search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Iranian Journal of Environmental Health, Science and Engineering
Iranian Association of Environmental Health (IAEH)
ISSN: 1735-1979
Vol. 7, Num. 2, 2010, pp. 115-122

Iran Journal of EnvironHealth Sci Eng, Vol. 7, No. 2, July-December, 2010, pp. 115-122

Article

The use of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of a styrene containing synthetic wastewater

1Chemical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Food Process Engineering and Biotechnology Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence Address: Chemical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran; Food Process Engineering and Biotechnology Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, babakb@aut.ac.ir

Date of Submission: 17-Nov-2009
Date of Decision: 17-Jan-2010
Date of Acceptance: 31-Jan-2010

Code Number: se10013

Abstract

In this study, the potential of a membrane bioreactor for treating styrene contaminated synthetic wastewater, with COD that simulated a petrochemical wastewater, was evaluated and compared with previous studies. At hydraulic retention times of 18 and 24 hours, the removal efficiency of COD and styrene was consistently higher than 99%. More significantly no styrene was detected in the exhaust air, which meant that, at both hydraulic retention times, the mechanism of styrene removal in the membrane bioreactor was exclusively through biodegradation. The lower contribution of stripping to overall styrene removal obtained in the present work compared to that previously reported for traditional activated sludge processes was attributed to the higher Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) that can be achieved in a membrane bioreactor. Decrease of hydraulic retention time from 24 h to 18 h also resulted in significant increase in the rate of membrane fouling as quantified by transmembrane pressure gradiant. This was attributed to decrease in extracellular polymeric substance concentration which resulted in sludge deflocculation. As a consequence, the particle size distribution of the activated sludge shifted to lower mean particle sizes and the increase in the percentage of smaller particles resulted in increase in the rate of membrane fouling.

Keywords: Activated sludge, Biodegradation, Immersed membrane bioreactor, Styrene, Volatile organic compound

Introduction

The most common method employed for degradation of hazardous volatile organic compound (VOC) chemicals such as styrene in petrochemical wastewaters is the conventional activated sludge process (CASP). The treatment of petrochemical wastewaters using CASP usually results in effluents which meet the industrial standards for the disposal of wastewaters (Qin et al., 2007). However, the CASP have two major disadvantages. The first is that during the aeration of the activated sludge, a significant quantity of VOCs can transfer to the air phase exiting these processes (Hsieh, 2000; Lin et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2008). Since styrene has been classified as a potential human carcinogen and occupational exposure limits have been set for it (USEPA, 1994), this means that the gaseous effluent from activated sludge plants requires further treatment. The second disadvantage is that the effluent from these units does not usually have the standard necessary to enable its use as process water (Qin et al., 2007).

According to the paper by Hsieh (2000), the removal of VOCs from industrial wastewaters during CASP occurs by the three mechanisms of stripping, adsorption and biodegradation. According to the model developed in this paper, the percentage contribution of biodegradation to overall styrene removal can be increased through the increase of either Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) or the biological rate constant for biodegradation. The latter can be achieved through the use of activated sludge previously adapted to styrene, whereas the former can be attained through the use of novel processes such as membrane bioreactor (MBR).

MBR is an activated sludge process in which the sedimentation stage has been replaced with membrane filtration. In this way, both a high MLSS and a very good quality effluent, suitable for process applications or may be even drinking water, can be achieved (Judd, 2006; Qin et al., 2007; Tam et al., 2007). The concentration of MLSS in MBRs is reported to be typically 3-5 times that of CASPs (Qin et al., 2007).

There have been several reports on the application of MBR process to the treatment of petrochemical wastewaters. Qin et al. (2007) claimed that a MBR process with an hydraulic retention time (HRT) as low as 13 hours can be used to treat a petrochemical wastewater and to obtain an effluent that meets discharge standard. Chang et al. (2006 a) claimed that BOD and COD removal efficiencies obtained with a MBR process used for the treatment of Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-styrene (ABS) industrial wastewater is higher than that which could be achieved with a CASP.

A drawback of the use of MBRs, compared to that of CASPs, is the possibility of membrane fouling, which, through decrease of the membrane flux, can severely reduce the output from such processes (Judd, 2006). Previous works have shown that the membrane fouling is affected by factors such as HRT, sludge retention time and biomass characteristics such as floc diameter, morphology, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), soluble microbial product (SMP), and viscosity (Ng and Hermanowicz, 2005; Massae et al., 2006; Meng et al., 2007). Therefore, the increase in MLSS, which is necessary to reduce the contribution of stripping to VOC removal in a CASP (Hsieh, 2000), can also aggravate the membrane fouling in a MBR.

A common method of alleviating membrane fouling in both submerged and crossflow MBRs (Ndinisa et al., 2006; Psoch and Schiewer, 2006; Meng et al., 2008) is air scouring of the membrane; this means that in MBRs, air sparging has the dual roles of supplying the mixed bacterial culture in activated sludge with oxygen and reducing the formation of the foulants on the membrane. For this reason, the air rates reportedly used in MBRs processes is usually higher than that used in CASPs. However, according to the model of CASP developed by Hsieh (2000), increase in air rate in CASP can result in significant increase in the rate at which VOCs, such as styrene, are removed by the stripping mechanism.

In the present study the performance of MBR in terms of COD and styrene removal and stripping of styrene was studied and compared with findings of previous work with the same or similar wastewaters in MBR and traditional activated sludge processes. Additionally, the membrane fouling during the operation of the MBR was characterized.

Materials and Methods

Seeding organisms

Activated sludge, used as inoculum in MBR runs, was obtained from the sludge return line at the CASP of Tabriz petrochemical company. After transfer to the laboratory, the activated sludge was frozen using 15% w/w glycerol and was stored. Before inoculating the MBR, the frozen activated sludge was thawed and grown under aeration in the above-mentioned media without styrene for a few days.

Feed wastewater characteristics

The synthetic wastewater employed in this study was formulated to simulate petrochemical industrial wastewater in terms of COD and styrene concentrations and had the following composition [Table - 1]. This resulted in a wastewater which had a COD of 1500 mg/L and contained the elements required for proper growth of the mixed bacterial population in activated sludge.

Experimental setup

A schematic diagram of the MBR experimental rig used in the present study is presented in [Figure - 1]. The bioreactor consisted of a 5L acrylic tank, in which a Kubota (Kubota corporation, Japan) flat sheet membrane was immersed. Specifications of the membrane is given in [Table - 2]. The gap between the membrane and the wall was set at 7mm to obtain efficient scouring of the membrane by the air flow (Ndinisa et al., 2006). Air was introduced at a distance of 10cm beneath the membrane module through a stainless steel tube containing ten 2mm nozzles. The output of level sensor, pressure transmitter, Dissolved Oxygen (DO)-meter, pH-meter, and thermometer were connected to a data acquisition system to enable monitoring of the process parameters via PC. Effluent turbidity was determined by using Hach 2100N Turbidimeter. The inlet and outlet peristaltic pumps were controlled (i.e. turned on or off) based on the data supplied by the level sensor. The synthetic wastewater was stored in a feed tank prior to being pumped to the MBR. In order to avoid the escape of styrene to the gas phase of the tank, the tank was separated into two parts using a 2cm thickness Teflon sheet; the bottom section was completely filled with the synthetic media, whereas a container full of styrene was placed in the upper part. Using a feed tank with this design ensured that the concentration of styrene in the inlet to MBR throughout its operation did not deviate from 50mg/L by more than 0.1 %. This system operated at solid retention time of 25 day and HRT=24h and 18h and two SRTs were allowed to pass before data pertaining to the treatment performance was obtained. The DO concentration were HRT of 24 and 18 h respectively .

Analytical methods

Styrene concentrations were analyzed by using a gas chromatograph (Younglin) equipped with a Helium Ionization Detector and a 50m long capillary column. The oven temperature was maintained at 70°C for 1min and raised to 140°C at 10°C/min. The temperatures of the injector and the detector were fixed at 200°C and 240°C, respectively. styrene concentration in the liquid phase was estimated using headspace method. Each gas and liquid sample was measured three times. The MLSS, MLVSS and COD were estimated according to Standard Methods (APHA, AWWA and WEF,1998). SMP and EPS were measured SMP and EPS were measured using the method described by Chang et al. (1999) according to the following procedure: The mixed liquor of activated sludge was centrifuged in order to remove the bulk solution (3200 rpm, 30 min). The supernatant was separated and was named as "SMP" The remaining pellet was resuspended with 0.9% NaCl solution This solution was heated at 100 °C for 1 h. The extracted solution was centrifuged again under the same operating condition as mentioned above. The supernatant obtained in this way was named as the "EPS solution". In this work, the sum of total proteins and polysaccharide was considered to represent the total amount of EPS and SMP because they are the dominant components typically found in extracted EPS and SMP. Protein fraction of SMP and EPS was measured using the folin phenol reagent method (Lowry et al.,1951), whereas the corresponding polysaccharide fraction was determined by phenol-sulfuric acid method (Dubois et al., 1956).

The sludge flocs were examined by light microscopy. The floc size distribution was determined by a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 instrument with a detection range of 0.02- 2000μm.

Results

COD and styrene removal performance of the MBR system

The results of the present study [Table - 3] shows that MBR operated at SRT of 25 days and HRT in the range 18-24 hours gave over 99% removal of COD and styrene from a synthetic wastewater containing 50 ppm styrene with COD of 1500 mg/L. The concentration of styrene in the output air from MBR was consistently below 0.1 ppm.Given the air rate used (7 L/min) the contribution of the stripping mechanism to overall styrene removal at HRT of 18 and 24 hours was 0.3% and 0.4% respectively. After steady state conditions were achieved, the MLSS at HRT of 18 and 24 hours was 5300 mg/L and 4300 mg/L respectively. The corresponding MLVSS values were 5100 mg/L and 4150 mg/L respectively. This gives a ratio of MLSS/MLVSS of 0.96 for both HRTs. Turbidity of the permeate at both HRTs was consistently below the detection limit of the Turbidity meter (< 1 NTU).

Fouling of membrane during operation of the MBR system

Fouling rate inside the MBR during its operation at both HRTs was quantified by monitoring the transmembrane pressure (TMP) values (results not shown). The range of TMP values, as well as the highest rate of rise of TMP with time during the operation of the MBR at HRTs of 18 and 24 hours, is presented in [Table - 4]. The results show a significant increase in the membrane fouling rate when HRT is reduced from 24 to 18 hours.

EPS and SMP

In [Table - 4], the range of total EPS and SMP values obtained during the operation of MBR at HRTs of 18 and 24 hours, is presented. It should be pointed out the values given are the range obtained during the operation of the MBR at the two HRTs and are not steady state values. The results show a significant decrease in the range of EPS values and a slight decrease in the range of SMP values, when HRT was reduced to 18 hours.

Particle size distribution

PSD data are presented in [Figure - 2]. These results show decrease in the mean particle size of the activated sludge when HRT was decreased to 18 hours.

Discussion

COD and styrene removal performance of the MBR system

The results obtained in the present work shows a very good performance of the MBR in treating a styrene containing wastewater since very high overall COD and styrene removal with insignificant volatilization of the toxic styrene were obtained and the effluent had extremely low turbidity.

Comparison of the results obtained in the present work with previous work in which either traditional activated sludge (Namkung and Rittman, 1987; Bhattacharya et al., 1996; Heiseh, 2000; Shokrollahzadeh et al., 2008) or MBR (Change et al., 2006 a,b; Min and Ergas, 2006) processes have been used for treating with VOC containing wastewaters shows a much lower volatilization of a VOC (styrene in this study) compared to other studies [Table - 3]. For example, based on the concentrations of styrene measured in the outlet air after steady state conditions were achieved in the MBR, the contribution of stripping to overall styrene removal at both HRTs was <1%.

In the paper by Hsieh(2000) a model is presented for removal of VOC′s in an activated sludge process. The model is predicts that, attypical operating conditions of an activated sludge process, the contribution of the stripping mechanism to overall styrene removal from the wastewater is around 15%. Also, according to Hsieh (2000) adsorption to activated sludge does not significantly contribute to styrene removal. It can therefore be concluded that in the present study in the MBR, styrene was almost exclusively removed through biological degradation. The

reason for the lower volatilization obtained in MBR compared to an activated sludge process can be understood by comparison of the MLSS data presented in [Table - 3]. This shows that, due to higher SRT (25 days) employed in the MBR compared to that commonly achievable in traditional activated sludge processes, much higher MLSS were obtained in the MBR at both HRTs compared to the corresponding activated sludge process operated at the same HRTs.

The finding of other work in which MBR was used to treat other VOCs in an MBR is also presented in [Table - 3]. These studies include the removal of acrylonitrile monomer from ABS industrial wastewater (Chang et al., 2006b) and a mixture of vinyl acetate-acetaldehyde-buteraldehyde from a synthetic wastewater (Min and Ergas, 2006). In both studies the contribution of stripping mechanism to VOC removal from the liquid phase was higher than that obtained in the present work, although still lower than the corresponding values that are obtained in a traditional activated sludge process. The better performance, in terms of reduced volatilization of a VOC, obtained in the present study relates to the lower solubility and/or lower volatility of styrene compared to the VOCs employed in the previous studies. However, the comparison of VOC removal data obtained in the present work or previously reported for MBR processes with those reported for an activated sludge process [Table - 3] shows that the use of MBR for treating VOC containing industrial wastewaters will result in lower volatilization compared to the treatment of the same wastewater in an activated sludge process. As reported in [Table - 3], the COD removal obtained the MBR studies for both synthetic and real petrochemical wastewaters is also usually higher than those reported for activated sludge processes; this can again be attributed to the higher MLSS that can be achieved inside an MBR.

Another point concerns the toxic effect of styrene on biomass performance and properties. Toxic aromatic VOCs such as styrene are common constituents of petrochemical wastewaters. The measurements (results not presented) of specific oxygen uptake rates (SOUR) for the bacterial community in the seed activated sludge and activated sludge during the operation of the MBR at the highest OLR (corresponding to the lower HRT employed in the present study) showed no effect of styrene at this loading rate on the performance of bacterial community in activated sludge inside MBR. However, in previous studies toxics effects of styrene on bacterial activity has been reported. For example, Kuhlmeier (1989) has reported that styrene imposes significant bacterial inhibition at concentrations higher than 100 mg/L. Kinetic studies of styrene biodegradation in the liquid phase using both pure and mixed bacterial strains have shown that Haldane kinetics can be used to model the styrene biodegradation process in the liquid phase (Jung and Park, 2005; Jorio et al., 2005). Haldane kinetics predicts that below a styrene concentration threshold, increase in styrene concentration increases the rate of styrene biodegradation, whereas at styrene concentrations above this threshold the opposite trend is observed (Shuler and Kargi, 2001). Kinetic studies with the activated sludge inoculums used in the present study also showed that, for the styrene biodegradation by the bacterial community inside this activated sludge, Haldane kinetics is a suitable model and the inhibitory styrene concentration is 21.57mg/L (Babaee et al.2009). Therefore, it is to be expected that at higher OLRs (i.e. lower HRTs or higher concentrations of styrene in the wastewater), styrene might result in the retardation of the activity of the bacterial population in activated sludge inside the MBR; this might result in a lowering of the performance of the MBR process for treating high OLR styrene containing wastewaters. This matter is presently under investigation in the authors′ laboratory.

Fouling of membrane

The results obtained in the present work showed a significant increase in the membrane fouling rate when HRT is reduced from 24 to 18 hours [Table - 3]. The change in morphology from floccular to dispersed was confirmed both by microscopic observation of activated sludge samples from the MBR at the two HRTs, as well PSD curves for the two sludge samples [Figure - 2]; the latter shows shift to smaller particle sizes when HRT was decreased from 24 to 18 hours. This change in morphology can be related to decrease in the EPS concentration [Table - 4], since EPS is one of the factors that cause effective bioflocculation (Ng and Hermanowicz, 2005). This explanation is also confirmed by previous works in MBR (Ng and Hermanowicz, 2005; Massae et al., 2006). Another factor contributing to the formation of dispersed morphology at the lower HRT could be increase in the styrene loading rate, since it has been previously reported that toxic factors can result in deflocculation of activated sludge (Li et al., 1993; Bott and Love, 2001, 2002). Decrease in HRT from 24 to 18 hours resulted in significant increase in the rate of membrane fouling which was attributed to the deflocculation of the activated sludge. According to Bai and Leow (2002) sludge particles having a size smaller than 50μm result in a greater specific cake resistance.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Petrochemical Research and Technology Company (NPC RT) of Iran for their financial support.[38]

References

1.APHA, AWWA, WEF, (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed.,Washington DC, USA  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Babaee, B., Fallah, N., Bonakdarpour, B., Nasernejad, , B.,(2009). Kinetics of styrene biodegradation by an industrial activated sludge. Proceedings of the 6th International Chemical Engineering Congress, 16-20 November 2009, Kish, Iran  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Bai, R., Leow, H. F., (2002). Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater-the effect of system operation parameters. Sep. Purif. Technol., 29 (2):189-198.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Bhattacharya, S.K., Madura, R.L., Dobbs, R.A., Angara, R.V.R., Tabak, H., (1996). Fate of selected RCRA compounds in a pilot-scale activated sludge system .Water. Environ. Res. 68 (3):260-268.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Bott, C. B., Love, N. G., (2001). The Immunochemical detection of stress proteins in activated sludge exposed to toxic chemicals. Water Res, 35 (1): 91-100.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Bott, B.C., Love, N.G., (2002). Investigating a mechanistic cause for activated-Sludge deflocculation in response to shock loads of toxic electrophilic chemicals. Water Environ. Res, 74 : 306-315.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Chae, S.R., Ahna, Y.T., Kang, S.T., Shin, H.S., (2006). Mitigated membrane fouling in a vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR). J. Membrane Sci, 280 : 572-581.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Chang, J.S., Chang, C.Y., Chen, A.C., Erdei, L., Vigneswaran, S., (2006a). Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of high strength acrylonitrile­butadiene-styrene (ABS) wastewater: effect of hydraulic retention time. Desalination, 191: 45-51.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Chang, C.Y., Chang, J.S., Lin, Y.W., Erdei, L., Vigneswaranb, S., (2006b). Quantification of air stripping and biodegradation of organic removal in acrylonitrile­butadiene-styrene (ABS) industry wastewater during submerged membrane bioreactor operation. Desalination, 191 : 162-168.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Chang, I.S., Lee, C.H., Ahn, K.H., (1999).Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane- coupled activated sludge system: the effect of floc structure on membrane fouling. Sep. Sci. Technol, 34 : 1743-1758.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Cheng, W.H., Hsu, S.K., Chou, M.S., (2008).Volatile organic compound emissions from wastewater treatment plants in Taiwan: Legal regulations and costs of control. J. Environ. Manag, 88 : 1485-1494.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, K., Rebers, P.A., (1956).Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical. Chem, 28 : 350-357.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Hsieh, C.C., (2000).Removal mechanisms of VOCs in an activated sludge process. J. Hazard. Mater, 79 :173-187.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Jorio, H., Brzezinski, R., Heitz, M., (2005). A novel procedure for the measurement of the kinetics of styrene biodegradation in a biofilter. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 80 :796-804.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Judd, S., (2006). The MBR Book Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier, Oxford.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Jung, I.G., Park, C.H., (2005). Characteristics of styrene degradation by Rhodococcus pyridinovorans isolated from a biofilter. Chemosphere, 61: 451-456.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Kuhlmeier, P. D., (1989). Enhanced microbial degradation of styrene in shallow soils and ground water, Proceedings of the Symposium held during the Third IAHS Scientific Assembly, Baltimore, MD, IAHS Publ. no. 185.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Li, D., Ganczarczyk, J.J., (1993).Factors affectingdispersion of activated sludge flocs Water Environ. Res, 65: 258-263.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Lin, T.Y., Sree, U., Tseng ,S.H., Chiu, K.H., Wu, C.H., Lo, J.G., (2004).Volatile organic compound concentrations in ambient air of Kaohsiung petroleum refinery in Taiwan. Atmos. Environ., 38: 4111-4122.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.H., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J., (1951), Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biolo. Chem, 193: 265-275.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Min, K., Ergas, S. J., (2006). Volatilization and biodegradation of VOCs in membrane bioreactor(MBR), Water Air Soil. Pollutant.: Focus 6 :83-96.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Massae΄, A., Spe΄randio, M., Cabassud, C., (2006). Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res, 40: 2405 - 2415.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Meng, F., Shi, B., Yang, F., Zhang, H., (2007a). Effect of hydraulic retention time on membrane fouling and biomass characteristics in submerged membrane bioreactors. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng., 30: 359-367.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Meng, F., Yang, F., (2007b). Fouling mechanisms of deflocculated sludge, normal sludge, and bulking sludge in membrane bioreactor. J. Membrane Sci., 305: 48-56.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Meng, F., Chae, S.R., Drews, A., Kraume, M., Shind, H.S., Yanga, F., (2009). Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res., 43 : 1489-1512.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Meng, F., Yang, F., Shi, B., Zhang, H., (2008). A comprehensive study on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors operated under different aeration intensities. Sep. Purif. Technol., 59: 91-100.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Ndinisa, N. V., Fane, A. G., Wiley, D.E., (2006).Fouling control in a submerged flat sheet membrane system: Part I - - Bubbling and Hydrodynamic Effects. Sep. Sci. Technol., 41 : 1383-1409.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Ng, H.Y, Hermanowicz, S. W , (2005). Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics. Water Res., 39: 981-992.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Namkung, E., Rittmann, B.E., (1987). Estimating volatile organic compound emissions from publicly owned treatment plant. J. Water Pollutant. Contr. Fed. 59: 670-678.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Pavoni, J.L., Tenney, M.W., Echelberger, Jr., W.F., (2006). Bacterial exocellular polymers and biological flocculation. J. Water Pollutant. Contr. Fed., 44 (3): 414-431.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Psoch, C., Schiewer, S., (2006). Resistance analysis for enhanced wastewater membrane filtration. J. Membrane Sci., 280 :284-297.  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Qin, J.J., Oo, M.H., Tao, G., Kekre, K.A., (2007). Feasibility study on petrochemical wastewater treatment and reuse using submerged MBR. J. Membrane Sci., 293 : 161-166.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Shokrollahzadeh, S., Azizmohseni, F., Golmohammad, F., Shokouhi, H. , Khademhaghighat ,F. (2008). Biodegradation potential and bacterial diversity of a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant in Iran. Bioresource Technol., 99: 6127-6133.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Shuler, M.L., Kargi, F., (2001). Bioprocess Engineering, Second Edition, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Tam, L.S., Tang, T.W., Lau, G.N., Sharma, K.R., Chen, G.H., (2007).A pilot study for wastewater reclamation and reuse with MBR/RO and MF/RO systems. Desalination, 202 : 106-113.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.United States Environmental Protection Agency, (1994) -OPPT Chemical Fact Sheets (Styrene Fact Sheet) http:// www.epa.gov/chemfact/styre-sd.txt.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Viero, A. F., Sant'Anna Jr, G. L., Nobrega, R., (2007) .The use of polyetherimide hollow fibres in a submerged membrane bioreactor operating with air backwashing. J. Membrane Sci. 302 : 127-135.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Visvanathan, C., Thu, L.N., Jegatheesan, V., Anotai, J., (2005). Biodegradation of pentachlorophenol in a membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 183: 455-464.  Back to cited text no. 38    

Copyright 2010 - Iran Journal of EnvironHealth Sci Eng


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[se10013t3.jpg] [se10013f2.jpg] [se10013f1.jpg] [se10013t4.jpg] [se10013t2.jpg] [se10013t1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil