|
Iranian Journal of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2006, pp. 83-85 Research Article Quinolone Resistance in Oligella Urethralis-Associated Urinary Tract InfectionAlireza Abdolrasouli, Marziye Aligholi, and Yahya Hemmati Current Author Addresses: Alireza Abdolrasouli, MSc in Medical Microbiology Department of Clinical Microbiology, Marie-Curie Medical Institute, 164 Mirdamad Blvd, Tehran, Iran. Phone: +98 (21) 2222 9781, Fax: +98 (21) 2225 2513, E-mail: alireza.abdolrasouli@hotmail.co.uk (Corresponding Author). Received February 14, 2006; Revised August 5, 2006; Accepted August 7, 2006 Code Number: pt06015 ABSTRACT The importance of oxidase-positive, nonfermentative, Gram-negative bacilli in a variety of pathological processes is becoming increasingly important. Oligella urethralis is an organism which is normally isolated as a commensal from the genitourinary tract. We have described one case of urinary tract infection caused by this organism. This isolated organism is found to be resistant to quinolones, while relatively sensitive to a wide variety of antibiotics. These findings clearly indicate that this organism may be an opportunistic pathogen and that extensive application of quinolones may provide a selective pressure for the emergence of resistance. We believe that this is the firs report of isolation and quinolone resistance in Oligella in Iran. Keywords: Oligella urethralis, Identification, UTI, Quinolone resistance A 73-year-old female with a three day history of increasing urinary frequency along with urgency and dysuria, was admitted to the clinic in May 2003. She had a history of prior urinary tract infections (UTIs) of uncertain aetiology. However, she was completely asymptomatic for four weeks prior to this admission. The patient had received ciprofloxacin on her previous episodes of UTI. A clean-catch midstream (CCMS) urine was collected, showing 12-14 white cells, 5-7 red blood cells and many bacteria under high power, which was suggestive of a urinary tract infection. Standard bacteriologic procedures for cultivation of the specimen were followed [1, 2]. The urine culture yielded more than 105 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) of a pure growth of bacteria,in both 5% sheep blood agar (SBA) and MacConkey agar (MAC) plates after overnight incubation at 35oC. A confirmatory second specimen which demonstrated the same result was obtained 24 hours later. Presumptive identification was made on the basis of schemes described by Schreckenberger and Graevenitz. In order to obtain the most reliable microscopic morphology, Gram staining was performed with a sample from enrichment broth culture, incubated for 2h at 35oC. Motility was determined by preparing a wet mount preparation of a young colony from a SBA plate. This strain failed to acidify the butt of triple sugar iron (TSI) agar and also was inactive in oxidation/fermentation of D-glucose. An oxidase test was performed using N, N, N, N-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (1%) [3]. According to the above mentioned tests, the isolated strain was characterized as a small Gram-negative, non-motile, nonfermentative, oxidase-positive bacillus which indicated a Moraxella-like organism. The preliminary identification was followed by traditional and more specific biochemical reactions as described by Moss [4] and Gilardi [5]. This strain was found to have the following key characteristics: (i) growth on MacConkeys agar and forming colorless colonies, (ii) alkalization of Christensens citrate, (iii) production of catalase, (iv) growth at 25, 37 and 42oC, (v) reduction of nitrite, (vi) production of phenylalanine deaminase (PAD) and lecithinase, (vii) sensitivity to Penicillin 10-U. Other characteristics of this isolated strain are as follows: It was unable to reduce nitrate and hydrolyze gelatin, urea and aesculin. It could not produce any H2S, DNase and indole. It was non-pigmented and did not produce any haemolysis on Tryptic Soy agar (TSA) and SBA respectively. Methods used to grow and identify this microorganism were those that used for Pseudomonas spp. Based upon all the above mentioned characteristics, and on the basis of retrospective inspection of bacteriologic reports, the strain isolated in this reported case was finally confirmed as being Oligella urethralis [3-5, 6, 7, 10]. Even though there is no validated testing method [1, 3] and little documentation of the results of the sensitivity testing of O. urethralis in literature [7], we performed the antibiogram by the comparative Kirby-Baure disk diffusion method. A standardized inoculum of bacteria (1.5×108 CFU/mL) was swabbed onto the surface of a Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plate. Filter paper disks impregnated with antimicrobial agents were placed on the agar. After 16-18 hours of incubation at 35oC in ambient air, the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was interpreted according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) [8]. The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern showed that this strain was resistant to nalidixic acid (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (1 µg), norfloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg) and nitrofurantoin (200 µg). However, it was sensitive to cefazolin (30 µg), cephradine (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftizoxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg) and cefixime (5 µg). (Oxoid Ltd., London, United Kingdom) The patient was started on oral cefixime 400 mg once daily for five days. All her urinary symptoms settled two days after starting the treatment. A further urine culture was obtained three days after the completing treatment, which proved to be negative. DiscussionOligella urethralis (formerly Moraxella urethralis and CDC group M-4) was first described as a Moraxella-like organism by Lautrop et al in 1970[9]. The genus Oligella was named because of the small size of the bacilli on the Gram stain [10].This genus belongs to a group of taxonomically diverse nonfermentative bacilli, and it could be distinguished from these similar organisms by a variety of traditional biochemical tests [1, 3-6]. In this case report, the isolated strain was primarily identified as a Moraxella-like organism based upon preliminary tests. Oligella urethralis is phenotypically similar to the Moraxella species, in that its isolates are coccobacillary, oxidase-positive, nonmotile, indole-negative and asaccharolytic Gram-negative bacteria. This strain of O. urethralis was ultimately differentiated from the similar Moraxella spp. based on more specific biochemical reactions. Some important features that help to differentiate O. urethralis from human isolates of Moraxella spp. and related organisms are as follows: M. catarrhalis, M. lacunata and M. nonliquefaciens all fail to grow on MacConkey agar, however they are able to reduce nitrate. M. osloensis and M. atlantae, are both PAD negative and unable to reduce nitrite. M. canis produces H2S (lead acetate paper) and reduces nitrate, whereas M. lincolnii neither grows on MacConkey agar nor reduces nitrite. Finally Psychrobacter phenylpyruvicus is a urease positive bacterium [3, 4, 11, 12]. Cellular fatty acid analysis can also be used to differentiate these microorganisms. Moss et al demonstrated that O. urethralis differed from the Moraxella species by the presence of large amounts (49%) of cis-vaccenic acid (18:1ω7c), small amounts (1%) of 3-hydroxyhexadecanoate (3-OH-16:0), and the absence of 10:0 and 3-hydroxydodecanoate (3-OH-12:0) [4]. Oligella urethralis is a commensal of the genitourinary tract, and most clinical isolates are from urine and the female genital tract [1, 3, 7, 10, 12]. Although symptomatic infections are rare, bacteremia, septic arthritis (mimicking gonococcal arthritis) [13] and peritonitis in two patients who were receiving chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have been described [7].O. urethralis is occasionally identified as a source of urinary tract infections [12]. Although validated antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Oligella and other similar nonfermentative bacteria have not been established [1, 3], in vitro susceptibility studies have been published and antimicrobial agents that had potential activity against isolated organisms, have been noted [7, 14]. The strain described here was resistant to ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, nalidixic acid and nitrofurantoin, but sensitive to other antimicrobial agents, including the first and the third generation of cephalosporins, penicillins, chloramphenicol and aminoglycosides. In our health system, quinolones have been widely used to treat uncomplicated upper and lower urinary tract infections, due to their high efficacy against the Gram-negative organisms, and also their oral administration. Our patient had received ciprofloxacin on her previous episodes of UTI and consequently, it seems that extensive application of quinolones may be responsible for emergence of resistance. Despite being contemporary, there is little documentation of the results of sensitivity testing of O. urethralis. Riley and colleagues demonstrated that this organism is not intrinsically resistant to quinolones, because the five previously isolated cases, including the type strain NCTC 11999, were found to be sensitive to ciprofloxacin [7].It is possible that quinolone resistance is readily acquired by this organism, as occurs with Pseudomonas aeruginosa [15, 16] and Staphylococcus aureus [17]. The two major mechanisms of quinolone resistance include alteration of the target sites, which are the organisms DNA gyrase (encoded by gyrA and gyrB) and topoisomerase IV (encoded by parC and parE), as well as active efflux of the drug out of the cell, which limits access of the drug to the target site. Resistance is usually associated with point mutations in the gyr or par loci [18]. Strains of O. urethralis are usually susceptible to β-lactam antibiotics; in one case, however, a β-lactamase producing strain has been reported by Pugliese et al [19].Mammeri and colleagues demonstrated that chromosomal integration of a cephalosporinase gene from Acinetobacter baumannii into Oligella urethralis, could be the source of acquired β-lactamas resistance among two different species [20]. In conclusion, this case has emphasized the potential role of Oligella urethralis as an opportunistic pathogen. Furthermore, it has demonstrated that quinolone resistance may arise in patients for whom quinolones are used extensively. AcknowledgmentThe authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Professor Abolghasem Amin and Professor Manouchehr Baharsefat for their advice and encouragement, to Mr Reza Kamalkhani for his generous support and Ms. Azita Roushan for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. References
Copyright © 2005 by Razi Institute for Drug Research (RIDR) |
|