|
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 2, Apr-Jun, 2011, pp. 136-139 Apical and cervical displacement produced byhand and engine-driven stainless steel andnickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved root canal Benito André Silveira Miranzi1, Gilberto Antônio Borges1, Almir José Silveira Miranzi4, Fernando Hueb de Menezes2, Mário Alfredo Silveira Miranzi3, Luis Henrique Borges1 1DDS, PhD, Department of Biomaterials, Dental School, University of Uberaba, Brazil Correspondence to: Benito André Silveira Miranzi Universidade de Uberaba UNIUBE, Departamento de Endodontia Av. Nenê Sabino, 1801, Bloco H, Sala nº 207 3055-500 - Uberaba, MG, Brazil. Phone: (34)84069382 E-mail: bmiranzi@mednet.com.br Received for publication: January 24, 2011 Accepted: May 31, 2011 Code Number: os11027 AbstractAim: The purpose of this study was evaluate the occurrence of displacement on the apical and cervical thirds of artificial curved root canals with 30° of
curvature,comparing the use of stainless steel hand and oscillatory files with
nickel-titanium(NI-TI) hand, rotary and oscillatory files. Keywords: root canal preparation, endodontic instruments, root canal therapy. Introduction The proper preparation of curved root canals is directly related to the capacity of providing uniform removal of intracanal dentin without resulting in undesirable canal aberrations. The use of stainless steel files for dilatation of curved canals may cause problems such as zipping, elbow, and perforations especially when the canals have to be enlarged above a size 25 file1.The introduction of nickel-titanium (NI-TI) files made possible to provide more regular preparations because these instruments have high flexibility, low elasticity modulus and shape memory,which lead these files to producing fewer mistakes during instrumentation of narrow and curved canals1-6. It has been shown that instrumentation with stainless steel hand files yield a larger number of aberrations compared with NI-TIrotary files4-5,7-8. Nevertheless, neither stainless steel files nor NI-TI instruments (either manual or engine-driven) are ableto yield complete cleaning and shaping of canal walls9-11. The purpose of this study was evaluate the occurrence of displacement on the apical and cervical thirds of artificial curved root canals with 30° of curvature, comparing the use of stainless steel hand and oscillatory files with NI-TI hand, rotary and oscillatory files. Material and methodsSeventy artificial curved root canals (Tecnodon, Uberaba, MG, Brazil) were fabricated following the methodology proposed by Dummer et al.12 with gradual curvatures of about 30º, measured according to the Schneider's method13. The working length (WL) was determined 1 mm short of the apical portion of the artificial root canals using size10 K-files (Union Broach®, Montgomeryville, PA, USA). Three reference points were made in the acrylic blocks to allow further precise super imposition of the images obtained before and after preparation of the simulated root canals. The blocks were positioned always in the same direction and photographed with a Nikon F-2 camera (Nikon®, Tokyo, Japan) using standard object/film distance. In order to quantify the possible distortions produced by instrumentation, two measured sections were put close to the resin blocks. After preparation, the blocks were photographed again, maintaining the initial position and the previously established object/film distance. After digitization of the photographs with a flatbed scanner Genius HR5 SCSI (KYEDCOM systems®, China) images were super imposed using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 image-editing software and Image tool 3.0 image-analysis software for possible provoked changes. The 70 canal-resin blocks were randomly assigned to 7 groups (n=10) and instrumented by a single operator. In all groups, the straight portion of the canals was prepared with size 1 to 3 Gates-Glidden drills (Union Broach®, Montgomeryville, Pennsylvania USA), according to a crown-down instrumentation technique, and root canal preparation wascomplemented using sizes 15 to 40 files at the WL. In group 1, the canals were manually prepared with Flex-R stainless steel files (Union Broach®) using balanced force. In group 2,the canals were manually prepared with Onix-R NI-TI files(Union Broach®) as in group 1. In group 3, the simulated canals were prepared with Flex-R stainless steel files activatedby Endo-Gripper oscillatory system (Union Broach®). In group 4, the canals were prepared with Onix-R NI-TI files(Union Broach®) activated by Endo-Gripper oscillatory system. In group 5, the canals were prepared with Pow-R NI-TI files (Union Broach®) activated by Anthogyr (Micro-Mega®, France) rotary pneumatic engine using a handpiece with 1:64 reduction. In group 6, the canals were prepared with Pow-R NI-TI files activated by Endo-Plus motor (VKDriller®, Brazil) with controlled speed of 250 rpm. In group7, the canals were prepared with Flex-R files activated by Endo-Plus motor and Endo-Gripper handpiece allowing constant oscillation of 250 rpm. At each change of instrument, the canals were copiously irrigated with 2 mL of distilled water together with bi-distilled glycerin (Farmax®, São Paulo, SP, Brazil®) to lubricate the canals and facilitate instrumentation. The blocks with root canals were fixed on a mini lathe (Western, L/C,T/T,China) to facilitate instrumentation. The superimposed images were magnified 4 times and evaluated using Image Tool 3.0 software, which allows measuring distances, angles and areas in digitized images. Initially, it was calibrated in millimeters as unit of measure having as reference to calibration the measured sections placed close to the blocks. Then, the software calculated by means of a drawning, the amount of material removed in the curved portion of the simulated canals at 2 mm level outside (Figure 1) and 11 mm inside. The normality Lilliefors was applied to the two levels analyzed and it showed normal curve which allowed using one-way ANOVA and Tukeys post-hoc test. The significancelevel was set at 5%. ResultsResults are shown in Tables 1 and 2. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) at 2 mm level between NI-TI and steel stainless groups (Table 1). On the other level, at 11 mm, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were observed between groups 5 and 6 (rotary systems) when compared with the remaining groups (Table 2). In group 1, it was observed loss of the WL and blockage, mainly after the use of size 25 file. Difficulties were found on moving from size 30 to 35 file and from size 35 to 40 file. There was zipping and elbow formation. A size 35 file fractured during instrumentation. In group 2, there was difficulty in moving from size 20to 25 file and from size 30 to 35 file. There was loss of WL but no instrument breakage was observed. In group 3, files up to size 25 were flexible enough to accompany the curvature without resistance. However, from size 30 on there was loss of the WL and need for using greater force with the handpiece. In spite of zipping and elbow formation, there was neither fracture nor distortion of any instrument. On the simulated canals in group 4, the file had to be first prepared manually, until reaching the WL and then the mechanical instrumentation system could be used. Sizes 35 and 40 files did not reach the WL. There was neither fracture nor distortion of any instrument. The files in group 5 had no difficulty in penetrating the canals. The WL was reached without finding resistance.There was not blockage and a size 25 file fractured. Likewise, the canals in group 6 were enlarged up to size 40 files without any difficulty. There was no instrument breakage and only a size 35 file presented tip distortion. No instrument fracturing or distortion was observed in group 7. It was noticed transport starting from size 30 file with loss of the WL, blockage and zipping and elbow formation. These findings are similar to those of group 3, which used the same hand piece but without speed control. DiscussionSeveral methodologies have been used to evaluate root canal preparation7-8,10-11. Simulated canals allow standardization of length, radius, diameter and curvature angle, while natural teeth present variations of canal shape and diameter. Dentin hardness may not be identical to that of the resin used for preparation of the blocks containing the artificial canals7-8,12. In this study, both hand and engine-driven (oscillatoryor rotary) stainless steel and NI-TI files had similar design configuration not to interfere with the results. The use of Pow-R is justified because the study evaluated the most effective preparation techniques and not the file design. Even though they are not used anymore, the Pow-R files are similarto the conventional (stainless steel) instruments used in hand instrumentation. Tan and Messer14 indicate files with small taper to finish the preparation in the work length, to improvethe intracanal cleaning and filling. It was observed that the NI-TI instruments were able to shape the simulated curved canals more appropriately, as observed in previous studies7-8,11. It was also verified that rotary NI-TI instrumentation using pneumatic or electric engines was more effective than manual instrumentation with stainless steel and NI-TI files. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies1,11. However, Rasquin et al.15 found better shaping and cleaning ability for AET (Endo-Eze®) files (oscillatory) compared with RaCe rotary system (FKG® Dentaire) in the cervical third. The authors did not found significant differences in the apical part. In all groups, it was observed that root canal preparation selected areas on the curved portion of the canal; in the apical region of the curvature the selected areas occurred onthe external side while in the cervical region of the curvature they occurred in the internal side. Similar outcomes have been reported2,7,16. Canals prepared with NI-TI instruments driven by rotary or oscillatory systems showed more centered preparations17. There was greater impaction of resin and, consequently, loss of the WL for the stainless steel instruments used either manually or activated by the Endo-Gripper oscillatory motion. Similar observations with less extrusion and impaction usingof NI-TI files coupled to rotary systems have been reported18-19. Preparation of curved root canals up to size 40 instrument confer a better cleaning and facilitate filling1,20. Therefore, all root canals were prepared up to size 40 files at the WL, aiming to comply with the basic requirements for good root canal shaping. However in the present results, the stainless steel instruments should be used up to file 20, followed byrotary Ni-Ti instruments. The investigation analyzed the hypothesis that the oscillatory instrumentation withcontrolled speed and stainless steel files would be analternative to decrease deformations during preparation ofcurved and strait root canals. The results showed that no significant difference was found for the tested hypothesis, resulting in similar deformation and blockage (Table 1). The crown-down technique combined with apical enlargement determine apical foramen diameter, as well as prevent aberrations of curved canals1,18,21-22. As the instrumentation technique used in all groups was the same, it could be assumed that the type of metal and movement of instrument sare crucial to keep the artificial root canal curvature. Further studies should be carried out on natural teeth to assess root canal cleaning because, as previously mentioned, simulated root canal methodology analyzes better other requirements. In conclusion, the most centered preparations were those belonging to groups prepared with NI-TI (groups 5 and 6) files and rotary systems, at both levels analyzed. Mechanical root canal preparation with NI-TI instruments yielded the best results. References
Copyright © 2011 - Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[os11027f1.jpg] [os11027t2.jpg] [os11027t1.jpg] |
|