|
||||||
|
Iran Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 20, No. 2, April-June, 2010, pp. 206-210 Original Article Estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava in pediatric patients Hamid Amoozgar*, Khobiar Zare, Gholamhossein Ajami, Mohammad Borzoee, Saeed Abtahi Division of pediatric cardiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran Correspondence Address: *Department of Pediatrics, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran; 7193711351 amozgah@sums.ac.ir Date of Submission: 28-May-2009 Date of Decision: 14-Dec-2009 Date of Acceptance: 30-Dec-2009
Code Number: pe10029 Abstract Objective: Paucity of data exists between mean right atrial pressure (RAP) and inferior vena cava (IVC) size and collapsibility in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Methods: In a prospective study, fifty consecutive pediatric patients with different congenital heart diseases who had right side cardiac catheterization were studied, comparing right atrial pressure with simultaneous M-mode echocardiographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter. Mean age of the patients was 4.96±4.05 years (30 male and 20 female). Patients were categorized into two groups according to their right atrial pressure (RAP) as measured by cardiac catheterization: Group 1 (40 patients) were those with mean RAP <8 mmHg and group 2 (10 patients) who had a mean RAP≥ 8 mmHg. Findings: In M-mode echocardiography IVC size was statistically different (P=0.004 and 0.009) in inspiration and expiration in the two groups. Mean RAP was estimated to be > 8 mmHg when IVC diameter in inspiration was >3.6 (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 47.5%, +LR=1.9) or if IVC diameter was >6mm in expiration (sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 87%, +LR=4.67). Conclusion: This study showed that measurement of IVC size in inspiration and expiration can be used as a reliable method for estimation of mean right atrial pressure. Keywords: Heart atrium; Echocardiography; Inferior vena cava; Pressure Introduction Noninvasive measurement of right ventricular pressure, pulmonary pressure and left atrial pressure with Doppler echocardiography is a widely accepted technique in most echocardiographic laboratories. This is accomplished by applying the modified Bernoulli principle to the peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity, which reflects the instantaneous pressure gradient between the right atrium and right ventricle or right atrium and left atrium through defected inter-atrial septum [1],[2],[3],[4],[5]. The accuracy of this technique depends on making an accurate estimate of right atrial pressure (RAP) during mid systole [6] , In addition the estimation of right ventricular filling pressures is important clinically for the diagnosis and management of various hemodynamic conditions with decreased or increased preload [7],[8],[9],[10]. Although clinical evaluation of jugular venous pulsations is usually used for estimate of RAP, however it may not be easy in children with a short neck, and such an examination may not always be feasible in a busy echocardiography laboratory [8],[9]. A few studies in selected adult and pediatric patients have evaluated the hemodynamic correlates of right atrial and right ventricular filling dynamics [11],[12],[13],[14]. On the other hand, studies on the changes in the diameter of the inferior vena cava in response to negative intrathoracic pressure have demonstrated a significant correlation of this index with RAP in adults [15],[16],[17],[18]. Such an approach, however, requires the patient's cooperation and has been limited in mechanically ventilated individuals [17]. A comprehensive evaluation of the relation of echocardiographic size of inferior vena cava (IVC) to mean RAP in pediatric patients with a variety of congenital heart defects and different clinical conditions has not been studied. This study was undertaken to assess the correlation of inferior vena cava diameter changes to mean RAP in 50 consecutive pediatric patients with various congenital heart diseases undergoing measurement of RAP. Subjects and Methods In a prospective study from April 2007 until June 2008, fifty consecutive pediatric patients who needed right sided interventional or diagnostic cardiac catheterization in affiliated hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (Nemazee and Faghihi Hospitals) were enrolled in this study. Patients with Common atrium or large atrial septal defects or interrupted IVC were excluded from the study. Echocardiography was performed with a GE vivid 3, 3 MHz probe. IVC size was recorded by M-mode echocardiography in sub-costal view in inspiration and expiration. Pressure measurements were done by Siemens 449 xi set (Siemens, Munich, Germany) and GE (Imaging technique, USA), angiographic machines. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their mean right atrial pressure (RAP) that was measured by cardiac catheterization, Group 1 were those with mean RAP <8 mmHg and group 2 who had mean RAP≥ BmmHg. Echocardiographic data obtained from each patient were compared with the result of cardiac catheterization. The study was approved by the ethics committee at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and written informed consents were obtained from the parents. All data are expressed as means ± one standard deviation (SD); linear regression was used to examine the relationship between echocardiographic para-meters and angiographic mean right atrial pressure. Pearson product moment correlation was used to compare values obtained by the two methods. Linear correlation was also tested using the Spearman rank method (correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated for statistically significant echocardiographic parameters, varying the discriminating thresholds of these parameters to determine the ability of mean right atrial pressure to discriminate between patients with a high right atrial pressure and those without it Statistical analysis was done using MedCalc® 8.0 software. Findings From fifty pediatric patients who enrolled in this study 30 patients were males and 20 were females. Mean age of the patients ± one standard deviation was 4.96 (±4.05) years, mean body surface area of 0.56 (±0.25) and the following is the list of the clinical diagnoses of these patients: tetralogy of Fallot [23 patients (pts)], ventricular septal defect (10 pts), pulmonary stenosis (3 pts), atrial septal defect and pulmonary stenosis (2 pts), primary pulmonary hypertension (4 pts), dilated cardiomyopathy (1 pt), ventricular and atrial septal defect (2 pts), coronary fistula (1 pt), patent ductus arteriosus (1 pt), patent ductus arteriosus and coarctation of aorta (1 pt), transposition of great artery and pulmonary stenosis (2 pts). Patients were categorized into two groups according to their mean right atrial pressure (RAP) that was measured by cardiac catheterization, Group 1 (40 patients) were those with mean RAP <8 mmHg and group 2 (10 patients) who had a mean RAP≥8mmHg. Mean IVC size in inspiration was 0.42+0.19 cm and 0.28+0.0.06 cm, P=0.004 in group 1 and 2 respectively; mean IVC size in expiration were 0.83±0.26 cm and 0.61+0.14 cm, P=0.009 respectively. The ratio of mean IVC size to body surface area in inspiration in group 1 and 2 were 0.83±0.48 and 0.64+0.12, P=0.118; in expiration these ratios were 1.62±0.69 and 1.31±0.25, P=0.117 respectively. ROC curves showed that if IVC size in inspiration was more than 3.6 mnni right atrial pressure was more than 8 mmHg with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, 47% and +likelihood ratio (LR)=1.9 respectively [Figure - 1]. If IVC size in expiration was more than 6 mm, right atrial pressure was more than 8 mmHg with a sensitivity and specificity of 70%, 85% and +LR=4.67 respectively [Figure - 1]. Pearson correlation between percent of IVC collapse during respiratory phase and mean right atrial pressure showed r=0.23, P=0.108. Discussion This study reveals that IVC size in inspiration and expiration in children, easily measured in sub-costal view can predict high atrial pressure in patients with different types of congenital heart diseases. Estimation of RAP is helpful in the overall management of patients with hemodynamic disorders and in the derivation of pulmonary artery pressure or left atrial pressure with Doppler echocardiography [5]. Several methods have been proposed for estimation of right atrial pressure for which right ventricular systolic pressure should be measured echocardio-graphically. Clinical estimation of the venous pressure has been used, but prospective studies have shown that it is inaccurate [19],[20]. A constant value of 14 mm Hg has been derived from a regression analysis comparing the tricuspid regurgitant velocity with direct catheter measurement of right ventricular systolic pressure in a large number of patients [21]. However, this method is not applicable to individual patients, especially those with abnormal pulmonary artery and right atrial pressures [6]. Measurement of IVC diameters and its changes during an inspiratory effort, commonly known as a sniff test, is used frequently in echocardiography laboratories to estimate RAP [16]. Its use however is limited in tachypneic patients and those on mechanical ventilation [17]. Another limitation is the difficulty of standardizing the inspiratory effort. Previous studies have demonstrated a good correlation between the collapse index of the inferior vena cava and RAP in adult patients without assisted ventilation [16]. In patients with mechanical ventilation, however, IVC collapse has been shown to correlate poorly to mean RAP (r=0.13 and maximal caval diameter has only a weak correlation with mean RAP in these patients (r=0.58) [17]. In a study by Kircher BJ, et al in adult patients caval index greater than or equal to 50% indicated RA pressure less than 10 mmHg, and caval indexes less than 50% indicated RA pressure greater than or equal to 10 mmHg [16]. A critical value of the index of the inspiration diameter of the inferior vena cava greater than or equal to 10 mm indicated patients with a pathologically elevated pressure in the right atrium with a 100% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity. Measurement of the diameter of the inferior vena cava and its respiratory variations is a suitable method for estimation of the mean right atrial pressure in adults [22]. Presented study demonstrated that a net value of IVC size larger than 6 mm can predict a mean right atrial pressure of more than 8 mmHg with sensitivity and specificity of 70%, 85% and +LR=4.67 which is not as accurate as those in adults. This discrepancy may be due to different patient size and differences in hemodynamics in various congenital heart diseases. Ultrasonographic measurements of IVC diameter and inspiratory movements are quantifiable and reliable method for assess onset of hypervolemia associated with congestive heart failure. Normalization of inspiratory IVC collapse movement correlates with successful diuretic therapy and can be reliably used for bedside assessment and monitoring treatment in patients with CHF [23]. Caval index was inversely correlated with mean central venous pressure (CVP). A caval index> r=20% indicated normal CVP. A caval index <20% is related to an elevated value of CVP. This method appears to be useful for accurate noninvasive estimation of mean CVP [24]. The present study showed poor correlation between IVC caval index and RA pressure but relatively fine correlation between IVC size in inspiration and expiration and mean RA pressure, this difference with previous studies in adult patients may be due to heterogeneity of congenital heart anomalies, difference in body size, rapid and uncontrollability of respiratory cycle in pediatric patients. The relatively small sample size, different pathologic CHD, and wide age range may be a limitation of this study; hopefully, this report may initiate more research in this field. Conclusion It is emphasized that the noninvasive method described here can be used in children with various CHD for estimation of RAP when invasive methods are not desirable. Acknowledgment The authors thank the Office of Vice Chancellor for Research of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for financial support of this study. They also thank Professor Gholamhossein Amirhakimi for thoughtful reviewing of the manuscript. References
Copyright 2010 - Iran Journal of Pediatrics The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[pe10029f1.jpg] |
|