search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Piracicaba Dental School - UNICAMP
EISSN: 1677-3225
Vol. 9, Num. 4, 2010, pp. 421-426

Braz J Oral Sci, Vol. 9, No. 4, October-December, 2010, pp. 421-426

Antimicrobial Efficacy Of Fruit Extracts Of Two Piper species Against Selected Bacterial And Oral Fungal Pathogens

Kamal Rai Aneja1, Radhika Joshi2, Chetan Sharma2, Ashish Aneja3

1PhD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India
2MSc, Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India
3MBBS, Medical Officer, Haryana Government, Posted Tarori (Karnal), India

Correspondence to: Radhika Joshi Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra- 136119, Haryana, India. Phone: 09355566163 E- mail: joshi_radhika31282@yahoo.com radhikasharma31282@gmail.com

Received for publication: February 7, 2010 Accepted: June 22, 2010

Code Number: os10048

Abstract

Aim: To assess the antimicrobial efficacy of five solvent extracts of two Piper species commonly used in diet and traditional medicine, P. cubeba and P. longum, against selected bacterial and oral fungal pathogens i.e. Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Methods:
The antimicrobial activity of five extracts of cubeb berries and Indian long pepper fruits was determined by the agar well diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the acetonic, methanolic and ethanolic extracts was determined by the modified agar well diffusion method.
Results:
Of the 5 fruit extracts evaluated, acetone, ethanol and methanol extracts of both the Piper spp. were found to have variable antimicrobial activities against all the four oral pathogens. The acetonic fruit extract of P. cubeba was the most effective against both the yeasts with the highest zone of inhibition (15.31 mm) against C. albicans followed by the methanolic (12.31 mm) and ethanolic (11.94 mm) extracts. C. albicans was found to be most sensitive pathogen, which survived up to 6.25 mg/mL in the acetonic extract (MIC = 12.5 mg/mL) followed by the methanolic and ethanolic extracts (MIC = 25 mg/mL). The acetonic, methanolic and ethanolic extracts of P. longum fruits showed almost equal inhibition zones of both yeasts, ranging between 10.64 and 14 mm. C. albicans survived up to 12.5 mg/mL (MIC= 25 mg/mL) while S.cerevisiae survived up to 25 mg/mL (MIC = 50 mg/mL).
Conclusions:
The crude extracts obtained from the fruits of the two Piper spp. may be used to treat oral fungal species, especially C. albicans, as they produced larger inhibition zones than antifungal drugs often used to treat these pathogens.

Keywords: oral pathogens, Piper cubeba, Piper longum, antibacterial or antifungal activity, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

Introduction

Oral diseases continue to be a major health problem worldwide1. Dental caries and periodontal diseases are among the most important global oral health problems2 . Streptococcus mutans is the major organism implicated with dental caries and oral infections3 . Candida albicans is the most common yeast isolated from the oral cavity, and is associated with oral fungal infections, endocarditis and septicemia4 . Staphylococcus aureus, a major human pathogen, is responsible for a number of hospital-acquired infections and propagates mainly in mouth and hands in the hospital environment5-6 . Saccharomyces cerevisiae considered to be an opportunistic pathogen in the oral cavity, may induce significant oral risks by acting as a tertiary colonizer in the progress of dental caries thus causing both superficial and invasive infections7 .

Microbial resistance to most of the antibiotics commonly used to treat oral infections (penicillins and cephalosporins, erythromycin, tetracycline and derivatives and metronidazole) has been documented8. The resistance of microorganisms against the traditional antibiotics needs urgent attention for the development of the new drug molecules. It is well documented from ancient times that active principles from plant origin have been used as medicines for various diseases and microbial infections9. A wide variety of medicinal plants used traditionally have not yet been systematically investigated against various microbial pathogens10 .

The genus Piper of family Piperaceae, with over 1,000 species, is distributed in both hemispheres. Piper cubeba Linn., commonly known as cubeb, tailed pepper (due to the stalks attached), Java pepper (in Java) and kemukus (in Indonesia), is a climbing perennial plant11. The fruits of this plant are used as a spice and have medicinal value, being often used for the treatment of abdominal pain, asthma, chronic bronchitis, diarrhea, dysentery, gonorrhea, enteritis and syphilis and reported to have an inhibitory effect on hepatitis C virus protease12-13. The dried fruits contain up to 10% essential oil composed of monoterpenes (sabinene 50%, carene, α-thujene, 1,4-cineol and 1,8-cineol) and sesquiterpenes (copaene, α- and β-cubebene, δ-cadinene, caryophyllene, germacrene, cubebol)14 .

P. longum Linn. (Javanese, Indian long pepper, pippali), another medicinal plant belonging to the genus Piper, is a small shrub characterized by fruits called berries borne in fleshy spikes, oblong, blunt and blackish green in color15 . The fruits contain 1% volatile oil, resin, a waxy alkaloid, a terpenoid substance and alkaloids piperine and piperlongumine16 . It is widely used as a folk medicine to cure diseases such as leprosy, tuberculosis, gonorrhea, paralysis of the tongue, diarrhea, cold, palsy, gout, rheumatism, lumbago, insomnia, epilepsy, anorexia, piles, dyspepsia, leucoderma cholera, scarlatina, chronic malaria, viral hepatitis, bronchitis, cough, asthma, stomachache, spleen diseases and tumors17-18 .

A literature search reveals that Piper spp. have been used in traditional medicine since long for several ailments15,1820 however, not much work has been done on the antimicrobial activity of their fruits. Since P. cubeba and P. longum have been used traditionally in medicine and their fruits have been used as food material, the biological evaluation of the fruits of these plants may lead to development of safer therapeutic agents21. Therefore, the present study has been designed to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of fruit extracts of P. cubeba and P. longum against selected bacterial and oral fungal pathogens.

Material and methods

Fruits/catkin of P. cubeba and P. longum were collected from the local market of Delhi, India. Dr. B.D. Vashishta (Botany Department) Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra confirmed the identification of the specimens.

Extraction

The samples were carefully washed under running tap water followed by sterile distilled water, and were air dried at room temperature (40°C) for 5 days and pulverized to a fine powder using a sterilized mixer grinder and stored in air-tight bottles. Four different solvents, namely ethanol, methanol, acetone and aqueous solvent (hot and cold), often used for the extraction of plant material were used to obtain the extracts22 . An amount of 10 g of pulverized fruit was separately soaked in 100 mL of acetone, ethanol, methanol, and cold sterile distilled water for 24 h. The same amount of pulverized fruit (10 g) was immersed in 100 mL of hot sterile distilled water (100°C) and allowed to stand for 30 min in a water bath with occasional shaking, and then left undisturbed for 24 h. Each preparation was filtered through a sterilized Whatman No.1 filter paper, and the filtered extract was concentrated under vacuum below 40°C using Heidolph, VE11 rotaevaporator23-25. The obtained dried extract was exposed to UV rays for 24 h and checked for sterility on nutrient agar plates and stored in labeled sterile bottles in a freezer at 4°C until further use26 .

Test microorganisms

Two oral pathogenic bacteria -S. mutans (MTCC*497) and S. aureus (MTCC 740) - and two oral pathogenic yeasts -C. albicans (MTCC 227) and S. cerevisiae (MTCC 170) were obtained from Microbial Type Culture Collection, IMTECH, Chandigarh. The microorganisms were subcultured on the specific media recommended for different microorganisms such as Brain heart infusion agar (S. mutans), Nutrient agar (S. aureus), Malt yeast agar (C. albicans and S. cerevisiae) and incubated aerobically at 37°C. The media were procured from HiMedia Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bombay, India. Identification of all the strains was confirmed by standard biochemical and staining methods27-29 .

Screening for antimicrobial activity

Antimicrobial activity of the 5 extracts of cubeb berries and Indian long pepper fruits was determined by following the agar well diffusion method of Okeke30. In this method, pure isolate of each microbe was subcultured on the recommended specific medium for each microorganism at 37°C for 24 h. A plate of each microorganism was taken and a minimum of 4 colonies were touched with a sterile loop and transferred into normal saline (0.85%) under aseptic conditions. Density of each microbial suspension was adjusted equal to that of 106cfu/mL (standardized by 0.5 McFarland standard) and used as the inoculum for performing agar well diffusion assay. One hundred microliters of inoculum of each test organism was spread onto the specific media plates so as to achieve a confluent growth. The agar plates were allowed to dry and 8-mm-diamater wells were made with a sterile borer in the inoculated agar plates. The lower portion of each well was sealed with a little specific molten agar medium31. The dried fruit extracts were reconstituted in 20% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for the bioassay analysis30 .

A 100 µL volume of each extract was propelled directly into the wells (in triplicates) of the inoculated specific media agar plates for each test organism. The plates were allowed to stand for 10 min for diffusion of the extract to take place and incubated at 37°C for 24h32-34. Sterile DMSO served as the negative control, and ciprofloxacin (for bacteria) and amphotericin-B (for fungi) served as the positive controls. The antimicrobial activity, indicated by the formation of an inhibition zone surrounding the well containing the extract, was recorded if the inhibition zone was greater than 8 mm. The experiments were performed in triplicates and the mean values of the diameter of inhibition zones with ± standard deviation were calculated35-36 .

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)

MIC is defined as the lowest concentration of a compound/extract/drug that completely inhibits the growth of the microorganism in 24 h35. The MIC for the acetonic, methanolic and ethanolic fruit extracts was determined by following the modified agar well diffusion method29 . A twofold serial dilution of each extract was prepared by first reconstituting the fruit extract in 20% DMSO followed by dilution in sterile distilled water to achieve a decreasing concentration range of 50 mg/mL to 0.39 mg/mL. A 100 µL volume of each dilution was introduced into wells (in triplicate) in the specific media agar plates already seeded with 100 µL of standardized inoculum (106cfu/mL) of the test microbial strain. All test plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h and observed for the inhibition zones. The lowest concentration of each extract showing a clear zone of inhibition (>8 mm) (in triplicate), considered as the MIC, was recorded for each test organism33 .

Statistical analysis

The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA followed by Dennett’s t-test for multiple comparisons were used for statistical evaluation. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results and discussion

The results of antimicrobial properties of ethanol, methanol, acetone and aqueous (hot and cold) fruit extracts of P. cubeba and P. longum, the positive control ciprofloxacin (for bacteria) and amphotericin-B (for fungi), and the negative control (DMSO), are presented in Table 1 and values of MIC of these extracts against the test pathogens are presented in Table 2. The antimicrobial activity of P .cubeba and P. longum extracts on the agar plates varied for the different solvents. Both positive controls produced significantly larger inhibition zones against the test bacteria (ciprofloxacin) and yeasts (amphotericin-B). However, the negative control produced no observable inhibitory effect. Of the 10 fruit extracts of P. cubeba and P. longum screened for antibacterial and antifungal activity, acetone, methanol and ethanol extracts showed activity against both the bacteria (S. mutans and S. aureus) and both yeasts (C. albicans and S. cerevisiae). However, aqueous extracts, both hot and cold, showed no activity against the test strains (Table 1).

A perusal of the data (Table 1) reveals that the acetonic fruit extract of P. cubeba was the most effective against both yeasts. It showed the largest zone of inhibition (15.31 mm) against C. albicans (Figure 1a) followed by the methanolic (12.31 mm) and ethanolic extract (11.94 mm). C. albicans was found to be most sensitive pathogen, which survived up to 6.25 mg/mL in the acetonic extract (Figure 2 i) (MIC = 12.5 mg/mL) followed by the methanolic and ethanolic extracts (25 mg/mL). The inhibition zones produced by the 3 solvents against S. cerevisiae ranged between 14 and 12.94 mm. S. cerevisiae was found to be comparatively more resistant than C. albicans, as it survived up to 12.5 mg/mL (MIC = 25 mg/mL) in all 3 extracts tested. Interestingly, the acetonic fruit extract of P. cubeba showed comparatively greater activity against both yeasts, C. albicans (15.31 mm) and S. cerevisiae (14 mm), than that of the standard drug amphotericin-B (13 mm), which indicates a great potential against oral fungal pathogens. Among the tested fruit extracts of P. cubeba, the acetonic extract showed greater antibacterial activity against S. aureus, the highest inhibition zone being 18.96 mm followed by the methanolic (17.65 mm) and ethanolic (17.32 mm) extracts (Table 1). S. aureus survived up to 12.5 mg/mL, thus having a MIC of 25 mg/mL (Table 2, Figure 2 ii). The inhibition zones produced by the 3 solvents against S. mutans ranged from 13 to 12.64 mm, and this microorganism survived up to 25 mg/mL (MIC = 50 mg/ mL).

