About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News  Donations

Iranian Journal of Environmental Health, Science and Engineering
Iranian Association of Environmental Health (IAEH)
ISSN: p-ISSN: 1735-1979
Vol. 7, Num. 3, 2010, pp. 307-312

Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2010, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 307-312

Survey On Degradation Rates Of Trichloroethylene In Aqueous Solutions By Ultrasound

1S. Dobaradran, 1R. Nabizadeh, *1,2A. H. Mahvi , 1,2A. R. Mesdaghinia, 1K. Naddafi, 1M. Yunesian, 1N. Rastkari,1Sh. Nazmara

1Center for Environmental Research and Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2National Institute of Health Research, Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran

*Corresponding author: E-mail:, Tel: +98 21 88 95 49 14

Received 18 May 2010; revised 11 August 2010; accepted 20 August 2010

Code Number: se10035


Sonochemical degradation of different compounds such as chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons is one of the recent advanced oxidation processes and it may be effective for removing low concentration organic pollutants from aqueous streams. Trichloroethylene (TCE) is one of these compounds that is mainly used as a degreaser. Important studies about TCE sonolysis have been focused at millimolar levels and natural pH, but in this study the ultrasonic degradation of TCE at different micromolar initial concentrations (30, 300 and 3000 µg/L) and 4 different initial pH with a 35 kHz frequency was investigated. Furthermore, the degradation of TCE by ultrasound with different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide at pH= 7 was also performed. Gas chromatography with FID detector was used for analyses of TCE. Results showed that the degradation of TCE increased with decrease in the initial concentration of TCE from 3000 to 30 µg/L at all initial pH. Initial pH of solution and different concentrations of H2O2 did not affect significantly the TCE destruction.

Key words: Trichloroethylene; Ultrasound; Hydrogen peroxide; Degradation rate


Chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs) may enter into water bodies and contaminate water sources and affect human health in a direct or indirect manner. Many efforts have reported in removal of organic material from aqueous solutions (Mesdaghinia et al., 2005; Mahvi et al., 2007; Zazouli et al., 2007; Naghizadeh et al., 2008). TCE is one of CAHs that has been mainly used as a degreaser (Watts, 1998). It is a volatile, colorless and nonflammable liquid and has different uses in many industries such as electronic and electrical, fabricated metal products and transport operations (ATSDR, 1995). The summary of TCE physical properties is shown in Table 1 (Gist and Burg, 1995).

Because of improper handling and disposal practices, TCE has been frequently detected in groundwater. TCE is considered as a probable carcinogenic chemical (Group B2) to human (Wartenberg et al., 2000). It has also many other adverse effects on human and animals (CEPA, 1993; Gist and Burg, 1995; Wartenberg et al., 2000). Due to its serious health effects, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US.EPA) has set the maximum contaminant level (MCL) and maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) for TCE as 0.005 mg/L and zero, respectively.

Most conventional treatment processes such as coagulation, sedimentation, precipitative softening, filtration and chlorination are not efficient in removal of TCE (Russell et al., 1992). Air stripping can induce secondary air pollution because of the phase shift of TCE. Although membrane processes and granular activated carbon are used most often, but they are expensive and transfer the contaminant to another phase (Nutt et al., 2006). Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) degrade volatile organic carbon (VOC) such as TCE into less harmful compound at near ambient temperature and pressure by using hydroxyl radical (Andreozzi et al., 1999).

Sonolysis is also considered as an advanced oxidation process because of hydroxyl radicals generation by pyrolysis of water molecules during cavitation (Shemer and Narkis, 2005). Cavitation of gas bubbles in liquid will result to local temperatures of 2000°K (Hart et al., 1990) up to 5000°K (Flint and Suslick, 1991). There are three reaction zones in aqueous sonochemistry: i) the bulk phase, ii) the gaseous region and iii) the gas–liquid interface region (Riesz et al., 1990). De Visscher et al. confirmed that the dominating degradation mechanism at millimolar is pyrolysis (De Visscher et al., 1996) and at low micromolar level, OH° is also another important degradation mechanism (Dewulf et al., 2001).

There are many reports about pollutant sonication especially at millimolar concentrations (Maleki et al., 2005; Nasseri et al., 2006; Dehghani et al., 2007a; Dehghani et al., 2007b; Maleki et al., 2007; Mahvi, 2009a; Mahvi et al., 2009b; Maleki, et al., 2010), but there are few reports regarding TCE degradation by sonolysis at micromolar concentration especially with a 35 kHz frequency ultrasound. In this work, the degradation rates of TEC at different micromolar concentration levels and different pH levels with using an ultrasound bath at 35 kHz frequency and also combined with different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide were studied. Degradation kinetics were also determined.

Table 1

Materials and Methods

Experiment setup

This experimental study was conducted at the Department of Environmental Health Engineering at Tehran University of Medical Sciences between January and April 2010. Ultrasound bath of the solution in a 150 mL glass reactor (Fig. 1) was performed with a 35 kHz frequency and power value of 500 W (Table 2).

Aqueous solutions of different concentrations of TCE (30, 300 and 3000 µg/L) were prepared by dissolving TCE (Merck Co., Germany) in deionized water.

Two different concentrations (10 and 50 mg/L) of H2O2 (Merck Co., Germany) were also prepared in deionized water and H2O2 concentration was measured with iodometric titration. The head space in the reactor was almost zero. The temperature was monitored during sonication and was maintained constant at 25°C by cooling water. Samples were taken from the reactor at given reaction times (15, 30, 45, 90, 105 and 120 min).


Samples were analyzed with a Varian CP–3800 (Australia) GC, equipped with FID detector. The GC was fitted with a CP–Sil & CB capillary column (30 m; 0.32 mm id; 0.25 µm film thickness). Injector temperature was 150°C, initial oven temperature was 35°C (held for 1 min) and increased to 100°C at a rate of 16°C/min, held for 5 min. The inlet was operated in 20 % split mode. Helium (99.999%) was used as carrier gas at 1 mL/min.

Figure 1

Data analysis was carried out using the SPSS statistical package (version 11.5) and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the data at the significant level of 0.05.

Table 2


Aqueous solution with initial concentrations of TCE (30, 300, and 3000 µg/L) at different pH were sonicated. Typical trend of ln C/C0 versus time for TCE at different initial concentrations and pH are shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 4.

First order degradation constants are presented in Table 3. Hydroxyl radicals generated in water by ultrasonication can produce H2O2 in the system. The addition of H2O2 did not significantly alter the degradation rate of TCE (Table 4).


With increasing the initial concentration of TCE, the apparent first order rate constants decreased, indicating non–elementary nature of the sonochemical reactions. This dependence of degradation rate constants on initial concentration was similar to other studies (De Visscher et al., 1996; Hoffmann et al., 1996; Jiang et al., 2002; Zhang and Hua, 2000). At high concentration levels (millimolar) pyrolysis is the dominating degradation mechanism (De Visscher et al., 1996) and degradation does not occur in the bulk solution; at low concentration levels (micromolar) an additional removal mechanism may be proposed and free radical reactions in the bubble-liquid interfacial region are likely to be important (Drijvers et al., 1996).

Degradation constants of TCE at pH= 3 increased by a factor of 4.11, if the initial concentration of TCE was reduced from 3000 µg/L to 30 µg/L. At pH= 5, 7 and 11, degradation constants of TCE also increased by 3.40, 4.08 and 3.66, respectively (Table 3). It is reported that degradation rate of TCE sonication with a frequency of 520 kHz, was in the range of 0.0208-0.0455 at initial TCE levels from 5 to 2000 µM ( Drijvers et al., 1999).

The reaction of TCE with OH° radicals becomes more likely at lower concentrations, resulting in an increase in the significance of degradation by OH°. Also, lower initial of TCE results in higher specific heat ratio, enhancing the temperature in the cavitation, so the pyolysis of both TCE and water would be faster (Gonzàlez-Garcia et al., 2010). Goel et al., have reported that TCE degradation rate decreased when initial levels of TCE reduced from 150 ppm to 50 ppm (Goel et al., 2004).

As shown in Figs. 2, 3, 4, no significant effect of initial pH on TCE degradation was observed. Varying the initial pH of solution did not affect the TCE destruction. Other researchers have also reported that initial pH has no significant effect on the degradation of organic compound due to sonication (Bhatnagar and Cheung, 1994).

Under the influence of sonication, hydrogen peroxide decomposes as shown below (Elkanzi and Kheng, 2000):

On one side where H2O2 acts as a free radical source by the dissociation process, it also acts as the scavenger of the generated radicals as shown above. There is possibly a maximum level of hydrogen peroxide beyond which the improvement in the degradation rate is decreased. Although the high concentration of H2O2 was never achieved in this study. In a study at two different concentrations of H2O2 (115 and 230 ppm), sonication of TCE at initial level of 50 ppm had no significant effect.

Finally it can be said that the sonolysis of TCE was performed under various experimental conditions such as initial concentration, pH and concentration of H2O2. When the initial concentration of TCE is decreased, the degradation rate for TCE increased, but initial pH of solution and H2O2 at different concentrations (10 and 50 mg/L) did not affect the TCE destruction.


The authors are grateful to the Center for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences for the financial support as well as all laboratory staffs of Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.


  1. Andreozzi, R., Caprio, V., Insola, A., Marotta, R., (1999). Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery. Catal.Today., 53: 51-59.
  2. ATSDR., (1995). Toxicological profile for trichloroethylene, U.S Department of Health & human services.
  3. Bhatnagar, A., and Cheung, H.M., (1994). Sonochemical destruction of chlorinated C1 and C2 volatile organic compound in dilute aqueous solution. Environ.Sci.Technol., 28: 1481-1486.
  4. CEPA (Canadian Environmental Act), (1993). Priority substances list assessment report: trichloroethylene. Environment Canada, Health Canada.
  5. Dehghani, M.H., Mahvi, A.H., Jahed, G.R., Sheikhi ,R., (2007a). Investigation and evaluation of ultrasound reactor for reduction of fungi from sewage.  Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B., 8 : 493-497.
  6. Dehghani, M.H., Mahvi, A.H., Najafpoor, A.A., Azam ,K., (2007b). Investigating the potential of using acoustic frequency on the degradation of linear alkylbenzen sulfonates from aqueous solution.  Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A., 8 : 1462-1468.
  7. De Visscher, A., Vane Eenoo, P., Drijvers, D., Van Langenhove, H., (1996). Kinetic model for the sonochemical degradation of monocyclic aromatic compound in aqueous solution. J.Phys.Chem., 100: 11636-11642.
  8. Dewulf, J., Van Langenhave, H., De Visscher, A., Sabbe, S., (2001). Ultrasonic degradation of trichloroethylene and chlorobenzene at micromolar concentrations: Kinetics and modeling. Ultrason. Sonochem., 8: 143-150.
  9. Drijvers, D., De Baets, R., De Visscher, A., Van Langenhave, H., (1996). Sonolysis of trichloroethylene in aqueous solution: volatile organic intermediates. Ultrason.Sonochem., 3: 583-590.
  10. Drijvers, D., Van Langenhave, H., Nguyen Thi Kim, L., Bray, L., (1999). Sonolysis of an aqueous mixture of trichloroethylene and chlorobenzene. Ultrason.Sonochem., 6: 115-121.
  11. Elkanzi, E.M., and Kheng, G.B., (2000). H2O2/UV degradation kinetics of isoprene in aqueous solution. J.Hazard.Mater., B73: 55-62.
  12. Flint, E.B., and Suslick, K.S., (1991). The temperature of cavitation. Science., 253: 1397.
  13. Gist ,G.L., and Burg, T.M., (1995). Trichloroethylene–a review of the literature from a health effects perspective. Toxicol Ind Health., 11: 253-307.
  14. Goel , M., Hongqiang, H., Mujumdar, A.S., Ray, M. B., (2004). Sonochemical decomposition of volatile and non-volatile organic compounds-a comparative study. Water Res., 38: 4247-4261.
  15. Gonzàlez-Garcia, J., Verónica, S., Igna, T., Diez-Garcia, M.I., Esclapez, M.D., Louisnard, O., (2010). Sonochemical treatment of water polluted by chlorinated organocompounds. A review. Water., 2: 28-74.
  16. Hart, E.J., Fischer, C.H., Henglein ,A., (1990). Sonolysis of hydrocarbons in aqueous solution. Radiat.Phys.Chem., 36: 511.
  17. Hoffmann, M.R., Hua, I., Hochemer ,R., (1996). Applications of ultrasonic degradation of chemical contaminants in water. Ultroson.Sonochem., 3: S163-S172.
  18. Jiang, Y., Petrier, C., Waite, T.D., (2002). Kinetics and mechanisms of ultrasonic degradation of volatile chlorinated aromatics in aqueous solutions. Ultrasonic.Sonochem., 9: 317-323.
  19. Mahvi, A.H., (2009a). Application of ultrasonic technology for water and wastewater treatment. Iran J.Public Health., 38: 1-17.
  20. Mahvi, A.H., Maleki ,A., Alimohamadi, M., Ghasri, A., (2007). Photo-oxidation of phenol in aqueous solution: Toxicity of intermediates.  Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering., 24 : 79-82.
  21. Mahvi ,A.H., Maleki ,A., Rezaee, R., Safari ,M., (2009b). Reduction of humic substances in water by application of ultrasound waves and ultraviolet irradiation. Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. & Eng., 4 : 233-240.
  22. Maleki, A., Mahvi, A.H., Ebrahimi, R., Zandsalimi, Y., (2010). Study of photochemical and sonochemical processes efficiency for degradation of dyes in aqueous solution. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering., DOI: 10.1007/s11814-010-0261-0.
  23. Maleki, A., Mahvi ,A.H., Mesdaghinia, A.R., Naddafi, K., (2007). Degradation and toxicity reduction of phenol by ultrasound waves. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia., 21 : 33-38.
  24. Mesdaghinia ,A,R., Rafiee, M. T., Vaezi ,F., Mahvi, A.H., (2005). Evaluation of ferric chloride and alum efficiencies in enhanced coagulation for TOC removal and related residual metal concentration. Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2 : 189-194.
  25. Maleki, A., Mahvi, A.H., Vaezi, F.,  Nabizadeh ,R., (2005). Ultrasonic degradation of phenol and determination of the oxidation by-products toxicity. Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2 : 201-206.
  26. Naghizadeh, A., Mahvi, A.H., Vaezi, F., Naddafi ,K., (2008). Evaluation of hollow fiber membrane bioreactor efficiency for municipal wastewater treatment. Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 4: 257-268.
  27. Nasseri, S.,  Vaezi, F.,  Mahvi, A. H.,  Nabizadeh ,R.,  Haddadi, S., (2006). Determination of the ultrasonic effectiveness in advanced wastewater treatment. Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 3 : 109-116.
  28. Nutt, M.O., Heck, K.N., Alvarez, P., Wong, M.S., (2006). Improved Pd-on-Au bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts for aqueous–phase trichloroethylene hydrodechlorination. Appl.Catal. B:Environ., 69: 115-125.
  29. Riesz, P., Kondo, T., Krishna,C.M., (1990). Sonochemistry of volatile and non-volatile solutes in aqueous solution: e.p.r and spin trapping studies. Ultrasonics., 28: 295-305.
  30. Russell, H.H., Mathews, J.E., Sewell, G.W., (1992). EPA Groundwater Issue: TCE removal from contaminated soil and ground water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  31. Shemer, H., and Narkis, N., (2005). Trihalomethanes aqueous solution sono-oxidation. Water Res., 39: 2704-27100.
  32. Wartenberg, D., Reyner, D., Scott, C.S., (2000). Trichloroethylene and cancer: epidemiologic evidence. Environ Health Perspect., 108 suppl 2: 161-76.
  33. Watts, R.J., (1998). Hazardous Waste Source, Pathways, Receptors. Wiley, New York, NY.
  34. Zazouli, M.A., Nasseri ,S., Mahvi, A.H., Mesdaghinia, A.R., Yunecian, M., (2007). Determination of hydrophobic and hydrophilic fractions of natural organic matter in raw water of Jalalieh and Tehranspars water treatment plants (Tehran), Journal of Applied Sciences 7 (18): 2651-2655.
  35. Zhang, G., and Hua, I., (2000). Cavitation chemistry of polychlorinated biphenls: decomposition mechanism and rates. Environ. Sci. Technol., 34: 1529-1534.

Copyright 2010 - Iran Journal of Environ Health Sci Eng

The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[se10035t1.jpg] [se10035f3.jpg] [se10035t2.jpg] [se10035f4.jpg] [se10035f2.jpg] [se10035t3.jpg] [se10035t4.jpg] [se10035f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2019, Site last up-dated on 12-Jun-2019.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Internet Data Center of Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa, RNP, Brazil