 |
| About Bioline | All Journals | Testimonials | Membership | News |
|
||||||
|
||||||
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 1, January-April, 2009, pp. 20-22 Original Article Assessment of air pollution and its effects on the health status of the workers in beam rolling mills factory (Iran National Steel Industrial Group) from Ahvaz-Iran Rafiei Masoud, Gadgil AlakaS, Ghole VikramS, Gore SharadD, Jaafarzadeh Neemat, Mirkazemi Roksana Department of Environmental Sciences, Ahvaz Joundishapour University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran Code Number: oe09005 Abstract Background: Air pollutants of iron- and steel-making operations have historically been an environmental and health hazard. These pollutants include gaseous substances such as sulfur oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide. The Iran National Steel Industrial Group beam rolling mills factory has two production lines viz. line 630 and line 650, with different beam production capabilities and is capable of producing different types of beams.Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study on 400 workers in different exposure levels to environmental pollution was performed during 2005 to determine the mean value of respirable particulate matter (RPM) concentrations and its effects on the health status of workers. To elicit information regarding the health status of the worker, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health standard questionnaire was used. Fisher's exact test was performed to assess the relative risk (RR) of exposure to air pollution on cardiovascular diseases, chest tightness, cough, difficulty in retention, i.e. loss of memory, tension, occupational fatigue, and occupational stress in exposed workers. Results: There was significant difference in RPM pollution level between two product lines. The RR of exposure to air pollution on cardiovascular diseases, chest tightness, cough, difficulty in retention, i.e. loss of memory, tension, occupational fatigue, and occupational stress in exposed workers were 2.78, 2.44, 2.15, 1.92, 1.57, 3.90, and 2.09, respectively. Keywords: Beam and steel, relative risk, respiratory particulate matter Introduction Iron and steel factory workers are at risk of exposure to a wide range of pollutants. This depends on the particular process, the materials involved, and the effectiveness of monitoring and control measures. Adverse effects are determined by the physical state, propensities of the pollutant involved, the intensity and duration of the exposure, the extent of pollutant accumulation in the body, and the sensitivity of the individual to its effects. Some effects are immediate while others may take years and even decades to develop. Changes in processes and equipments along with improvement in measures to keep exposures below toxic levels have shown to be effective in reduceding the risks to the workers. [1] The Iran National Steel Industrial Group (INSIG) is one of the biggest melting and casting plants in Iran. Consumption of raw material, energy, and water is high resulting in a significant volume of emission of air pollutants, both indoors and outdoors. Potential health effects depend on the number of particles in the respirable range, the chemical composition of the dust, the concentration of the exposure, and the duration of the exposure. [2] The main objective of the study was to determine the mean value of respirable particulate matter (RPM) concentrations in production line 650 and line 630 and to assess the relative risk (RR) of this pollution on the health status of exposed and non-exposed worker groups. The Beam Rolling Mills Factory has two production lines: line 630 and line 650, with the capacities of 190,000 and 195,000 ton annually, respectively, and is capable of producing various types of beams. [3] Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among workers of the INSIG. Two hundred workers (who were exposed to RPM at the work place) were randomly selected as the exposed group and 200 administrative staff were randomly selected as the non-exposed, control group. Exposed and non-exposed groups were preliminarily matched on various criteria such as age, work experience, and smoking habits. All 400 workers selected were asked to fill up the questionnaires. Data were analyzed using the 13 th version of the SPSS software, (Linda Fidder and et al ., California State University, Bakersfield). Fisher′s exact test was performed to calculate the RR. To measure the air pollution, 40 sampling stations were selected in two different production lines. A low-volume sampler′s pump was used for the study. After proper calibration and getting the calibration curve, data for RPM were collected (0.178 + 0.768X). The Model SKC (SKC Company, Blandford Forum, Dorset, United Kingdom), with a flow rate 2 L/min, membrane filter of 27 mm diameter, and pore size of 0.5 mm was used. Forty samples with the number of replications four times (160) in production lines 650 and 630 were collected. The concentrations were determined by weighing method using 0.1 mg precision balances. [5],[6] Results There was significant difference in RPM pollution level between two product lines 650 versus 360. [Table - 1] shows that the mean concentrations of RPM in production line 650 were significantly different from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health standard (3 mg/m 3 ), P < 0.05 (t-test). There were significant differences between work condition of the exposed and the non-exposed workers in neatness (P = 0.001), lighting (P = 0.001), and noise (P = 0.001) in the work place. Ninety-eight percent (n = 196) of the exposed workers reported suffering from dirty environment, 77% (n = 154) from lack of suitable light, and 99% (n = 198) from noisy working environment [Table - 2]. [Table - 3] shows that the RR of exposure to air pollution on developing cardiovascular diseases, chest tightness, cough, difficulty in retention, i.e. loss of memory, tension, occupational fatigue, and occupational stress in exposed workers were 2.78, 2.44, 2.15, 1.92, 1.57, 3.90, and 2.09 times, respectively, more among the exposed workers versus the non-exposed workers. Maximum RR was observed in occupational fatigue (RR = 3.90) and minimum RR was observed in feeling of tension (RR = 1.57). [Table - 4] illustrates the regression coefficient between records of workers disease and indoor mean value of RPM concentration in production lines 630 and 650. There was maximum and minimum regression coefficient between mean value of RPM concentrations and cough, difficulty in remembering (70%), and cardiovascular diseases (40%), respectively. Discussion The findings of this study show the direct effect of indoor air pollution on the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, chest tightness, cough, difficulty in retention, i.e. loss of memory, tension, occupational fatigue, and occupational stress. Unacceptable work condition (unhygienic, noisy, and dark work environment) may also contribute to an increased risk of these problems. Unsafe behavior like lack of respiratory mask use may be another contributor. [7] The results of this study reveal the need for improvement of the work condition for the well-being of the workers. Generating awareness among the workers to use safety equipments is also another preventive measure that needed to be undertaken. It is recommended that the equipment of all sampling workstations be house kept and corrected. Periodic medical inspection of workers needs to be incorporated as mandatory management programs. The management should take these issues seriously for the well-being of the workers.[8]Acknowledgments The authors are thankful to the management of INSIG and Dr. B. Mombani Management of Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) for providing necessary help to undertake this investigation. We acknowledge Mrs. M. Shabab and Mr. M. Lahijanzadeh for their kind cooperation.References
Copyright 2009 - Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[oe09005t1.jpg] [oe09005t2.jpg] [oe09005t4.jpg] [oe09005t3.jpg] |
| |||||||||