The aqueous (hot and cold) extracts did not show any activity against the tested yeast and bacteria (Table 1). A literature search reveals that among the Piper spp., the fruits of P. cubeba have received less attention on their antimicrobial activity. The berries contain essential oil consisting of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, the oxides 1.4and 1, 8-cineole, kadsurin A, piperenone and the alcohol cubebol37-38 in addition to two groups of secondary metabolites, i.e., alkaloids (piperine being the most abundant alkaloid39), and lignans (cubebin, though lesser in amounts in berries as compared to other lignans like yatein and hinokinin)11,39-40. The antibacterial and antifungal activity shown by the fruit extracts of P. cubeba against all the 4 test strains in this study may be due to the presence of piperine and cubebin in the berries. Cubebin has also been found to possess antiinflammatory, analgesic and trypanocidal activities14, 41-42.

The data presented in the Table 1 reveal that acetonic, methanolic and ethanolic extracts of P. longum produced almost equal inhibition of both the yeasts, ranging between 10.64 and 14 mm (Figure 1b). C. albicans survived up to 12.5 mg/mL thus having an MIC of 25 mg/mL while S. cerevisiae survived up to 25 mg/mL thus having an MIC of 50 mg/mL (Table 2). The zone of inhibition produced against the bacterial pathogens by the three solvent extracts of P. longum fruits was mild that ranged between 10 and 11.31 mm without much variation in the different solvents activity (Table 1).

However, the bacteria were found to be comparatively resistant as they survived up to 50 mg/mL, thus having an MIC of 100 mg/mL. The fruit of P. longum contains a large number of alkaloids and related compounds, the most abundant of which is piperine, together with methyl piperine, pipernonaline, piperettine, asarinine, pellitorine, piperundecalidine, piperlongumine, piperlonguminine, retrofractamide A, pergumidiene, brachystamide-B, a dimer of desmethoxypiplar-tine, N isobutyl-decadienamide, brachyamide- A, brachystine, pipercide, piperderidine, longamide, dehydropipernonaline piperidine and tetra hydro piperine43. Piperine, an alkaloid in the fruits of P.longum is responsible for the pungency of long pepper and has been shown to possess antiinflammatory, antiamoebic, antiasthmatic, anticonvulsant and antibacterial activities44-45. Thus, the antibacterial and antifungal activity of the fruits of P. longum may be due to the presence of the alkaloid piperine.

It may, therefore, be concluded from the above investigation that the crude extracts obtained from the fruits of the two Piper spp. may be used to treat oral fungal species, especially C. albicans, as they produced larger inhibition zones than the antifungal drugs often used to treat these pathogens. However, isolation of pure compounds and their toxicological analysis and clinical investigation in animal models are to be made before their trials on human.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to our Honorable Vice Chancellor, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra for providing us the infrastructure in the Department of Microbiology. We would like to thank Dr. B.D.Vashishta, Department of Botany, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, for helping with the identification of the fruit samples. We are thankful to Dr. Tapan Chakrabarti, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, for providing the microbial cultures.

References

  1. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83: 661-9.
  2. Palombo EA. Traditional medicinal plant extracts and natural products with activity against oral bacteria: potential application in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. eCAM Advance Access. 2009; 1-15.
  3. Lee SS, Zhang W, Li Y. The antimicrobial potential of 14 natural herbal dentifrices: results of an in vitro diffusion method study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135: 1133-41.
  4. Bagg J. Essentials of microbiology for dental students. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
  5. Knighton HT. Study of bacteriophage types and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococci isolated from dental students and faculty members. J Dent Res. 1960; 39: 906-11.
  6. Piochi BJ, Zelante F. Contribution to the study of Staphylococcus isolated in the mouth.III. Staphylococcus isolated from dental plaque. Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo. 1975; 13: 91-7.
  7. Bonjar GHS. Anti yeast activity of some plants used in traditional herbal medicine of Iran. J Biol Sci. 2004; 4: 212-5.
  8. Bidault P, Chandad F, Grenier D. Risk of bacterial resistance associated with systemic antibiotic therapy in periodontology. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007; 73: 721-5
  9. Borris RP. Natural products research: perspective from a major pharmaceutical company. J Ethnapharmacol. 1996; 51: 29-38.
  10. Farrukh A, Iqbal A. Broad spectrum antibacterial and antifungal properties of certain traditionally used Indian medicinal plants. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003; 19: 653-7.
  11. Koul JL, Koul SK, Taneja SC, Dhar KL. Oxygenated cyclohexanes from Piper cubeba. Phytochem. 1996; 41: 1097-9.
  12. Eisai PT. Medicinal Herb Index in Indonesia. 2. ed. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat; 1995.
  13. Junqueira APF, Perazzo FF, Souza GHB, Maistro EL. Clastogenicity of Piper cubeba (Piperaceae) seed extract in an in vivo ma mmalian cell system. Genet Mol Biol. 2007; 30: 656-63.
  14. Borsato MLC, Grael CFF, Souza GEP, Lopes NP. Analgesic activity of the lignans from Lychnophora ericoides. Phytochem. 2000; 55: 809-13.
  15. Ali MA, Alam NM, Yeasmin MS, Khan AM, Sayeed MA. Antimicrobial screening of different extracts of Piper longum Linn. Res J Agri Biol Sci. 2007; 3: 852-7.
  16. Wu S, Sun C, Pei S, Lu Y, Pan Y. Preparative isolation and purification of amides from the fruits of Piper longum L. By upright counter-current chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 2004; 1040: 193-204.
  17. Warrier PK, Nambiar VPK, Raman KC. Piper longum Linn: Indian Medicinal Plants. Madras, India: Orient Longman; 1995.
  18. Reddy PS, Jamilk K, Madhusudhan P, Anjani G, Das B. Antibacterial activity of isolates from Piper longum and Taxus baccata. Pharma Biol. 2001; 39: 236-8.
  19. Young-Cheol Y, Sang Guei L, Hee-Kwon L, Moo-Key K, Sang-Hyun L, Hoi-Seon L. A piperidine amide extracted from Piper longum L. fruit shows activity against Aedes aegypti mosquito larvae. J Agri Food Chem. 2002; 50: 3765-7.
  20. Li X, Zhou J, Li H, Du S, Li Y, Huang L et al. Study on proliferation effect of extracts of Piper longum on mesenchymal stem cells of rat bone marrow and the relationship to chemical functional groups. Zhong-Yao-Cai. 2005;28: 570-4.
  21. Catalano S, Cioni PL, Panizzi L, Morelli I. Antimicrobial activity of extracts of Mutisia acuminate var acuminate. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998; 59: 207-9.
  22. Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999; 12: 564-82.
  23. Lokhande PD, Gawai KR, Kodam KM, Kuchekar BS, Chabukswar AR, Jagdale SC. Antibacterial activity of extracts of Piper longum. J Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007; 2: 574-9.
  24. Bag A, Bhattacharya SK, Bharati P, Pal NK, Chattopadhyay RR. Evaluation of antibacterial properties of Chebulic myrobalan (fruit of Terminalia chebula Retz.) extracts against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and trimethoprim-suphamethoxazole resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Afr J Plant Sci. 2009; 3: 25-9.
