 |
| About Bioline | All Journals | Testimonials | Membership | News |
|
||||||
|
||||||
Simian Malaria at Two Sites in the Brazilian Amazon - II. Vertical Distribution and Frequency of Anopheline Species Inside and Outside the Forest Ricardo Lourenco-de-Oliveira+, Sergio LB Luz Laboratorio de Transmissores de Hematozoarios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, 21045-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Suported by CNPq
An anopheline survey was carried out in two simian malaria areas in the Brazilian Amazon, Balbina and Samuel, to determine the potential vectors of Plasmodium brasilianum. The most abundant and/or acrodendrophilic anophelines in the forest and the most likely vector were Anopheles mediopunctatus, An. nuneztovari, An. oswaldoi, An. triannulatus and An. shannoni. An. darlingi and An. marajoara were captured essentially in anthropic habitats outside the forest and are unlikely to be involved in the transmission of P. brasilianum among monkeys within the forests and from monkeys to man in their surroundings in the Amazon. Key words: simian malaria vectors - Anopheles - Culicidae - Plasmodium brasilianum The simian malaria caused by Plasmodium brasilianum is widespread in the humid forests of Central and South America. Its vector has been discovered only in the Atlantic forest, of southern and southeastern Brazil, where the acrodendro-philic mosquito Anopheles (Kerteszia) cruzii was found naturally infected with the parasite (Deane et al. 1970). An. cruzii does not occur in the Amazon Region where P. brasilianum is suspected to be the cause of a zoonozis (Lal et al. 1988, Arruda et al. 1989). Such a zoonotic malaria vector would need to feed frequently on infected monkeys and humans, mainly indians, rubber gatherers, wood cutters and fishermen, inside the forest or in the surrounding areas. The current work forms part of a study carried out in two localities in the Brazilian Amazon to describe the zoonotic potential of simian malaria by P. brasilianum. The infection rates of this parasite in monkeys from those areas have been published elsewhere (Lourenco-de-Oliveira & Deane 1995). This paper presents the results of a mosquito survey conducted in those sites to describe the anopheline fauna within the forest and in surrounding cleared areas, as well as anopheline species frequencies near the ground and in the tree canopy. METHODOLOGY The anopheline survey was performed near two hydroelectric plants in the Amazon Basin: Balbina, on the Uatuma River, State of Amazonas (1 degree 55'S : 59 degrees 28'W) and Samuel, on the Jamari River, State of Rondonia (8 degrees 10'S: 62 degrees 29'W), Brazil, where P. brasilianum was detected in, respectively, 15.8% and 9.9% of the primates. Details about these two sites, such as climate, vegetation and fauna are given elsewhere (Lourenco-de-Oliveira & Deane 1995). Mosquitoes were caught while biting human or animal baits or by light-trap and identified according to Deane et al. (1947) and Faran and Linthicum (1981). The anopheline captures in Balbina were performed in two periods: 6-30 September 1988 and 18 September to 20 October 1989. Within the forest, anopheline catches were carried out on human bait, from 6 to 9 p.m., at two sites: Base I, on both the west and east margins of the Uatuma River, and Base II, an island in the reservoir about 70 km from the dam. At Base I anophelines were collected simultaneously from a human bait at ground level and another on a platform in the canopy, at 14 m above the ground. For comparison, mosquito captures were also conducted outside the forest, from 27-29 September 1988, in three settlements of the Waimiri-Atroari Indian tribe: Cacau, Curiuau and Mare. In 1989, a total of 424 Waimiri-Atroari lived in 11 settlements near the Balbina forest. The settlements of Cacau and Mare are on the east and west margins of the Camanau River, with 33 and 37 inhabitants, respectively, while the Curiuau is on the north margin of the Curiuau River, with 36 residents. The huts are constructed completely of palm leaves or have wooden walls and a roof of palm leaves. Anophelines were captured simultaneously on four human baits, one inside the hut, one immediately outside, one near the forest, and another in the forest, from 6 to 9 p.m., in Cacau and Curiuau and from 5 to 7 a.m. in Mare. Additionally, a CDC light-trap (Sudia & Chamberlain 1962) was operated near the rivers and the forest. In Samuel, anophelines were surveyed from 17 February to 28 March 1989 and from August 1990 to July 1991. Collections were performed at three sites within the Samuel Ecological Station, where platforms were built at 15-17 m above the ground in the canopy of selected trees. The Samuel Ecological Station is an uninhabited portion of primary forest between 8 degrees 50' and 9 degrees 04'S and 63 degrees 08' and 63 degrees 19'W, on the southeast border of the reservoir, 50 km from the dam and contiguous with the Jamari National Forest. There, anophelines were caught daily, except on rainy nights, from 6 to 9 p.m., on human baits placed simultaneously on the ground and in the canopy. Additionally, some anophelines were collected from 6 to 8 p.m., between 23-31 July 1991, outside the forest, close to dwellings, at three sites near Samuel: Boca do Rio Novo, Caboclo and Japiim Road. At the first two sites, collections were only on human baits, while at Japiim Road simultaneous catches were performed on man and cow. Only a fisherman's family lives at Boca do Rio Novo, in a wooden house surrounded by the forest, 5 km from the Samuel dam. During the dry season, Caboclo is a temporary settlement of rubber-gatherers, located 4.5 km form the dam, with open, wooden huts, covered with palm leaves, surrounded by the forest. Both Boca do Rio Novo and Caboclo are downstream from the dam on the west bank of Jamari River. Anophelines were captured on a human baith close to the dwellings. At Japiim Road anophelines were collected from a human bait and a cow near two wooden houses close to the forest. This road links the village of Itapoa do Oeste to the Japiim stream, a tributary of the Jamari River, south of the Samuel Ecological Station. All collection sites in Balbina and Samuel are shown on a map in Lourenco-de- Oliveira and Deane (1995:333). G test against a null hypothesis was used to compare the occurrence of anopheline species at ground and in the canopy. RESULTS Ten anopheline species were recognized in the surveyed areas of both Balbina and Samuel (Tables I, IV). An. nuneztovari and An. oswaldoi were the most abundant species in Balbina, accounting for more than 70% of the total. Nine anopheline species were collected within the forest and only two, An. darlingi and An. oswaldoi, at the Waimiri-Atroari settlements near Balbina (Table I, Fig. 1). In these anthropic environments only 19 anopheline mosquitoes were captured during 22 hr of human baiting and 8 hr of light- trapping (Table II). An. darlingi was collected only outside the forest (84.2% of the anophelines from the settlements) while An. oswaldoi was collected both in and outside, although more commonly within the forest. An. darlingi was also the only anopheline caught in and close to huts (Fig. 1). An. mediopunctatus was far the most common mosquito in Samuel (66.3% of the total, Table IV). Two other anopheline species were also frequent in the area: An. nuneztovari (13.7%) and An. shannoni (9.9%). An. mediopunctatus was the most common species in the forest (almost 70% of the total), where it occurred unikely; by contrary An. darlingi was caught almost exclusively in anthropic environments, accounting for 80.6% of the anophelines captured at Boca do Rio Novo, Caboclo and Japiim Road. An. marajoara was found only outside the forest, primarily attracted by the cow (Table V, Fig. 2). Most of the anophelines in the forest at Balbina were collected at both levels of the vegetation (Table III, Fig. 3).These included An. nuneztovari, An. oswaldoiand An. triannulatus, which were not significantly more abundant in the canopy (62.5%, 58.5% and 64.9% caught in the canopy, respectively)(Eq = 0.6998). An. mediopunctatus was more common in the canopy (71.9%), while An. mattogrossensis was captured only at ground level. Almost 80% of the anophelines caught within the forest in Samuel were collected in the canopy (Table III). An. oswaldoi was slightly more frequent on the ground while An. mediopunctatus and An. shannoni were the most common canopy feeders (Fig. 3). An. mediopunctatus exhibited the strongest acrodendrophilic behavior in Samuel, with 85.5% of the females captured in the tree canopy and accounted for 74% of the total mosquitoes collected at that level. DISCUSSION The preference of an anopheline species for feeding in the forest and particularly in the canopy is essential for considering it a potential vector of simian malaria because hosts are primarily arboreal. Attention must be given to the difference between the composition of the anopheline fauna within and outside the forests of Balbina and Samuel. Five species were the most frequent sylvatic anophelines: An. mediopunctatus, An. nuneztovari, An. oswaldoi and An. triannulatuswere relatively common at both sites but An. shannoni was abundant only at Samuel. By contrary, An. darlingi predominated outside the jungle. This and other mosquito species found in Balbina and Samuel were rare or absent in the tree canopy, and are unlikely to be involved in the transmission of quartan simian malaria in the Amazon. An. mediopunctatus has always been associated with the forested environments and has been found in all simian malaria areas in the Amazon (Almeida & Deane 1970, Ferreira Neto et al. 1970, Deane et al. 1971, Deane 1976, 1992). It was captured only within the forests at both Balbina and Samuel, and was the most common anopheline species at the latter site. The presence and abundance of the other four anopheline species in the forest has already been reported for simian malaria areas in the Amazon. In a forested swamp in Porto Nacional, State of Amazonas, Deane et al. (1968) reported that 30% of the collected anophelines were An. nuneztovari and An. oswaldoi. The latter species was the predominant mosquito in catches performed by Deane et al. (1971) in an enzootic area of simian malaria, Serra do Navio, State of Amapa, accounting for 75.7% of the anophelines collected, while An. nuneztovari accounted for only 3.7%. An. oswaldoi was the most common anopheline in forested swamp near Tefe, State of Amazonas within the territory of Cacajao calvus, from which P. brasilianumwas first identified, where it represented 51.3% of the anophelines collected by Almeida and Deane (1970). Deane et al. (1971) observed that near the Tracajatuba River, an area located 100 km from Serra do Navio, where 16.6% of monkeys were infected with P. brasilianum, both An. nuneztovari and An. oswaldoi were rare (only 3.2% and 4.7% of the total, respectively), but An. triannulatus accounted for 63.7% of the anophelines collected. Similarly, Deane and Ferreira-Neto (1973) reported from Cabeceira Grande, State of Tocantins, that 8.1% of monkeys were infected with P. brasilianum and 70% of the collected anophelines were An. triannulatus. This mosquito species has been detected in all simian malaria areas surveyed in the Brazilian Amazon, but at most sites its density was low or moderate, except for the two localities mentioned above (Deane et al. 1968, 1971, Almeida & Deane 1970, Ferreira Neto et al. 1970, Deane & Ferreira Neto 1973). Brazilian species of monkeys and marmosets live predominantly in the forest canopy where the anopheline vector of simian malaria must also take most of its blood meals. This behavior suggested to Deane et al. (1969) that An. cruzii was the vector of both P. brasilianum and P. simium in south and southeast Brazil. The field work performed in Balbina was restricted to short periods in September and October of two adjoing years. At that time, the most common anophelines, An. oswaldoi and An. nuneztovari, were slightly more numerous in the canopy than near the ground. One of the acrodendrophilic anopheline, An. mediopunctatus, was not abundant during that period of the year in Balbina. On the other hand, An. mediopunctatus was the most common and acrodendrophilic anopheline in Samuel and its preference for the high levels of the vegetation in simian malaria areas has already been demonstrated (Deane et al. 1971, Deane 1992) (Table III, Fig. 3). Previously, An. oswaldoi has been shown to feed preferently in the canopy only in Cabeceira Grande (Deane & Ferreira Neto 1973). This anopheline was more common in ground collections at Samuel (Table III, Fig. 3) as well as in Trinidad and other localities in Brazil (Aitken et al. 1968, Deane et al. 1971). An. oswaldoi has shown no preference with regard to vertical distribution or tended to be slightly acrodendrophilic, as it was in Balbina, in three other simian malaria areas in the Brazilian Amazon (Deane et al. 1968, 1971, Ferreira Neto et al. 1970). In contrast to Balbina and Samuel where An. nuneztovari was slightly acrodendrophilic, the species was previously collected in larger numbers near the ground, e.g. by Deane et al. (1971) at Serra do Navio (95.8% on the ground), at Tracajatuca (67.1%) and at Porto Maua (59.4%). Although feeding height preferences of An. oswaldoi and An. nuneztovari may vary from site to site, their abundance within the forest (Fig. 1) may suggests their possible involviment in simian malaria at Balbina. Other anophelines in Samuel, the common An. shannoni and the rare Ch. bonneae, showed a marked preference for biting at the forest canopy. The acrodendrophilic behavior of these species was also observed by Deane et al. (1953,1968, 1971) and Ferreira Neto et al. (1970) in several Amazonian areas with and without simian malaria. Few mosquito surveys were conducted previously at Balbina and Samuel and in their surroundings. Chagas et al. (1982) reported the presence of An. darlingi, An. nuneztovari and An. oswaldoi in Balbina at the beginning of the dam construction. When the Uatuma River was dammed, flooding of the forest provided extensive breeding sites for An. oswaldoi, which became very abundant (Eletronorte 1988). The first anopheline survey at Samuel was carried out by Deane (1947) who found 30 An. darlingi and 2 An. nuneztovari indoors, trapped in bednets, during the day. During the construction of the Samuel Dam, An. oswaldoi, An. mediopunctatus, An. nuneztovari were collected near the Jamari River, but An. darlingi was still the predominant mosquito in cleared areas, accounting for 90-100% of the total captured (Tadei 1985, 1986). Most of the mosquito captures in the present survey were carried out within Samuel's forest in contrast to those performed by Deane (1947) and Tadei (1985, 1986) who worked essentially in man-made or disturbed environments. The few hours spent with captures conducted in anthropic environments outside the forest in both Balbina and Samuel (Tables I, IV) confirmed the results of hundreds of hours of anopheline collections that we have been performing in the Amazon, with regarding to the anopheline fauna constitution and the synanthropy of An. darlingi (Lourenco-de- Oliveira et al. 1989, 1994). During the last three decades, ambitious colonization projects in the Brazilian Amazon were responsible for progressive changes in the landscape. The forest was cleared and replaced to pastures and plantations. With the modifications in the landscape several anopheline species commonly reported in the past have been rare in the present surveys. Concomitantly, An. darlingi became the predominant or practically the only species in the anthropic environments. It became the most synanthropic