|
Iranian Journal of Pediatrics
Tehran University of Medical Sciences Press
ISSN: 1018-4406 EISSN: 2008-2150
Vol. 18, Num. 2, 2008, pp. 154-158
|
Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 18, No. 2, June, 2008, pp. 154-158
Being Child of Prisoners of War: The Case
of Mental Health Status
Mostafa Najafi *1, MD, Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist;Shahla Akochkian2, MD, Psychiatrist; Hamid Reza Nikyar3 MD, Psychiatrist
1Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, IR Iran
2Behavioral Science Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, IR Iran
3Azad Islamic
University, Faculty of Medicine, Najafabad Unit, IR Iran
* Correspondence author;
Address: Behavioral Science Research Center, Nour Medical Center, Hasht Behesht Ave, Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: m_najafi@bsrc.mui.ac.ir
Received: 29/11/07; Revised: 20/12/07; Accepted: 12/04/08
Code Number: pe08024
Abstract
Objective: Captivity has political, mental and social effects on
captives. According to stress severity, captivity duration, religious idea,
resistance and affective susceptibility, captivity causes significant mental
and neurological effects. Present study was aimed to evaluate mental situation
of captives' children in Isfahan Province.
Material & Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytic observational study. Strengths and
difficulties questionnaire (SQD) was used for mental evaluation of captives' children.
We selected 384 objectives by random sampling.
Findings: There
was a significant difference between emotional signs, disruptive and
communicational problems and social behaviors related with the age of children.
A significant difference was also seen between emotional signs and educational level
of children.
Conclusion:Captivity of the father in long term has unsuitable
physical and mental effects on children. Rate of these effects depends on mother's
reaction to loss of spouse as well as age, and the social support provided for children.
Key Words: Captivity; Children; Mental Situation;
Prisoners of war
Introduction
Captivity has main effects on several aspects of
human life including mental, social and political behavior. According to the severity
of stress, duration of captivity and personal religious idea, resistance and
damage susceptibility, captivity may cause some neurological or mental
disorder. Some of them are termed in the literature as Survivor Syndrome, Post-concentration
Camp Syndrome and Master Slave syndrome.
Captives suffer from some mental or behavioral
disorders even after freedom that can limit conformity of them to society and their
social roles. These disorders have the same prevalence in captives of all
countries[1]. Captives have 40% higher chance for psychological ward
hospitalization than general population[2]. Mortality rates due to
disease or accidents are higher than in general population[3,4].
Father's
captivity and long term loss can cause depression, adaptive or behavioral disturbance
in children. These effects depend on the age and social support provided for
the child as well as mothers reaction and resistance. In other words, anxiety
of women for captive's health and other life conditions may affect mental or
physical health of children.
Psychological disorders in father, poor social
and economic situation in the family can lead to stressful situation in family
members. Children are more susceptible to getting disorders. Once psychological
disorders in these families recognized, stress and anxiety of captives and
their families, especially of their children can be reduced with suitable
intervention.
Unfortunately, up to now there are no useful studies
on psychology of Iranian captives and their families. It is necessary that we
carefully evaluate their personal and family conditions. In present study, we tried
to evaluate mental situation in children of Iranian captives.
Material & Methods
This was a cross-sectional analytic observational
study. Study samples
were all captives in Isfahan Province. From all 1404 captives that lived in Isfahan province, 384 persons were selected randomly. Study samples were invited to a 2-day
tour in Abrisham Garden in Isfahan. In this tour we used Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
(SDQ) for reviewing mental situation of captives' children. SDQ is a short questionnaire that consists of 25 questions to
screen behavioral disorders in 316 year-old children. There are four types of
the questionnaire: for parents, for teachers, for children and for younger
children that was completed by their parents or teachers. At first SDQ was
approved for using in Iran by studying 50 children. Four subtypes of SDQ reviewed
emotional symptoms, disruptive behavior, attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD), and personal communicational and social behavior disorders.
For statistical analysis we
used SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 14.0).
Quantitative variables were presented by central indices and qualitative variables
by frequencies tables. Scores of SDQ were analyzed in all groups of children by
Analysis of Variance test (ANOVA) and t-test. Age of children was matched
before analyzing. P-values less than 0.05 were assumed
significant.
Findings
There are significant differences between emotional
symptoms (P=0.02), disruptive disorders (P=0.04), communicational
disorders (P=0.01), and social behavior of captives' children with their
age. But correlation between age and ADHD was not significant (P=0.06).
There were no significant
differences between emotional symptoms, disruptive disorders, attention deficit
hyper activity disorders (ADHD), communicational disorders of the children and
their sex (P>0.05). Significant differences were seen in social behaviors between sons and daughters (P=
0.04) (Table 1). There were no significant differences between emotional
symptoms, disruptive disorders, ADHD and
communicational disordersand social behavior of the children
and the place of their education (P>0.05) (Table 2).
Table 1- Behavioral disorders between captives Childs
according their sex
Behavioral
disorders |
Sex |
N |
Mean (SD) |
P. value |
Emotional symptoms |
Male |
85 |
3.1 (2.4) |
0.2 |
Female |
67 |
3.7 (2.7) |
Disruptive Disorders |
Male |
88 |
4.5 (2.1) |
0.7 |
Female |
65 |
4.4 (2.1) |
ADHD |
Male |
87 |
5.7 (1.5) |
0.4 |
Female |
67 |
5.5 (1.9) |
Communicational disorders |
Male |
88 |
4.9 (1.4) |
0.5 |
Female |
67 |
5.1 (1.9) |
Social behaviors |
Male |
86 |
6.8 (2.2) |
0.04 |
Female |
65 |
7.6 (1.9) |
There were no significant differences between
emotional symptoms, disruptive disorders, ADHD and
communicational disordersand social behavior of the childrenand their level of education (P>0.05)
(Table 3).
There was a significant difference between
emotional symptoms according to their Educational status (P=0.04), but
disruptive disorders, ADHD, communication disorders and social behavior showed
no significant differences (Table 4).
Discussion
Present
study was designed for evaluation of psychological
disorders of captives' children. In this study there were significant
differences between captives' sons and daughters for social
behavior. Frequency of emotional symptoms, disruptive disorders, communicational
disorders and social behavior in different age groups of thechildren was different
and this difference
Table 2- Behavioral disorders between captives Childs
according their educational place
Behavioral
disorders |
Educational place |
N |
Mean (SD) |
P. value |
Emotional symptoms |
Governmental |
61 |
3.4 (2.5) |
0.9 |
Non governmental |
17 |
3.4 (3.1) |
Disruptive Disorders |
Governmental |
61 |
4.0 (2.1) |
0.1 |
Non governmental |
17 |
4.9 (2.0) |
ADHD |
Governmental |
62 |
5.6 (1.6) |
0.6 |
Non governmental |
17 |
5.8 (1.7) |
Communicational disorders |
Governmental |
63 |
5.1 (1.5) |
0.6 |
Non governmental |
16 |
4.8 (1.2) |
Social behaviors |
Governmental |
61 |
7.4 (2.0) |
0.7 |
Non governmental |
16 |
7.2 (1.9) |
Table 3- Behavioral disorders between captives Childs
according their educational level
Behavioral
disorders |
Educational level |
N |
Mean (SD) |
P. value |
Emotional symptoms |
Primary |
67 |
3.5 (2.6) |
0.2 |
Intermediate |
11 |
3.1 (2.7) |
Disruptive Disorders |
High school |
3 |
0.7 (1.1) |
0.9 |
Primary |
67 |
4.2 (2.1) |
ADHD |
Intermediate |
11 |
4.2 (2.1) |
0.8 |
High school |
3 |
4.0 (1.0) |
Communicational disorders |
Primary |
68 |
5.6 (1.6) |
0.2 |
Intermediate |
11 |
5.4 (1.7) |
Social behaviors |
High school |
3 |
5.3 (1.1) |
0.89 |
Primary |
68 |
5.1 (1.5) |
was significant.
Educational levels of captives'children affect significantly the emotional
symptoms.
One
of the most important causes of mental health in captives' children is emotional
behavior of their parents. In reviewing mental behavior of children according
to their parents'
emotional behavior, post trauma stress
disorders (PTSD) must be noted[5].
Table 4- Behavioral disorders between captives Childs
according their educational status
Behavioral
disorders |
Educational level |
N |
Mean (SD) |
P. value |
Emotional symptoms |
Excellent |
56 |
2.5 (3.2) |
0.04 |
Good |
15 |
2.3 (2.6) |
Moderate |
4 |
3.3 (6.2) |
Disruptive Disorders |
Excellent |
56 |
1.2 (4.4) |
0.2 |
Good |
15 |
1.8 (3.5) |
Moderate |
4 |
0.5 (5.2) |
ADHD |
Excellent |
56 |
1.7 (5.7) |
0.8 |
Good |
15 |
1.5 (5.4) |
Moderate |
4 |
0.8 (6.0) |
Communicational disorders |
Excellent |
56 |
1.3 (5.1) |
0.8 |
Good |
15 |
1.8 (4.8) |
Moderate |
4 |
1.2 (5.0) |
Social behaviors |
Excellent |
54 |
1.8 (7.5) |
0.7 |
Good |
15 |
1.9 (7.6) |
Moderate |
4 |
2.7 (6.7) |
Children of solders with PTSD had more mental problems than children of thosewithout
it[6]. Behavioral disorders are frequently reported in children of
captives that had more disturbances in captivity period[7].
Several studies reported a relation- ship
between signs of behavioral disorders and PTSD in captives with signs of
behavioral disorders, PTSD, depression, anxiety and antisocial behavior in
their children[8,9]. Disturbance of homes and families, loss of
natural physical, mental and social growth, unsuitable effects of loss of
father, mother or both were noted on behavioral changes of children as direct
and indirect effects of war on children[10,11]. Several studies
reported effects of war and living in war environment on captives' family
members including children, wives and mothers[1215].
Conclusion
According
to sources, father loss and captivity have unsuitable physical and mental impact
on children. Rate and severity of these effects depend on a) mother's reaction
to father loss; age of children
and rate of social support provided for children.
References
-
Boehnlein JK,
Kinzie JD, Ben R, et al. One year follow up study of PTSD among campaign
concentration Camps. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142(8):956-9.
-
Eitinger L,
Strøm A. New investigations on the mortality and morbidity of Norwegian
ex-concentration camp prisoners. Isr J Psychiatry relat Sci. 1981; 18(3):173-95.
- Dent OF,
Richardson B, Wilson S, et al. Postwar mortality among Australian World War II
prisoners of the Japanese. Med J Australia. 1989;150(7):378-82.
- Richardson HJ. Report of a study
of disabilities and problems of Hong Kong veterans, 1964-1965. 30. In: Nice
DS, Garland CF, Hilton SM, Baggett JC, Mitchell RE. Long-term health. Ottawa, Canada; Canadian Pensions Commission. 1995.
- Ruscio AM, Weathers FW, King LA, et
al. Male war-zone veterans' perceived relationships with their children: the
importance of emotional numbing. J Trauma Stress. 2002;15(5): 351-7.
- Westerink J, Giarratano L. The
impact of posttraumatic stress disorder on partners and children of Australian
Vietnam veterans. Aust NZ J Psychiatr. 1999;33(6):841-7.
- Rosenheck R, Fontana A. Transgene-
rational effects of abusive violence on the children of Vietnam combat veterans. J Trauma Stress. 1998;11(4):731-42.
- del Valle LE, Alvelo J. Perception
of post traumatic stress disorder symptoms by children of Puerto Rican Vietnam
veterans. P R Health Sci J. 1996;15(2): 101-6.
- Shaw JA.
Children exposed to war/terrorism. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev.
2003;6(4):237-46.
- Goldson E. The effect of war on
children. Child Abuse Negl. 1996;20(9):809-19.
- Birgenheier PS. Parents and
children, war and separation. Pediatr Nurs. 1993; 19(5): 471-6.
- Schaller JG, Nightingale EO.
Children and childhoods. Hidden casualties of war and civil unrest. JAMA.
1992;268(5): 642-4.
- El-Nagar SE. The impact of war on
women and children: case study of Sudan. Women 2000. 1992;5(1):9-11.
- Dubrow NF, Garbarino J. Living in the war zone: mothers and
young children in a public housing development. Child Welfare. 1989;68(1):3-20.
- Smith P,
Perrin S, Yule W, et al. War exposure among children from Bosnia- Hercegovina:
psychological adjustment in a community sample. J Trauma Stress. 2002;15(2):147-56.
© Copyright 2008 - TUMS PUBLICATIONS
|