|
International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences of Yazd
ISSN: 1680-6433 EISSN: 2008-2177
Vol. 5, Num. 4, 2007, pp. 191-194
|
Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol. 5, No. 4, Autumn, 2007, pp. 191-194
Short communication
The association of preterm labor with vaginal colonization of group B streptococci
Bibi Shahnaz Aali1 M.D., Hamid Abdollahi2 Ph.D., Nouzar Nakhaee3 M.D., M.P.H., Zohreh Davazdahemami3 B.Sc., Anahita Mehdizadeh4 B.Sc.
1 Departmentn of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Physiology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, kerman, Iran.
2 Department of Microbiology, Kerman University of Medical sciences.
3 Kerman University of Medical sciences, Kerman, Iran.
4 Departmant of Genetics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.
Correspondence
Author: Dr. Bibi Shahnaz Aali, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Physiology
Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences ,Kerman, Iran. E-mail:shahnaz.aali@gmail.com
Received: 29 June 2007; accepted:
27 December 2007
Code Number: rm07037
Abstract
Background:
Group B streptococcus is regarded as a potential factor for adverse outcomes of
pregnancy such as preterm birth.
Objective: To
study the association of maternal vaginal colonization with group B streptococcus
(GBS) and preterm labor.
Materials and Methods:
From April 2005 to May 2006, vaginal culture for GBS were conducted in 101
laboring women with a gestational age of 24-37 weeks and 105 women admitted for
term delivery at maternity center of Afzalipour Hospital in Kerman, Iran.
Student`s t test and Chi square test were used to compare continuous and
categorical data between the groups. Using multivariate logistic regression the
association between GBS colonization and preterm labor was analyzed. P-values<0.05
were considered as significant.
Results: Colonization
was detected in 9.2% of all mothers. Although GBS colonization was found more
frequently in preterm than term patients (12 v/s 7 cases), the difference was
not statistically significant. However, GBS positivity was roughly associated
with preterm labor. Age was also a risk factor for GBS colonization. No case of
perinatal sepsis occurred during the study period.
Conclusion:
Maternal colonization for GBS is relatively low in our center. Increasing age
enhances the risk of colonization. Vaginal colonization of GBS is relatively
associated with preterm labor.
Key words:
Group B streptococcus, Preterm labor, Vaginal colonization.
Introduction
Preterm delivery is a relatively
common condition in obstetrics. It comprises 7% of all deliveries, but accounts for more than 80%
of perinatal morbidity (1). Recently,
the association of maternal GBS colonization with preterm labor has
become a subject of controversy. In 1996, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, accounted preterm delivery as a
risk factor for group B streptococcal sepsis and recommended the use of prophylacticantibiotic in preterm
labor (2) . Regan et al (1996) found that women heavily colonized with
GBS at the time of delivery were more likely to deliver prematurely (3).
Feikin et al (2001) study also indicated an association between GBS
colonization at delivery and preterm birth (4). On the contrary, other
investigators reported no association between preterm labor and cervicovaginal
GBS colonization (5, 6). The prevalence of maternal colonization varies in
countries owing to socioeconomic and ethnic differences (3-6). As the
contribution of GBS to preterm labor may also be influenced by ethnicity and
geographic variations, we performed the present study to assess the association
between preterm labor and GBS vaginal colonization in women attending Afzalipour Maternity Center, Kerman, Iran. This center is the main referral maternity center
of Kerman Medical University and admits patients from all over the province of
Kerman, which is located in southeast of Iran with a hot and dry climate.
Materials and methods
During a year from April 2005 to May 2006, 101
women with preterm labor and 105 patients randomly admitted for delivery at a
gestational age of 38-40 weeks entered this case- control study. Preterm labor
was considered as the occurrence of four uterine contractions in a 20 minutes time
period plus cervical dilatation greater than 1 cm and cervical effacement of
80% or more before 37 weeks of gestational age based on the last menstrual
period or ultrasonographic report in the first half of pregnancy. Multifetal
pregnancy, previous preterm delivery, underlying disease, uterine anomaly,
placenta previa, current antibiotic usage, rupture of membranes ≥ 6
hours were excluded. Demographic and obstetric data was gathered for each
patient. All participants gave written informed consent. Samples were
collected from the upper thirds of vagina and cultured on blood and chocolate agar
plates (Merck, Germany), and then incubated in 5- 10% carbon dioxide at 37ºC
for 24 hours.
The small round bacterial colonies with almost
flat surface (discoid like) on blood agar were regarded as β hemolytic and
group B streptococcus at first stage. Further differential tests including Gram
stain, Bacitracin, SXT, VP, CAMP and hipurate hydrolysis were performed on each
isolate. Additional confirmation was carried out by using a specific test for GBS,
MASTSTREP (agglutination tests from Mast Company, UK).
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 15). Student`s
t test, Chi square test were used to compare continuous and categorical data
between cases and controls. Using multivariate logistic regression the
associations between selected characteristics and preterm labor were analyzed.
The HosmerLemeshow test was used to assess model fit. P-values<0.05 were considered
as significant.
Results
The
majority of women in both groups were young (mean age: 26.3 years) and had low
parity (mean: 0.8). The groups were comparable regarding age, gravidity and
other obstetric parameters (Table I). No
difference in socioeconomic and ethnic status was expected, as all patients
attended a public center.
The
frequency of positive cultures was calculated to be 9.2% in the entire study
population. Although a greater number of preterm patients (11.9%) in comparison
to the term group (6.7%) revealed positive culture for GBS, the difference was
not statistically significant (Table I).Age
revealed a significant association with preterm labor (Table II). Besides, as it
is shown in Table 2 the odds of preterm
labor was roughly associated with GBS culture positivity (OR: 2.96, 95%CI: 0.96-9.17).
No case of neonatal sepsis was developed
during the study period.
Discussion
Maternal colonization rate was calculated to be 9.2% in our study. Reported GBS colonization rates in the world are quite variable, but generally range from 6 to 30% (5,7,8). The differences in colonization rates depend on the particular population and especially on the laboratory methods used to identify GBS (9). The additional tests performed in our study may account for the lower frequency of colonization in our population in comparison to other developing countries (10).
In Nomura et al
(2006) study, Colonization rate for women
with preterm premature rupture of membranes was 30% (9). However, 21.1% of our
study population who presented with ruptured membrane revealed positive culture
for GBS. This difference can best be explained by the geographical variation of
GBS colonization. No significant difference was found in colonization between
term and preterm patients on admission in our study that corroborates Kubota'sfindings (6). However, based on
multivariate logistic regression, GBS
positive women were nearly three times more likely to suffer from preterm labor
than negative ones which is consistent
with other studies (3, 4). The p-value for this odds ratio was almost
significant, and worth considering. In
contrast, Tsolia et al (2003) found no association between prematurity and GBS colonization
(5).
Researchers
have shown that the risk of earlyonset sepsis in colonized neonates
is increased in case of prolonged membrane rupture, maternal signs of
infection,amnionitis, intrapartum fetal monitoring, or if the baby
hasa low birth weight or is born preterm (8). As intrapartum fetal
monitoring is not used in our center and cases with prolonged membrane rupture
were excluded, lack of neonatal sepsis was not a surprising finding.
In the present study older women were
more at risk of preterm labor. This can be due to more frequent conditions for
contamination these women experience over time. On the other hand, gravidity
and parity showed no significant association with preterm labor while Tsolia et
al (1998) indicated that multiparity was associated with a lower colonization
rate (5). This inconsistency is related to the socioeconomic differences in the population studied.
Although the colonization rate of GBS is relatively low in our center, it can be regarded as a risk factor for preterm labor. Therefore, Prophylactic antibiotic therapy should be considered in these patients. Older women are more susceptible to be colonized with this microorganism. More investigations are required to confirm the association of age and colonization rate.
Table I. Clinical and obstetric characteristics in
preterm and term participants.
Characteristics |
Term |
Preterm |
p-value |
Mean age (SD) |
25.6 (5.9) |
27 (6) |
0.09 |
Mean gravidity (SD) |
2.2 (2.4) |
2 (1.6) |
0.51 |
Mean parity(SD)
Mean of living
child (SD)
Previous abortion (%)
Ruptured membrane (%)
Positive culture (%) |
0.9 (1.4)
0.8 (1.3)
12(11.4)
31(29.5)
7(6.7) |
0.7 (1.2)
0.7 (1.1)
13(12.9)
6(5.9)
12(11.9) |
0.54
0.59
0.75
0.001
0.19 |
Table II. Logistic regression analysis to assess the
association between selected characteristics and preterm labor.
Characteristics |
Adjusted odds ratios |
95% confidence intervals |
p-value |
Age |
1.10 |
1.03-1.16 |
0.004 |
Gravidity
Parity
Living child
Previous abortion
No
Yes |
0.92
1.01
0.73
1
1.15 |
0.72-1.16
0.46-2.22
0.33-1.63
-
0.42-3.17 |
0.47
0.99
0.45
-
0.79 |
Positive culture
No
Yes |
1
2.96 |
-
0.96-9.17 |
-
0.06 |
Acknowledgement
This project was funded by Research Council of
Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Authors extend their gratitude to the council
members for their valuable advice.
References
- Holst E, Goffeng AR, Andersch B. Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal microorganisms in idiopathic premature labor and association with pregnancy outcome. Clin Microbiol 1994; 32:176-186.
-
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention: Prevention of perinatal group B streptococci disease. Revised
guidelines from the CDC. MMWR 51(RR-11):1, 2002d.
- Regan JA, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP, Eschenbach
DA, Blachwelder WC, Lou Y, et al . Colonization with group B streptococci in pregnancy and
adverse outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:1354-1360.
- Feikin DR, Thorsen P, Zywicki S, Arpi M, Westergaard JG, Schuchat A. Association between colonization with group B streptococci during pregnancy and preterm delivery among Danish women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184:427-433.
- Tsolia M, Psoma M, Gavrili S, Petrochilou V, Michalas S, Legakis N, et al. Group B streptococcus colonization of Greek pregnant women and neonates:prevalence, risk factors and serotypes. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9:832-838.
- Kubota T. Relationship between maternal group
B streptococcal colonization and
pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:926-930.
- Amin A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Uduman S. Group B streptococcal serotype distribution of isolates from colonized pregnant women at the time of delivery in United Arab Emirates. J Infect 2002; 45:42-46.
- Benitz WE, Gould JB, Druzin ML.
Risk factors for early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: estimation of odds
ratios by critical literature review. Pediatrics 1999; 103:77.
- Nomura ML, Passini Júnior
R, Oliveira UM. Selective versus non selective culture medium for group
B streptococcus detection in pregnancies
complicated by preterm labor or preterm premature
rupture of memberance.
Braz J Infect Dis 2006; 10:247-250.
- Stoll BJ, Schuchat A. Maternal carriage of group B
streptococci in developing countries. Pediatr Infect Dis 1998;17:499-503.
© Copyright 2007 - Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|