anopheline in the Amazon, as observed at Balbina, Samuel and all over the region (Tadei et al. 1988, Lourenco-de-Oliveira et al. 1989, 1994, Deane 1989, Klein & Lima 1990, Lourenco-de-Oliveira 1994). Obviously the sylvatic anophelines deprived from their natural blood feeding sources among wild animals may leave the forest and invade the open fields, i.e. the anthropic environment. There, they attack mostly domestic animals, while An. darlingi is the predominant species feeding on man (Deane et al. 1948, Lourenco-de-Oliveira et al. 1989, Klein & Lima 1990, Oliveira-Ferreira et al. 1992). An. darlingi may take blood in the forest, even near the canopies. Deane et al. (1953) collected 19.4% and 11.8% of An. darlingi females at 10m and 15m, respectively, versus 50.6% near ground in a forest where simian malaria has never been detected, in Belem, State of Para. This forest surrounds one of the principal breeding sites of the species in the area. Lourenco-de-Oliveira et al. (1989) showed that only 6.8% of the total anophelines collected into a small patch of forest near Ariquemes, State of Rondonia belonged to this species, although there were numerous breeding places in the area. Species belonging to the An. albitarsis complex, as An. marajoara, are essentially zoophilic mosquitoes that breed and feed outside the forest, where it was not collected at both Balbina and Samuel, confirming previous studies performed by Deane et al. (1948), Lourenco-de-Oliveira and Heyden (1986), Lourenco-de-Oliveira et al. (1989), Rosa- Freitas et al. (1990), Oliveira-Ferreira et al. (1992), Forattini et al. (1993). We conclude that neither An. darlingi nor An. marajoara can be suspected as vector of simian malaria among monkeys in the forest nor from monkeys to man in the Brazilian Amazon. For the same reason, i.e. because An. darlingi is better adapted to the anthropic environments such as the open fields in the rural areas, cleared river margins and proximity to the secondary woods and recently cleared forests, it is the primary vector of the human malaria throughout this region (Deane 1986, 1989, Lourenco-de-Oliveira 1989, Lourenco-de-Oliveira et al. 1989, Oliveira-Ferreira et al. 1990). On the other hand the anopheline vectors of P. brasilianum in the Amazon are likely to be among the most abundant, sylvatic and canopy feeders at Balbina and Samuel: An. medio-punctatus, An. nuneztovari, An. oswaldoi, An. triannulatus and An. shannoni. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To "Centrais Eletricas do Norte do Brasil SA" (ELETRONORTE)" for support in the field, Laboratories of Entomology - "Fundacao Nacional de Saude" (FNS), from the states of Rondonia and Amazonas, and "Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Manaus", for the help in the collections of anophelines and Prof. NM Serra Freire for help in the statistical analysis. REFERENCES Aitken THG, Worth CB, Tikasingh ES 1968. Arbovirus studies in Bush Bush forest, Trinidad, W.I., September 1959 - December 1964. III. Entomological Studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 17: 253-268. Almeida FB, Deane LM 1970. Plasmodium brasilianum reencontrado em seu hospedeiro original, o macaco uacari branco, Cacajao calvus. Bol Inst Nac Pesq Amazonia (Patologia Tropical) 4: 1-9. Arruda ME, Nardin EH, Nussenzweig RS, Cochrane AH 1989. Sero- epidemiological studies of malaria in indian tribes and monkeys of the Amazon basin of Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 41: 379-385. Chagas JAC, Barroso MAB, Amorim RDS, Robles CRQ 1982. Controle da malaria em projeto hidreletrico no estado do Amazonas. Rev Brasil Malariol D Trop 34: 68-81. Deane LM 1947. Observacoes sobre a malaria na Amazonia brasileira. Rev Serv Esp Saude Publ 1: 3-60. Deane LM 1976. Epidemiology of simian malaria in the American Continent. PAHO Scientific Publ 317: 144- 163. Deane LM 1986. Malaria vectors in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 81 (Supl. II): 5-14. Deane LM 1989. A cronologia da descoberta dos transmissores da malaria na Amazonia brasileira. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 84: 149-156. Deane LM 1992. Simian malaria in Brasil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 87 (Supl. III): 1-20. Deane LM, Ferreira Neto JA 1973. Malaria de macacos no Estado de Goias, Brasil: Encontro de Guaribas, Alouatta caraya, infectados com Plasmodium brasilianum. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 15: 107-111. Deane LM, Causey OR, Deane MP 1947. Chave ilustrada para a identificacao de trinta e cinco especies de anofelinos das regioes Nordestina e Amazonica do Brasil pelos caracteres da femea, com notas sobre os transmissores da malaria (Diptera, Culicidae). Rev Serv Esp Saude Publ 1: 309-336. Deane LM, Causey OR, Deane MP 1948. Notas sobre a distribuicao e a biologia dos Anofelinos das Regioes Nordestina e Amazonica do Brasil. Rev Serv Esp Saude Publ 1: 827-965. Deane LM, Damasceno RG, Arouck R 1953. Distribuicao vertical de mosquitos em uma floresta dos arredores de Belem , Para. Folia Clinica et Biol 20: 101-110. Deane LM, Deane MP, Ferreira Neto JA, Almeida FB 1971. On the transmission of simian malaria in Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 13: 311-319. Deane LM, Ferreira Neto JA, Cerqueira NL, Almeida FB 1968. Studies on monkey malaria in the vicinity of Manaus, State of Amazonas, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 10: 335- 341. Deane LM, Ferreira Neto JA, Deane MP, Silveira IPS 1970. Anopheles (Kerteszia) cruzi, a natural vector of the monkey malaria parasites, Plasmodium simium and Plasmodium brasilianum. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 64: 647. Deane LM, Ferreira Neto JA, Okumura M, Ferreira MO 1969. Malaria parasites of brazilian monkeys. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 11: 71-86. Eletronorte 1988. Relatorio da Operacao Muiraquita. Min Minas e Energia, Brasilia, 93 pp. Faran ME, Linthicum KJ 1981. A handbook of the Amazonian species of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Syst 13: 1-81. Ferreira Neto JA, Deane LM, Carneiro EWB 1970. Infeccao natural de guaribas, Alouatta belzebul belzebul (L., 1766), pelo Plasmodium brasilianum Gonder & Berenberg- Gossler, 1908, no Estado do Maranhao, Brasil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 12: 169-174. Forattini OP, Kakitani I, Massad E, Marucci D 1993. Studies on mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and anthropic environment. 2 - Immature stages research at rice irrigation system location in South-Eastern Brazil. Rev Saude Publ 27: 227-236. Klein TA, Lima JBP 1990. Seasonal distribution and biting patterns of Anopheles mosquitoes in Costa Marques, Rondonia, Brazil. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6: 700- 707. Lal AA, Cruz VF, Collins WE, Campbell GH, Procell PM, McCutchan TF 1988. Circumsporozoite protein gene from Plasmodium brasilianum. Animal reservoirs for human malaria parasites? J Biol Chem 263: 5495-5498. Lourenco-de-Oliveira R 1989. Some observations on the mosquitoes of indian settlements in Xingu National Park, Mato Grosso State, Brazil, with emphasis on malaria vectors. Rev Brasil Biol 49: 393-397. Lourenco-de-Oliveira R 1994 Qual a importancia da hematofagia extradomiciliar do Anopheles darlingi, na Amazonia? Rev Patol Trop 23 (Suppl.): 100-101. Lourenco-de-Oliveira RL, Heyden R 1986. Alguns aspectos da ecologia dos mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae) de uma area de planicie (Granjas Calabria), em Jacarepagua, Rio de Janeiro. IV. Preferencias alimentares quanto ao hospedeiro e frequencia domiciliar. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 81: 15-27. Lourenco-de-Oliveira RL, Deane LM 1995. Simian malaria at two sites in the Brazilian Amazon. I - The infection rates of Plasmodium brasilianum in non-human primates. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 90: 331-339. Lourenco-de-Oliveira R, Guimaraes AEG, Arle M, Silva TF, Castro M, Motta MA, Deane LM 1989. Anopheline species, some of their habits and relation to malaria in endemic areas of Rondonia state, Amazon region of Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 84: 501-514. Lourenco-de-Oliveira R, Santos F, Lima DC, Honorio NA, Araujo MDR 1994. Avaliacao da importancia epidemiologica da hematofagia peri e intradomiciliar do An. darlingi e outros anofelinos em areas endemicas de malaria, em Rondonia. Rev Patol Trop 23 (Suppl): 319. Oliveira-Ferreira J, Lourenco-de-Oliveira R, Deane LM, Daniel Ribeiro CT 1992. Feeding preference of Anopheles darlingi in malaria endemic areas of Rondonia state - Northwestern Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 87: 60l- 602 Oliveira-Ferreira J, Lourenco-de-Oliveira R, Teva A, Deane LM, Daniel Ribeiro CT 1990. Natural malaria infections in anophelines in Rondonia State, Brazilian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg 43: 6-10. Rosa Freitas MG, Deane LM, Momen H 1990. A morphological, isoenzymatic and behavioural study of ten populations of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albitarsis Lynch-Arribalzaga, 1878 (Diptera: Culicidae) including from the type-locality - Baradero, Argentina. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 85: 275- 289 Sudia WD, Chamberlain RW 1962. Battery operated light trap, an improved model. Mosquito News 22: 126-129. Tadei VP 1985. Estudos de ecologia e controle ambiental na regiao do reservatorio da UHE de Samuel. Impacto do reservatorio no aumento de doencas endemicas - Vetores da malaria. Periodo julho/dezembro, 1985. CNPq, Brasilia, 18pp. Tadei VP 1986. Estudos de ecologia e controle ambiental na regiao do reservatorio da UHE de Samuel. Impacto do reservatorio no aumento de doencas endemicas - Vetores da malaria. Periodo julho/dezembro, 1986. CNPq, Brasilia, 71pp. Tadei VP, Santos JMM, Costa WLS, Scardana VM 1988. Biologia dos anofelinos amazonicos. XII. Ocorrencia de especies de Anopheles, dinamica da transmissao e controle da malaria na zona urbana de Ariquemes, Rondonia. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 30: 221-251. Wilkerson RC 1988. Notes and redescription of some Anophelesseries Arribalzagia holotypes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the British Museum (Natural History). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 90: 411-421.
Fig. 2: percentage of each anopheline species collected inside (a) and outside the forest (b) in Samuel, State of Rondonia, Brazil, from 17 February to 28 March 1989 and from August 1990 through July 1991. Fig. 3: percentage of each anopheline species caught on humans on the ground and in the forest canopy in Balbina (a) and Samuel (b), respectively in the States of Amazonas and Rondonia, Brazil. TABLE I: Anopheline mosquitoes caught inside and outside the forest at Balbina, i.e. at three Waimiri-Atroari settlements, State of Amazonas, Brazil, from 6 to 30 September 1988 and 18 September to 20 October 1989
Forest
--------------
Species Inside Outside Total
--------------------------------------------------------------
Anopheles nuneztovari Gabaldon 840 - 840
Anopheles oswaldoi (Peryassu) 742 3 745
Anopheles (Nys.) spp.^a 300 - 300
Anopheles triannulatus (Neiva & Pinto) 102 - 102
Anopheles evansae(Brethes) 74 - 74
Anopheles mediopunctatus^b (Theobald) 64 - 64
Anopheles mattogrossensis Lutz & Neiva 6 - 6
Anopheles darlingi Root - 16 16
Anopheles peryassui Dyar & Knab 3 - 3
Anopheles shannoni Davis 2 - 2
Anopheles galvaoi Causey, Deane & Deane 1 - 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
Total 2133 19 2152
--------------------------------------------------------------
Man-hours 148.5 30 178.5
^a: damaged specimens; ^b: the specimens identified by us as
An. mediopunctatus probably consists of two related species,
neither of which seems to be An. mediopunctatus s.s.
(Wilkerson pers. comm., Wilkerson 1988).TABLE II: Anopheline mosquitoes caught on human baits and with a CDC light trap at three Waimiri-Atroari settlements - Cacau, Mare and Curiuau - near Balbina's forest, State of Amazonas, from 27 to 29 September 1989
Human baits^a
-----------------------------------
Species Inside Near the Near the Into the
the huts huts forest forest
------------------------------------------------------
Anopheles darlingi 8 7 1 -
Anopheles oswaldoi - - - -
------------------------------------------------------
Total 8 7 1 -
------------------------------------------------------
Man-hours 8 8 4 2
Table II continued
Light trap
-----------------------
Species Near the Near the Total
river florest
------------------------------------------
Anopheles darlingi - - 16
Anopheles oswaldoi - 3 3
------------------------------------------
Total - 3 19
------------------------------------------
Man-hours 6 2 30
^a: one person per site.TABLE III: Capture frequency of anopheline at human baits on the ground and in the forest canopy at Samuel^a and Balbina^b, respectively, in the States of Rondonia and Amazonas, Brazil
Mosquitoes/man-hour (x10)
--------------------------------
Species Samuel Balbina
-------------- --------------
ground canopy ground canopy
----------------------------------------------------------
Anopheles darlingi - 0.0 - -
Anopheles evansae 0.3 0.3 4.2 5.8
Anopheles galvaoi - - 0.1 -
Anopheles nuneztovari 13.1 21.3 42.7 71.3
Anopheles oswaldoi 3.8 2.3 41.7 58.8
Anopheles triannulatus 1.3 2.4 6.8 6.9
Anopheles (Nys) spp.^c 1.6 3.3 21.0 19.3
Anopheles mattogrossensis - - 0.7 -
Anopheles mediopunctatus 24.2 142.9 2.4 6.4
Anopheles peryassui - - 0.1 0.3
Anopheles shannoni 5.3 19.7 0.1 0.1
Anopheles (Ano.) spp.^c - 0.0 - -
Anopheles nimbus 0.1 - - -
Chagasia bonneae 0.1 0.5 - -
----------------------------------------------------------
Total 49.7 192.8 119.9 168.9
----------------------------------------------------------
Man-hours 356 356 76.5 72
^a: from 17 February to 28 March 1989 and August 1990 to July
1991; ^b: from 6-30 September 1988 and 18 September to 20
October 1989; ^c: damaged specimens.TABLE IV: Anopheline mosquitoes caught inside and outside the forest at Samuel, State of Rondonia, Brazil, from 17 February to 28 March and from August 1990 to July 1991
Forest
--------------
Species of anophelines Inside Outside Total
-----------------------------------------------------------
Anopheles mediopunctatusa 5946 - 5946
Anopheles nuneztovari 1227 4 1231
Anopheles shannoni 888 1 889
Anopheles darlingi 1 274 275
Anopheles oswaldoi 216 - 216
Anopheles (Nys.) spp.^b 174 6 180
Anopheles triannulatus 132 - 132
Anopheles marajoara Galvao & Damasceno - 55 55
Chagasia bonneae Root 22 - 22
Anopheles evansae 22 - 22
Anopheles nimbus (Theobald) 3 - 3
Anopheles (Ano.) spp. 1 - 1
----------------------------------------------------------
Total 8632 340 8972
----------------------------------------------------------
Man-hours 712 16 728
^a: the specimens identified by us as An. mediopunctatus
probably consists of two related species, neither of which
seems to be An. mediopunctatus s.s. (Wilkerson pers. comm.,
Wilkerson 1988); ^b: damaged specimens.TABLE V: Anopheline mosquitoes caught on human and cow at three settlements - Boca do Rio Novo, Caboclo and Japiim Road - near Samuel's forest, State of Rondonia, from 23 to 31 July 1991
Boca do Japiim Road
Species Rio Novo Caboclo ----------- Total
Human Human Human Cow
------------------------------------------------------------
Anopheles marajoara - - 1 54 55
Anopheles darlingi 243 25 6 - 274
Anopheles nuneztovari 1 1 - 2 4
Anopheles shannoni - - 1 - 1
Anopheles (Nys.) spp.^a 3 2 - 1 6
------------------------------------------------------------
Total 247 28 7 57 340
------------------------------------------------------------
Man-hours 4 4 6 2 16
^a: damaged specimens. Copyright 1996 Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
The following images related to this document are available:Line drawing images[oc96123b.gif] [oc96123a.gif] [oc96123c.gif] |
| |||||||||
