Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Middle East Fertility Society
Vol. 10, No. 3, 2005, pp. 250-257
Bioline Code: mf05043
Full paper language: English
Document type: Research Article
Document available free of charge
Middle East Fertility Society Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2005, pp. 250-257
© Copyright 2005 - Middle East Fertility Society
A prospective comparative study to assess the accuracy of MRI versus HSG in tubouterine causes of female infertility|
Khaled Abdel Malek, Mohamed Hassan,Ahmed Soliman, Heba El-sawah, Amr Osama Azab
Objective: To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging versus hysterosalpingography during investigating infertile women due to uterotubal causes of infertility
Setting: kasr EL-Aini Hospital
Materials and methods: All infertile women were subjected to both hysterosalpingography and MRI. Laparoscopy was performed to confirm different findings, being considered the gold standard for diagnosis.
Results: MRI was superior to HSG in diagnosing uterine anomalies (accuracy 100% vs. 96%), but failed to diagnose any case of intrauterine adhesions or peritubal adhesions.
Conclusion: In infertile women with suspected uterine anomalies, magnetic resonance imaging is the study of choice because of its high accuracy and detailed elaboration of uterovaginal anatomy. Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy are reserved for women in whom interventional therapy is likely to be undertaken.
hysterosalpingography, magnetic resonance imaging, laparoscopy, infertility
Alternative site location: http://www.mefsjournal.org