|
Indian Journal of Pharmacology
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Pharmacological Society
ISSN: 0253-7613 EISSN: 1998-3751
Vol. 37, Num. 3, 2005, pp. 139-140
|
Indian Journal of Pharmacology, Vol. 37, No. 3, May-June, 2005, pp. 139-140
Editorial
Open access: To be or not to be?
Singh J
IJP, JIPEMR, Pondicherry
Correspondence Address:IJP,
JIPEMR, Pondicherry
jatindersingh@vsnl.com
Code Number: ph05036
Very few of us will disagree that there is a crisis in the availability of scholarly journals. Skyrocketing costs coupled with a lack of public funding have conspired to make journals disappear from most libraries. Even large academic institutes are becoming wary about using their meagre budgets for print journals with high price tags. Scientists, especially those working in cash-strapped developing countries are at a disadvantage of not being able to access international research.
The emergence of the Internet led to most journals jumping with alacrity
on to the so called online access bandwagon. The initial euphoria over
this move ended as readers had to pay for both the print edition and
the online version with enhanced pricing. The emergence of Open Access
publishing and its application to biomedical literature is viewed by
some as a panacea to the pricing monopoly that is being enjoyed by a
select number of large commercial publishing conglomerates.
What is Open Access?
′Open access′ (OA) means that a reader of a scientific publication can read it over the Internet, print it out and even further distribute it without any payments or restrictions. Three initiatives have been central to the development of the OA movement- Budapest (February 2002), Bethesda (June 2003), and Berlin (October 2003). The present, most accepted "official" definition of OA allows anyone to "copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship".
Copyright issues do not find a place in the definition of this collaborative
effort. The use of a Creative Commons Licence (http://creativecommons.org/license/)
is instead advocated, to obviate barriers.
There are two primary means for delivering OA, OA journals and OA archives
or repositories. The chief difference between them is that OA journals
conduct peer review while OA archives do not. OA archives are considered
as a less radical and more controllable form of access as the focus shifts
from a publisher to the institution for which the scientists work. The
institute provides a repository for all published research work carried
out in their departments. There are other OA media such as personal web
sites, e-books, discussion forums and RSS feeds and there will undoubtedly
be many more in the future as the Internet diversifies.
What are the advantages of OA?
OA serves the interests of many groups, enlarges the audience of authors
and increases the visibility and impact of their work and gives readers
barrier-free access to the literature they need for their research. The
rich and poor are put on an equal footing for these key resources and the
need for permissions to reproduce and distribute content is eliminated.
One of the best known instances of OA in biomedical sciences was the
launch of free Medline linked to Pubmed search in 1997. This revolutionised
retrieval
of relevant information. Many initiatives have been launched since then
to popularise OA. Some of the more famous ones that exist are, BioMed Central
(http://www.biomedcentral.com/) which is a publisher of peer reviewed electronic
journals in biology and medicine and provides free online access to all
its research articles. Public Library of Science (http://www.public libraryofscience.org/)
which is a coalition of research scientists dedicated to making the "world′s scientific and medical literature a public resource",
and publishes two online journals PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine. The Directory
of Online Journal (DOAJ- http://www.doaj.org/) lists all available free
and full text journals and is the most comprehensive source of its type.
In India, MedIND (http://medind.nic.in/) lists and provides links to free
full text of Indian biomedical journals.
What are its limitations?
For many, the Open Access picture is not so rosy. Non-profit publishers,
like their commercial counterparts, have similar concerns on copyright
issues. Scientific societies that contribute directly or indirectly to
produce specialty journals may be forced to close shop if their journals
were to switch to OA. Researchers who work on non funded research projects
or those who work in developing countries would be unable to afford the
authors′ fees which would become mandatory in the "author pays" model
of OA publishing. There is also the imminent fear that the peer-review
process will be undermined, thereby reducing the authenticity of published
material.
When the OA repositories are in place, the major method used
for locating OA-material will be through general-purpose Web search
engines. Some repositories are already in the process of being hosted
by non-journal
related websites such as Google Scholar. The problem with using general
search engines is that the results are cluttered with all the varied
material which is available on the Internet, and it takes a lot of
effort to sort it out so as to be of relevance.
What is the stand of the IJP?
The Indian Journal of Pharmacology appreciates all the good that stems
from the availability of OA. However it cannot accept the OA movement′s
stand on copyright. Doing away with copyright can lead to exploitation
of published intellectual work by commercial organizations. A drug company,
for example, can print and distribute any number of copies of an article
without obtaining permission in order to promote its products. Without
copyright law, this kind of exploitation cannot be checked. Why should
a journal or even a researcher help fan commercial interests?
IJP will continue to be a Free Access journal and insist on copyright
transfer. Readers may make a few copies of any article for personal use
and distribute a limited number of copies for non-profit, non-promotional
academic activities (such as workshop or lectures) without prior permission.
Authors are also free to archive their articles (post-publication) in
their personal or institutional repositories and this does not require
permission from the journal. The journal intends to share the reprint
revenue with the authors and it has no plans to adopt "author pays" model
in the foreseeable future.
As far as the reader is concerned, Free access or Open access through
the website are not very much different but the former tends to protect
the
interests of both, the journal and the authors. Such an approach will
maintain the authenticity of the published work and take care of the
interest of
scholars who will get free access to all published data and will get
it right.
Copyright 2005 - Indian Journal of Pharmacology
|