search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines
African Ethnomedicines Network
ISSN: 0189-6016
Vol. 5, Num. 4, 2008, pp. 421-426

African Journal of Traditional, Complimentary and Alternative Medicines, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2008, pg. 421 - 426

Research Paper                                                         

Antibacterial activity of some folklore medicinal plants from South India

M. Jaya Prakash Goud1*, A. Komraiah2, K. Narasimha Rao1, A.Ragan2, V.S.Raju2, M. A. Singara Charya1

1Department of Microbiology,Kakatiya University-506009,India
2Department of Botany,Kakatiya University-506009,India
*E-mail : jp_muthyala@yahoo.co.in

Code Number: tc08058

Abstract

Antibacterial activity and phytochemical tests of eight whole plant methanol extracts belonging to family Euphorbiaceae were evaluated. In agar well diffusion assay the diameter of inhibition zones ranged from 3-13 mm.  Phyllanthusemblica showed maximum activity of 13 mm.  The MIC and MBC observed were 30-140 mcg/ml and 40-160 mcg/ml, respectively.  P.piscatorum and P.emblica showed the lowest MIC (30 mcg/ml), P.emblicathe lowest MBC (40 mcg/ml) and thus an effective inhibitor of the tested bacteria. Alkaloids, saponins and tannins were detected in 7 out of 8 tested plants.

Key words: Plant extracts, Antibacterial activity, MIC, MBC, Phytochemical tests

Introduction

Finding healing powers in plants is an ancient idea.  There is an evidence that Neanderthals living 60,000 years ago in present day Iraq used plants such as hollyhock  (Stock, 1988) as medicines.  These plants are still widely used in ethnomedicine around the world.  It is estimated that there are 250,000 to 500,000 species of plants on earth .  A relatively small percentage (1 to 10%) of these are used as food.  It is possible that even more are used for medicinal purposes  (Moerman, 1996). 

Microorganisms have developed resistance to many antibiotics and this has created immense clinical problem in the treatment of infectious diseases (Davis, 1994).  The increase in resistance of microorganisms due to indiscriminate use of commercial antimicrobial drugs encouraged scientists to search for new antimicrobial substances from various sources including medicinal plants (Karaman et al., 2003).  Another driving factor for the renewed interest in past 20 years has been the rapid rate of plant species extinction.

Around 12,000 plant secondary metabolites of antimicrobial importance have been isolated.  These compounds fall in one of the major groups of compounds like phenols, quinones, flavonoids tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids and other mixtures (Schultes, 1978).

Infectious diseases account for high proportion of health problems in the developing countries (Sashi et al, 2003). In India, about 2500 species of plants are used for medicinal purposes and about 90% of the medicinal plantsprovide raw materials for the herbal pharmaceuticals, which are collected from wild habitats. The rich knowledge base of countries like India in medicinal plants and health care has led to the keen interest by pharmaceutical companies to use this knowledge as a resource for research and development programmes in the pursuit of discovering novel drugs (Rajasekharan and Ganeshan, 2002).

An antimicrobial compound arylnaphthalide lignan Justicidin B  was isolated from Phyllanthus piscatorum (Gertsch et al., 2004). Antimicrobial acivities have been repored from Bridelia ferruginea (Kabir et al., 2005; Akinpelu, 2000), Mallotus phillipensis (Taylor et a.l., 1996), Phyllanthus emblica(Panthi and Chaudhary, 2006), Phyllanthus polyphyllus(Ngemenya et al, 2006)and Bridelia species (Irobi et al 1994).  However, several plants are used in India in the form of crude extracts without scientific evidence of efficacy (Ahmed et al., 1998).  At this juncture, it is of interest to determine the scientific basis for the traditional use of these medicinal plants.  The aim of the present study is to reveal the antimicrobial properties and phytochemicals of 8 selected medicinal plants through in vitro investigation. 

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Eight whole plant materials (Table 1) of the family Euphorbiaceae were collected locally or either procured from local traditional healers claiming their efficacies.  Their botanical identities were determined and authenticated.  Samples were deposited in the Botany Department Herbarium of Kakatiya University.  The whole plants were oven dried at 600C for one week, and powdered and stored in airtight containers. 10 g of each of the powdered plant materials were extracted in a soxhlet extractor containing 40 ml of 80% methanol. The resulting extracts were evaporated under reduced pressure. 

Phytochemical tests

Methanolic extracts of the plants were qualitatively analyzed.  Tannins, phenols and steroids were tested as described by Gibbs (1974).  Alkaloids, ellagic acids, iridoids, lignans, methelene dioxy compounds, triterpenoids were tested by standard procedures  (Trease and Evans, 1989). 

Bacterial cultures

Four Gram positive bacteria, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus leuteus, and four gram negative bacteria, Salmonella typhi, Enterobacter aerogens,Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris were used for bioassay.  The pure strains were obtained from microbial type culture collection and gene bank (MTCC), Institute of microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. The organisms were maintained on agar slopes at 4oC and sub cultured for 24hr before use. 

 Bacterial susceptibility testing 

The Agar plate well–diffusion method was used as described by Desta  (2005).  A standardized inoculum 1-2 × 107 cfu/ml 0.5 MC Farland standards was introduced onto the surface of sterile agar plate, and evenly distributed  by using a sterile glass spreader.  Simultaneously, 8 mm wells were cut from the plate using a sterile cork borer.  70µl of extract at a concentration of 50 mcg/ml was introduced into each well. The agar plates were incubated aerobically at 37oC.  After 24hr, the inhibition zones were measured with a ruler and compared with the control well containing only methanol. 30 mcg/ml of ampicillin served as control. 

Determination of MIC and MBC

MICs and MBCs of the extracts were determined as described by Kabir  et al. (2005).  MICs of the extracts were determined by diluting them to various concentrations ranging from 10 to 200 mcg/ml.  Each volume of each extract and nutrient broth were mixed in a test tube and 0.1 ml of standard inoculum (1-2 × 107 cfu/ml) was added to each tube. Control tubes were maintained simultaneously. The tubes were incubated aerobically at 370C for 24 hrs.  The lowest concentration of extract that produced no visible bacterial growth (no turbidity) when compared with control tube was regarded as MIC. MBC was determined by sub-culturing the test dilution onto a fresh agar plate (without extract) and incubated for 24 hr.  The highest dilution that yielded no single bacterial colony was taken as MBC.

Statistical analysis

All the tests were conducted in triplicates.  The data of all the parameters were statistically analyzed and expressed as mean ± S.D.  

Results and Discussion

The profile of eight medicinal plants used in this study is shown in Table 1. 

 Tests were conducted for the presence of  phytochemicals in all of these methanolic extracts (Table 2). Alkaloids, phenols and tannins were detected in all the extracts except that of P. EmblicaP .piscatorum and P. flaccidus which were positive to 9 and 8 phytochemical tests respectively. These results are in parallel to the earlier studies conducted on terpens , alkaloids , lignans , flavonoids and tannins in Phyllathus species (Vongvanich et al, 2000; Houghton, 1999; Lin et al, 1995). The results of the phytochemical tests on  B. ferruginea confirms the studies on the same by Kabir, where he reported the presence of alkaloids, tannins, saponins and flavonoids (Kabir  et al.,

Table -1: Profile of Eight medicinal plants used

Plant species

Activity

Voucher

number

Breynia ramnoids

Anti-convulsant, sedative, Antibacterial

APE 11

Bridelia montana

Antibacterial, skin cleanser

APE 12

Bridelia ferruginea

Antibacterial, Antifungal, Anti-spasmatic

APE 13

Mallotus phillipensis

Urolithotriptie, Antibacterial

APE 14

Phyllanthus emblica

Antidiabetic, antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-viral, immunomodulatary

APE 15

 Phyllanthus flaccidus

Anti-edematic, anti-dysentry antimicrobial

APE 16

Phyllanthus Polyphyllus

Anti-inflammatory, sedative, anti-bacterial

APE 17

Phyllanthus piscatorum

Antibacterial, anti-dysentery, immunomodulatory.

