search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Pharmacology
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Pharmacological Society
ISSN: 0253-7613 EISSN: 1998-3751
Vol. 37, Num. 1, 2005, pp. 44-45

Indian Journal of Pharmacology, Vol. 37, No. 1, January-February, 2005, pp. 44-45

Research Letter

Cigarette smoke condensate reduces the detoxifying capabilities of rat lens

Division of Ocular Pharmacology, Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110029

Correspondence Address:Division of Ocular Pharmacology, Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110029
tvelpandian@hotmail.com

Code Number: ph05013

Sir,

Epidemiological studies indicate that cigarette smoking increases the risk of developing cataract while cessation of smoking reduces the risk.[1] It is postulated that the complex mixture of trace metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitro compounds in cigarette smoke act as pro-oxidants that exert oxidative damage to lens and possibly initiate cataractogenesis.[2] Thus, this may be a crucial mechanism of catarctogenesis in smokers. However, very few studies are available on the effects of cigarette smoking on the endogenous antioxidant mechanisms. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study to record the effect of cigarette smoke on the detoxifying mechanisms of organ-cultured lens and validate a quick in vitro screening model for potential anti-cataract agents.

Adult Wistar rats (150-200 g) of either sex, were used in accordance with institutional ethical guidelines. They were sacrificed using anaesthetic ether and lens dissected (weight range of 0.02-0.04 g) for the present study. Cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) was prepared according to the method of Shalini et al.[2] A leak proof system was improvised that burnt filter tipped cigarettes, in a steady stream of air. The smoke content from six cigarettes (Wills, ITC Ltd) was trapped by bubbling through distilled water (24 ml) containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 50 l). This was filtered through glasswool and centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 5 min to give CSC. The CSC was standardized by ensuring that the optical density (OD) was 0.6 at an absorption maximum of 270 nm (Beckman Spectrophotometer). A 1: 1 dilution of CSC with Dulbecco′s Modified Eagle′s Medium (DMEM) was prepared and the capsulated rat lenses were incubated in it. The control rat lens was incubated as such with DMEM.[2] Ambient light and temperature conditions (37° C) were maintained. Rat lenses were homogenized in 1 ml of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 15 min (Eltek refrigerated centrifuge, RC 4100 D). The assay procedure of Ellman was followed for estimation of reduced glutathione (GSH).[3] The lens was homogenized in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to prepare a 10% homogenate. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity in the homogenate was estimated according to the method of Habig, et al.[4] The kinetic profile was read at 340 nm for every 30 s up to 180 s. To elucidate the effect of various concentrations of CSC on GST activity in homogenate, increasing volume of CSC (10, 20, 40 and 80 l) were added to normal. The enzyme catalyzes the conjugation of 1-chloro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) with GSH to form a complex and the product is measured spectrophotometrically. The result is expressed as nmol of CDNB conjugated/min/mg protein. The protein levels of rat lens were estimated by the standard Lowry′s method.[5]

Two tailed unpaired t-test was applied to compare the level of significance between the means of treated and control group for corresponding time points. In GST estimation each concentration of CSC was compared to normal levels and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

There was a significant fall in normal GSH level in rat lens (5.98 ± 0.41 l) as the duration of CSC exposure was increased from 0.5 to 2 h (0.49 ± 0.10 l) [Figure - 1]. In comparison to normal activity of GST in rat lens, there was a significant fall in its activity with 20, 40 and 80 l of CSC [Figure - 2].

Epidemiological studies, in vivo studies alongwith in vitro studies, provide a correlation between cigarette smoking and cataractogenesis.[1] As the lens is an immunologically isolated organ, the cataractogenic action of smoke due to direct topical incidence is less likely. The possible route could be systemic absorption of the inhaled smoke. We chose to study the activity of GST in presence of CSC, since it is actively involved in detoxification of toxic agents by catalyzing their conjugation to GSH and thereby eliminating them from circulation. Significant amount of GST is known to be present in ocular tissue where it plays a pivotal role in protecting lens clarity.[6] Studies indicate that deletion of GST gene was significantly higher in cataract patients than in controls and that cataract patients lacking the GST gene were significantly younger than cataract patients possessing the GST gene.[7] On the other hand, GSH is also implicated in imparting non-enzymic antioxidant defense to the lens. It is required to maintain protein sulfhydryls in the reduced form. It prevents their oxidation by reacting with potential oxidants and electrophilic compounds. Thus depletion of GSH and GST has been linked to various toxic effects to different organs, including cataracts by X-ray and naphthalene.[8]

In this study it was noted that within half-an-hour there was a rapid depletion of GSH in lens when exposed to CSC. A maximum fall is observed when the lenses are exposed for 2 h. Concomitantly there was a fall in GST activity also. This suggests that chronic exposure to CSC depletes the endogenous defense system. The present in vitro study provides evidence that CSC exhibits oxidative stress and negatively affects the detoxifying mechanisms of the lens.

References

1.Christen WG, Manson JE, Seddon JM, Glynn RJ, Buring JE, Rosner B, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of cataract in men. JAMA 1992;268:989-93.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Shalini VK, Luthra M, Srinivas L, Rao SH, Basti S, Reddy M, et al. Oxidative damage to the eye lens caused by cigarette smoke and fuel smoke condensates. Indian J Biochem Biophys 1994;31:261-6.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Ellman GL. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys 1959;82:70-7.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione-S-transferase, the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem 1974;249:7130-9.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Lowry O, Rosebrough A, Farr A, Randall R. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Tomarev SI, Zinovieva RD. Squid major lens polypeptides are homologous to glutathione-S-transferase subunit. Nature 1988;336:86-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
7.Sekine Y, Hommura S, Harada S. Frequency of glutathione-S-transferase 1 gene deletion and its possible correlation with cataract formation. Exp Eye Res 1995;60:159-63.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Reddy VN. Glutathione and its function in the lens-an overview. Exp Eye Res 1990;50:771-8.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  

Copyright 2005 - Indian Journal of Pharmacology


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ph05013f1.jpg] [ph05013f2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil