search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Journal of Reproductive Health
Women's Health and Action Research Centre
ISSN: 1118-4841
Vol. 12, Num. 3, 2008, pp. 185-196

African Journal of Reproductive Health, Vol. 12, No. 3, Dec, 2008, pp. 185-196

Review Article

A Review of the Changes in the Ophthalmic and Visual System in Pregnancy

Afekhide E. Omoti 1, Joseph M. Waziri-Erameh2 and Valentina W. Okeigbemen3

1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin-City-mail: afeomoti@yahoo.com Phone: +2348037047716.
2
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City
3
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City
Correspondence: Afekhide E. Omoti Department of Ophthalmology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin-City-mail: afeomoti@yahoo.com Phone: +2348037047716

Code Number: rh08047

ABSTRACT

Pregnancy is often associated with ocular changes which may be more commonly transient but occasionally, permanent. It may be associated with the development of new ocular conditions, or can exacerbate pre-existing conditions. The ocular effects of pregnancy may be physiological or pathological or may be modifications of pre-existing conditions. Adnexial changes include chloasma, spider angiomas and ptosis. Anterior segment changes include a decrease in conjunctival capillaries and an increase in the granularity of conjunctival venules and in corneal curvature, changes in corneal thickness, refractive index, accommodation and refractive errors, and a decrease in intraocular pressure. Posterior segment changes include worsening of diabetic retinopathy, central serous chorioretinopathy, increased risk of peripheral vitreochorioretinal dystrophies and retinal detachment, and a beneficial effect on non-infectious uveitis. Systemic disorders of importance include preeclampsia, Graves disease and multiple sclerosis. Intracranial disorders with ocular effects in pregnancy include Pseudotumor cerebri, prolactinomas and Sheehan’s syndrome

RĖSUMĖ

Examen des changements dans la grossesse ophtalmique et du système visuel La grossesse est souvent associée aux changements oculaires qui peuvent être plus généralement la coupure, mais de temps en temps, permanents. Il peut être associé au développement de nouvelles conditions oculaires, ou peut renforcer des conditions préexistantes. Les effets oculaires de grossesse peuvent être physiologiques ou pathologiques ou peuvent être les modifications des conditions préexistantes. Les changements annexais incluent chloasma, des angiomes d'araignée et ptose. Des changements de segment antérieurs incluent une diminution dans des capillaires conjonctivales et une augmentation de la granularité de vénales conjonctivales et dans la déviation cornéenne, des changements de l'épaisseur cornéenne, de l’indice de réfraction, et des erreurs réfractions et une diminution dans la pression intraoculaire. Des changements de segment postérieurs incluent la dégradation de rétinopathie diabétique, choriorétinopathie séreux central, le risque accru du périphérique vitréochoriorétinal des dystrophies et le décollement de la rétine et des effets avantageux sur uvéites non contagieux. Les désordres systémiques d'importance incluent pré éclampsie, la maladie de Tombes et la sclérose en plaques. Des désordres intracrâniens avec des effets oculaires dans la grossesse incluent la Pseudotumeur cérébrale, prolactinomas et le syndrome de Sheehan.

KEY WORDS: Pregnancy, Ocular changes, Diabetic retinopathy, Preeclampsia

Introduction

Women undergo a tremendous number of changes, both systemic and ocular, throughout pregnancy. During pregnancy, physiological changes occur in the cardiovascular, hormonal, metabolic, haematologic, and immunologic systems.1,2 By some of these mechanisms, pregnancy causes changes in the eyes such as deterioration in the background retinopathy in diabetic women, even when good metabolic control is achieved and retinopathy is minimal.3,4 Compared with non-diabetic pregnant women, retinal capillary blood flow has been reported to be higher in diabetic women during pregnancy and after delivery5.Together with the hormonal and metabolic changes occuring during pregnancy, hyper-dynamic retinal capillary circulation may contribute to the progression of retinopathy in pregnant diabetic women5. Hormonal changes are among the most prominent systemic changes in pregnant women. The placenta, maternal endocrine glands and the fetal adrenal glands combine their productivity to make a high-powered hormone factory. The immune state is suppressed, leaving the pregnant woman more susceptible to serious immunological dis-orders1.Visual changes in pregnancy are common, and many are specifically associated with the pregnancy itself6.Pregnancy is often associated with ocular changes, most often transient in nature, though occasionally permanent. It can be associated with development of new conditions, or can exacerbate pre-existing conditions. The ocular effects of pregnancy may be divided into physiologic changes, pathologic conditions or modifications of pre-existing conditions7.This review gives an overview on the changes that can affect the ocular health and vision of a pregnant woman and during childbirth.

Ocular Adnexia

Chloasma which is also known as mask of pregnancy is a hormonallymediated process, characterized by increased pigmentation around the eyes and cheeks.8,9 The pigmentation changes tend to fade slowly postpartum. Spider angiomas, a type of telangectasia, commonly develop during pregnancy on the face and upper body8.All these external changes resolve postpartum.2,8,9 Ptosis has been reported to occur during and after normal pregnancy and it is usually unilateral9. The mechanism is thought to be due to defects that develop in the levator aponeurosis from fluid, hormonal, and other changes from the stress of labour and delivery9.

Anterior Segment of the Eye Conjunctiva

A decrease in the conjunctival capillaries and an increase in the granularity of conjunctival venules have been reported to occur and are reversible postpartum9.

Tear film

Pregnancy induced dry eye syndrome may occur due to disrupted lacrimal acinar cells10.Pregnancy can trigger alterations of lacrimal gland growth factor expression and redistribution of lymphocytes from periductal foci to interacinar sites and enhanced immuno-reactivity of prolactin, TGF-beta1, and EGF in ductal cells11.

Cornea

Many women develop contact lens intolerance while pregnant even when they fit comfortably before pregnancy.2,12 In a study of corneal curvature in pregnant women there was a statistically significant increase in corneal curvature during the second and third trimester which resolved postpartum or after the cessation of breastfeeding12.Pregnancy is associated with changes in corneal sensitivity and thickness.2,13,14 A measurable but slight increase in corneal thickness due to edema occurs during pregnancy. Corneal sensitivity tends to decrease, with the largest changes late in pregnancy14. Due to variations in thickness; the refractive index of the cornea may be altered. It is thus advisable to postpone changes in prescription and fitting of contact lenses until several weeks postpartum.

Newly developed Krukenberg spindles on the cornea have been observed early in pregnancy and they tend to decrease in size during the third trimester and postpartum. They are not accompanied by other findings of pigment dispersion, such as increased angle pigmentation and iris tran sillumination defects14.The mechanism presumably is related to hormonal changes such as low progesterone levels, however, by the third trimester, an increase in progesterone and aqueous outflow often result in decreased or absence of Krukenberg spindles.

Accommodation and Refractive Errors

Changes in accommodation and refractive errors have been reported during pregnancy. 13,15 Transient accommodative loss has been noted both during and after pregnancy. Accommodative insufficiency and paralysis have been documented in association with lactation15.The results of refractive eye surgery before, during, or immediately after pregnancy are unpredictable, and refractive surgery should be postponed until there is a stable postpartum refraction6.

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Pregnancy can have beneficial effects on glaucoma.2,6,16 Pregnancy is associated with a decreased IOP in healthy eyes6, and in ocular hypertension16,and the effects of glaucoma medications on the fetus and breast-fed infant are largely unknown6.In normal subjects, pregnancy decreased IOP by 19.6%. About 35% of total decrease occurred between 12th and 18th weeks of pregnancy16. In ocular hypertension, pregnancy decreased IOP by 24.4%. About 61% of total decrease occurred between 24th and 30th weeks of pregnancy16. With advancing pregnancy, intraocular pressure decreases. The higher decrease in ocular hypertensive subjects may be due to their higher level of ocular pressure. In ocular hypertensive subjects, pregnancy can decrease IOP up to a level of normal limit16.various mechanisms have been implicated for this observation. Such mechanisms include an increase in aqueous outflow; a decrease in systemic vascular resistance, leading to decreased episcleral venous pressure; generalized increased tissue elasticity, leading to decreased scleral rigidity; and generalized acidosis during pregnancy.

Posterior Segment Disorders

Diabetic Retinopathy: Pregnancy can worsen preexisting diabetic retinopathy17-24.Diabetic changes that occur during pregnancy are similar to the findings in non pregnant diabetic patients and in males. However, pregnancy in diabetic patients with good metabolic control doesn't seem to be a risk factor for developing vascular complications. These complications are still strongly correlated with duration of diabetes25.

There is no difference in the grading procedures. Gestational diabetes (diabetes mellitus that occurs during pregnancy) has not been associated with the development of retinopathy24.Varying degrees of progression of diabetic retinopathy have been reported. In one report, progression of the retinopathy occurred in 77.5% of the patients who presented with diabetic retinopathy at conception; proliferative diabetic retinopathy occurred in 22.5%17.Only 26% of the patients who started the pregnancy without diabetic retinopathy had some progression of the retinopathy17.In another report, progression of retinopathy in pregnancy was uncommon (5.0% pregnancies) but was significantly more common in women with duration of diabetes > 10 years and in women with moderate to severe retinopathy at baseline19.Laser therapy was needed in 2.2% pregnancies, which is much lower than that reported in earlier studies19.Yet in another report, worsening of initial retinal lesions was observed in 16% of the pregnant group compared to only 6% of the control20.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Argon laser panretinal photocoagulation of preproliferative and proliferative DR resulted in no subsequent DR-induced complications20.

Risk factors associated with progression of diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy include duration of diabetes20,25 and coexistence of hypertensive disorders18.In a study of the risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy17,it was reported that duration of diabetes was longer in the progressive group compared with the non-progressive group. The glycohemoglobin was higher in the progressive group than in the nonprogressive group at each time point, but only in the third trimester was the difference statistically significant. The hemoglobin level was lower in the progressive group than in the nonprogressive group. The systolic blood pressure was higher in the progressive group17,26. In another report,using logistic regression to control for covariates, ocular perfusion pressure was significantly associated only with incidence of retinopathy in younger-onset persons. The odds ratio for a 10-mmHg increase in ocular perfusion pressure was 2.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.303.50). Also, myopia was protective for progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy in younger-onset persons. These results suggest that pressure phenomena may be related to the development of retinopathy in youngeronset persons. This would have implications for treatments affecting both IOP and blood pressure26.

Sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy is a rare disease, but it can have devastating consequences for mother and child27.Laser photocoagulation should be considered for pregnant women with severe preproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy may not regress postpartum. Close follow-up should be extended in the postpartum period in this group of patients until the retinopathy is stabilized. The presence of combined rhegmatogenous and tractional retinal detachment and neovascular glaucoma has been reported to be associated with poor outcome27.

Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: This is a macular disorder characterized by a localized serous retinal detachment. It most commonly affects young middleaged adults aged 20 to 45 years. It is usually more common in men more than women at a ratio of10:128.Pregnancy is considered a risk factor for the development of central serous chorioretinopathy.13,29 There may be no racial predominance in the development of central serous chorioretinopathy in pregnancy28. Central serous chorioretinopathy in pregnant woman is often associated with subretinal exudation which is probably fibrinous in nature.28,30 Subretinal fibrinous exudates have been seen in 90% of the patients, compared with fewer than 20% of patients in typical (non-pregnant) central serous chorioretinopathy28.The affection resolves spontaneously at the end of pregnancy or after delivery, but may recur in the context or outside of subsequent pregnancy30. The special conditions of pregnancy, including haemodynamic, biological and psychological alterations may lead susceptible women to develop central serous chorioretinopathy30.

Peripheral Vitreochorioretinal Dystrophies (PVCRD): Dynamic observations of 86 pregnant women with peripheral vitreochorioretinal dystrophies (121 eyes) showed that the condition progressed during pregnancy in 33.8% cases31. Decrease of ocular haemodynamics and scleral rigidity were characteristic of pregnancy31. The highest incidence of PVCRD progress was observed in pregnant women with the hypokinetic type of systemic hae-modynamics31.

Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Pregnant women who have high myopia, a history of retinal detachment or retinal holes, or have known lattice degeneration are frequently referred to an ophthalmologist for advice concerning the management of pregnancy and labor, i.e. whether a spontaneous vaginal delivery can be allowed and whether prophylaxis for high-risk retinal pathology is indicated32.Many obstetricians still believe that pregnant women with ocular abnormalities predisposing to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment should have an instrumental delivery, and a few even advocate Caesarian section. It has been shown that prenatal treatment of asymptomatic retinal pathology is not indicated and that spontaneous vaginal delivery may be allowed to take place in women with high-risk retinal pathology32.

Macular Edema: Macular edema with and without proliferative retinopathy may also occur during pregnancy. It may develop or worsen during pregnancy. It has been shown that macular edema often is linked in pregnant women with diabetes who also demonstrate proteinuria and hypertension. Studies have shown that some cases have resolved spontaneously postpartum but it may persist in others, causing long-term visual loss33.

Uveitis: Uveitis refers to inflammation of the uveal tract, comprising the iris, ciliary body and the choroid. It has been reported that pregnancy is associated with lower numbers of flare-ups of noninfectious uveitis compared to the non pregnant state34. If flare-ups do occur during pregnancy, they happen predominantly in the first trimester. Specific causes of non-infectious uveitis showing beneficial effects of pregnancy include Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, idiopathic uveitis and Behçet's disease.35,36 Many of these women will experience a rebound in activity within months of delivery36.It is considered that the increase of intrinsic hormone, especially corticosteroid, and some other factors with pregnancy may give the suppressive influence on uveitis35.

Toxoplasmosis: Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic zoonosis that occurs worldwide and is an important cause of blindness37.The infection is naturally acquired by the ingestion of oocysts excreted by infested cats or by ingestion of tissue cysts in undercooked or raw meat. Primary infection during pregnancy may result in a congenital infection. Latent ocular toxoplasmosis may reactivate during pregnancy in the mother. Toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis is the most common cause of posterior uveitis in immunocompetent patients.37,38 In adults decreased vision and floaters are most frequently reported. Active toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis typically presents as grey-white retinal necrosis with choroiditis, vasculitis and vitritis. However, atypical presentations including neuroretinitis, papillitis, Fuchslike anterior uveitis, scleritis and acute retinal necrosis have been described37.The diagnosis is based on clinical findings and can be supported by the detection of antibodies and Toxoplasma gondii DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).37,38 Anterior uveitis can occur, with mutton-fat keratic precipitates, fibrin, cells and flare, iris nodules and posterior synechiae38.It is often fatal in the newborn babies infected by transplacental way, thus, the discovery of a toxoplasmic seroconversion during the follow up of the pregnant women had posed to the obstetrician some problems in the management39.The estimated risk of fetal infection ranged between 2 and 10% based on live born children and between 3 and 14% when interrupted pregnancies were included40.Toxoplasmosis therapy includes antimicrobial drugs and corticosteroids. For early maternal infections as for those acquired later, the recommendation is immediate treatment with spiramycin, monthly ultrasound surveillance, amniocentesis and treatment with pyrimethamine and sulphamides if the PCR is positive40.The prognosis for ocular toxoplasmosis is favorable in immunocompetent individuals, as long as the central macula is not directly involved.37,38

Systemic Diseases in Pregnancy Affecting the Ocular System

Hypertensive disorders: The onset of the triad of hypertension, oedema and proteinuria in an otherwise normotensive pregnant woman, is termed pregnancyinduced hypertension (PIH) or preeclampsia. If these changes are associated with seizures, then the disorder is referred to as eclampsia.2 another category is “pregnancyaggravated hypertension,” which is preeclampsia or eclampsia superimposed upon chronic hypertension.41 Preeclampsia is an obstetric disease of unknown cause that affects approximately 5% of pregnant women. The visual system may be affected with variable intensity.42 Visual symptoms are common in patients with pre-eclampsia, and are caused by various underlying pathological changes in the retina. Blurred vision may be one of these symptoms.43 Retinal detachment in preeclampsia is usually bilateral and serous, and its pathogenesis is related to the choroidal ischemia secondary to an intense arteriolar vasospasm.42 In affected eyes, the patients complain of a relative central scotoma. Ophthalmoscopy may show edema in the affected maculae, while a serous neurosensory detachment of the macula, a neurosensory detachment in the papillomacular region or late leakage and subretinal exudates may be detected.43 The majority of patients have complete recovery of vision with clinical management, and surgery is unnecessary.42,44

Cortical blindness is a rare complication of preeclampsia.45,46,47 It is usually reversible and most likely due to vasogenic edema rather than vasospasm47. Other ocular pathology seen in preeclampsia include reduced arteriole to venule ratio, acute hypertensive retinopathy, choroidal infarcts, papillophlebitis, retinal artery and vein occlusion, retinal pigment epithelial changes, optic neuritis, optic atrophy, ischemic optic neuropathy, and thrombosis of the central retinal artery48,49,50,51 .

Graves Disease: Autoimmune thyroid disease, including Graves' disease and autoimmune thyroiditis, is common in women of childbearing age52.rarely; the fetus can be affected because of transplacental passage of maternal IgG. Graves’ disease is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. It is an important cause of unilateral and bilateral proptosis. Pregnant women with Graves’s orbitopathy are treated in a similar fashion to non-pregnant women. Graves’ disease tends to remit late in pregnancy and relapse postpartum53.the diagnosis of Graves' disease in pregnancy can be complex because of normal gravid physiologic changes in thyroid hormone metabolism.Mothers with active Graves' disease should be treated with antithyroid drugs, which impact both maternal and fetal thyroid function. Optimally, the lowest possible dose should be used to maintain maternal free thyroxine levels at or just above the upper limit of the normal nonpregnant reference range54. Mild cases may be monitored, but moderate to severe cases must be treated. Thyroid inhibitors such as propylthiouracil, methimazole and carbimazole all cross the placenta and are excreted in breast milk, but the drug of choice in pregnant women is propylthiouracil53.

Multiple sclerosis (MS): This is an important cause of optic neuritis. Multiple sclerosis is the most common chronic disabling neurological disease affecting young women55.paradoxically, our knowledge of the relationship between pregnancy and MS is limited. The influence of pregnancy in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been a matter of controversy for a long time. Women with MS were often discouraged to envisage pregnancy56. However, several conclusions emerge from the literature:55,56 1) The rate of relapse in MS decreases during pregnancy, and it rises significantly during the first three months post partum before coming back to its level prior to pregnancy. 2) Although pregnancy and delivery cause changes of the relapse rate, they have no influence on mid and long term residual disability. 3) Epidural analgesia do not seem to have any deleterious effect on the disease. 4) Lastly, MS does not seem to influence pregnancy, delivery or the child's health. Pregnancy does not appear to be a period at greater risk for exacerbations but, on the contrary it seems to act, on the whole, as a protective event. These data allow physicians to provide reassuring counseling to women57. Puerperal immune-mediated changes are responsible for activation of optic neuritis associated with relapsing multiple sclerosis58.This may result in acute loss of vision in breastfeeding women and may be the presenting feature of multiple sclerosis59.Multiple sclerosis must be considered as an etiology for acute puerperal lactation-associated blindness when there is no clear anatomic or infectious cause59.

Intracranial Conditions in Pregnancy Affecting Vision

Pseudotumor cerebri (PTC): PTC which is also known as Benign Intracranial Hypertension (BIH) is a syndrome characterized by intracranial hypertension and associated with headaches, visual disturbances and papilloedema, but without any identifiable intracranial pathology60.It is a rare disorder occurring in the reproductive age range of females, thus occurring infrequently in pregnancy61. Changes of endocrine status have been found to prevail among aetiological factors, viz. pregnancy, obesity, galactorrhea-amenorrhea, hypothyrosis, ingestion of oral contraceptives62.The patients show signs of intracranial hypertension (headache, vomiting, congested optic discs). The spinal fluid pressure is elevated, with the cellular and protein composition being normal. The condition is marked by benign course and favorable outcome62.Overall, pregnancy outcome does not appear to be adversely affected and the risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies does not appear to be increased.once diagnosed61, the decision to treat is based on visual acuity and visual field loss. Medical management and observation are usually effective. Pregnancy is not contraindicated in women with pseudotumor cerebri, and termination of pregnancy is seldom required.60,61

Intracranial Tumors: Prolactinomas are the most common functioning tumors seen in the pregnant patients63.They may be micro or macro adenomas. Hormone fluctuations during pregnancy can stimulate estrogen receptors on the prolactinoma, leading to tumor enlargement64.Thus, previously asymptomatic pituitary adenomas or micro adenomas may enlarge and result in various ophthalmic symptoms, such as headache, visual field and/or visual acuity loss. For this reason, patients with amenorrhea should be screened to rule out a pituitary mass prior to initiating pro-ovulation medications. Symptomatic pituitary adenomas may require the combined efforts of an ophthalmologist, obstetrician, neurosurgeon, and endocrinologist to decide upon appropriate medical, surgical, or radiation treatment. In cases of prolactinomas, bromocriptine, a dopamine agonist, can lower prolactin and cause shrinking of the tumor. Bromocriptine is considered safe to use during pregnancy and is not associated with increased risk of spontaneous abortion, congenital malformation or long-term postnatal development65.If the tumor does not respond to drugs, transsphenoidal hypophysectomy is advocated during the second trimester, with delivery taking place in the third trimester64.

Sheehan’s syndrome: Sheehan's syndrome or pituitary apoplexy occurs as a result of ischemic pituitary necrosis due to severe postpartum hemorrhage. It may be rarely seen without massive bleeding or after normal delivery66.It is a potentially visual-threatening complication of pituitary adenomas because of the sudden increase in pituitary size from infarction or hemorrhage. This condition may present as a sudden onset of headache, visual loss, and/or ophthalmoplegia. It is one of the most common causes of hypopituitarism in developing countries66.Enlargement of pituitary gland, small sella size, disseminated intravascular coagulation and autoimmunity have been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of Sheehan's syndrome in women who suffer from severe postpartum hemorrhage66.The great majority of the patients have empty sella on CT or MRI.

In conclusion, pregnancy may result in several changes affecting all the segments of the eye. Some of these changes may be beneficial while others are not. The majority are however, transient with resolution of symptoms after delivery.

References

  1. Thornburg, KL, Jacobson SL, Giraud GD, Morton MJ. Hemodynamic changes in pregnancy Semin Perinatol 2000; 24: 11-14
  2. Sunness JS. The pregnant woman’s eye. Surv Ophthalmol 1988; 32: 219-38.
  3. Soubrane G, Canivet J, Coscas G. Influence of pregnancy on the evolution of background retinopathy: preliminary results of a prospective fluorescein angiography study Int Ophthalmol Clin 1985; 8: 249-255
  4. Hellstedt T, Kaaja R, Teramo K, Immonen I. Macular blood flow during pregnancy in patients with early diabetic retinopathy measured by blue-field entoptic simulation Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1996; 234: 659-663
  5. Loukovaara S, Harju M, Kaaja R, Immonen I. Retinal capillary blood flow in diabetic and nondiabetic women during pregnancy and postpartum period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:1486-91.
  6. Dinn RB, Harris A, Marcus PS. Ocular changes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003; 58:137-44.
  7. Sheth BP, Mieler WF. Ocular complications of pregnancy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001; 12: 455-63.
  8. Pritchard JA, MacDonald PC, Grant NF. Williams Obstetrics. 17th ed. Norwalk, Conn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1985:188-91.
  9. Somani S. Pregnancy, special considerations. www.emedicine.com/oph/topic747.htm.
  10. Schechter JE, Pidgeon M, Chang D, Fong YC, Trousdale MD, Chang N. Potential role of disrupted lacrimal acinar cells in dry eye during pregnancy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002; 506:153-7.
  11. Ding C, Chang N, Fong YC, Wang Y, Trousdale MD, Mircheff AK, Schechter JE. Interacting influences of pregnancy and corneal injury on rabbit lacrimal gland immunoarchitecture and function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:1368-75.
  12. Park SB, Lindahl KJ, Temnycky GO, Aquavella JV. The effect of pregnancy on corneal curvature. CLAOJ 1992; 18: 256-9.
  13. Pilas-Pomykalska M, Czajkowskii J, Oszukowski P. Ocular changes during pregnancy. Ginekol Pol 2005; 76: 655-60.
  14. Riss B, Riss P. Corneal sensitivity in pregnancy. Ophthalmologica 1981;183: 57-62.
  15. Duke-Elder S. System of Ophthalmology. Vol.7. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1971:703.
  16. Qureshi IA. Intraocular pressure and pregnancy: a comparison between normal and ocular hypertensive subjects. Arch Med Res 1997; 28: 397-400.
  17. Axer-Siegel R, Hod M, Fink-Cohen S, Kramer M, Weinberger D, Schindel B, Yassur Y. Diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy. Ophthalmology 1996; 103:1815-9.
  18. Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Kranias G, Khoury J, Combs CA, Mimouni F, Siddiqi TA, Lipman MJ. Progression of diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy: association with hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:1214-8.
  19. Temple RC, Aldridge VA, Sampson MJ, Greenwood RH, Heyburn PJ, Glenn A. Impact of pregnancy on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2001; 18: 573-7.
  20. Ayed S, Jeddi A, Daghfous F, el Euch M, Ben Osman N, Marrakchi S, Nacef L. Developmental aspects of diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy. J Fr Ophtalmol 1992; 15:474-7.
  21. Oguz H. Diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy: Effects on the natural course. Semin Ophthalmol 1999; 14:249-57.
  22. Best RM, Chakravarthy U. Diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy. Br J Ophthalmol 1997; 81:249-51.
  23. Sheth BP. Does pregnancy accelerate the rate of progression of diabetic retinopathy? Curr Diab Rep 2002; 2: 327-30.
  24. Soubrane G, Coscas G. Influence of pregnancy on the evolution of diabetic retinopathy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1998; 38:187-94.
  25. Wender-Ozegowska E, Zawiejska A, Pietryga M, Zozulinska D, Wierusz-Wysocka B, Chmaj K, Biczysko R. Effect of pregnancy on diabetic vascular complications. Ginekol Pol 2004; 75: 342-51.
  26. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Ocular factors in the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 77 - 83.
  27. Chan WC, Lim LT, Quinn MJ, Knox FA, McCance D, Best RM. Management and outcome of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy. Eye 2004;18: 826-32.
  28. Sunness JS, Haller JA, Fine SL. Central serous chorioretinopathy and pregnancy. Arch Ophthalmol.1993; 111: 360-4.
  29. Haimovici R, Koh S, Gagnon DR, et al. Risk factors for central serous chorioretinopathy: A case-control study. Ophthalmology 2004;111: 244-9.
  30. Khairallah M, Nouira F, Gharsallah R, Chachia N. Central serous chorioretinopathy in a pregnant woman. J Fr Ophtalmol 1996; 19: 216-21.
  31. Kolenko OV, Sorokin EL, Egorov VV. Relationship between constitutional type of systemic hemodynamics and formation of peripheral vitreo-chorioretinal dystrophies during pregnancy. Vestn Oftalmol. 2002;118: 20-3.
  32. Landau D, Seelenfreund MH, Tadmor O, Silverstone BZ, Diamant Y. The effect of normal childbirth on eyes with abnormalities predisposing to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:598-600.
  33. Sinclair SH, Nesler C, Foxman B, et al. Macular edema and pregnancy in insulindependent diabetes. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97:154-67.
  34. Kump LI, Cervantes-Castañeda RA, Androudi SN, Foster CS, Christen WG. Patterns of exacerbations of chronic noninfectious uveitis in pregnancy and puerperium. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2006;14:99-104.
  35. Taguchi C, Ikeda E, Hikita N, Mochizuki M. A report of two cases suggesting positive influence of pregnancy on uveitis activity. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1999;103:66-71.
  36. Rabiah PK, Vitale AT. Noninfectious uveitis and pregnancy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:91-8.
  37. Pleyer U, Torun N, Liesenfeld O. Ocular toxoplasmosis. Ophthalmologe. 2007;104: 603-16.
  38. Bonfioli AA, Orefice F. Toxoplasmosis. Semin Ophthalmol. 2005; 20:129-41
  39. Ouerhani R, Skhiri A, Nefoussi R, Abdellah E, Triki A, Faouzi Gara M. Toxoplasmic infection in pregnancy. Report of 12 cases. Tunis Med. 2006; 84:805-7.
  40. Wallon M, Gaucherand P, Al Kurdi M, Peyron F. Toxoplasma infections in early pregnancy: consequences and management. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002; 31:478-84.
  41. Pritchard JA, MacDonald PC, Grant NF. Williams Obstetrics, ed. 17. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1985; 525-60.
  42. Prado RS, Figueiredo EL, Magalhaes TV. Retinal detachment in preeclampsia. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2002; 79:183-6.
  43. Somfai GM, Miháltz K, Tulassay E, Rigó J. Diagnosis of serous neuroretinal detachments of the macula in severe preeclamptic patients with optical coherence tomography. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2006; 25:11-20.
  44. Sánchez Vicente JL, Ruiz Aragón J, Nanwani K, Sánchez Vicente P, Guiote Linares JR, Díez Garretas C, Herrador Montiel A. Retinal detachment in preeclampsia and HELLP Syndrome. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003;78:335-8
  45. Waziri-Erameh MJM, Omoti AE, Edema OT. Bilateral total loss of vision following eclampsia-A case report. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003; 7:106-108.
  46. Llovera I, Roit Z, Johnson A, Sherman L. Cortical blindness, a rare complication of pre-eclampsia. J Emerg Med. 2005; 29:295-7.
  47. Do DV, Rismondo V, Nguyen QD. Reversible cortical blindness in preeclampsia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 134:916-8
  48. Capoor S, Goble RR, Wheatley T, Casswell AG. White-centered retinal hemorrhages as an early sign of preeclampsia. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 119:804-6.
  49. McLoone EM, Best RM. Pregnancy-related papillophlebitis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2004; 14:65-6.
  50. Beck RW, Gamel JW, Willcourt RJ, Berman G. Acute ischemic optic neuropathy in severe preeclampsia. Am J Ophthalmol 1980; 90:342-6.
  51. Saito Y, Tano Y. Retinal pigment epithelial lesions associated with choroidal ischemia in preeclampsia. Retina. 1998; 18:103-8.
  52. Brown RS. Autoimmune thyroid disease in pregnant women and their offspring. Endocr Pract. 1996; 2: 53-61.
  53. Becks GP, Burrow GN. Thyroid disease and pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 1991; 75:121-50.
  54. Chan GW, Mandel SJ. Therapy insight: management of Graves' disease during pregnancy. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 3: 470-8.
  55. Confavreux C, Hutchinson M, Hours M, Cortinovis-Tourniaire P, Grimaud J, Moreau T. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy: clinical issues. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1999; 155: 186-91.
  56. Vukusic S, Confavreux C. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2006; 162:299-309.
  57. Bernardi S, Grasso MG, Bertollini R, Orzi F, Fieschi C. The influence of pregnancy on relapses in multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1991; 84:403-6.
  58. Leiba H, Glaser JS, Schatz NJ, Siatkowski RM. Postpartum optic neuritis: etiologic and pathophysiologic considerations. J Neuroophthalmol. 2000; 20: 85-8.
  59. Retzloff MG, Kobylarz EJ, Eaton C. Optic neuritis with transient total blindness during lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 902-4.
  60. Bashiri A, Mazor M, Maymon E, Wiznitzer A, Brisko D, Leiberman JR. Pseudotumor cerebri during pregnancy. Harefuah. 1996; 131:397-402, 455.
  61. Peterson CM, Kelly JV. Pseudotumor cerebri in pregnancy. Case reports and review of literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1985;40:323-9.
  62. Deev AS, Karpikov AV, Pchelintseva ZI. The causes and clinical course of benign intracranial hypertension. Lik Sprava. 1995; 3-4:101-3.
  63. Frohman LA. Pituitary tumors in pregnancy. Endocrinologist 2001;11: 399-406.
  64. Nader S. Thyroid disease and other endocrine disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 257-85.
  65. Krupp P, Monka C. Bromocriptine in pregnancy: Safety aspects. Klin Wochenschr 1987; 65: 823-7.
  66. Kelestimur F. Sheehan's syndrome. Pituitary. 2003; 6: 181-8.

© Copyright 2009 - Women's Health and Action Research Centre

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil