|
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 1, Jan-June, 2003, pp. 30-35 CME Ipsilateral fasciocutaneous flaps for leg and foot defects Visweswar Bhattacharya, Rajesh Kumar Watts Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, India.
Code Number: pl03007 ABSTRACT It was a revolutionary enhancement for lower limb reconstruction when fasciocutaneous flaps were first described and used in clinical practice in 1981. Subsequently persistent studies were made to emphasize and confirm the rich vascular network associated with deep fascia. Thereafter studies were directed to identify the various types of perforators supplying the deep fascia and the overlying subcutaneous tissue and skin. Accordingly the scientists classified these flaps keeping in mind their clinical applications. The authors of this article have also performed extensive research on various aspects. This has led to better understanding about the finer details of vascularity. Based on this various modifications have been made for safe application of reconstruction for defects extending from knee to sole. To avoid complications the clinician should be able to select the proper procedure as regards the donor site and the possible preoperative and postoperative technical faults. A well-designed and meticulously executed flap usually has smooth recovery. Both Colour Doppler and Audio Doppler are useful tools in planning a safe flap. Now these flaps have proved to be standard technique without requiring a special set up extensive training. Key words: Fasciocutaneous flaps, Antegrade flaps, Retrograde flaps, Defects of leg and foot, Doppler studies, Perforator based flaps. INTRODUCTION From the initial suspicion about their clinical utility to a standard technique in the armamentarium of a reconstructive surgeon, fasciocutaneous flaps have come a long way. Constituent-wise, fasciocutaneous flaps are those, which include skin, subcutaneous tissue and the deep fascia. The majority of moderate size defects extending from knee to sole can be reconstructed by these procedures. Depending upon the location of the defect, the planning and manoeuvering vary. However the basic principles of blood supply remain the same. Vascular basis1 The word "Flappe" means anything that hung broad and loose, fastened only by the side. In contrast to earlier beliefs, fasciocutaneous flaps have a definite vascular system, a suprafascial plexus and a subfascial plexus anastomosing with the subcutaneous and subdermal plexi. Direct cutaneous, musculocutaneous and septocutaneous perforators contribute to these plexi (Figure 1). Based on this various classifications have been described. Cormack and Lamberty Classification2,3 Type A - multiple perforators entering at base of flap and extend throughout its longitudinal length, e.g. "super-flap" in the lower leg (Ponten).4 Type B- single fasciocutaneous perforator, e.g. medial arm flap, parascapular flap etc. Modified type B- where main vessel is taken with the perforator as a "T" junction, e.g. a flap based on inferior cubital artery but taking in addition the radial artery. Type C- it is based on multiple small perforators that run along a fascial septum. The supplying artery is included with the flap, e.g. radial forearm flap. Type D- osteo-myo-fasciocutaneous flap. It is similar to Type C but includes a portion of adjacent muscle and bone, e.g. Chinese forearm flap with half diameter of radius. This is there in the original classification of Cormack and Lamberty and is now considered as a part of Type C. Cormack and Lamberty also introduced a new classification Type A- has a fascial plexus Type B- has a single perforator Type C- has multiple perforators and a segmental source artery Mathes and Nahai's Classification2,3 Type A- with a direct cutaneous pedicle to the fascia Type B- with a septocutaneous perforator Type C- with peforators from a musculocutaneous source VARIANTS OF FASCIOCUTANEOUS FLAPS
INDICATIONS Moderate size defects with local healthy available tissue CONTRAINDICATIONS
LIMITATIONS
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
As per location of the defect, the leg and foot can be divided into six areas-
For defects from knee to upper two third of leg antegrade flaps either based on the perforators arising from posterior tibial artery (on medial side) or flaps from anterolateral aspect based on the perforators of the peroneal artery are used. These flaps are transposition cum rotation in nature, hence the incision requires to be stepped up from the distal margin of the defects. Only those defects require flap cover where underlying vital structures are exposed. Sometimes in a given wound, part of it can be managed by SSG and rest might require a flap cover. The defects at lower third of leg to midsole will require retrograde flaps based on the lower perforators of the above mentioned vascular trunks. The circumferential area involving tendoachilles, malleoli and anterior ankle can be managed by retrograde flaps supplied by perforators of either posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery depending upon the proximal available tissue. The width of the flap is maximum at the calf which is usually transferred for heel and sole defects. The natural anatomy is such that the weight bearing width of the heel up to midsole is almost same in dimension as that of the calf area. Therefore defects located here should not have paucity of tissue. It is essential to incorporate 2-3 sizeable perforators in the pedicle, to ensure necessary blood supply, irrespective of the nature of the flap. That is how a non-convential long flap can be designed with safety. The rationality of these flaps can be assessed by fresh cadaveric dissections, preoperative Colour Doppler study and peroperative fluorescein study. Preoperative Colour Doppler Study5-8 helps in locating the main vessel and the site and size of the perforators. The size of the peroneal artery decreases as we go from proximal to distal but posterior tibial artery diameter remains almost the same as since it continues as the main vessel of the foot. However the perforators may vary in size irrespective of their location. The perforators can be classified based on their internal diameter into three groups: Small= 0.8-1.2 mm; Intermediate= 1.3-2.0 mm; Large= more than 2.0mm The sizeable Perforators to sustain a flap are the intermediate or large ones. Bedside Audio-Doppler definitely helps in corroborating the findings of the Colour Doppler and vice versa. This also increases the accuracy in locating the perforators. The surface marking of vascular axis of all the three main vessels of the leg is useful For Posterior tibial artery (Figure 2)
For Anterior tibial and Peroneal arteries (Figures 3 & 4)
Peroperatively the vascular axis can be also located by identifying the first perforator (while raising the flap), which is ultimately sacrificed. The perforators of Posterior tibial artery and Peroneal artery are usually located at every 4-5 cm when measured from the tip of malleoli. They can be identified by Doppler about 1 cm on either side of the main vascular trunk depending upon their direction. This knowledge is of immense importance for safe application of a flap. In retrograde flaps the lower limit of dissection decides the reach of the flap. Since lower two perforators are approximately within 8 cm from malleoli, that is taken as the safe limit of dissection inferiorly. However if the extent of the defect necessitates further dissection, then the vascularity is maintained by the lower perforators as well as by the small vessels arising from the anastomoses around the ankle joint. The safe upper limit of a retrograde flap is about 10 cm from the joint level in an adult. This observation was found justifiable after performing dye studies in fresh cadavers. If it needs enhancement then the distal part of the flap should be delayed 5 to 7days prior to flap dissection. In anteromedial flaps the medial border of the flap lies along the medial border of tibia and the posterior border is at the mid calf line. In anterolateral flaps the lateral border is over the fibula and posterior border is upto mid calf line. However the flap can be extended by 1-2 cm if need be. Inferiorly based flaps are balloon shaped because of the configuration of the leg as well as the feasibility of narrowing the pedicle to about 4 cm. If needed more than one flap can be raised for a given defect TECHNIQUE OF FLAP RAISING9,10 Once the patient is under anaesthesia, before painting, mark the outline/margins of the flap with the reverse side of the scalpel. This helps in knowing the flap design even if the markings are washed away during painting. The surgeon should have a flap planning kit. The dimensions of the defect are estimated. The availability of the surrounding tissue is judged. The final defect is measured after recreation. Planning in reverse- this is a mock transfer of the flap. With a piece of lint a flap passes through all the stages of its transfer in reverse fashion starting from the point as if it has been inset into the recipient defect, to its raising from the donor site so as to avoid a flap falling short. Dissection of a Peninsular Fasciocutaneous Flaps
Dissection of Island/Skeletonized Perforator Based Flaps
Skeletonization has its advantages
Such flaps are indicated when the defect is almost adjacent to it. Technically an incision is given along a proposed line of the flap near the base. The perforators entering the pedicle are identified under loupe magnification. Sometimes another incision has to be given on the opposite proposed line of flap to clearly visualize the perforators from both the sides. There after, the flap can be raised rapidly. USUAL TECHNICAL FAULTS Patient Selection
These conditions may adversely affect the microcirculation Intraoperative
POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
IDENTIFICATION OF EARLY SIGNS OF FLAP NECROSIS
FOLLOW UP
DONOR SITE MORBIDITY It is usually acceptable to the patients. There is no functional loss. The grafted area gradually becomes soft and supple but seldom matches with the adjacent normal skin. CONCLUSION Wherever feasible the ipsilateral fasciocutaneous flaps are most justified for moderate sized defects. Flaps of various other constituents based on same vascular principles are also applicable but it is beyond the scope of this article. REFERENCES
Copyright 2003 - Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery. The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[pl03007f4.jpg] [pl03007f1.jpg] [pl03007f2.jpg] [pl03007f3.jpg] |
|