  25. Ogundiya MO, Okunade MB, Kolapo AL. Antimicrobial activities of some Nigerian chewing sticks. Ethnobot Leaflts. 2006; 10: 265-71.
  26. Aneja KR, Joshi R. Antimicrobial activity of Amomum subulatum and Elettaria cardamomum against dental caries causing microorganisms. Ethnobot Leaflts. 2009; 13: 840-9.
  27. Aneja KR. Experiments in microbiology plant pathology and biotechnology.4. ed. New Delhi, India: New Age International Publishers; 2003.
  28. Benson HJ. Microbiological applications: laboratory manual in general microbiology. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004.
  29. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Microbiology. A laboratory manual. California: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company; 1995.
  30. Okeke MI, Iroegbu CU, Eze EN, Okoli AS, Esimone CO. Evaluation of extracts of the root of Landolphia owerrience for antibacterial activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001; 78: 119-27.
  31. Nkere CK, Iroegbu CU. Antibacterial screening of the root, seed and stem bark extracts of Picralima nitida. Afr J Biotechnol. 2005; 4: 522-6.
  32. Rajasekaran C, Meignanam E, Vijayakumar V, Kalaivani T, Ramya S, Premkumar N et al. Investigations on antibacterial activity of leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae): a traditional medicinal plant of India. Ethnobot Leaflts. 2008; 12: 1213-7.
  33. Aneja KR, Joshi R. Evaluation of antimicrobial properties of fruit extracts of Terminalia chebula against dental caries pathogens. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2009; 2: 105-11.
  34. Khokra SL, Prakash O, Jain S, Aneja KR, Dhingra Y. Essential oil composition and antibacterial studies of Vitex negundo Linn.extracts. Ind J Phar Sci. 2008; 70: 522–6.
  35. Aneja KR, Joshi R, Sharma C. Antimicrobial activity of Dalchini (Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark) extracts on some dental caries pathogens. J Pharm Res. 2009; 2: 1387-90.
  36. Aneja KR, Joshi R, Sharma C. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Sapindus mukorossi and Emblica officinalis against dental caries pathogens. Ethnobot Leaflts. 2010; 14: 402-12.
  37. Saleem M, Kim HJ, Ali MS, Lee YS. An update on bioactive plant lignans. Nat Prod Rep. 2005; 22: 696-716.
  38. Thongson C, Davidson PM, Mahakarrchanakul W, Weiss J. Antimicrobial activity of ultrasound-assisted solvent-extracted spices. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004; 39: 401-6.
  39. Parmar VS, Jain SC, Bisht KS, Jain R, Taneja P, Jha A et al. Phytochemistry of the genus Piper. Phytochem. 1997; 46: 597-673.
  40. Usia T, Watabe T, Kadota S, TezukaY. Potent CYP3A4 inhibitory constituents of Piper cubeba. J Nat Prod. 2005; 68: 64-8.
  41. Bastos JK, Carvalho JCT, de Souza GHB, Pedrazzi AHP, Sarti SJ. Antiinfla mmatory activity of cubebin, a lignan from the leaves of Zanthoxyllum naranjillo Griseb. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001; 75: 279-82.
  42. De Souza VA, Da Silva R, Pereira AC, Royo VD, Saraiva J, Montanheiro M et al. Trypanocidal activity of (-)-cubebin derivatives against free amastigote forms of Trypanosoma cruzi. Bioorgan Med Chem Lett. 2005; 15: 303-7.
  43. Atal CK, Zutshi U, Rao PG. Scientific evidence on the role of Ayurvedic herbals on bioavailability of drugs. J Ethnopharmacol. 1981; 4: 229-32.
  44. Sunila ES, Kuttan G. I mmunomodulatory and antitumor activity of Piper longum Linn. and piperine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004; 90: 339-46.
  45. Mishra P. Isolation, spectroscopic characterization and computational modelling of chemical constituents of Piper longum natural product. Int J Pharma Sci Rev Res. 2010; 2: 78-86.

Copyright 2010 - Braz J Oral Sci


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[os10048t1.jpg] [os10048f2.jpg] [os10048f1.jpg] [os10048t2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil