 |
| About Bioline | All Journals | Testimonials | Membership | News |
|
||||||
|
||||||
Revista Colombia Médica, Vol. 40, No. 2, Abril-Junio, 2009, pp. 231-234 Emil Theodor Kocher: an innovator surgeon Theodor Kocher: un cirujano innovador María Liliana Franco, MD1, Natalia Acosta, Biol2, Lilian Chuaire, PhD (c)3
1Medical doctor, Universidad del Rosario, Bogot á DC, Colombia. e-mail: marialilianaf85@hotmail.com Received for publication March 6, 2008 Code Number: rc09031 SUMMARY Emil Theodor Kocher is considered along with Frank Lahey, Theodor Billroth, William Halsted, Charles Mayo, George Crile and Thomas Dunhill as one of the «Magnificent Seven», referring to the group of surgeons who managed thyroidectomy to make it a safe and efficient intervention that it is now practiced throughout the world. He was author of numerous contributions towards medicine. One of his most important contributions was to elucidate the function of the thyroid gland, through the observation and study of thyroidectomyzed patients, for which he was recognized by the academic and scientific community during the early twentieth century. Keywords: Thyroidectomy; General surgery; History of medicine. RESUMEN Theodor Emil Kocher es considerado junto con Frank Lahey, Theodor Billroth, William Halsted, Charles Mayo, George Crile y Thomas Dunhill como uno de los llamados «Siete Magníficos» en alusión al grupo de cirujanos que lograron hacer de la tiroidectomía la intervención eficiente y segura que en la actualidad se practica en el mundo entero. Autor de innumerables aportes al arte de la medicina, quizás su contribución más importante fue haber dilucidado la función de la glándula tiroides, por medio de la observación y del estudio del estado de sus pacientes tiroidectomizados, hallazgo que le hizo acreedor del reconocimiento de la comunidad académica y científica de los comienzos del siglo XX. Palabras clave: Tiroidectom ía; Cirugía general; Historia de la medicina. Emil Theodor Kocher was the first surgeon awarded with the Nobel Prize in the field of physiology and medicine. The distinction was granted by the Nobel Committee in December the 11th of 1909 due to «his work in physiology, pathology, and thyroid gland surgery»2, which allowed him the discovery of its function throughout the excision or removal of this gland. During the nineteenth century, this procedure was essential not only to prove the gland ’s function, but of the majority of organs and tissues. For this reason it constituted a remarkable tool for the understanding and treatment of innumerable diseases. This issue becomes very important if it is considered the fact that at those moments, surgery was not seen as a part of medical discipline. Instead, it was set as a manual skill exerted by practitioners whose expertise could only be demonstrated when they made procedures such as manipulating broken bones, skin tumor excisions or removing boils. Even more, the effectiveness of surgical procedures in treating diseases was not recognized. This generated rejection towards the surgeon ’s image because collectively it was unconsciously related to pain, infection3, and high mortality rates4. Due to this, surgery was not considered a prestigious profession as medicine alone. At times in which there were wrong beliefs regarding human health -inherited straight from Galen- events as the introduction to histopathology by Johannes M üller (1801-1858) and Alfred Donné (1801-1878) and to general anesthesia by John Collins Warren (1778-1856), Horace Wells (1815-1848) and William Thomas Green Morton (1819-1868), as well as the advances in antiseptics and new techniques in head and neck surgery, developed by great surgeons as Kocher, Billroth, von Langenbeck and von Volkmann, did not just mark a breakpoint with traditional medicine, but they constituted a huge step towards a new era in which the already mentioned, Kocher, found an appropriate scenario for the development of his glowing career5. Along with his colleagues, Kocher contributed towards the recognition of surgery as an invaluable tool used in the detection of disorders produced by sick organs or tissues throughout the restoration of their function or their removal3. This made surgery inseparable from medicine5 and turned it into an essential element in the treatment of certain diseases, which until that very moment could only be medically treated or by means of radical changes in lifestyle or throughout relatively harmless methods such as inducing vomit, using purgative substances or bleeding3. Before 1872, year in which Kocher performed his first thyroidectomy, the prevalence of thyroid hypertrophy in Berne, Switzerland, his hometown, was extremely high and the mortality rate related to surgical intervention reached about 75%. The most frequent complications included damage of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and post operatory tetany due to removal of parathyroid glands 6. His mentor and namesake, Billroth, who had had problems with post operatory tetany, decided to end up with thyroid surgery, in answer perhaps to several voices that had risen up against the procedure. For instance, Diffenbach in Germany had judged it for what he believed it was «one of the most thankless and dangerous» also «reckless» and he argued that if it wasn’t forbidden once and for all, at least it should be controlled7. While in France thyroidectomy was prohibited by the Medicine Academy of the time, in America, Gross referred to it as a «horrible butchery, deserving reproach and conviction», in which «not a honest or sensitive surgeon should be involved»8. With such history and aware about the high mortality rate observed throughout the thyroidectomies that he made during the following ten years (12.8% of 101 in total), as well as of the undesirable clinical condition in which some of his patients were left in9, it was not strange that Kocher limited the number of his interventions until he had more knowledge regarding thyroidal function which would let him refine his technique. He made this decision in 1874 after he had a successful intervention in an eleventh year old female patient who soon after surgery began to show signs of tiredness and lack of initiative. As pictures of the time show, before the patient’s surgery, she was taller than her younger sister2. However, nine years later, her height was much more reduced and had cretinoid appearance2. It was not until he realized a possible association between her clinical picture and the one caused by iodine deficiency described by Virchow, when Kocher decided to modify his technique even though he did not fully know the details of such relation. In 1883 he perfectioned the technique throughout the preservation of a small portion of the glandular tissue. For instance it could be a complete lobe, to ensure a minimal hormonal secretion and avoid the appearance of post operatory myxedema10. He used to save radical interventions for cases of untreatable compression or cancer1. He based this on his personal experience which proved him in part, that the removal of goiter was the cause of what he called «cachexia thyreopriva» that was similar to congenital hypothyroidism in its symptoms. Moreover, it proved that partial excision, or «thyroid juice» supply, lowered the symptoms4. Meanwhile, Ord, who defined the term myxedema, made research in thyroid function along with Kocher. After discovering that thyroid follicles of postmortem tissues did not contain colloid but instead they had a fibrous material, Ord associated the myxedematous state with the thyroid gland. However, it was until 1883 that the thyroidal function was totally cleared up thanks to the results obtained by Semon, who proposed that the fall in the activity of such organ was the origin of both Ord ’s myxedema and Kocher’s cachexia thyreopriva, the same as Gull’s cretinism. That same year, Kocher published his observations about the results of total thyroidectomy1. Kocher also ventured extraordinarily in treating patients with exophthalmic goiter which had been described before by Graves 11. In order to reduce the thyroid activity of these patients, Kocher designed a strategy that consisted of two phases: in the first, he provoked a decrease in the blood flow to the gland, for which he tied up some of its arteries. In the second phase, he performed a partial lobectomy, usually unilateral. He considered a third phase in which he excised some of the remaining lobe. However, he just did it in case the condition persisted or reappeared. The mortality rate related to this procedure was of 4.5%. He was author of the famous «Kocher’s II incision», which was a slightly curve transverse outlined cut, brought about two centimeters above the sternoclavicular articulations2. This incision allowed him to work in a «cleaner» way in a field that was practically blood free, in contrast to the initial procedures taught by Billroth, his teacher2. By 1912, Kocher had performed about 5000 thyroidectomies with only 0.5% of mortality12. Kocher was the first with the idea to exchange body parts, or in other words, transplanting organs. In 1883 he tried to reverse the post operatory myxedematous condition of one of his patients, throughout the reinsertion of thyroid tissue. This fact opened the door for surgeons as Mathieu Jaboulay and Alexis Carrel to find ways to replace sick tissues for healthy ones 13, so they could understand and treat many diseases that were incomprehensible and incurable at the time. The first transplants were made with organs such as pancreas, kidneys, testicles, and ovaries13. Besides laying the basis to identify thyroid function and physiology, Kocher showed an unending concern for health and quality of life of his thyroidectomized patients. Through this, he promoted different methods such as «organotherapy» and the distribution of thyroid extract pills in order to restore the gland’s function in such patients14. Kocher contributed in other fields besides surgery which put him at a higher level. For instance, he created a way to reduce shoulder dislocations (Kocher ’s III method). Moreover, he designed new techniques and instruments to approach other organs as the gallbladder. He empowered the existing techniques for inguinal hernia radical surgery throughout invagination (Kocher’s II method) and introduced improvements in the intervention of organs as stomach, lung, and tongue15. Kocher performed successful surgeries due to his deep knowledge in anatomy and physiology and precision in surgical techniques. In this way he contributed in shifting the point of view about the surgeon ’s job at the beginning of the twentieth century. Emil Theodor Kocher was one of the most important exponents of thyroid surgery. He inspired a new surgical school based on his refined technique. He transferred his concepts to other recognized surgeons in Europe and America, such as Charles Mayo, who was pioneer of endocrinologic surgery in America. Kocher’s ideas and his observations about the results of his interventions were crucial not only for physiology and surgery, but for the rising of medical endocrinology16,17. REFERENCES
© Copyright 2009 - Revista Colombia Médica The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[rc09031f1.jpg] |
| |||||||||
