) and, among these, four (9.3%) tested positive for HIV. Data regarding the use of alcohol and the presence of other diseases were not obtained.

Spoligotyping - Of the 93 M. tuberculosis isolates, 36 different spoligotyping patterns were observed. Based on these spoligotypes, distinct families of TB were identified: Haarlem (H), Latin American and Mediterranean (LAM), undesignated (U), T family (modern TB strains), East-African Indian (EAI) and S lineage (Figure).

The spoligopatterns of 83 isolates (89.2%) were classified according to the SITVIT database and, of these, 65 isolates were clustered into 12 Shared International Types (ST), with each cluster containing between three and 13 isolates. The remaining 18 isolates showed unique STs. The main STs found in this study were ST46 (n = 13, 15.7%), ST20 (n = 6, 7.2%), ST42 (n = 6, 7.2%) and ST47 (n = 6, 7.2%).

Of the 83 M. tuberculosis isolates identified in the SITVIT database, 72 were classified into families and sublineages according to SpolDB4. The number of these 72 isolates that ranked in the LAM, U, H and T families were, respectively, 25 (34.7%), 17 (23.6%), 16 (22.2%) and 11 (15.3%). The minor families observed in our study were EAI (n = 1, 1.4%), S lineage (n = 1, 1.4%) and H1-S (n = 1, 1.4%). Eleven M. tuberculosis isolates were not classified into families according to SpolDB4, but did have attributed ST numbers according to the SITVIT database (ST2508, ST2512, ST2525, ST2563 and ST2654).

Ten isolates (10.8%), comprising six spoligotyping patterns not found in the SITVIT database, were assigned to families and subfamilies by "SpotClust". The family assignment of these remaining isolates revealed that 80% belonged to the LAM family and 20% belonged to the T family (Table I). These six new spoligotypes have been submitted to the SITVIT database (pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVITDemo/).

MIRU-VNTR typing - MIRU-VNTR typing was conducted for 84 clinical isolates and a total of 67 distinct MIRU patterns were obtained. Of the 84 isolates, 58 (69%) were orphans and the remaining 26 (31%) were grouped into nine clusters, each comprising 2-6 isolates (Figure).

Allele polymorphism analysis of 12 MIRU loci revealed that MIRU locus 40 was the most discriminatory locus with eight alleles, followed by MIRU loci 23, 10 and 16. In MIRU locus 40, the presence of three alleles was most frequent, followed by a single copy of an allele. The MIRU 20, 26 and 31 loci were moderately discriminant. Other loci were less polymorphic, with only two alleles for MIRU loci 4, 20 and 39 and one allele for MIRU locus 24, for which a single copy was present in all 84 M. tuberculosis isolates analyzed (Table II).

Combining spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing - Among the 84 M. tuberculosis isolates analyzed by spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing, 72 (85.7%) distinct genotypes were obtained, resulting in eight clusters with 100% similarity. By considering similarity indices of at least 69%, we observed three distinct clonal groups that represented 92.9% of the isolates analyzed (Figure). Table III summarizes the discriminative power of each typing method alone and of the two methods combined, according to the HGI.

DISCUSSION

Molecular methods have been used for epidemiological studies of TB in developed countries, but this kind of study is scarce in developing countries. Particularly, there are few studies of this nature in Brazil (Borsuk et al. 2005, Cafrune et al. 2006, Oelemann et al. 2007b, Malaspina et al. 2008, Malaghini et al. 2009). To explore the molecular epidemiology of TB in northwestern PR, we chose to work with two effective and fast methodologies: spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing (Malaghini et al. 2009).

The distribution of 93 isolates analyzed by spoligotyping in our study revealed 36 distinct patterns, six of which have not yet been described in SITVIT (10.8% of isolates). These new STs have been submitted to the database by our group. The LAM, H and T families were the largest families observed in our study and they are the three genotypic families most frequently found in Africa, Central America, Europe and South America (Brudey et al. 2006).

Previous studies analyzing M. tuberculosis isolates from Araraquara and the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) in Southern Brazil reported the prevalence of ST53 (T1 sublineage) (Borsuk et al. 2005, Malaspina et al. 2008). In contrast, in our study, ST53 was only representative of 5.4% (5/93) of the isolates, while ST46 (U, likely H lineage) was the most prevalent and accounted for approximately 14% (13/93) of the isolates.

One isolate detected in our study belonged to the EAI lineage (ST48, EAI1_SOM), which is typically more prevalent in southeast Asia. This lineage has also been detected in another study in Northern Brazil. ST1892 (U lineage) and ST2512, both characterized in our study, are known to have exclusive geographic distribution in Brazil. ST61 (LAM10_CAM sublineage), ST563 (U lineage) and ST2654 were also identified in our study but had not yet been described in our country. The other STs, which had already been described in the SITVIT database (pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVITDemo/), have been previously identified in Brazil, but this is the first report of their presence in our state, probably because of the limited study in our region previously.

When MIRU-VNTR was applied to the study of M. tuberculosis isolates, the most allelic diversity was observed for MIRU loci 40, 23, 10 and 16 (HGI = 0.732, 0.678, 0.673 and 0.641, respectively), while moderate polymorphisms were found in MIRU loci 26, 20 and 31 (HGI = 0.439, 0.380 and 0.326, respectively). Conversely, Kovalev et al. (2005) observed the most allelic diversity for MIRU loci 26, 31 and 10 in M. tuberculosis isolated from the Ural region of the Russian Federation. Sharma et al. (2008), studying isolates from Kanpur, India, and working with only six MIRU loci (MIRU 4, 10, 16, 26, 39 and 40), observed that the most discriminatory loci were, in order of diversity, 26, 10, 16 and 40. Despite the high discriminatory power of MIRU locus 40 as observed in this study (8 alleles), it is possible that a higher discriminatory power can be obtained with another study population.

MIRU locus 24 was present in a single copy in all isolates analyzed in our study, which is in agreement with Kovalev et al. (2005). However, that study found MIRU locus 23 to have the second-lowest discriminatory power, which differs from our finding that MIRU locus 39 was the second-least discriminating.

MIRU-VNTR significantly reduced the number of epidemiological links among the isolates studied, while spoligotyping overestimated these links. Thus, MIRU-VNTR demonstrated a superior capacity to differentiate M. tuberculosis clinical isolates in our study. We believe that using the newly developed 15 or 24-locus MIRU-VNTR (Supply et al. 2006, Oelemann et al. 2007a, Alonso-Rodríguez et al. 2008) could further increase the discriminatory power of this method.

Despite the high discriminatory power of MIRU-VNTR typing observed in our study, a few isolates clustered by this method and, in some cases, the clustered isolates were discriminated by spoligotyping. This result demonstrates the need to combine the two methodologies to provide a higher discriminatory power for epidemiological study. According to Cowan et al. (2005), when combining these two methodologies, the clustering rate is similar to that of IS6110-RFLP fingerprinting.

The results obtained with spoligotyping in our study suggested a possible epidemiological link between two patients who were prisoners in the same prison at the same time and whose isolates displayed the same molecular pattern (ST46). However, when these isolates were typed by MIRU-VNTR, they showed different patterns. In other M. tuberculosis isolates that were clustered by combining spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing, no correlation with retrospective epidemiological data was apparent.

Significant diversity in circulating strains was observed in our study of M. tuberculosis isolates from what is considered to be a low-endemic TB setting in Brazil, using a combination of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing. These methodologies allowed 85.7% differentiation of the M. tuberculosis isolates analyzed, which is in agreement with a recent study conducted in the city of Curitiba (the capital of PR) that found 93.5% differentiation using Mixed-linker PCR DNA fingerprinting (Malaghini et al. 2009). Alternatively, an analysis of M. tuberculosis isolates from three regions of RS found 66% clonal differentiation using IS6110-RFLP and spoligotyping (Cafrune et al. 2006), while isolates from two cities in RS that were analyzed by IS6110-RFLP and spoligotyping revealed high clonal diversity of M. tuberculosis (Borsuk et al. 2005).

In summary, the present study offers the first insight about the genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis isolates from patients with TB in cities from the northwest region of PR. This kind of study is important for tracing relationships among the strains and may also help to interrupt the chain of transmission between different communities and aid in recognition of the principal clades responsible for spreading the disease. Of course, additional studies with more isolates over longer time periods will be critical if we are to fully understand the epidemiology of TB in this region.

REFERENCES

  • Alonso-Rodríguez N, Martínez-Lirola M, Herránz M, Sanchez-Benitez M, Barroso P, INDAL-TB Group, Bouza E, García de Viedma D 2008. Evaluation of the new advanced 15-loci MIRU-VNTR genotyping tool in Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular epidemiology studies. BMC Microbiol 8: 34.
  • Borsuk S, Dellagostin MM, Madeira S de G, Lima C, Boffo M, Mattos I, Almeida da Silva PE, Dellagostin OA 2005. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in a region of Brazil with a high incidence of tuberculosis. Microbes Infec 7: 1338-1344.
  • Brudey K, Driscoll JR, Rigouts L, Prodinger WM, Gori A, Al-Hajoj SA, Allix C, Aristimuño L, Arora J, Baumanis V, Binder L, Cafrune P, Cataldi A, Cheong S, Diel R, Ellermeier C, Evans JT, Fauville-Dufaux M, Ferdinand S, Garcia de Viedma D, Garzelli C, Gazzola L, Gomes HM, Guttierez MC, Hawkey PM, van Helden PD, Kadival GV, Kreiswirth BN, Kremer K, Kubin M, Kulkarni SP, Liens B, Lillebaek T, Ho ML, Martin C, Martin C, Mokrousov I, Narvskaïa O, Ngeow YF, Naumann L, Niemann S, Parwati I, Rahim Z, Rasolofo-Razanamparany V, Rasolonavalona T, Rossetti ML, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Sajduda A, Samper S, Shemyakin IG, Singh UB, Somoskovi A, Skuce RA, van Soolingen D, Streicher EM, Suffys PN, Tortoli E, Tracevska T, Vincent V, Victor TC, Warren RM, Yap SF, Zaman K, Portaels F, Rastogi N, Sola C 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol 6: 23.
  • Cafrune PI, Riley LW, Possuelo LG, Valim AR, Borges M, Ribeiro MO, Rossetti ML, Zaha A 2006. Recent transmission of tuberculosis involving retired patients. J Infect 53: 370-376.
  • Candia N, Lopez B, Zozio T, Carrivale M, Diaz C, Russomando G, de Romero NJ, Jara JC, Barrera L, Rastogi N, Ritacco V 2007. First insight into Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic diversity in Paraguay. BMC Microbiol 7: 75.
  • Cowan LS, Diem L, Monson T, Wand P, Temporado D, Oemig TV, Crawford JT 2005. Evaluation of a two-step approach for large-scale, prospective genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 43: 688-695.
  • Dale JW, Brittain D, Cataldi AA, Cousins D, Crawford JT, Driscoll J, Heersma H, Lillebaek T, Quitugua T, Rastogi N, Skuce RA, Sola C, Van Soolingen D, Vincent V 2001. Spacer oligonucleotide typing of bacteria of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: recommendations for standardised nomenclature. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 5: 216-219.
  • González-y-Merchand JA, Estrada-García I, Colston MJ, Cox RA 1996. A novel method for the isolation of mycobacterial DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 135: 71-77.
  • Hunter PR, Gaston MA 1988. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability to typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 26: 2465-2466.
  • Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J 1997. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 35: 907-914.
  • Kent PT, Kubica GP 1985. Public health mycobacteriology. A guide for the level III laboratory, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, 207 pp.
  • Kovalev SY, Kamaev EY, Kravchenko MA, Kurepina NE, Skorniakov SN 2005. Genetic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Ural region, Russian Federation, by MIRU-VNTR genotyping. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9: 746-752.
  • Malaghini M, Brockelt SR, Burger M, Kritski A, Thomaz-Soccol V 2009. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated in the state of Parana in southern Brazil. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 89: 101-105.
  • Malaspina AC, Cavalcanti HR, Leite CQ, Machado SM, Viana BH, Silva RM, Hage EF, Figueiredo WM, Marques E, Ferrazoli L, Arbex M, Lessi M, Fonseca LS, Rigouts L, Saad MH 2008. Usefulness of Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular typing in a tuberculosis low-endemic agro-industrial setting of Brazil. Jpn J Infect Dis 61: 231-233.
  • Mazars E, Lesjean S, Banuls AL, Gilbert M, Vincent V, Gicquel B, Tibayrenc M, Locht C, Supply P 2001. High-resolution minisatellite-based typing as a portable approach to global analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular epidemiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1901-1906.
  • Molhuizem HO, Bunschoten AE, Schouls LM, van Embden JDA 1998. Rapid detection and simultaneous strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria by spoligotyping. In T Parish, NG Stoker, Methods in molecular biology, Mycobacteria protocols, vol. 101, Humana Press, New Jersey, p. 381-394.
  • Oelemann MC, Diel R, Vatin V, Haas W, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Locht C, Niemann S, Supply P 2007a. Assessment of an optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number-tandem-repeat typing system combined with spoligotyping for population-based molecular epidemiology studies of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 45: 691-697.
  • Oelemann MC, Fontes ANB, Pereira MAS, Bravin Y, Silva G, Degrave W, Carvalho ACC, Brito RC, Kritski AL, Suffys PN 2007b. Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in community health centers of Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102: 455-462.
  • Pandolfi JR 2006. Otimização da técnica de MIRU (mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units) para o estudo epidemiológico de pacientes com tuberculose, Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 82 pp.
  • Prodinger WM 2007. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis: toy or tool? A review of the literature and examples from Central Europe. Wien Klin Wochenschr 119: 80-89.
  • Sharma P, Chauhan DS, Upadhyay P, Faujdar J, Lavania M, Sachan S, Katoch K, Katoch VM 2008. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a rural area of Kanpur by spoligotyping and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units (MIRUs) typing. Infect Genet Evol 8: 621-626.
  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification, WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco, 573 pp.
  • Sola C, Filliol I, Legrand E, Lesjean S, Locht C, Supply P, Rastogi N 2003. Genotyping of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using MIRUs: association with VNTR and spoligotyping for molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics. Infect Genet Evol 3: 125-133.
  • Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S, Bifani P, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth B, Sola C, Rastogi N, Vatin V, Gutierrez MC, Fauville M, Niemann S, Skuce R, Kremer K, Locht C, van Soolingen D 2006. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.J Clin Microbiol 44: 4498-4510.
  • Supply P, Lesjean S, Savine E, Kremer K, van Soolingen D, Locht C 2001. Automated high-throughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. J Clin Microbiol 39: 3563-3571.
  • Supply P, Mazars E, Lesjean S, Vincent V, Gicquel B, Locht C 2000. Variable human minisatellite-like regions in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome. Mol Microbiol 36:762-771.
  • Valcheva V, Mokrousov I, Rastogi N, Narvskaya O, Markova N 2008. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from different regions of Bulgaria. J Clin Microbiol 46: 1014-1018.
  • van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, Hermans P, Martin C, McAdam R, Shinnick TM, Small PM 1993. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol 31: 406-409.
  • Vitol I, Driscoll J, Kreiswirth B, Kurepina N, Bennett KP 2006. Identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains families using spoligotypes. Infect Genet Evol 6: 491-504.
  • WHO - World Health Organization 2009. Global tuberculosis control: epidemiology, strategy, financing. WHO report WHO/HTM/TB/2009.411). Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2009/en/index.html.

Copyright © 2010 - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[oc10131t2.jpg] [oc10131t3.jpg] [oc10131t1.jpg] [oc10131f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil