|
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 43, No. 1, January-June, 2010, pp. 27-28 Commentary Hypospadias algorithm: The way to propose Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, General Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Egypt Correspondence Address: Dr. Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, General Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Egypt, wghnnam@gmail.com Code Number: pl10007 Tubularized incised plate repair is based on an old principle of urethral plate tubularization, also known as the Thiersch-Duplay procedure. Although a good concept, its main drawback was the limitation imposed by the width of the urethral plate. Snodgrass popularized the concept of urethral plate incision with subsequent tubularization and secondary dorsal healing for primary hypospadias repair. This relatively simple yet elegant and effective procedure has gained widespread acceptance, currently being recognized as the surgical technique of choice for distal and other types of hypospadias repair. [1],[2],[3] In the present study, it is a good effort from the authors to propose the algorithm for hypospadias repair; however, to my mind, it cannot be postulated according to these small number of cases along with no comparison with different techniques and choices. Decision making in hypospadias repair is no longer determined by meatal location, as in the past, but by severity of penile curvature and appearance of the incised urethral plate. Severe curvature, requiring plate transection or an "unhealthy" incised plate are uncommonly encountered. A treatment Algorithm must consider the following:
The meatal stenosis rate varies from 0 to 17%, and Snodgrass has reported meatal stenosis rates below 1%. This has been a controversial topic and considered to be possibly related to the surgical technique. In the present study, meatal stenosis was high (8.8%), with no explanation for this high rate. References
Copyright 2010 - Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery |
|