|
Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research
Surgical Sciences Research Society, Zaria and Association of Surgeons of Nigeria
ISSN: 1595-1103
Vol. 8, Num. 3-4, 2006, pp. 155-157
|
Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 8, No. 3-4, Jul-Dec, 2006, pp. 155-157
Experience With Ventral Penile Skin Island Flap urethroplasty
I.O. Ntia
and I. A. Mungadi
Department
of SurgeryUsmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto
Request Reprints to Dr IO
Ntia Department of Surgery Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital.
Code Number: sr06037
Abstract
Background: Island flap techniques currently used in
urethroplasty utilize the prepuce and the dorsal penile skin. Our experience
with a one-stage island flap urethroplasty for urethral strictures utilizing
the ventral penile skin is described.
Patients and Method: This is a longitudinal study of seventy six
consecutive patients with impassable and complicated urethral strictures
treated using this technique over a seven-year period. Sixty were bulbous
while sixteen were bulbomembranous urethral strictures. Following operation
the patients were assessed using urine flow rates, urethrograms and some
urethroscopy. Restrictures were successfully reoperated.
Results: Sixty-eight
patients (89.5%) had satisfactory voiding with good urine stream without
complication at one year after operation. Five patients (6.6%) had restricture
and three (3.9%) others had urethral bagginess and postmicturition dribbling.
The overall complication rate was 10.5%. At three years after initial operation
and reoperation seventy-five patients (98.7%) were voiding satisfactorily.
There was one complete failure, no death.
Conclusion: This technique has produced satisfactory results
compared with other similar techniques in current use. Further work is required
to make valid conclusions about the value of this procedure.
Key words: Urethral stricture, Ventral penile skin, , Urethroplasty.
Introduction
Penile
and preputial skin have been used for one-stage urethral reconstruction with
excellent functional and cosmetic results in the past three decades 1,2,3.
Urethroplasty is generally reserved for those patients who have failed to
respond adequately to simple instrumentation those with complicated and
complex strictures and those with dense impassable strictures 2,4.
Intraluminal coil stenting of strictures may offer temporary benefit in some
strictures that fail to respond to instrumentation 5,6.
Urethroplasty, therefore, still remains the last hope of the urethral cripple. Penile
and preputial island skin flap techniques described so far utilize the dorsal
penile skin and prepuce. The dorsally based flap is rotated ventrally to reach
the site of urethral defect. We describe here a one-stage island flap
technique utilizing the ventral penile skin flap and a ventrally based pedicle
for the repair of urethral strictures. This is a longitudinal study of our
first consecutive 76 patients operated with this modification.
Patients
and Method
Between
Jan. 1996 and Dec. 2002 seventy-six patients were treated using this technique
in the Urology unit of U.D.U.T.H., Sokoto. They were aged between 7 and 56
years. The mean age was 41 years. The causes of the urethral strictures
included infection (44.7%), trauma (47.4%) and instrumentation (7.9%). The causes
are summarized on Table 1. All the patients were referred to the unit for
failed repeated instrumentation, and for, impassable and complicated urethral
strictures. Table II is a list of other some clinical features associated with
the e strictures. All patients had suprapubic catheters before repair. The
operative technique is essentially similar to that used for dorsal transverse
penile island skin flap urethroplasty described by Duckett and Quartey 1,2,9.
In this case, however, the incision, flap and pedicle are ventral. In the mid
line of the ventral transverse flap pedicle is the frenula artery. The
stricture is exposed in the same manner and then the flap is designed to fit.
The flap is transferred to the site of stricture through the extended flap
incision as appropriate. The sites of the strictures are summarized on Table III. The length of the grafts used ranged from 3.5 to 7.5cm and the width from
2.5cm to 3.5cm. There were 31 ventral oblique flaps and 27ventral transverse flaps; 18 were ventrolateral
flaps. The lengths of flaps are summarized on Table IV. In 62 patients the
ventral penile skin flap was utilized as a patch; in 14 patients the patch was
partially tubulised to bridge the defect. To facilitate skin closure in some patients
the sub-coronal skin incision is extended around the penis and the skin
mobilized to create Byars flaps (4) to effect skin closure.
Post-operatively the patients were seen at 2 weeks, 8 weeks and thereafter
every 3months. Those patients with diminishing
urine stream had repeated assessments
for.re-do
surgery.
Results
Sixty-eight
patients (89.5%) had satisfactory result at one year follow up with acceptable
cosmetic appearance, good urine stream and no complication. There was
restricture in five patients (6.6%) and bagginess and postmicturition dribbling
in three (3.9%) patients. There was erectal dysfunction in one patient, that
lasted about 3 months. The results of operation are summarized on Table V.
The total complication rate was 10.5%. After the complications have been dealt
with, seventy-five (98.7%) patients were voiding satisfactorily. Five (6.0%)
patients required repeated urethral dilatation in the first year and one of
these patients who presented with hypertension and chronic renal failure later
required a permanent vesicostomy. He has developed renal failure and is
currently on haemodialysis. There were no complications causing urethrocutaneous
fistulae and chordee .
Table
I: Causes of Urethral Stricture
Cause |
No. of Patients |
% |
Trauma |
36 |
47.4 |
Infection |
34 |
44.7 |
Instrumentation |
6 |
7.9 |
Total |
76 |
100 |
Table II: Associations of Urethral Strictures
Feature |
No.
of Patients |
% |
Failed Dilatation |
76 |
100 |
Complex Impassable Strictures |
64 |
84.2 |
Urethrocutaneous fistula |
22 |
28.9 |
False passage/Diverticulum |
20 |
26.3 |
Urethral/Calculus |
16 |
21.1 |
Prior Repair |
16 |
21.1 |
impassable structure/simple |
48 |
63.2 |
Multiple strictures |
28 |
36.8 |
Table III Location of
Urethral Strictures
Urethral Site |
No of Patients |
% |
Bulbo-penile |
18 |
23.7 |
Bulbous urethra |
42 |
55.3 |
Bulbo membranous |
16 |
21.0 |
Total |
76 |
100 |
Table IV Length of
Ventral Penile Skin Flaps
Types
of Flap |
No. of Patient (%) |
Graft size (cm) |
Ventral Transverse |
2 (35.5) |
5.0 6.5 |
Ventral oblique |
31 (40.8) 7 |
5.5 7.5 |
Ventrolateral |
18 (23.7) |
3.5 5.5 |
Total |
76 (100) |
3.5 7.5 |
Table
V Outcome of 76 Ventral Penile Flap Urethroplasties
Results |
No. |
% |
At 1 year |
|
|
No. of Patients |
76 |
|
Satisfactory |
68 |
89.5 |
Restricture |
5 |
6.5 |
Postmicturition dribbling |
2 |
2.6 |
Urethral diverticulum |
1 |
1.3 |
Fistula |
0 |
0 |
Total |
8 |
10.5 |
At 3 years |
|
|
Satisfactory |
75 |
98.7 |
Restricture |
1 |
1.7 |
Discussion
The
unique mobility of the penile skin and the pattern of its blood supply permits
a well-vascularized flap to be mobilized from any part of the penile skin to
reach the posterior urethra. The preservation of the vascular pedicle
increases the chances of survival of the skin graft. In this technique, the
island skin graft is mobilized from the ventral aspect of the penis and the
vascular pedicle is fashioned in a manner similar to dorsal skin flaps described
by Duckett (9) and Quartey (1). The axial flap is taken
to the site of repair directly through a short straight subcutaneous tunnel or
an extended ventral skin incisions. There is no rotation of the pedicle as in
the dorsal skin flap procedures. The technique can be utilized for anterior
and posterior urethral strictures. It cannot be utilized in the repair of
hypospadias for obvious reasons. For distal urethral strictures the dorsal and
ventrolateral penile skin flaps are more appropriate. As a result of the
developments in the field of urethroplasty in the last three decades repair
techniques are expected to ensure the restoration of efficient voiding and
freedom from follow-up instrumentation to almost every patient. Any
restricture should cause the surgeon to reflect on the choice of the procedure
and the technique of its performance (4,7,10). In this report,
efficient voiding was restored in sixty-eight patients (89.6%). Five patients
(6.5%) required follow-up instrumentation. There was restricture in one of
these patients. Our long-term failure rate was 1.3%. Definite substitution
procedures are now expected to achieve a long-term failure rate of less than
10% 7. In this preliminary report of our experience, our results
appear very good and quite comparable to results from other existing techniques
of penile skin flap urethroplasty. Our patients included ischaemic
strictures and patients for retrievoplasty. Most of our patients had
complicated or impassable strictures. Our complication rate at one year of
10.5% is quite low compared with other available reports 4,7,10.
Using this technique, we were able to shorten our urethroplasty time on the
average by about 30 minutes. This may be attributed not only to a simpler
technique but also to the increasing experience over the years.This technique
seems to hold promise to become a useful modification in urethral
reconstruction . It will require a larger series to establish its relevance
in current urethroplasty. Urothroplasty still offers the opportunity for
restoration of efficient voiding to patients with complicated and impassable
urethral strictures.
Conclusion
We
have reported the ventral penile skin island flap procedure. The results seem
to be good and long term failure rate appears to be low. Further work is
required in order to make valid conclusions with regard to its value compared
to other techniques of urethroplasty
References
- Quartey JKM: One-stage
Penile/Preputial Cutaneous island flap urethroplasty for urethral stricture: A
preliminary report. J. Urol. 1985; 134: 474 475.
- Osegbe D N and Ntia I O: One
stage Urethroplasty for complicated Urethral Strictures using axial penile skin
island flap: Eur. Urol. 1990; 17 : 79 84.
-
Parsons KF and Abercrombie GF:
Transverse Preputial Island Flap Neo-urethroplasty. Br. J. Urol. 1982; 54:745
747.
- Mundy AR. Results and
Complications of Urethroplasty and its future. Br. J. Urol. 1993; 71: 322
325.
- Milroy EJG, Chapple CR, Eldin A et
al: A new stent for the treatment of Urethral Strictures. Br. J. Urol. 1989;
63: 392 396.
- Yachia D and Beyar M: New Self
expanding, Self-retaining temporary Coil Stent for recurrent Urethral
Strictures near the external sphincter. Br. J. Urol. 1993; 71: 317 321.
- Turner Warwick RT: The management
of Traumatic Urethral Strictures and injuries. Br. J. Surg. 1973; 60: 775.
- Waterhouse
K, Abrams J, Graber H et al: Transpubic approach to the lower urinary tract.
J. Urol, 1973; 109: 486.
- Duckett JW, The island flap
technique for hypospadias repair: Urol. Clin. North Am.,1981; 8:503 512.
- Osegbe DN and Arogundade RA:
Changing Pattern of Urethral Stricture in Nigeira. Nig Postgraduate
Med. Journal. 1994; 1:1 5.
- Byars L.T. Surgical Repair of
hypospadias: Surg. Clin. North Am. 1950; 30:1371.
Copyright 2006 - Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research
|