APE 18

Table 2: Results of phytochemical tests

Plants

AL

EA

IR

LI

MDC

ST

TA

TT

pH

B.ramnoids

++

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

++

B.montana

++

-

+

-

+

+

++

-

++

B.ferruginea

++

++

++

+

+

+

+

++

++

M.phillipensis

++

-

-

++

-

+

+

+

++

P.Emblica

+++

+

+

+

-

-

++

+

++

P.flaccidus

++

+

+

-

+

++

+++

++

+++

P.Polyphyllus

++

+++

-

-

-

+

++

-

+

P.piscatorum

+++

+

+

+++

+

+

+++

+

++

AL – Alkaloids, EA – Ellagic acids, IR – Iridoids, LI – Lignans, MDC – Methelene dioxy compounds, ST – Steroids, TA – Tannins, TT – Triterpenoids, PH – Phenols,
+++  =  High Amount; ++ = Moderate Amount; + = Low Amount; -  Absent

  

Table 3: Antibacterial activity of the crude plant extracts by well diffusion method

Plants

B.st

S.A

B.S

M.l

S.t

E.a

P.m

P.v

B.ramnoids

--

--

5 ± 0.2

-

-

4 ± 0.2

-

-

B.montana

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

B.ferruginea

-

-

8 ± 0.2

8 ± 0.1

-

8 ± 0.2

8 ± 0.1

10 ± 0.1

M.phillipensis

-

3 ± 0.1

3± 0.1

3± 0.2

-

3 ± 0.2

3 ± 0.2

-

P.Emblica

-

9± 0.1

10 ± 0.1

10

8 ± 0.1

13 ± 0.2

11± 0.1

13 ± 0.1

P.flaccidus

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P.Polyphyllus

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P.piscatorum

-

6± 0.1

10± 0.2

9 ± 0.2

-

9 ± 0.1

10 ± 0.1

9 ± 0.2

Ampicillin

-

16±0.1

14±0.1

12±0.1

10±0.1

12±0.2

16±0.1

15±0.1

 Key: B.st – Bacillus stearothermophilus, S.a – Staphylococcus aureus, B.s – Bacillus subtilis, M.l– Micrococcus leuteus, S.t – Salmonella typhi, E.a – Enterobacter aerogens, P.m – Proteus mirabilis, P.v. – Proteus vulgaris,
Figures indicate average zone of inhibition (in mm), (-) = No inhibition, Ampicillin = Commercial antibiotic.

Table 4:  Efficacies of crude extracts as compared to standard ampicillin

Plant species

B.st

S.A

B.S

M.l

S.t

E.a

P.m

P.v

B.ramnoids

-

-

36%

-

-

33%

-

-

B.montana

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

B.ferruginea

-

-

57%

65%

-

65%

50%

66%

M.phillipensis

-

19%

22%

25%

-

25%

19%

-

P.Emblica

-

57%

72%

81%

80%

109%

67%

86%

P.flaccidus

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P.Polyphyllus

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P.piscatorum

-

38%

72%

73%

-

73%

61%

57%

Key: B.st – Bacillus stearothermophilus, S.a – Staphylococcus aureus,
B.s – Bacillus subtilis, M.l– Micrococcus leuteus, S.t – Salmonella typhi,
E.a – Enterobacter aerogens, P.m – Proteus mirabilis, P.v. – Proteus vulgaris,
% - Efficacy as compared to ampicillin in inhibiting the bacteria.

Table 5: Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of methanol extracts (mcg/ml)

Plants

B.st

S.a

B.s

M.l

S.t

E.a

P.m

P.v

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

B.ramnoids

135

150

90

105

85

105

75

90

115

130

90

115

130

160

85

130

B.montana

110

130

135

60

70

95

95

115

90

110

110

125

80

105

70

105

B.ferruginea

70

85

95

125

60

85

65

90

85

110

50

75

40

65

75

85

M.phillipensis

95

105

85

100

85

110

70

105

95

120

110

135

90

120

80

95

P.Emblica

95

105

50

65

40

60

50

80

35

45

45

50

30

40

60

80

P.flaccidus

130

160

110

135

90

115

95

135

85

95

85

110

110

125

95

105

P.Polyphyllus

140

155

85

115

95

130

85

105

125

155

80

105

95

120

80

105

P.piscatorum

90

120

75

105

30

55

50

65

80

110

45

65

40

50

70

85

 Key: B.st – Bacillus stearothermophilus, S.a – Staphylococcus aureus, B.s – Bacillus subtilis, M.l– Micrococcus leuteus, S.t – Salmonella typhi, E.a – Enterobacter aerogens, P.m – Proteus mirabilis, P.v. – Proteus vulgaris,
MIC – Minimum inhibitory concentration,  MBC – Minimum bactericidal concentration,;mcg/ml – Microgram per milliliter 

2005).  However,  B. montana revealed the presence of phenols, tannins, alkaloids, ellagic acid and lignans in contrast to the report of Irobi, where he reported the presence of only phenols and tannins (Irobi et al., 1994).  The difference in the findings might be due to the nature of solvent used for extraction which determines the presence or absence of a metabolite in the extract.

Eight whole plant methanol extracts were tested against 4 gram +ve and 4 gram -ve bacteria.  The results of antibacterial activity of the methanol extracts and their efficacies as compared to standard ampicillin are depicted in Tables 3 and 4 respectively.   In agar well diffusion assay, the diameter of inhibition zones ranged from 3-13 mm (Table 3).  P.emblica showed maximum antibacterial activity against E. aerogens (13 mm), Proteus vulgaris (13 mm) and Proteus mirabilis (11 mm) with an efficiency of 109%, 86% and 67% to those of Ampicillin.  Maximum zones of clearance by P. emblica were observed in gram –ve bacteria. Similar results were obtained by Mazumder, where the extract showed significant concentration dependent antibacterial activity particularly against gram –ve microbes (Mazumder et al., 2006). P.emblica showed inhibitory activity against 7 organisms including 4 gram –ve bacteria. Phytochemicals tests revealed the presence of high amounts of alkaloids and also phenols in the extract of P. emblica. Alkaloids (Kabir  et al., 2005) and phenols (Houghton et al., 1999) have been reported to possess antimicrobial activity.

None of the extractsor Ampicillin was active on B.stearothermophilus.  So this bacteria is considered as most resistant towards all the extracts tested.  B. montana, P.flaccidus and P.polyphyllus showed no inhibition. Irobi reported that Bridelia species produced antimicrobial activities ranging from 4-20 mm (Irobi et al., 1994).  This is due to high concentration of 5 mg/ml of extracts tested as compared to 100 µg/ml of extract tested in present study.  This other wise can be stated as significant concentration dependent antibacterial activity (Mazumder et al., 2006).

Lowest antibacterial activity was exhibited by M.phillipensis (3 mm) against 3 gram +ve and 2 gram –ve bacteria.  This confirms the earlier report of Chattopadhyay, where the crude methanol extract was found to be active against S.aureus, B.subtilis and P. mirabilis (Chattopadhyay et al., 2002) .  Taylor reported that bacteria causing diarrhea and dysentery were effectively inhibited by extract of M. phillipensis (Taylor et al, 1996). P. piscatorum showed maximum activity of 10 mm against B. subtilis and P. mirabilis with an efficacy of 72% and 61% respectively as that of standard Ampicillin  (Table 4). Gertsch reported that P. piscatorum had no inhibitory activity against gram +ve bacterial strains (Gertsch et al., 2004) . In this study the extract showed inhibitory activity against 3 gram +ve and 3 gram –ve among the 8 tested bacterial strains. The reason for the difference in activities in both of the findings is supposed to be dependent on plant habitat (Rajakaruna et al., 2002). The antibacterial activity of P .piscatorum might be due to the presence of high amounts of lignans as revealed in phytochemical tests. Lin reported the antimicrobial activity of lignans isolated from Phyllanthus sps (Lin et al., 1995). The inhibitory activity of  B.ferrugineaagainst two gram +ve and three gram -ve bacteria was consistent with the earlier report of Akinpelu where he reported inhibitory activity on seven out of 8 organisms tested (Akinpelu, 2000). Maximum inhibitory zone of 10 mm was noticed as compared to Kabir et al., (2005) with 4.7 and 4.6 mm zones of activity by B.ferruginea.

The MICs and MBCsof the eight extracts is 30-140 mcg/ml and 40-160 mcg/ml, respectively (Table 5) P. piscatorum and P.emblica showed lowest MIC (30 mcg/ml) against B.subtilis and P.mirabilis respectively.  P .emblicashowed the lowest MBC (40 mcg/ml) against P .mirabilis.  This result is similar with that of Onoch, where Phyllanthus species were active against P.mirabilis  (Onoch et al, 2003).  According to Panthi, P. emblicawas more effectivein fresh rather than in dry condition (Panthi and Chaudhary, 2006). So >30 mcg/ml (MIC) and >40 mcg/ml (MBC) can be expected of the same.  This is interesting and such low concentrations could be used in combination with other plant extracts.  P. emblica is one of the best constituents of a well known drug ‘Triphala’ i.e combination of P. emblica, T. chebula and T. bellirica in equal proportion is used to manage stomach disorder. P. polyphyllus with MIC of 140 mcg/ml and P.flaccidus with MBC of 160 mcg/ml showed highest concentrations on B. stearothermophilus, which when compared to MIC of 2 mg/ml and MBC of 6 mg/ml (Ngemenya et al., 2006) is very low in concentration. The antimicrobial activity of these plant species can be attributed by the presence of alkaloids  phenols and tannins (Table 2). It has been reported that Alkaloids, phenols and tannins are plant metabolites well known for antimicrobial activity (Tschesche, 1970).

P .piscatorum, B .ferruginea and P. emblica showed MIC of <100 mcg/ml on all the bacteria tested , so these 3 extracts can be considered to have broad spectrum antibiotic values. This is in parallel with the findings of Kabir et al (2005) at MIC of > 100 mcg/ml for B.ferruginea. The antimicrobial activity of P. piscatorum might be due to arylnaphthalide lignan Justicidin B  (Gertsch, 2004). B.subtilis, M.leuteus and P.vulgaris were inhibited at <100 mcg/ml (MIC) by all the extracts tested.  These 3 bacteria can be treated as sensitive towards all the extracts used.   From Table 5 it is clear that extracts were bacteriostatic at lower concentrations and bactericidal at higher concentrations.

Conclusion

It is evident from the present study that some of the extracts inhibited the tested microorganisms. The extracts were bacteriostatic at lower concentrations and bactericidal at higher concentrations.

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to  S.Girisham, Head, Department of Microbiology for providing the necessary facilities and Mr.Chaeraalu for technical assistance.

References

  1. Ahmed, I., Mehmood, Z and Mohammad, F (1998). Screening of some Indian medicinal plants for their antimicrobial properties. J Ethnopharmacol 62: 183-193.
  2. Akinpelu, D.A. and Olorunmola, F..O. (2000). Antimicrobial activity of Bridelia ferruginea fruit. Fitoterapia 71: 75-76.
  3. Chattopadhyay D, Arunachalam G, Mandal A.B, Sur T.K, Mandal S.C and Bhattacharya S.K (2002). Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity of folkfore: Mallotus Peltatus leaf extract. J  Ethnopharmacol  82: 229-37.
  4. Davis, J. (1994).  Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes.  Science 264: 375-382.
  5. Desta, B (2005). Ethiopian traditional herbal drugs part 11.Antimicrobial activity of 63 medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 100: 168-175.
  6. Gibbs R.D (1974). chemotaxonomy of flowering plants. McGill-Queen’s university press, Nontreal and London vol I: 523-619.
  7. Gertsch J, Niomawe, Gertsch-Roost K. and Sticher O (2004). Phyllanthus Piscatorum, Ethnopharmacological studies on a women’s medicinal plant of the Yanomami Amerindians. J Ethnopharmacol  91: 181-188.
  8. Houghton P.J, Woldemariam T.Z, O’Shea S, Mullen J.E, Rostron T, Bantvala J.E,Walker E, Thyagarajan S.P, Soloman S and Yeap Foo L (1999). The anti-HIV activity of an aqueous extract and polyphenolic compounds of Phyllanthus amarus  J Pharm Pharmacol  51:100.
  9. Irobi O.N, Moon-Yong M & Anderson W.A. and Daramola S.A. (1994). Antimicrobial activity of bark extracts of Bridelia ferruginea (Euphorbiaceae), J. Ethnopharmacol. 43: 185-90.
  10. Kabir O. A, Olukayode O, chidi E O, Christopher C and fasure K.A (2005). Screening of crude extracts of six medicinal plants used in south-West Nigerian unorthodox medicine for anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. Comp Alt Med 5: 6.
  11. Karaman I, Sahin P, Gulluce M, Oguten H, Songul M and Adiguzed, A  (2003).  Antimicrobial activity of aqueous and methanol extracts of Juniperus oxycedrus L.  J Ethanopharmacol 2837: 1-5.
  12. Lin M.J, Lec S.S and Liu K.C.S.C (1995) Phyllamyricins A-C, 3 Novel      Lignans  from Phyllanthus myrtifolius  J Nat  Prod  58: 244-249.
  13. Mazumder A, Mahato A. and Mazumder R (2006). Antimicrobial potentiality of Phyllanthus amarus against drug resistant pathogens. Nat Prod Res. 20: 323-326.
  14. Moerman  D.E (1996)  An analysis of the food plants and drug plants of Native North America. J Ethnopharmacol  52: 1-22.
  15. Ngemenya, Moses N.,James A, Mbah, Pierre Jane and Vincent P.K. Titanji (2006) Antibacterial effects of some Cameroonian medicinal plants against common pathogenic bacteria. Afr J Tra  Comp and Alt Med  2: 84-93.
  16. Onoch P.A, Opegbemi A.O, Kadri O.A, Ajayi K.M and Okorie D.A (2003) Antimicrobial properties of Nigerian Euphorbiaceae. Nigerian J Natural Products Med  7: 9-12.
  17. Panthi M.P and Chaudhary R.P (2006) Antibacterial activity of some selected folklore medicinal plants from west Nepal. Scientific World 4: 205-210.
  18. Rajasekharan P.E and Ganeshan S (2002) Conservation of medicinal plant biodiversity in Indian perspective. J Med Aromatic Pl Sci  24: 132-147.
  19. Rajakaruna N, Harris C and Towers G.H.N (2002)  Antimicrobial activity of plants collected from serpentine outcrops in Srilanka. Pharm biol 40: 235-244.
  20. Sashi Kumar J, Remya M and Janardhan K (2003) Antimicrobial activity of ethnomedicinal plants of Nilgiri Biosphere reserve and Western ghats.  Asian J  Microbial  Biotech  Env Sci  5: 183-185.
  21. Schultes R.E (1978) The Kingdom of plants  In: W.A.R. Thomson (ed.), Medicines from the earth, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, pp 208.
  22. Stock Well C (1988) Natures pharmacy. Century Hutchinson Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
  23. Taylor R.S.L, Edel F, Manandhar N.P and Towers G.H.N (1996)  Antiviral activities of Nepalese medicinal plants. J  Ethnopharmacol 52: 157-163.
  24. Trease,G.E and Evans W.C (1989) A text-book of pharmacognosy. Bailliere Tinall Ltd., London. p53.
  25. Tschesche R (1970) Advances in the chemistry of antibiotic substances from higher plants pharmacognosy and phytochemistry.  In: Proceedings of the 1st international congress, Murich,  Edited by Wagner H, Horharmmer L. Springer – verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York 171: 274-289.
  26. Vongvanich N, Kittakoop P, Kramyu j, Tanticharoen M and Thebtaranonth Y (2000) Phyllanthusols A and B, Cotytoxic norbisabolane glcosides from Phyllanthus acidus skeels. J Org Chem 65: 5420-3.

© Copyright 2008 - African. Journal. Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil