|
Indian Journal of Medical Sciences
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Journal of Medical Sciences Trust
ISSN: 0019-5359 EISSN: 1998-3654
Vol. 57, Num. 7, 2003, pp. 323-328
|
Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, Volume 57, Number 7, July 2003, pp.
323-
328 PRACTITIONERS SECTION
Code Number: ms03009
Books and news
DOCKWAL C. CURRENT MANAGEMENT OF AIDS AND HIV INFECTION
1999, Popular Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai 400 034. pp. 184 Price Rs.
200/-
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) has become one of the greatest
challenges facing mankind today. Students and clinicians need comprehensive
but practical information about HIV and the diseases it causes. This book aims
to provide the necessary overview.
The book is divided into four sections. 1. dealing with general aspects of
HIV infection, such as epidemiology, structure and life cycle of HIV, pathogenesis,
diagnosis diagnosis and opportunistic diseases. 2. dealing with involvement
of various organ systems in AIDS. 3. dealing with therapeutics of AIDS and
use of antiretroviral agents. 4. dealing with prevention of HIV infection in
health-care settings and the AIDS epidemic in India.
This detailed book will be extremely useful for medical students and practicing
clinicians. The book is moderately priced.
FUTURE TRENDS IN VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH
Report of the WHO Study Group
World Health Organization, Technical Report Series, No. 907 2002, vii
+ 85 pages
Since the publication of the report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on
Veterinary
Public Health in 1975, many significant developments have occurred in this
field. The present report of a WHO Study Group re-examines the role and functions
of veterinary public health and its contribution to public health practice
today and in the years to come.
Since 1975, new emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases have acquired global
significance for human health, and have required rapid responses from, and
team-work between, physicians, veterinarians, and biologists. The veterinary
sector has a long and distinguished history in contributing to the maintenance
and promotion of public health. As health is multidimensional, health policy
and practice should be inter-disciplinary and intersectoral. Therefore, the
contributions of other sectors in particular agriculture, animal health and
production, food industry, education, housing, public works and communications
are vital. Such concerted action is particularly needed in developing countries
with weak infrastructure and limited resources.
This report reviews current and foreseen global changes for their potential
implication on veterinary public health with regards to national and international
policies, management of programmes and training. The report also provides recommendations
for action in these areas.
MEDICINE PRICES:
New survey shows that medicines can be less expensive
Better information on prices, price differences and the factors contributing
to the final cost of a medicine are essential if governments and other medicine
purchasers are to find ways of making medicines more affordable. For this reason,
the World Health Organization (WHO) and Health Action International (HAI) released
Medicine Prices, a pricing manual outlining how to collect data for thirty
widely-used medicines to identify how prices for patients are determined.
Medicine prices vary between countries and regions and historically, relatively
little has been known about how those prices are determined. In developing
countries, where poverty places medicines out of reach of one-third of the
population, people who do have some access sometimes pay more than in industrialized
countries for the same medicine. Most of this money is paid out-of-pocket,
as health insurance is often lacking.
The new manual proposes a price survey methodology, suggests how to analyse
price data, and identifies broad policy options to achieve more affordable
prices. In short, it will allow buyers and procurers of medicines to make more
informed, cost-effective choices, and will contribute to global knowledge on
medicine pricing. The manual offers a new approach to measuring the cost of
medicine. Among other things, it encourages comparison of prices of innovator
brand products with their generic equivalents. In field tests, 30 days of
ulcer treatment with the innovator brand of ranitidine was found to cost the
equivalent of 50 days' wages in Cameroon and 20 days in Kenya, while the generic
ranitidine cost 24 and eight days' wages respectively.
The manual also brings to light the difference between procurement price and
consumer prices. The latter include mark-ups, taxes, tariffs and other charges.
Pilot-testing the manual in Peru, for example showed that local cost add-ons
raised the price of generic ranitidine from $2.90 for 20 tablets (improved
price) to $7.20 (retail price). Even in Brazil where most medicines are domestically
produced, taxes and retail mark-ups typically add over 40% to factory prices.
Analysis of price components allows greater clarity as to whether price differences
originate with manufacturers, local distribution systems, dispensing fees,
taxes and other local factors.
Field tests with the manual in a number of low- and middle-income countries
show, for example that the consumer price of nifedipine, a drug used for hyper-tension,
is six times higher in South Africa than in Brazil, with intermediate prices
found in Ghana and the Philippines. It is not unusual for people in developing
countries to pay more for medicines than consumers in industrialized countries,
both in relation to their income and even in absolute terms. For instance,
in 2000, lamivudine, used in the management of HIV/AIDS, was found on average
to be 20% more expensive in Africa than in ten industrialized countries. Average
income levels in Africa are about 2% of those in the high income industrialized
countries, so
the difference in affordability is severe.
Data from the pilot studies are available on HAI's website at www.haiweb.org/medicine
prices.
745 000 CHILDREN DIE OF MEASLES EACH YEAR, BUT ALL DEATHS ARE PREVENTABLE
THROUGH A NOVEL, COMPREHENSIVE IMMUNIZATION STRATEGY
WHO Backgrounder/5 May 2003
745 000 Children die of measles each year, but all measles deaths are
preventable
using a comprehensive immunization strategy
Problem: Despite the availability of a safe, highly effective and inexpensive
vaccine, measles affects over 30 million children and claims the lives of almost
750 000 each year more than half of them in Africa. Of all the vaccine-preventable
diseases, measles remains the leading killer of children.
Solution: The strategy for measles mortality reduction recommended
by WHO/UNICEF provides children with two opportunities for measles immunization.
The first opportunity is given at nine months of age through the country's
routine immunization delivery system, and a second opportunity is provided
through supplementary immunization activities conducted every three to four
years to ensure that every child is protected.
The comprehensive strategy has been extremely effective in a block of seven
southern African countries. Through its full implementation, Botswana, Lesotho,
Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland and Zimbabwe have reduced measles
deaths to
very low levels since the year 2000.
If implemented correctly the strategy could prevent a further 2.3 million
child deaths in Africa over the next 10 years, markedly reducing the death
toll form measles on the continent.
Global commitments to measles reduction: There are two global goals related
to measles mortality reduction. The 2000 UN Millennium Development Goals include
a target to reduce the under-five mortality by two thirds by 2010. And the
2002 UN General Assembly Special Session on Children (UNGASS) established a
resolution to reduce measles deaths by 50% by the year 2005 compared to 1999
levels.
This year, a resolution to the World Health Assembly, on 24 May,
will ask countries to contribute actively to the achievement of the UNGASS
and Millennium Development targets without further delay.
Funding Needs: WHO and UNICEF currently estimate that an additional
US$ 200 million will be required to implement the comprehensive measles strategy
over the next three years in the 45 priority countries that account for about
95% of global measles deaths. The funds would pay for the vaccines, safe injection
materials, refrigeration equipment, transportation and personnel both to the
strengthen routine immunization systems and to conduct the supplementary measles
immunization activities.
A dose of measles vaccine cost only US$ 0.25, including safe injection equipment.
Of all health interventions, measles immunization carries one of the highest
health returns for the money spent.
ABSTRACT
NOT SO BENIGN INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION
That a common antibiotic, doxycycline, used to treat malaria, acne, and other
infections could cause increased intracranial pressure is not a recent revelation.
Other tetracyclic antibiotics such as minocycline and tetracycline have caused
intracranial hypertension.
Benign intracranial hypertension is a syndrome of signs and symptoms of increased
intracranial pressure without causative lesions on images obtained by magnetic
resonance imaging or computed tomography. It should be considered when anyone
taking doxycycline begins to complain of a new headache.
Corbett and Thompson made a plea to replace "benign" with "idiopathic," to
set apart the idiopathic form of increased intracranial pressure from symptomatic
forms, and to dispel the notion that condition is totally benign.
What to call this syndrome is far from settled, but at present we diagnose
the primary or idiopathic form in individuals in whom no cause can be found
after careful questioning and clinical evaluation. The secondary forms of intracranial
pressure should be characterized as intracranial hypertension due to venous
thrombosis, or intracranial hypertension due to medication, such as doxycycline.
The other major controversy concerns the cause of intracranial hypertension.
One group posit that all forms of intracranial hypertension, idiopathic and
secondary, are due to venous occlusion, or venous hypertension. However,
others have shown that changes in the venous sinuses including venous hypertension
may be secondary to the intracranial hypertension itself. King showed that
if pressure of cerebrospinal fluid is reduced the venous hypertension disappears.
How doxycycline causes intracranial hypertension is not known; however, case
reports abound of increased intracranial pressure associated with drugs including
tetracycline, minocycline and doxycycline.
Most of what we know about benign intracranial hypertension concerns the idiopathic
form. More common than previously recognized, idiopathic intracranial hypertension
occurs in 10-20/100 000 obese women. This mean that idiopathic intracranial
hypertension is as common among obese women as multiple sclerosis. The disorder
affects women (7:1), who present with symptoms of intracranial hypertension
(headache, diplopia, whooshing noises in the head) and signs of intracranial
hypertension (papilloedema, palsy of the sixth cranial nerve). Ninety per cent
of the patients are obese.
In contrast, intracranial hypertension due to the tetracycline antibiotics
(including doxycycline) occurs in both sexes, at almost any age, and without
concomitant obesity. The symptoms and signs of intracranial hypertension, however,
are the same. How quickly a person develops intracranial hypertension after
ingesting doxycycline is unknown, but in the largest review of intracranial
hypertension induced by minocycline, some participants had used the
drug for up to a year before developing symptoms whereas others became symptomatic
within two weeks. Some dispute whether tetracyclines cause intracranial hypertension
at all since so many individuals are treated with the drug every year without
developing intracranial hypertension. However, individual cases have been reported
where stopping the drug resolved symptoms and signs of intracranial hypertension
and restarting the drug brought recurrence of intracranial hypertension.
No matter whether the disorder is idiopathic or secondary, it is known to
be anything but benign. Corbett et al found that idiopathic intracranial hypertension
often persists up to 41 years after the initial diagnosis, and that over 25%
of patients have severe visual loss. Patients with secondary forms of intracranial
hypertension such as those using doxycyline are also not immune to visual loss.
In 12 patients with minocycline induced intracranial hypertension 25% had notable
visual field loss. Therefore, patients who complain of headache after using
doxycycline should be examined carefully, including their visual acuity, and
formal testing of the visual fields. Funduscopy after dilating the pupils to
look for papilloedema is mandatory.
Treatment of the primary and secondary forms of intracranial hypertension
is similar-reduce intracranial hypertension. While there are no randomised
controlled trials to guide the choice of treatment most practitioners recommend
acetazolamide and weight loss to treat primary idiopathic hypertension. In
the
secondary forms, correcting the underlying mechanism, for example, treating
the venous thrombosis, or stopping the causative medication is indicated. If
visual loss progresses despite optimal medical therapy (usually acetazolamide,
methazolamide or furosemide (frusemide) in adequate doeses), consideration
of optic nerve sheath fenestration or lumbar peritoneal shunt is warranted
to prevent further visual loss. Risk factors for visual loss include a delay
in diagnosis due to failure to diagnose the disorder, inadequate treatment,
and delayed treatment. The outcome of increased intracranial pressure due to
doxycyclines is generally good if recognised early, before vision has been
affected seriously.
Despite the many controversies, intracranial hypertension due to use of doxcycline
does occur. Practitioners prescribing the tetracyclic antibiotics should be
aware of the syndrome of increased intracranial pressure, and pay particular
attention to the ocular fundus for papilloedema. Appropriate referral for visual
testing including visual fields should be made, and treatment directed at stopping
the drug, and instituting symptomatic treatment that lowers the intracranial
pressure.
BMJ 2003;326:613.
INHALED GLUCOCORTICOIDS VERSUS LEUKOTRIENE RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS AS SINGLE
AGENT ASTHMA TREATMENT: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE
Ducharme
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of anti-leukotrienes and
inhaled glucocorticoids as monotherapy in people with asthma.
Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing
anti-leukotrienes with inhaled glucocorticoids for 28 days or more in children
and adults.
Main outcome measure Rate of exacerbations that required treatment
with systemic glucocorticoids.
Results 13 trials (12 in adults, one in children) met the inclusion
criteria; all were in people with mild and moderate asthma. Leukotriene receptor
antagonists were compared with inhaled glucocorticoids at a daily dose equivalent
to 400-450 mg beclometasone dipropionate. Patients treated with leukotriene
receptor antagonists were 60% more likely to suffer an exacerbation requiring
systemic glucocorticoids (relative risk 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to
2.2; number needed to treat 26, 13 to 81). A 130 ml greater improvement (80
ml to 170 ml) in forced expiratory volume in one second and a 191/min greater
increase (141 to 241) in morning peak expiratory flow rate were noted in favour
of inhaled glucocorticoids. Differences in favour of inhaled glucocorticoids
were also observed for nocturnal awakenings, use of rescue b2 agonists,
and days without symptoms. Risk of side effects was no different between groups,
but leukotriene receptor
antagonists were associated a 2.5-fold increase risk of withdrawals due to
poor asthma control (relative risk 2.5, 1.8 to 3.5).
Conclusions Inhaled glucocorticoids does equivalent to 400 mg/day beclometasone
are more effective than leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of
adults with mild or moderate asthma. There is insufficient evidence to conclude
on the efficacy of anti-leukotrienes in children.
BMJ 2003;326:623-3.
DOCTORS & MEDICAL INSURANCE
A quarter of 700 US jurors thought it was OK for doctors to lie to medical
insurance companies to get them to fund treatments (Annals of Internal Medicine
2003;138:472-5). About a fifth said their doctor had already done it. Over
half the respondents agreed with the statement: "My insurance company
is more concerned with saving money than with improving and maintaining my
health."
BMJ 2003;326:720.
Companies to get them to fund treatments (Annals of Internal Medicine 2003;138:472-5).
About a fifth said their doctor had already done it. Over half the respondents
agreed with the statement: "My insurance company is more concerned with
saving money than with improving and maintaining my health."
BMJ 2003;326:720
Copyright 2003 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences.
|