search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
ISSN: 0970-0358 EISSN: 1998-376x
Vol. 44, Num. 1, 2011, pp. 104-109

Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 44, No. 1, January-April, 2011, pp. 104-109

Original Article

Is chronic venous ulcer curable? A sample survey of a plastic surgeon

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Faciomaxillary Surgery, Madras Medical College and Govt General Hospital, Chennai - 600 003; Sri Jayam Hospital, West Tambaram, Chennai - 600 045; K.J. Hospital and Research Foundation, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai - 600 084, India

Correspondence Address:
V Alamelu
23, Ramakrishnan Street, West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045
India
alamelusurgeon@gmail.com

Code Number: pl11021

DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.81457

Abstract

Introduction: Venous ulcers of lower limbs are often chronic and non-healing, many a time neglected by patients and their treating physicians as these ulcers mostly do not lead to amputation as in gangrenous arterial ulcer and also cost much to complete the course of treatment and prevention of recurrence.
Materials and Methods:
One hundred and twenty two lower limb venous ulcers came up for treatment between May 2006 and April 2009. Only twenty nine cases completed the treatment. The main tool of investigation was the non invasive Duplex scan venography. Biopsy of the ulcer was done for staging the disease. Patients' choice of treatment was always conservative and as out-patient instead of hospitalisation and surgery, which required a lot of motivation by the treating unit.
Results:
Out of twenty nine cases, ten cases were treated conservatively and seven (24.13%) healed well. Remaining nineteen cases were given surgical modality in which fifteen cases (51.74%) were successful. Only seven cases (24.13%) failed to heal. Compression stockings were advised to control oedema, varices and pain. Foot care, regular exercises and follow-up were stressed effectively.

Keywords: CEAP classification; venous valve damage; venous hypertension; venous ulcers; compression

Introduction

Venous ulcers are full thickness defects of skin in lower limb mostly in ankle region, due to venous hypertension, also known as chronic venous disease (CVD) of lower limb. It is five to seven times more common than arterial ulcer. Its overall prevalence was given as 0.18%. [1] Chronic venous disease is mainly reported in women in Western countries. The incidence may be more in our country as here patients do not seek early medical advice because of limb covering apparel, scanty financial resources, and disregard for disfigurement of the limb. [2] It is often ignored and poorly managed as many wound centres treat the problem and not the cause. [3] The plastic surgeon′s help is sought only when the ulcer becomes complicated with deeper infection, foul smell and intractable pain. A hospital based observational study of leg venous ulcer patients has been performed to assess the efficacy of our management protocol in these patients.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and twenty two chronic lower limb venous ulcers were treated between May 2006 and April 2009. The number of cases who took complete treatment and formed our study, was only 29 (23.7%) consisting of 25 males (86.2%) and 4 females (13.8%) as others dropped out due to financial crunch or fear of hospitalisation. The presenting features of all the patients have been summarised in [Table - 1]. Average duration of the symptoms was 2 years and 6 months. The coexisting diseases, past treatment and examination findings have been summarised in [Table - 2] and [Table - 3]. Nine patients were medically treated in the past and one patient had small saphenous vein ligation in the left leg 3 years before [Table - 1], [Table - 2] and [Table - 3].

Investigations for basic vital parameters and specific ones in only severe thrombotic ulcers, like prothrombin time, platelet count, international ratio (PT, PC, INR values) were done. X-ray of the leg and foot, wound culture and sensitivity and abdominal ultrasonogram were also done routinely. Doppler study showed normal Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) between o.8 and 1.1, ruling out arterial insufficiency in these ulcers. [4],[5] Duplex scan venography was done in all cases as it is the gold standard to evaluate both anatomical and functional changes of the venous system [Figure - 1]. [6],[7] Valveless major and perforator veins were seen with reflux. An analysis of scan findings revealed mostly post thrombotic features as depicted in [Table - 4]. Biopsy of the ulcer was done from the edge and scrapings. Histopathological findings showed typical large venous sinuses with pericapillary inflammation, showing macrophages with plenty of neutrophils near the vessel wall, with non healing granuloma. Destruction of normal subcutaneous tissue and replacement with thick fibrosis was also detected with severe skin destruction and ulcer crater [Figure - 2]. [8]

All the 29 cases (25 males and 4 females) were initially treated with thorough cleaning and dressing. They were analysed as per Clinical findings, aetiology, anatomical site and pathological picture (CEAP classification) [9] for further management by either conservative or surgical modality. Ten cases (34.5%) with shallow, spreading ulcers having only superficial vein thrombosis were treated conservatively with saline or skin substitutes. We used locally available dressings like collagen sheet [10] in three patients [Figure - 3], Quinidochlor cream with polyurethane foam dressing in three cases and nanocrystalline silver coated dressing [11],[12] in four cases. Out of these ten cases, seven cases (24.1% of total 29 cases) healed within 3 months of conservative treatment [Figure - 3]. Compression stockings were given concurrently to the affected limb to reduce oedema, lymphostasis, pain and to enhance venous flow. Three cases failed to show healing.

Surgical treatment was required for nineteen patients(65.5%) as their ulcers were deep and recalcitrant. Split thickness skin grafting of varying thickness [13] was done for eleven superficial ulcers out of which ten were successful and there was one failure [Figure - 4]. Full thickness skin grafting [14] was done for four cases with deep ulcers. There were three failures and one successful healing [Figure - 5]. Pedicled flap cover [15] was done for two deep ulcers exposing muscle as they were able to provide good vascularised tissue to reduce the ongoing ulceration One patient was treated with reverse sural artery flap and the other with local fasciocutaneous flap after good debridement. Both the ulcers healed satisfactorily. No recurrence has been encountered in a follow up of 2 years [Figure - 6]. Free flaps [16],[17],[18] were used in two patients with deep ulcers having skin changes with lipodermatosclerosis (LDS). Latissimus dorsi free muscle flap in the one and a free anterolateral thigh flap [Figure - 7] in the other patient were done. Both flaps settled well (6.89% of total cases) and the patients are ulcer free on follow up. In our study, we did not use V.A.C therapy [19] due to prohibitive cost of the commercial unit. In summary, surgically good results were obtained in fifteen out of twenty nine cases (51.72%).Four cases failed to heal. The outcome of the procedures is summarised in the [Table - 5].

The healed ulcer cases were followed up with class 2 compression stockings [20] and physiotherapy to further reduce the raised pressure in ankle veins. Limb elevation and exercises along with avoidance of prolonged standing were advised. Till the end of study period, they did not show recurrence. Education about preventive methods and information on lifestyle [21] modification were given.

Discussion

Though the venous ulcers are notorious for their non-healing nature, we achieved 75.87% success by offering treatment according to the CEAP classification. Ten ulcers, which were classified by CEAP method [9],[22],[23] as of C0,C1,C2,C6-En,Ep,-Ac.Ap-Pr group-[Group 1], with only refluxing saphenous perforators and superficial, ulcers with early cellulitis, were offered conservative treatment of debridement, dressing and limb elevation. Various cost-effective skin substitutes like collagen sheets, hydroquinoline cream with polyurethane foam dressing and nano silver coated polyurethane dressings were used for dressing, after thorough debridement. Allografts, bioengineered bilayered dressings like Apligraph, [24] and Integra can also be tried if finances of the patient permit. All these prevent infection, enhance autolytic debridement, reduce discharge, potentiate growth factors and reduce pain. The use of connective tissue matrix, expanded epidermal stem cells or growth factors and cytokines are also being tried. [25] in some centres.

Nineteen post thrombotic and discharging ulcers in our study belonged to C3, C4, C5, C6 S- Ep, Es-Ap, Ad-Poc, group [Group 2]. These were deep, infected ulcers with larger area of damaged skin, with gross oedema. Reflux with or without partial obstruction of deep or superficial veins, and valveless veins were noted in Duplex scan. Resurfacing the raw area had to be done. Medium thickness split skin grafting or thick split thickness skin grafting and skin flaps were carried out after complete debridement of the ulcer area including the liposclerotic skin all round. Full thickness skin graft was a failure as three out of four cases did not show remission of the ulcers. Out of 19 operated cases, 15 (79%) healed well. Vascular surgery like ligation, stripping, endosurgery, etc., may address haemodynamic disturbances but not the ulcers and was not attempted in our study though one case had prior saphenofemoral ligation. In summary, surgical skin grafting,pedicled or free flaps are the answers, provided the recipient and donor vessels have adequate lumen. Prognosis is good if the patient adheres to the strict protocol of treatment.

In complicated multifactorial, deep recurrent ulcers belonging to CEAP type of C4a, b, C6s-Ep, Es-Ad-Proc group [Group 3] in both superficial and deep veins, (None came under this group in our study), repeated surgical debridement and skin reconstructive surgeries to vascularise the ulcer site with stable skin cover, foot elevation, rest and antithrombotic measures with sterile dressing, pedicled or free flaps are to be done after careful assessment. Sometimes repeated surgical procedures along with assistance of vascular surgeons and ortho-surgeons are needed in cases with bony stiffness or deformities. Modern concepts of vascular surgery are under study worldwide like endovenous operations, radiofrequency ablation of veins,laser endocoagulation of veins or foam sclerotherapy. [26]

We advocate in all cases stockings for compression to decrease blood vessel diameter and pressure inside the veins and prevent the reflux. They lower the amount of fluid leak from capillaries and prevent clotting by decreasing action of thrombin. Specifically designed class 2 stockings are superior to elastocrepe or diver′s bandages. [27] Synthetically woven class 2 compression stockings are very useful before and after surgery for ulcer healing. Optimal, sustained compression is achieved also with multilayered bandage. Compression is contraindicated if ABI is less than 0.7 as it may aggravate arterial compromise.

Education and advice to perform regular venous exercises, to avoid prolonged standing, sitting or smoking and to carry out proper foot care are given to patients to prevent recurrence. Obesity control is advised as it induces vessel thrombosis and varices in leg. [28] Clothing must be non-constrictive. Associated metabolic diseases like diabetes or hypertension or uraemia must be controlled. A well -balanced protein diet is essential. [29] Repeated review with surgeons is mandatory to prevent complications like osteomyelitis, ankle contracture, stiff joints or carcinomatous changes. [30] In our survey, we had not come across malignancy as a complication.

Conclusion

The problem of non healing, recurrent, painful venous ulcer was analysed and its special features made us do this survey and we were able to achieve 75% success. As many physicians tend to consider these ulcers as just chronic non-healing ulcers, they deprive them of meticulous attention to its origin from venous hypertension caused by Post Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) syndrome, varicose veins and venous reflux. But as plastic surgeons, if we really understand the uniqueness [31] of this ulcer in presentation and pathology and classify as above, intervene timely with debridement and skin substitutes, carry out surgical reconstruction, sometimes along with vascular surgeon′s help, then we can bring about a satisfactory cure and limb salvage to normalcy.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Prof. K. Jagadeesan, Director and Senior Surgeon, who gave valuable suggestions and referred some patients to us for treating them with our protocol. We thank the Ethical Committee for giving clearance to submit the article for publication. We thank our post graduates who helped some patients to get various investigations done and documented the findings. Above all, we thank the patients for their endurance and cooperation throughout the period of treatment.

References

1.Cornwall JV, Dore CJ, Lewis JD. Legulcers: Epidemiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 1986;73:693-6  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Kompally GR, Baradwaj S, Singh G. Varicose veins: Clinical presentation and surgical management. Indian J Surg 2009;71:117-205.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Word R. Medical and surgical therapy for advanced chronic venous insufficiency. Surg Clin North Am 2010;90:1195-214.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Vowden K, Vowden P. Venous leg ulcers: Part 2: Assessment Prof Nurse. 1998;13:633-8 quiz632.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Rettori R, Blin E. Procedure to follow with a resistant ulcer of the ankle. J Mal Vasc 1989;14:143.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Bengisun U. Is systemic detection of venous reflux mandatory in practice? Medicographia 2006;28:157.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Puskás A, Balogh Z, Hadadi L, Imre M, Orbán E, Kósa K, et al. Spontaneous recanalisation in deep vein thrombosis: A prospective duplex ultrasound study. Int Angiol 2007;26:53-63.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Coleridge Smith PD. Deleterious effects of white cells in the course of skin damage in chronic venous insufficiency. Int Angiol 2002;21:26-32.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Elkoff B, Rutherford RB, Bergan JJ, et al. Revision of the CEAP for chronic venous disorders: Consensus Statement. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:1248-52.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Cen L, Liu W, Cui L, Zhang W, Cao Y. Collagen tissue engineering: Development of novel biomaterials and application. Pediatr Res 2008;63:492-6.   Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Sibbald RG, Ruiz CJ, Couttis P, Fierheller M, Rothnam A. Bacteriology, inflammation and healing: A study of nanocrystalline silver dressing in chronic venous ulcer. Adv Wound Care 2007;10:549-58.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Thomas S, McCubbin P. An in vitro analysis of the antimicrobial properties of 10 -Silver cotaining dressings. J Wound Care 2003;12:305-8.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Turczynski R, Tarpila E. Treatment of legulcers with split skin graft: Early and late results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999;33:301-5.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Mol MA, Nanninga PB, van Eendenburg JP, Westerhof W, Mekkes JR, van Ginkel CJ. Grafting of venous leg ulcer: An inter individual comparison between cultured skin equivalents and full thickness punch grafts. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;22:77-82.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Top H, Benlier E, Aygit AC, Kiyak M. Distally based sural flap in chronic venous ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:160-5.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Kumins NH, Weinzweig N, Schuler JJ. Free tissue transfer provides durable treatment for large non healing venous ulcers. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:848-54.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Steffe TJ, Caffee HH. Long-term results following free tissue transfer for venous stasis ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:131-7.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Reddy MM, Reddy MD. Role of free tissue transfer in the management of chronic venous ulcer. Indian J Plast Surg 2004;37:28-33.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Vacuum-assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic non-healing wounds. Wounds 2000;12:60-7.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Nelson EA, Harper DR, Prescott RJ, Gibson B, Brown D, Rutkey CV. Prevention of occurrence of venous ulcer randomised controlled trial of class 2, class 3 elastic compression. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:803-8.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Davies JA, Bull RH, Farrelly IJ, Wakelin MJ. A home based exercise programme improves ankle range of motion in long term venous ulcer patients. Phlebology 2007;22:86-9.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Porter JP, Rutherford RB, Clagett GP. Reporting standards in venous disease. J Vasc Surg 1988;8:172-81.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Sytchev GG. Classification of chronic venous disorders of lower extremities and pelvis. Int Angiol 1985;4:203-6  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Barber C, Watt A, Pham C, Humphreys K, Penington A, Mutimer K, et al. Influence of bioengineered skin substitutes on diabetic foot ulcer and venous leg ulcer outcomes. J Wound Care 2008;17:517-27.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Falanga VJ. Tissue engineering in wound repair. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000;13:15-9.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Hissink RJ, Bruins RM, Erluns R, Castellenos Nuijits ML, van den Berg M. Innovative treatment in chronic venous insufficiency: Endovenous laser ablation of perforating veins: A prospective short-term analysis of 58 cases. Eur J Vasc Endo Vasc Surg 2010;40:403-6.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Amsler F, Willenberg T, Blättler W. Insearch of optimal compression therapy for venous leg ulcer: A meta analysis of studies comparing diver's bandage with specifically designed stockings. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:66.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Netzen O, Bergquist D, Lindhagen A. Venous and nonvenous leg ulcers: Clinical history and appearance in a population study. Br J Surg 1994;81:182-3  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Legendre C, Debure C, Meaume S, Lok C, Cronard JL, Senet P. Prevalence of protein deficiency on venous ulcer healing. J Vasc Surg 2000;48:688-93  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Schnirring-Judge M, Belpedio D. Malignant Transformation of a chronic venous stasis ulcer to basal cell carcinoma in a diabetic patient: A case study and review of pathophysiology. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49:75-9  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Coleridge Smith PD, Thomas P, Scurr JH, Dormandy JA. Causes of venous ulcerations: A new hypothesis. BMJ 1988;296:1726-7.  Back to cited text no. 31    

Copyright 2011 - Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[pl11021t3.jpg] [pl11021f6.jpg] [pl11021f3.jpg] [pl11021f4.jpg] [pl11021f7.jpg] [pl11021t4.jpg] [pl11021t2.jpg] [pl11021f1.jpg] [pl11021f5.jpg] [pl11021t1.jpg] [pl11021t5.jpg] [pl11021f2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil