en |
Potential dual expansion of domesticated donkeys revealed by worldwide analysis on mitochondrial sequences
Ma, Xi-Yao; Ning, Tiao; Adeola, Adeniyi C.; Li, Jie; Esmailizadeh, Ali; Lichoti, Jacqueline K.; Agwanda, Bernard R.; Isakova, Jainagul; Aldashev, Almaz A.; Wu, Shi-Fang; Liu, He-Qun; Abdulloevich, Najmudinov Tojiddin; Afanasevna, Manilova Elena; Ibrohimovich, Khudoidodov Behruz; Adedokun, Rahamon Akinyele Moshood; Olaogun, Sunday Charles; Sanke, Oscar J.; Mangbon, Godwin F.; Chen, Xi; Yang, Wei-Kang; Wang, Zhe; Peng, Min-Sheng; Ommeh, Sheila C.; Li, Yan & Zhang, Ya-Ping
Abstract
Molecular studies on donkey mitochondrial
sequences have clearly defined two distinct maternal
lineages involved in domestication. However,
domestication histories of these two lineages remain
enigmatic. We therefore compared several
population characteristics between these two
lineages based on global sampling, which included
171 sequences obtained in this study (including
Middle Asian, East Asian, and African samples) plus
536 published sequences (including European,
Asian, and African samples). The two lineages were
clearly separated from each other based on whole
mitochondrial genomes and partial non-coding
displacement loop (D-loop) sequences, respectively.
The Clade I lineage experienced an increase in
population size more than 8 000 years ago and
shows a complex haplotype network. In contrast, the
population size of the Clade II lineage has remained
relatively constant, with a simpler haplotype network.
Although the distribution of the two lineages was
almost equal across the Eurasian mainland, they still
presented discernible but complex geographic bias
in most parts of Africa, which are known as their
domestication sites. Donkeys from sub-Saharan
Africa tended to descend from the Clade I lineage,
whereas the Clade II lineage was dominant along the
East and North coasts of Africa. Furthermore, the
migration routes inferred from diversity decay
suggested different expansion across China between
the two lineages. Altogether, these differences
indicated non-simultaneous domestication of the two
lineages, which was possibly influenced by the
response of pastoralists to the desertification of the
Sahara and by the social expansion and trade of
ancient humans in Northeast Africa, respectively.
Keywords
Donkey lineage; Domestication history; Population; Expansion
|